2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension.

These practice guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension are a concise summary of the more extensive ones prepared by the Task Force jointly appointed by the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology. These guidelines have been prepared on the basis of the best available evidence on all issues deserving recommendations; their role must be educational and not prescriptive or coercive for the management of individual subjects who may differ widely in their personal, medical and cultural characteristics. The members of the Task Force have participated independently in the preparation of these guidelines, drawing on their academic and clinical experience and by objective examination and interpretation of all available literature. A disclosure of their potential conflict of interest is reported on the websites of the ESH and the ESC.

The year in cardiology 2014: peripheral circulation.

In 2014, the debate on the indication of revascularization in case of asymptomatic carotid disease continued, while another one regarding the use of surgery vs. stenting addressed some new issues regarding the long-term cardiac risk of these patients. Renal arteries interventions trials were disappointing, as neither renal denervation nor renal artery stenting was found associated with better blood pressure management or outcome. In contrast, in lower-extremities artery disease, the endovascular techniques represent in 2014 major alternatives to surgery, even in distal arteries, with new insights regarding the interest of drug-eluting balloons. Regarding the aorta, the ESC published its first guidelines document on the entire vessel, emphasizing on the role of every cardiologist for screening abdominal aorta aneurysm during echocardiography. Among vascular wall biomarkers, the aorta stiffness is of increasing interest with new data and meta-analysis confirming its ability to stratify risk, whereas carotid intima-media thickness showed poor performances in terms of reclassifying patients into risk categories beyond risk scores. Regarding the veins, new data suggest the interest of D-dimers and residual venous thrombosis to help the decision of anti-coagulation prolongation or discontinuation after the initial period of treatment for deep vein thrombosis.

Nutraceuticals and blood pressure control: a European Society of Hypertension position document.

: High-normal blood pressure (BP) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, however the cost-benefit ratio of the use of antihypertensive treatment in these patients is not yet clear. Some dietary components and natural products seems to be able to significantly lower BP without significant side effects. The aim of this position document is to highlight which of these products have the most clinically significant antihypertensive action and wheter they could be suggested to patients with high-normal BP. Among foods, beetroot juice has the most covincing evidence of antihypertensive effect. Antioxidant-rich beverages (teas, coffee) could be considered. Among nutrients, magnesium, potassium and vitamin C supplements could improve BP. Among nonnutrient-nutraceuticals, soy isoflavones could be suggested in perimenopausal women, resveratrol in insulin-resistant patients, melatonin in study participants with night hypertension. In any case, the nutracutical approach has never to substitute the drug treatment, when needed.

Treatment of hypertension in patients with peripheral arterial disease: an update.

Hypertension is a known risk factor for cardiovascular events, and recent data have pointed to peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as another strong risk factor; together, they cause a surprisingly high total risk. This review deals with the clinical management of this dangerous association. The ankle-brachial index helps in the diagnosis of PAD and the estimation of risk. To control risk, lifestyle adaptation is essential. There is no consensus on a first choice of antihypertensive drug. Arguments favor angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but most patients require several antihypertensive drugs to reach goal pressure (140/90 mm Hg or lower). Moreover, to control the risk of PAD, antiplatelet drugs, antihypertensive drugs, and statins are recommended.

Short-term and long-term repeatability of the morning blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, we studied the repeatability of the morning blood pressure in older (> or =60 years) patients with isolated systolic hypertension. METHODS: The sleep-through morning surge was the morning blood pressure minus the lowest nighttime blood pressure. The preawake morning surge was the morning blood pressure minus the preawake blood pressure. In addition, we determined the cusum plot height of blood pressure from 04:00 to 10:00 h from a plot of cumulative sums. RESULTS: In 173 patients with repeat recordings within 33 days (median), the short-term repeatability coefficients, expressed as percentages of maximal variation, ranged from 35 to 41% for the daytime and nighttime blood pressures and from 50 to 56% for the night-to-day blood pressure ratios. Short-term repeatability ranged from 52 to 75% for the sleep-through and the preawake morning surge, and from 51 to 62% for the cusum plot height. In 219 patients with repeat recordings within 10 months (median), the corresponding long-term estimates ranged from 45 to 64%, from 69 to 71%, from 76 to 83%, and from 50 to 78%, respectively. In categorical analyses of the short-term repeatability of the sleep-through morning surge and the preawake morning surge, using the 75th percentile as arbitrary cut-off, surging status changed in 28.0 and 26.8% of patients (kappa-statistic < or =0.33). In the long-term interval, these proportions were 32.0 and 32.0%, respectively (kappa-statistic < or =0.20). The kappa-statistic threshold for moderate reproducibility is 0.4. CONCLUSION: The morning surge of blood pressure is poorly reproducible, irrespective of whether it is analysed as continuous or categorical variable.

Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension.

The prognostic relevance of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is incompletely clear, and its global impact on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the prognostic value of MUCH. We searched for articles assessing outcome in patients with MUCH compared with those with controlled hypertension (CH) and reporting adjusted hazard ratio and 95% CI. We identified 6 studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (12 610 patients with 933 events) and 5 using home blood pressure measurement (17 742 patients with 394 events). The global population included 30 352 patients who experienced 1327 events. Selected studies had cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality as primary outcome, and the main result is a composite of these events. The overall adjusted hazard ratio was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.57-2.06) for MUCH versus CH. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that adjusted hazard ratio was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.52-2.21) in studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.38-2.20) in those using home blood pressure measurement. Risk was significantly higher in MUCH than in CH independently of follow-up length and types of studied events. MUCH was at significantly higher risk than CH in all ethnic groups, but the highest hazard ratio was found in studies, including black patients. Risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality is significantly higher in patients with MUCH than in those with CH. MUCH detected by ambulatory or home blood pressure measurement seems to convey similar prognostic information.

2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension.

: Document reviewers: Guy De Backer (ESC Review Co-ordinator) (Belgium), Anthony M. Heagerty (ESH Review Co-ordinator) (UK), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Murielle Bochud (Switzerland), Claudio Borghi (Italy), Pierre Boutouyrie (France), Jana Brguljan (Slovenia), Héctor Bueno (Spain), Enrico G. Caiani (Italy), Bo Carlberg (Sweden), Neil Chapman (UK), Renata Cifkova (Czech Republic), John G. F. Cleland (UK), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Ioan Mircea Coman (Romania), Peter W. de Leeuw (The Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (The Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Hans-Christoph Diener (Germany), Maria Dorobantu (Romania), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Csaba Farsang (Hungary), Marc Ferrini (France), Ian M. Graham (Ireland), Guido Grassi (Italy), Hermann Haller (Germany), F. D. Richard Hobbs (UK), Bojan Jelakovic (Croatia), Catriona Jennings (UK), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Abraham A. Kroon (The Netherlands), Christophe Leclercq (France), Dragan Lovic (Serbia), Empar Lurbe (Spain), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Theresa A. McDonagh (UK), Franz Messerli (Switzerland), Maria Lorenza Muiesan (Italy), Uwe Nixdorff (Germany), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Gianfranco Parati (Italy), Joep Perk (Sweden), Massimo Francesco Piepoli (Italy), Jorge Polonia (Portugal), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Stefano F. Rimoldi (Switzerland), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Naveed Sattar (UK), Petar M. Seferovic (Serbia), Iain A. Simpson (UK), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Alice V. Stanton (Ireland), Philippe van de Borne (Belgium), Panos Vardas (Greece), Massimo Volpe (Italy), Sven Wassmann (Germany), Stephan Windecker (Switzerland), Jose Luis Zamorano (Spain).The disclosure forms of all experts involved in the development of these Guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines.

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether ambulatory blood-pressure measurements recorded for 24 hours in patients with treated hypertension predict cardiovascular events independently of blood-pressure measurements obtained in the physician's office and other cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We assessed the association between base-line ambulatory blood pressures in treated patients and subsequent cardiovascular events among 1963 patients with a median follow-up of 5 years (range, 1 to 66 months). RESULTS: We documented new cardiovascular events in 157 patients. In a Cox proportional-hazards model with adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, serum cholesterol concentration, body-mass index, use or nonuse of lipid-lowering drugs, and presence or absence of a history of cardiovascular events, as well as blood pressure measured at the physician's office, higher mean values for 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure were independent risk factors for new cardiovascular events. The adjusted relative risk of cardiovascular events associated with a 1-SD increment in blood pressure was 1.34 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.62) for 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, 1.30 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.58) for ambulatory systolic blood pressure during the daytime, and 1.27 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.57) for ambulatory systolic blood pressure during the nighttime. For ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, the corresponding relative risks of cardiovascular events associated with a 1-SD increment were 1.21 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.46), 1.24 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.49), and 1.18 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.40). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treated hypertension, a higher ambulatory systolic or diastolic blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events even after adjustment for classic risk factors including office measurements of blood pressure.

Biological performance of a new beta-TCP/PLLA composite material for applications in spine surgery: in vitro and in vivo studies.

The objective of this research was to carry out an in vitro and in vivo study of the biological performance of PLLA/beta-TCP composite materials, to estimate the scope of their potential applications in bone surgery. Samples with increasing beta-TCP (0-60% w/w) contents were processed by injection molding. The in vitro study consisted of an evaluation of inflammatory potential by assaying the IL-1alpha secreted by monocytes, and then cell proliferation (counting) and phenotype expression (PAL and I collagen) in human osteogenous cells. The in vivo study was carried out using cylindrical implants of composite materials composed of composite materials containing 0 or 60% beta-TCP and pure beta-TCP, respectively. The implants were inserted in femoral sites in rabbits, using the Kathagen protocol. Each animal received a 60% implant, with either a 0 or a 100% implant in the contralateral femur, so that the materials could be compared with one another. Five animals were examined for each material and implantation period, giving a total of 30 animals. This study showed that adding increasing percentages of beta-TCP to a lactic acid polymer matrix stimulated the proliferation of human osteogenous cells and synthesis of the extracellular bone matrix in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo results indicate that, in comparison with pure PLA, tricalcium phosphate-containing composite materials had faster degradation kinetics, caused less inflammatory reaction, and promoted contact osteogenesis. The composite material containing 60% beta-TCP demonstrated a similar performance to pure tricalcium phosphate bone grafts in terms of osteogenesis, and is apparently compatible with the production of intra-osseous implants for situations representing high levels of mechanical strain.

Predictive value of clinic and ambulatory heart rate for mortality in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of clinic and ambulatory heart rate with total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular death in a cohort of elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial. METHODS: A total of 4682 patients participated, whose untreated blood pressure on conventional measurement at baseline was 160 to 219 mm Hg systolic and lower than 95 mm Hg diastolic. Clinic heart rate was the mean of 6 readings during 3 visits. Ambulatory heart rate was recorded with a portable intermittent technique in 807 subjects. RESULTS: Raised baseline clinic heart rate was positively associated with a worse prognosis for total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality among the 2293 men and women taking placebo. Subjects with heart rates higher than 79 beats/min (bpm) (top quintile) had a 1.89 times greater risk of mortality than subjects with heart rate lower than or equal to 79 bpm (95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.68 bpm). In a Cox regression analysis, predictors of time to death were heart rate (P<.001), age (P<.001), serum creatinine level (P =.001), presence of diabetes (P =.002), previous cardiovascular disease (P =.01), triglyceride readings (P =.02), smoking (P =.04), and elevated systolic blood pressure (P =.05), while total cholesterol level was found to be nonsignificant in the model. In the ambulatory monitoring subgroup, clinic and ambulatory heart rates predicted noncardiovascular but not cardiovascular mortality. However, in a Cox regression analysis in which clinic and ambulatory heart rates were included, a significant association with noncardiovascular mortality was found only for clinic heart rate (P =.004). In the active treatment group, the weak predictive power of clinic heart rate for mortality disappeared after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, a clinic heart rate greater than 79 bpm was a significant predictor of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality. Ambulatory heart rate did not add prognostic information to that provided by clinic heart rate.

Hypertension in peripheral arterial disease.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower limbs is associated with a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Intermittent claudication is the most common symptomatic manifestation of PAD, but is in its own value an important predictor of cardiovascular death, increasing it by three-fold, and increasing all-cause mortality by two-to-five fold. Hypertension is a risk factor for vascular disorders, including PAD. Of hypertensives at presentation, about 2-5% have intermittent claudication, with increasing prevalence with age. Otherwise, 35-55% of patients with PAD at presentation also show hypertension. Patients who suffer from hypertension with PAD have a greatly increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. There is no consensus on the specific treatment of hypertension in PAD because of the limited controlled studies on antihypertensive therapy in such specific PAD population. There is an obvious need of such outcome studies, especially since the two conditions are frequently encountered together. However, as risk is high in all PAD patients, the most important goal remains to decrease the global cardiovascular risk in such patients rather than to focus on the control of blood pressure only and on the reduction of symptoms of PAD. Therefore, treatment with antiplatelet drugs, ACE-inhibitors and statins should be considered.

Benefits and risks of more intensive blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients of the HOT study with different risk profiles: does a J-shaped curve exist in smokers?

BACKGROUND: The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study investigated 18 790 hypertensives randomized to three diastolic blood pressure (DBP) targets (< or = 90, < or = 85, < or = 80 mmHg) for 3.8 years and found marked, significant reductions in cardiovascular events and mortality the lower the target DBP in the subset of diabetics. We investigated whether the benefits of intensive DBP lowering could be extended to other subgroups, and whether there are hypertensives in whom the risk of aggressive DBP lowering may outnumber the benefits. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 18 790 patients were stratified as: medium/high-very high global cardiovascular risk; men/women; older/younger; current smokers/non-smokers; higher/lower serum cholesterol; higher/lower serum creatinine; with/without diabetes; with/without ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Comparisons were made between the less aggressive target group (DBP < 90 mmHg) and the two more aggressive target groups together (< or = 85 and < or = 80 mmHg). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate treatment-subgroup interactions and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Benefits were greatest in diabetics (RR 0.53 for cardiovascular events, and 0.67 for cardiovascular death), whereas in smokers more intensive DBP lowering was associated with increased risk of all types of cardiovascular event (RR 1.71-2.67; P = 0.01-0.001), except myocardial infarction. After excluding smokers, intensive DBP lowering was associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular events in diabetics (-49%), high-very high risk patients (-23%), IHD patients (-32%), patients with lower creatinine (-18%), women (-33%) and older patients (-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Although subanalyses have only a descriptive value, it appears reasonable to recommend intensive antihypertensive treatment to hypertensives with diabetes, IHD and high global cardiovascular risk. In smokers, treatment intensification should be associated with the greatest efforts to induce smoking cessation.

Relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and follow-up clinic blood pressure in elderly patients with systolic hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Patients with elevated clinic blood pressure and normal ambulatory blood pressure have a better prognosis than patients with sustained ambulatory hypertension, and may not have to be treated with antihypertensive drugs. On the contrary, current guidelines emphasize repeated clinic blood pressure measurements for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure at baseline and clinic blood pressure after 6 months of follow-up in untreated hypertensive patients, and the relationships of these pressures with the subsequent incidence of cardiovascular events. METHODS: Patients who were > or = 60 years old, with systolic clinic blood pressure of 160-219 mmHg and diastolic pressure < 95 mmHg, participated in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe trial. The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure at baseline and clinic blood pressure after 6 months of follow-up was examined in 295 patients enrolled in the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring substudy and randomized to the placebo arm, and who were still on double-blind treatment and not taking other antihypertensive drugs after 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Age averaged 70 +/- 6 years, 41% were men, and baseline daytime ambulatory blood pressure was 152 +/- 16/84 +/- 10 mmHg; clinic blood pressure decreased from 173 +/- 10/86 +/- 6 mmHg at baseline to 163 +/- 20/85 +/- 9 mmHg at month 6. Systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure at baseline and systolic clinic blood pressure at month 6 were considered normal if < 140 mmHg. Of the 74 patients with normal systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure at baseline, only seven (9.5%) had a normal systolic clinic blood pressure during follow-up. Conversely, of the 24 patients with normal follow-up clinic blood pressure, only seven (29%) had a normal systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure at baseline. The incidence of cardiovascular events beyond the 6-month visit was significantly related to baseline ambulatory blood pressure but not to follow-up clinic pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline daytime ambulatory blood pressure and follow-up clinic blood pressure do not identify the same patients for antihypertensive treatment. Baseline ambulatory pressure is a better predictor of cardiovascular events than follow-up clinic pressure.

Conservative versus extirpative management in cases of placenta accreta.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of conservative and extirpative strategies for placenta accreta on maternal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with placenta accreta admitted to our tertiary center from January 1993 through December 2002. Two consecutive periods, A and B, were compared. During period A (January 1993 to June 1997), our written protocol called for the systematic manual removal of the placenta, to leave the uterine cavity empty. In period B (July 1997 to December 2002), we changed our policy by leaving the placenta in situ. The following outcomes over the 2 periods were compared: need for blood transfusion, hysterectomy, intensive care admission, duration of stay in intensive care, and postpartum endometritis. RESULTS: Thirty-three cases of placenta accreta were observed among 31,921 deliveries (1.03/1,000). During period B, there was a reduction in the hysterectomy rate (from 11 [84.6%] to 3 [15%]; P <.001), the mean number of red blood cells transfused (3,230 +/- 2,170 mL versus 1,560 +/- 1,646 mL; P <.01), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (5 [38.5%] versus 1 [5.0%]; P =.02), compared with period A. There were 3 cases of sepsis in period B and none in period A (P =.26). At least 2 women with conservative management subsequently had successful pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Leaving the placenta accreta in situ appears to be a safe alternative to removing the placenta.

Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993 through 1999.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal morbidity and mortality at Port Royal Maternity between 1993 and 1999 for infants with a singleton breech presentation born after 37 weeks, according to planned mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 501 patients of whom vaginal delivery was planned in 322 (64%) or/and cesarean in 179 (36%). RESULTS: Severe neonatal morbidity was similar in the two groups (13/322, 4.0% versus 8/179, 4.5%; P=0.82); severe trauma morbidity was not significantly higher in the "planned vaginal delivery" group (3/322, 0.9% versus 1/179, 0.06%; P=0.16); there were no long-term sequelae. Mortality was not higher when vaginal delivery was planned. CONCLUSION: We have not found in this series any excess of morbidity or mortality attributable to vaginal delivery of breech presentations. This work does not indicate that we should change our obstetrical practice in the light of other recently-published studies.