Codesign and refinement of an optimised antenatal education session to better inform women and prepare them for labour and birth.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to codesign, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness. DESIGN: There were four distinct phases: codesign (focus groups and codesign workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms) and systematic refinement. SETTING: The study was set in a single maternity unit with approximately 5500 births annually. PARTICIPANTS: Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people and birth partners were invited to participate in the intervention, and midwives were invited to deliver it. Both groups participated in feedback. OUTCOME MEASURES: We report on whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and explain how the intervention was refined with input from parents, clinicians and researchers. RESULTS: The codesign was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people (79%) and birth partners (82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in codesigning an evidence-informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within National Health Service resource constraints. A nationally mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.

Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI: current evidence and practice.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with atrial fibrillation taking oral anticoagulation and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent insertion are recommended to receive antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonist. This combinatory regime encompasses triple therapy (TT). Although TT reduces the risk of ischemic events such as stroke and stent thrombosis, it is associated with an increased bleeding risk. Areas covered: The efficacy and safety profile of TT is uncertain with undetermined optimal duration and therapeutic combination. This review summarizes relevant trials evaluating TTs application and introduces exploration of duration and dosage in addition to other contributory factors including stent type and choice of antithrombotic agents. Expert commentary: TT has shown to be effective for reduction of ischemic risk. However, trials have failed to demonstrate the regime's superiority in efficacy over alternatives such as dual therapy (single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant) and continue to denote an increased bleeding risk. Further research driven by a balance between thromboembolic and bleeding end points is required to demonstrate TTs potential beneficence, along with optimal duration identification and antithrombotic choice. Individualized patient risk stratification, along with risk factor optimization should also be incorporated.

The Sierra Club and immigration policy: a critique.

In 1998, the Sierra Club membership voted in a contentious referendum to refrain from including restriction of U.S. immigration as part of its official club population policy. Club proponents of immigration reduction had declared the problem was simply the environmental impact of greater numbers of people; however, they failed to distinguish themselves from groups with much broader immigration-reduction agendas, leaving themselves open to charges of racism. The club faction calling for the exclusion of immigration issues from the policy, on the other hand, failed to acknowledge the demographic reality of the contribution of immigration (30%) to the growth of the U.S. population. As a result, current club policy is not credible, as it calls for a reduction in the U.S. population but ignores immigration. The Sierra Club's complex organi- zational structure and open, democratic political process make it particularly vulnerable to internal conflict during periods of changing perspectives within the organization.