Eflornithine as Postimmunotherapy Maintenance in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: Externally Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Survival Outcome Comparisons.

PURPOSE: Long-term survival in high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) is approximately 50%, with mortality primarily driven by relapse. Eflornithine (DFMO) to reduce risk of relapse after completion of immunotherapy was investigated previously in a single-arm, phase II study (NMTRC003B; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02395666) that suggested improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with historical rates in a phase III trial (Children Oncology Group ANBL0032; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00026312). Using patient-level data from ANBL0032 as an external control, we present new analyses to further evaluate DFMO as HRNB postimmunotherapy maintenance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NMTRC003B (2012-2016) enrolled patients with HRNB (N = 141) after standard up-front or refractory/relapse treatment who received up to 2 years of continuous treatment with oral DFMO (750 ± 250 mg/m2 twice a day). ANBL0032 (2001-2015) enrolled patients with HRNB postconsolidation, 1,328 of whom were assigned to dinutuximab (ch.14.18) treatment. Selection rules identified 92 NMTRC003B patients who participated in (n = 87) or received up-front treatment consistent with (n = 5) ANBL0032 (the DFMO/treated group) and 852 patients from ANBL0032 who could have been eligible for NMTRC003B after immunotherapy, but did not enroll (the NO-DFMO/control group). The median follow-up time for DFMO/treated patients was 6.1 years (IQR, 5.2-7.2) versus 5.0 years (IQR, 3.5-7.0) for NO-DFMO/control patients. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression compared EFS and OS for overall groups, 3:1 (NO-DFMO:DFMO) propensity score-matched cohorts balanced on 11 baseline demographic and disease characteristics with exact matching on MYCN, and additional sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: DFMO after completion of immunotherapy was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84]; P = .008) and OS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.76]; P = .007). The results were confirmed with propensity score-matched cohorts and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The externally controlled analyses presented show a relapse risk reduction in patients with HRNB treated with postimmunotherapy DFMO.

Preoperative Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with a Vectored Thermal Pulsation System Prior to Extended Depth of Focus IOL Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Patients implanted with a range-of-vision intraocular lens (IOL) (multifocal or extended depth of focus, EDOF) may be more susceptible to visual disturbances from poor tear film quality, and prophylactic treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) has been recommended. The purpose was to evaluate whether vectored thermal pulsation (LipiFlow™) treatment prior to cataract surgery with a range-of-vision IOL safely improves postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover, multicenter study of patients with mild-to-moderate MGD and cataract. The test group underwent LipiFlow treatment prior to cataract surgery and implantation of an EDOF IOL, while the control group did not. Both groups were evaluated 3 months postoperatively, after which the control group received LipiFlow treatment (crossover). The control group was re-evaluated 4 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 121 subjects were randomized, with 117 eyes in the test group and 115 eyes in the control group. At 3 months after surgery, the test group had a significantly greater improvement from baseline in total meibomian gland score compared with the control group (P = 0.046). At 1 month after surgery, the test group had a significant decrease in corneal (P = 0.04) and conjunctival (P = 0.002) staining compared to the control group. At 3 months after surgery, the test group had significantly lower incidence of being bothered by halos compared with the control group (P = 0.019). The control group had a significantly lower incidence of being bothered by multiple or double vision compared with the test group (P = 0.016). After crossover, patients had significant improvement in vision (P = 0.03) and total meibomian gland score (P < 0.0001). No safety concerns or relevant safety findings were uncovered. CONCLUSION: Presurgical LipiFlow treatment of patients implanted with range-of-vision IOLs improved meibomian gland function and postoperative ocular surface health. This supports guidelines recommending proactive diagnosis and management of MGD in patients with cataracts to improve patient experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03708367).

Topical Ocular TRPV1 Antagonist SAF312 (Libvatrep) for Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Purpose: Evaluation of safety and efficacy of topical ocular SAF312 (Libvatrep) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain. Methods: In this placebo (vehicle)-controlled, participant- and investigator-masked study, 40 participants were randomized (1:1) to two treatment sequences in a bilateral PRK crossover design (SAF312 2.5% followed by vehicle [or vice versa], one eye drop, four times daily for 72 hours after PRK). Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6 hours after first drop of study drug and average VAS scores over 0 to 12 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included postoperative oral rescue medication (ORM) use and adverse events (AEs). Results: All 40 participants completed the study. Both primary endpoints were met; mean difference in VAS pain scores between SAF312- and vehicle-treated eyes was -11.13 (P = 0.005, -25%) at 6 hours postoperatively and -8.56 (P = 0.017, -22%) over 0 to 12 hours. Mean VAS pain scores with SAF312 were consistently lower than with vehicle from 1 hour postoperatively up to 30 hours (P ≤ 0.10 observed in 8/11 time points). Less ORM was taken with SAF312 up to 0 to 72 hours postoperatively, with a trend of fewer participants taking ORM at 0 to 24 hours postoperatively with SAF312 versus vehicle. No serious AEs were reported. All ocular AEs were mild and transient, and none were drug related. SAF312-treated eyes showed no delay in wound healing and had a lower grade 4 conjunctival hyperemia 24 hours postoperatively versus vehicle-treated eyes. Conclusions: SAF312 was well tolerated and effective in reducing ocular pain post-PRK. Translational Relevance: Topical SAF312 presents a new therapeutic option for patients undergoing PRK.

Efficacy of lofexidine for mitigating opioid withdrawal symptoms: results from two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Objectives: Fear of opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) often dissuades opioid discontinuation. Lofexidine is an FDA-approved, alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist for treatment of OWS. Pivotal trial results from the per-protocol statistical analyses have been published. However, the FDA prescribing information presents these efficacy results using a different, standardized statistical approach that does not transform data or impute missing values. This analysis is easier to interpret and allows comparison across studies. This reanalysis is presented here. Methods: Studies were double-blind, placebo-controlled for 7 days in Study 1 and 5 days in Study 2. Opioid-dependent adults received placebo or lofexidine; efficacy was assessed using the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale of Gossop (SOWS-G) daily. Results: Study 1 (N = 602) mean SOWS-G scores were 6.1 (SE: 0.35), 6.5 (SE: 0.34), and 8.8 (SE: 0.47) over Days 1-7 for lofexidine 2.88 mg/day, 2.16 mg/day, and placebo, respectively (for 2.88, p < .0001; for 2.16 mg, p < .0001). Study 2 (N = 264) mean SOWS-G scores were 7.0 (SE: 0.44) and 8.9 (SE: 0.48) over Days 1-5 for lofexidine 2.16 mg/day and placebo, respectively (p = .0037). Median time to treatment discontinuation was approximately 2 days later with lofexidine treatment than with placebo and significantly more lofexidine-treated subjects completed the studies. Hypotension and bradycardia were more common with lofexidine. More placebo subjects withdrew prematurely for lack of efficacy. Conclusion: This simplified analysis confirmed previous per-protocol results, that lofexidine better reduces OWS severity and increases retention compared with placebo in opioid-dependent adults. These results are robust and comparable across studies using various methods of analysis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: Study 1, NCT01863186; Study 2 NCT00235729. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Safety and Efficacy of RimabotulinumtoxinB for Treatment of Sialorrhea in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: RimabotulinumtoxinB (RIMA) may be preferable as an anti-sialorrhea treatment compared with current oral anticholinergic drugs in people with neurological disorders. Objective: To assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of RIMA injections for the treatment of sialorrhea in adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of RIMA 2500 U and 3500 U was conducted from November 14, 2013, to January 23, 2017. A total of 249 adult patients with troublesome sialorrhea secondary to any disorder or cause were screened. Of them, 13 refused further participation in the study or were lost to follow-up and 49 did not fulfill the criteria for participation; 187 were ultimately enrolled. Patients had to have a minimum unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR) of 0.2 g/min and a minimum Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale score of 4. Exposures: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to RIMA, 2500 U (n = 63); RIMA, 3500 U (n = 64); or placebo (n = 60). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were the change in USFR from baseline to week 4 and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at week 4. The CGI-C scores were recorded on a 7-point scale ranging from very much improved to very much worse. Adverse events were recorded throughout the trial period. Results: Of 187 patients enrolled (147 men [78.6%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [13.3] years), 122 patients had Parkinson disease (65.2%), 13 (7.0%) were stroke survivors, 12 had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (6.4%), 6 had medication-induced sialorrhea (3.2%), 4 had adult cerebral palsy (2.1%), and 30 had sialorrhea owing to other causes (16.0%). A total of 176 completed the study. Treatment with both doses of RIMA significantly reduced USFR at week 4 vs placebo (mean treatment difference, -0.30 g/min [95% CI, -0.39 to -0.21] for both doses vs placebo, P < .001). The CGI-C scores were statistically significantly improved at week 4 for both treatment groups vs placebo (-1.21 [95% CI, -1.56 to -0.87] for 2500 U, -1.14 [95% CI, -1.49 to -0.80] for 3500 U, both P < .001). Treatment benefits were seen as early as 1 week after injection and were maintained over the treatment cycle of approximately 13 weeks. The RIMA injections were well tolerated compared with placebo. The most common adverse events were self-limited mild to moderate dry mouth, dysphagia, and dental caries. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with RIMA (2500 U and 3500 U) in adults was well tolerated and reduced sialorrhea, with the onset of the effect at 1 week after the injection. These data support the clinical use of RIMA in the management of sialorrhea in adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01994109.

Safety and Efficacy of Lofexidine for Medically Managed Opioid Withdrawal: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and efficacy of lofexidine for treating opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) and facilitating completion of opioid withdrawal. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 18 US centers from June 2013 to December 2014. Participants (n = 603) aged ≥18 years, dependent on short-acting opioids, and seeking withdrawal treatment, randomized 3:3:2 to receive lofexidine 2.88 mg/d (n = 222), lofexidine 2.16 mg/d (n = 230), or placebo (n = 151) for 7 days. Primary outcome was the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale of Gossop (SOWS-Gossop) scores rating withdrawal symptoms over days 1 to 7. RESULTS: Participants were of mean age, 35 years; 71% male. Pairwise differences in overall SOWS-Gossop log-transformed least squares means were statistically significant for lofexidine 2.16 mg (difference, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.04; P = 0.02) and 2.88 mg (-0.26; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.09; P = 0.003) compared with placebo. Fewer than half of participants in both groups completed the study. Completion rates for lofexidine 2.16 mg (41.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.85; P = 0.007) and 2.88 mg (39.6%; OR, 1.71; P = 0.02) were significantly better compared with placebo (27.8%). Overall adverse event (AE) rates were similar across groups. Common AEs for lofexidine included orthostatic hypotension, hypotension, and bradycardia, but resulted in few study discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: Lofexidine 2.16 mg and 2.88 mg significantly reduced symptoms of OWS versus placebo, and increased absolute rates of completing the 7-day study by 14% and 12%, respectively (a relative increase of 85% and 71%). Data suggest that lofexidine is a generally safe and effective nonopioid treatment for opioid withdrawal. Lofexidine could serve as a withdrawal treatment option when a nonopioid agent is preferred or required, when agonist-assisted withdrawal is unavailable, when agonist discontinuation caused OWS, and during induction into maintenance treatment with opioid agonists or antagonists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01863186.

Changes in posterior corneal elevation after laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in posterior corneal elevation using the Pentacam topographer (Oculus) in patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement. SETTING: Private practice, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. METHODS: The Pentacam device was used to evaluate the changes in posterior corneal elevation above the best-fit sphere before LASIK enhancement and after LASIK enhancement in 24 eyes. The change in posterior corneal elevation in eyes for which pre-primary LASIK data were available was also evaluated. RESULTS: After LASIK enhancement, the mean change in posterior corneal elevation was 5 microm. The mean posterior corneal elevation was 12 +/- 7 microm before LASIK enhancement and 16 +/- 6 microm after enhancement; the difference was statistically significant (P = .004). In eyes for which pre-primary LASIK data were available, the mean change in posterior corneal elevation after primary LASIK was 2 microm. The mean posterior corneal elevation was 11 +/- 5 microm before LASIK enhancement and 11 +/- 7 microm after enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference in posterior corneal elevation between before LASIK enhancement and after LASIK enhancement. However, the change in posterior corneal elevation was much smaller than previously reported values and below the sensitivity of the Pentacam topographer.

A novel mutation of the Keratin 12 gene responsible for a severe phenotype of Meesmann's corneal dystrophy.

PURPOSE: To determine if a mutation within the coding region of the keratin 12 gene (KRT12) is responsible for a severe form of Meesmann's corneal dystrophy. METHODS: A family with clinically identified Meesmann's corneal dystrophy was recruited and studied. Electron microscopy was performed on scrapings of corneal epithelial cells from the proband. Mutations in the KRT12 gene were sought using direct genomic sequencing of leukocyte DNA from two affected and two unaffected family members. Subsequently, the observed mutation was screened in all available family members using polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. RESULTS: A heterozygous missense mutation (Arg430Pro) was found in exon 6 of KRT12 in all 14 affected individuals studied. Unaffected family members and 100 normal controls were negative for this mutation. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a novel mutation in the KRT12 gene that is associated with a symptomatic phenotype of Meesmann's corneal dystrophy. This mutation results in a substitution of proline for arginine in the helix termination motif that may disrupt the normal helix, leading to a dramatic structural change of the keratin 12 protein.

Infectious and noninfectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis Occurrence, management, and visual outcomes.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review the occurrence, treatment, and visual outcomes associated with various etiologies of keratitis as a postoperative complication of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) at an academic surgical center. SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: The charts of 5618 post-LASIK patients (10 477 eyes) were reviewed for the development of keratitis. Occurrence rates, management regimens, and final best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were reported for infectious and noninfectious keratitis etiologies. RESULTS: Post-LASIK keratitis was diagnosed in 279 eyes. The keratitis was diagnosed as infectious in 33 eyes (12%) and as noninfectious in 246 eyes (88%). Infectious cases included 5 eyes (15%) with herpes simplex keratitis (HSV), 18 (55%) with adenoviral keratitis, and 10 (30%) with nonviral (including bacterial, fungal, and parasitic) keratitis. Of noninfectious cases, 193 (78%) were classified as diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK), 36 (15%) as staphylococcal marginal hypersensitivity, and 17 (15%) as localized debris-related keratitis. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of post-LASIK keratitis was 2.66%, with DLK being the most common diagnosis overall. The occurrence of noninfectious keratitis (2.34%) was 7.5 times greater than the occurrence of infectious keratitis (0.31%). Adenoviral keratitis had the best visual outcomes overall, with all 18 patients achieving 20/20 BSCVA. In contrast, all 5 eyes with HSV keratitis lost 1 or 2 lines of BSCVA. Excluding adenoviral keratitis, infectious etiologies had significantly worse visual outcomes than noninfectious etiologies at the 20/40 and 20/20 levels (P = .0013 and P<.001, respectively).

Development and validation of a short global dry eye symptom index.

ABSTRACT we have developed and evaluated the repeatability of a short questionnaire based on a visual analog scale (VAS) to quantify the frequency and severity of symptoms of dry eye syndrome (DES). The "Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye" (SANDE) questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal VAS technique to quantify patient symptoms of ocular dryness and/or irritation. Fifty-two subjects with DES were prospectively enrolled and followed-up at 2 and 4 months with repeated administrations of the SANDE questionnaire and clinical ocular surface evaluation. Subjects demonstrated a wide range of symptom scores indicative of the variability of the disease. Analyses comparing the repeatability of SANDE scores from baseline to the 2-month follow-up indicated a significant downward regression of scores toward the mean. In contrast, repeatability measures were consistently good for questionnaires administered within a few days of one another (ICC ranging from 0.53 to 0.76). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that 50% of repeated SANDE symptom scores were within 10 mm of each other, 80% were within 20 mm, and 95% were within less than 30 mm. These data describe good repeatability for the SANDE symptom score when repeated assessments are made within a few days. The results are encouraging and suggest that further refinement and testing of the SANDE questionnaire in larger populations may result in a reliable questionnaire to detect change in irritative symptoms over time.

Apomorphine Subcutaneous Injection for the Management of Morning Akinesia in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: In patients with motor fluctuations complicating Parkinson's disease (PD), delays in time-to-ON with levodopa are common. This open-label study aimed to assess the effect of apomorphine on time-to-ON in PD patients with morning akinesia. METHODS: The safety population included 127 enrolled patients, and the full analysis set (FAS) included 88 patients. Patients completed a 7-day levodopa baseline period recording their time-to-ON following each morning dose of levodopa. Patients were titrated to an optimal dose of apomorphine (2-6 mg) while taking trimethobenzamide antiemetic therapy. Apomorphine was injected each morning for a 7-day treatment period and time-to-ON was self-recorded in 5-minute blocks. The primary efficacy variable was time-to-ON in the apomorphine treatment period versus the baseline levodopa period. Secondary assessments included and global impression scales. Safety and tolerability were assessed through adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Patients receiving apomorphine achieved mean ± standard deviation (SD) time-to-ON 23.72 ± 14.55 minutes, reduced from 60.86 ± 18.11 minutes with levodopa (P < 0.0001). Dose failures (defined as time-to-ON >60 minutes) were more commonly reported with levodopa versus apomorphine (46% vs. 7% of diary entries, respectively). Secondary endpoints supported the primary efficacy findings, with significant improvements from levodopa baseline to apomorphine treatment period (all P < 0.0001). The most common AEs were nausea and dizziness. Most patients who discontinued because of AEs did so in the titration phase. CONCLUSIONS: Apomorphine injections significantly reduced time-to-ON in PD patients experiencing delayed onset of their morning levodopa dose, and was well tolerated in most patients. After apomorphine treatment, fluctuating patients with morning akinesia experienced rapid and reliable improvement of time-to-ON.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new intranasal midazolam formulation in healthy volunteers.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single 5-mg doses of midazolam after administration of a novel intranasal (IN) formula, IM, and IV midazolam in an open-label, randomized, 3-way cross-over study in 12 healthy volunteers. IN doses were delivered as 0.1-mL unit-dose sprays of a novel formulation into both naris. Blood samples were taken serially from 0 to 12 h after each dose. Plasma midazolam concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental analysis was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean midazolam bioavailabilities and % coefficient of variation were 72.5 (12) and 93.4 (12) after the IN and IM doses, respectively. Median time to maximum concentration was 10 min for IN doses. Adverse events were minimal with all routes of administration, but nasopharyngeal irritation, eyes watering, and a bad taste were reported after IN doses. Our results support further development of this novel midazolam nasal spray.

Psychometric evaluation of the 10-item Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale-Gossop (SOWS-Gossop) in patients undergoing opioid detoxification.

INTRODUCTION: The Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS)-Gossop is a 10-item questionnaire developed to evaluate opioid withdrawal symptom severity. The scale was derived from the original 32-item Opiate Withdrawal Scale in order to reduce redundancy while providing an equally sensitive measure of opioid withdrawal symptom severity appropriate for research and clinical practice. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and provide score interpretation guidelines for the SOWS-Gossop 10-item version. METHODS: Blinded, pooled data from two trials assessing the efficacy of lofexidine hydrochloride in reducing withdrawal symptoms in patients undergoing opioid detoxification were used to evaluate the quantitative psychometric properties and score interpretation of the SOWS-Gossop. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-five (N=555) observations were available at baseline with numbers decreasing to n=213 at day 7. Mean (standard deviation) SOWS-Gossop scores were 10.4 (6.86) at baseline, 8.7 (6.49) on day 1, 10.5 (7.21) on day 2, and 3.1 (3.95) on day 7. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the SOWS-Gossop items loaded on a single factor consistent with a single total score. Intra-class correlations (95% confidence interval) were 0.78 (0.70-0.85) between baseline and day 1, 0.84 (0.79-0.89) between days 4 and 5, and 0.88 (0.83-0.91) between days 6 and 7, demonstrating good test-retest reliability. Mean SOWS-Gossop scores varied significantly (p<0.0001) by Modified Clinical Global Impression severity groups supporting known-groups validity. Most correlations with conceptually similar instruments were over 0.4, providing evidence of construct validity. Results suggest that a change score of approximately 2-4 points is likely a small but meaningful improvement on the SOWS-Gossop Total Score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that the SOWS-Gossop includes concepts that are relevant to patients' experiences with opioid withdrawal and has excellent psychometric properties. The SOWS-Gossop is an appropriate, precise, and sensitive measure to evaluate the symptoms of acute opioid withdrawal in research or clinical settings.

Results of late flap removal after complicated laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of flap removal on complications after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Three university-based referral centers and 1 private practice. METHODS: This retrospective interventional case series comprised 6 eyes of 6 patients at 4 centers. Flap removal occurred 2 to 41 weeks after the LASIK procedure. The corneal flaps were excised by 2 methods: In 2 eyes, the flap was lifted and excised manually. In 4 eyes, the thin flap was removed by excimer ablation using phototherapeutic keratectomy and/or photorefractive keratectomy. Postoperative measurements included uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, slitlamp evaluation, and computerized videokeratography. All patients had an 8-month or longer convalescence to assess visual recovery. RESULTS: After the initial flap complication, the BSCVA decreased in all 6 eyes (mean loss 3.0 lines +/- 1.5 [SD]). After flap removal, it improved in all eyes (mean gain 2.2 +/- 1.2 lines). All patients reported a reduction in or elimination of visual symptoms. Despite the improvements, a minor loss of BSCVA (mean -0.8 lines [range 0 to 2 lines]) remained in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients, flap removal is a viable surgical option to improve visual function.

Safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in cataract and LASIK surgery patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% as antibacterial prophylaxis in the surgical setting. METHODS: Two prospective safety surveillance studies were conducted-one in the cataract surgery setting and the other in the laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery setting. Cases from patients aged 18 years and above were eligible for inclusion. In both surveillance studies, data were collected from consecutive cases of routine primary cataract surgery and LASIK surgery, respectively, in which besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% or moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% was used as the topical perioperative prophylactic antibacterial medication as part of the clinician's routine standard of care. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: The cataract surgery surveillance study included 485 cases/eyes (besifloxacin, n = 333; moxifloxacin, n = 152), whereas the LASIK surveillance study included 456 cases/eyes (besifloxacin, n = 344; moxifloxacin, n = 112). In the cataract study, only 1 TEAE was reported in a besifloxacin case (mild hypersensitivity/allergic reaction considered possibly related to besifloxacin). No TEAEs were reported in the LASIK study. In both studies, surgical outcomes were similar with both treatments. The frequency of preoperative and/or postoperative dosing was generally lower for besifloxacin than that for moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: In prospective safety surveillance studies of patients undergoing cataract extraction or LASIK, TEAEs associated with prophylactic use of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% were rare, and surgical outcomes with besifloxacin were similar to those with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of trimethobenzamide to control nausea and vomiting during initiation and continued treatment with subcutaneous apomorphine injection.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting can occur in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients initiated on apomorphine subcutaneous injections and antiemetic prophylaxis is recommended per product labeling. Data suggest long-term antiemetic prophylaxis may not be needed, although this has not been systematically studied. METHODS: We evaluated coadministered trimethobenzamide with apomorphine in 182 PD subjects using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with phased withdrawal of subjects from trimethobenzamide to placebo. Evaluations included presence/absence of nausea and vomiting; Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (INVR); subject evaluation of medication; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score; "on" response post-injection; and safety assessments. RESULTS: Incidence of nausea and/or vomiting on Day 1 of apomorphine initiation (primary endpoint) was not significantly different between trimethobenzamide and placebo. Over a longer period, a significantly lower incidence was found for trimethobenzamide during Period 1 (Days 1-28, p = 0.025) and Period 2 (Days 29-56, p = 0.005), with no difference during Period 3 (Days 57-84). INVR results were generally more favorable with trimethobenzamide than placebo in Period 1 and significantly more favorable in Period 2. The majority of subjects in both groups achieved an "on" response after apomorphine injection at all assessments. No significant differences were found between groups for UPDRS motor scores. No added safety risk with concomitant use of trimethobenzamide and apomorphine was found. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that trimethobenzamide helps reduce nausea/vomiting during the first 8 weeks of apomorphine therapy, but is generally not needed thereafter. Trimethobenzamide did not worsen parkinsonism nor affect "on" response after apomorphine injection.

A multicenter, open-label, exploratory dose-ranging trial of intranasal hydromorphone for managing acute pain from traumatic injury.

UNLABELLED: We conducted a prospective multicenter, open-label, escalating dose-range trial to compare, across patients, single intranasal doses (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg) of hydromorphone HCl in the treatment of acute trauma pain The main outcome measure of pain-intensity reduction was derived from serial Numerical Pain-Rating Scores and calculated as the summed pain-intensity difference over 3 hours (SPID 3). Nasal examinations, vital signs, and adverse events were reported as safety outcomes. The mean decrease in pain intensity from baseline to 30 minutes was 39 to 44% for the 4-, 6-, 8- and 10-mg doses (n = 19, 33, 28, and 19 per group) and only 24% reduction for the 2-mg dose (n = 14). SPID 3 for the 2-mg dose was 40 to 50% below all other doses. There were no clinically meaningful changes in vital signs or nasal examinations. Adverse events (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, oxygen desaturation, bad taste, dizziness) were of mild to moderate intensity, increased with dose, and expected, based on route of administration and opioid pharmacology. Intranasal hydromorphone provides a component of rapid pain relief in the care of emergency department patients suffering from acute trauma pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a pilot dose-ranging study of intranasally administered hydromorphone, administered in the emergency department to patients suffering from acute trauma pain. This study demonstrates research success in this setting and noninjection-based delivery and certain doses of intranasal hydromorphone may be effective in treating acute trauma pain.

Removal of INTACS for myopia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the removal of INTACS. DESIGN: Subgroup analysis from a nonrandomized comparative interventional trial. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred fifty-two patients with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better and myopia (1.0-3.5 diopters [D]) were enrolled in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trials of INTACS. Forty-six eyes among a total of 684 underwent INTACS removal. INTERVENTION: INTACS removal. METHODS: Safety and efficacy of INTACS removal was assessed by comparison of results from preoperative and 3-month postremoval visits. Safety was assessed by maintenance of preoperative best spectacle-corrected acuity and induction of astigmatism (measured by manifest refraction). Efficacy was assessed by comparison of mean spherical equivalent measured by both manifest and cycloplegic refraction, as well as percentage of eyes within +/- 0.5 D and +/- 1.0 D of baseline values. A subset of 27 patients completed a prospective questionnaire assessing the frequency of six visual symptoms (glare, halos, double vision, photophobia, night vision difficulties, and fluctuating vision). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and cycloplegic refraction. RESULTS: Forty-one of 46 patients' eyes that had undergone INTACS removal had reached the 3-month postremoval visit. Of these eyes, 73% (30 of 41) had returned to within +/- 0.5 D and 97% (40 of 41) to within +/- 1.0 D of baseline spherical equivalent as measured by manifest refraction. With respect to astigmatism, 88% (36 of 41) had returned to within +/- 0.5 D and 100% (41 of 41) to within +/- 1.0 D of preoperative value. No patient had a loss of best spectacle-corrected acuity of more than 2 lines, with equal numbers of eyes having a loss or gain of 1 line (nine eyes) and 2 lines (one eye). For most eyes, INTACS removal was associated with a substantial reduction in the six types of visual symptoms; however, in some eyes (up to 15%) symptoms that had not been detected preoperatively were noted after INTACS removal. CONCLUSIONS: INTACS removal was not associated with a loss (> 2 lines) of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity or induction (> 1 D) of astigmatism or myopia. INTACS removal was associated with a reversal to preoperative values in most cases.