Complications Associated with Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Data from the Nationwide Prospective Cohort REGESMOHS.

BACKGROUND: Large prospective studies on the safety of Mohs micrographic (MMS) surgery are scarce, and most focus on a single type of surgical adverse event. Mid-term scar alterations and functional loss have not been described. OBJECTIVES: To describe the risk of MMS complications and the risk factors for them. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort collected all adverse events on consecutive patients in 22 specialised centres. We used multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to find out factors associated with adverse events. RESULTS: 5,017 patients were included, with 14,421 patient-years of follow-up. 7.0% had some perioperative morbidity and 6.5% had mid-term and scar-related complications. The overall risk of complications was mainly associated with use of antiaggregant/anticoagulant and larger tumours, affecting deeper structures, not reaching a tumour-free border, and requiring complex repair. Age and outpatient setting were not linked to the incidence of adverse events. Risk factors for haemorrhage (0.9%) were therapy with antiaggregant/anticoagulants, tumour size, duration of surgery, and unfinished surgery. Wound necrosis (1.9%) and dehiscence (1.0%) were associated with larger defects and complex closures. Immunosuppression was only associated with an increased risk of necrosis. Surgeries reaching deeper structures, larger tumours and previous surgical treatments were associated with wound infection (0.9%). Aesthetic scar alterations (5.4%) were more common in younger patients, with larger tumours, in H-area, and in flap and complex closures. Risk factors for functional scar alterations (1.7%) were the need for general anaesthesia, larger tumours that had received previous surgery, and flaps or complex closures. CONCLUSIONS: MMS shows a low risk of complications. Most of the risk factors for complications were related to tumour size and depth, and the resulting need for complex surgery. Antiaggregant/anticoagulant intake was associated with a small increase in the risk of haemorrhage, that probably does not justify withdrawal. Age and outpatient setting were not linked to the risk of adverse events.

Ustekinumab with Intravenous Infusion: Results in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Adalimumab is the only approved biological therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The last published recommendations support the use of other off-label biologic therapies. We report on a multicentric retrospective review of patients with HS treated with an ustekinumab dosing schedule of intravenous infusion adjusted by weight, followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose of 90 mg every 8 weeks, as recently approved for Crohn's disease. The minimal follow-up period required for inclusion was 16 weeks. A total of 14 patients from six hospitals were included. In 50% of the treated patients, therapeutic outcomes, measured by means of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and decrease of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, were reached at week 16. In 71.42% of patients DLQI and VAS of pain improved, irrespective of achievement of HiSCR. Two patients abandoned treatment due to lack of efficacy or patient preferences. No ustekinumab-related adverse effects were reported. The results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study, the short follow-up period, and the small patient number. This therapeutic regime proved to be safe and showed moderate efficacy in treating HS with failure to previous biologic therapy. Ideally, the efficacy of ustekinumab in HS should be tested in randomized and controlled clinical trials.