No Strength Differences Despite Greater Posterior Rotator Cuff Intramuscular Fat in Patients With Eccentric Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: When nonoperative measures do not alleviate the symptoms of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), patients with advanced OA primarily are treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). It is unknown why TSAs performed in patients with eccentric (asymmetric glenoid wear) compared with concentric (symmetric glenoid wear) deformities exhibit higher failure rates, despite surgical advances. Persistent disruption of the posterior-to-anterior rotator cuff (RC) force couple resulting from posterior RC intramuscular degeneration in patients with eccentric deformities could impair external rotation strength and may contribute to eventual TSA failure. Pain and intramuscular fat within the RC muscles may impact external rotation strength measures and are important to consider. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there relative shoulder external rotation weakness in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (2) Is there higher resting or torque-dependent pain in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (3) Do patients with eccentric deformities have higher posterior-to-anterior RC intramuscular fat percent ratios than patients with concentric deformities? METHODS: From February 2020 to November 2021, 65% (52 of 80) of patients with OA met study eligibility criteria. Of these, 63% (33 of 52) of patients enrolled and provided informed consent. From a convenience sample of 21 older adults with no history of shoulder pain, 20 met eligibility criteria as control participants. Of the convenience sample, 18 patients enrolled and provided informed consent. In total for this prospective, cross-sectional study, across patients with OA and control participants, 50% (51 of 101) of participants were enrolled and allocated into the eccentric (n = 16), concentric (n = 17), and control groups (n = 18). A 3-degree-of-freedom load cell was used to sensitively quantify strength in all three dimensions surrounding the shoulder. Participants performed maximal isometric contractions in 26 1-, 2-, and 3-degree-of-freedom direction combinations involving adduction/abduction, internal/external rotation, and/or flexion/extension. To test for relative external rotation weakness, we quantified relative strength in opposing directions (three-dimensional [3D] strength balance) along the X (+adduction/-abduction), Y (+internal/-external rotation), and Z (+flexion/-extension) axes and compared across the three groups. Patients with OA rated their shoulder pain (numerical rating 0-10) before testing at rest (resting pain; response to "How bad is your pain today?") and with each maximal contraction (torque-dependent pain; numerical rating 0-10). Resting and torque-dependent pain were compared between patients with eccentric and concentric deformities to determine if pain was higher in the eccentric group. The RC cross-sectional areas and intramuscular fat percentages were quantified on Dixon-sequence MRIs by a single observer who performed manual segmentation using previously validated methods. Ratios of posterior-to-anterior RC fat percent (infraspinatus + teres minor fat percent/subscapularis fat percent) were computed and compared between the OA groups. RESULTS: There was no relative external rotation weakness in patients with eccentric deformities (Y component of 3D strength balance, mean ± SD: -4.7% ± 5.1%) compared with patients with concentric deformities (-0.05% ± 4.5%, mean difference -4.7% [95% CI -7.5% to -1.9%]; p = 0.05). However, there was more variability in 3D strength balance in the eccentric group (95% CI volume, % 3 : 893) compared with the concentric group (95% CI volume, % 3 : 579). In patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities, there was no difference in median (IQR) resting pain (1.0 [3.0] versus 2.0 [2.3], mean rank difference 4.5 [95% CI -6.6 to 16]; p = 0.61) or torque-dependent pain (0.70 [3.0] versus 0.58 [1.5], mean rank difference 2.6 [95% CI -8.8 to 14]; p = 0.86). In the subset of 18 of 33 patients with OA who underwent MRI, seven patients with eccentric deformities demonstrated a higher posterior-to-anterior RC fat percent ratio than the 11 patients with concentric deformities (1.2 [0.8] versus 0.70 [0.3], mean rank difference 6.4 [95% CI 1.4 to 11.5]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with eccentric deformities demonstrated higher variability in strength compared with patients with concentric deformities. This increased variability suggests patients with potential subtypes of eccentric wear patterns (posterior-superior, posterior-central, and posterior-inferior) may compensate differently for underlying anatomic changes by adopting unique kinematic or muscle activation patterns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings highlight the importance of careful clinical evaluation of patients presenting with eccentric deformities because some may exhibit potentially detrimental strength deficits. Recognition of such strength deficits may allow for targeted rehabilitation. Future work should explore the relationship between strength in patients with specific subtypes of eccentric wear patterns and potential forms of kinematic or muscular compensation to determine whether these factors play a role in TSA failures in patients with eccentric deformities.

Assessment of painful total shoulder arthroplasty using computed tomography arthrography.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) arthrography when evaluating glenoid component stability in the setting of postarthroplasty shoulder pain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients presenting to the clinic during a 5.5-year period to identify those with a painful shoulder arthroplasty more than 1 year after the index procedure. We excluded reverse and hemiarthroplasty procedures, patients with a clearly identifiable cause for pain, such as rotator cuff insufficiency or gross component loosening as seen on plain radiographs, and those with culture-positive aspiration. There were 14 patients with suspected glenoid component loosening but inconclusive plain radiographs. Each of the 14 patients underwent a CT arthrogram that was evaluated by the senior author (J.J.P.W.) for the presence or absence of contrast material underneath the polyethylene component. Operative reports and surgical videos from subsequent arthroscopy were reviewed to assess glenoid component stability as determined by direct arthroscopic visualization. RESULTS: CT arthrography suggested glenoid component loosening in 8 of 14 patients (57.1%), and arthroscopic inspection identified loosening in 10 of 14 patients (71.4%). In 3 of 10 patients (30%), CTA suggested a well-fixed glenoid component, but gross loosening was identified during arthroscopy. In this study, CTA yielded a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 87.5%, and a negative predictive value of 50.0%. CONCLUSION: CTA had a low negative predictive value (50%), and therefore, the prediction of component stability based on the absence of contrast between the glenoid component and the bone-cement interface does not always reflect true stability.

External Rotation Strength After TSA in Osteoarthritic Shoulders with Eccentric Deformity Is Not Impacted by Posterior Rotator Cuff Deficiency.

Background: Patients with persistent glenohumeral osteoarthritis symptoms despite nonoperative management may pursue anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). TSA revision rates are higher in patients with preoperative eccentric (asymmetric posterior erosion) compared with concentric (symmetric) glenoid deformity. If posterior rotator cuff deficiency demonstrated preoperatively in patients with eccentric deformity persists after TSA, it may manifest as relative weakness in external compared with internal rotation secondary to deficient activity of the shoulder external rotator muscles. Persistent posterior rotator cuff deficiency is hypothesized to contribute to TSA failures. However, it remains unknown whether rotational strength is impaired after TSA in patients with eccentric deformity. Our goal was to determine if patients with eccentric deformity exhibit relative external rotation weakness that may be explained by posterior rotator cuff deficiency after TSA. Methods: Patients who were >1 year after TSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and had had preoperative eccentric or concentric deformity were prospectively recruited. Torque was measured and electromyography was performed during maximal isometric contractions in 26 three-dimensional direction combinations. Relative strength in opposing directions (strength balance) and muscle activity of 6 shoulder rotators were compared between groups. Results: The internal (+) and external (-) rotation component of strength balance did not differ in patients with eccentric (mean internal-external rotation component of strength balance: -7.6% ± 7.4%) compared with concentric deformity (-10.3% ± 6.8%) (mean difference: 2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.3% to 6.7%]; p = 0.59), suggesting no relative external rotation weakness. Infraspinatus activity was reduced in patients with eccentric (43.9% ± 10.4% of maximum voluntary contraction [MVC]) compared with concentric (51.3% ± 10.4% of MVC) deformity (mean difference: -7.4% [95% CI, -13.4% to -1.4%] of MVC; p = 0.04). Conclusions: A relative external rotation strength deficit following TSA was not found, despite evidence of reduced infraspinatus activity, in the eccentric-deformity group. Reduced infraspinatus activity suggests that posterior rotator cuff deficiencies may persist following TSA in patients with eccentric deformities. Longitudinal study is necessary to evaluate muscle imbalance as a contributor to higher TSA failure rates. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Translations of the Humeral Head Elicit Reflexes in Rotator Cuff Muscles That Are Larger Than Those in the Primary Shoulder Movers.

Muscle activation helps stabilize the glenohumeral joint and prevent dislocations, which are more common at the shoulder than at any other human joint. Feedforward control of shoulder muscles is important for protecting the glenohumeral joint from harm caused by anticipated external perturbations. However, dislocations are frequently caused by unexpected perturbations for which feedback control is essential. Stretch-evoked reflexes elicited by translations of the glenohumeral joint may therefore be an important mechanism for maintaining joint integrity, yet little is known about them. Specifically, reflexes elicited by glenohumeral translations have only been studied under passive conditions, and there have been no investigations of how responses are coordinated across the functional groupings of muscles found at the shoulder. Our objective was to characterize stretch-evoked reflexes elicited by translations of the glenohumeral joint while shoulder muscles are active. We aimed to determine how these responses differ between the rotator cuff muscles, which are essential for maintaining glenohumeral stability, and the primary shoulder movers, which are essential for the large mobility of this joint. We evoked reflexes using anterior and posterior translations of the humeral head while participants produced voluntary isometric torque in six directions spanning the three rotational degrees-of-freedom about the shoulder. Electromyograms were used to measure the stretch-evoked reflexes elicited in nine shoulder muscles. We found that reflex amplitudes were larger in the rotator cuff muscles than in the primary shoulder movers, in part due to increased background activation during torque generation but more so due to an increased scaling of reflex responses with background activation. The reflexes we observed likely arose from the diversity of proprioceptors within the muscles and in the passive structures surrounding the shoulder. The large reflexes observed in the rotator cuff muscles suggest that feedback control of the rotator cuff augments the feedforward control that serves to compress the humeral head into the glenoid. This coordination may serve to stabilize the shoulder rapidly when preparing for and responding to unexpected disturbances.

In Vivo Evaluation of Subacromial and Internal Impingement Risk in Asymptomatic Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to evaluate subacromial and internal impingement risk between shoulders (dominant/nondominant) during dynamic motion using subject-specific anatomy and precise in vivo kinematics. DESIGN: In a prospective cross-sectional study, nine subjects underwent bilateral magnetic resonance (N = 18 shoulders) and fluoroscopic imaging during elevation and external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction. Subject-specific bone models were created and distances from footprint to (a) acromion and (b) glenoid were measured to evaluate risk. RESULTS: Throughout elevation, subacromial impingement risk was greater in the dominant shoulder (P = 0.0178). Regardless of side, high subacromial impingement risk occurred at 30% (78 degrees), 50% (101 degrees), and 70% (57 degrees) of the elevation cycle (P < 0.0001). High subacromial impingement risk also occurred at 30% (94 degrees), 50% (120 degrees), and 70% (63 degrees) of the external rotation motion cycle (P < 0.0001). Throughout both motions, internal impingement risk was not observed; however, the footprint and glenoid were closest at 50% of the elevation (101 degrees) and external rotation (120 degrees) cycles (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: During elevation, subacromial impingement risk is greatest at lower arm positions (30% cycle, 78 degrees) and is greater in the dominant shoulder. High subacromial impingement risk also occurs with external rotation (63-120 degrees). Internal impingement risk does not occur with maximal elevation (101 degrees) or external rotation at 90-degree abduction but is more closely approached with elevation.

Changes in Psychological Status and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There has been little documentation of the effects of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) on psychological status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We investigated changes in psychological status (depression and anxiety) and HRQoL following TSA and assessed the effect of preoperative psychological status on postoperative clinical and functional outcome. We hypothesized that TSA would improve both psychological status and HRQoL. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 46 patients undergoing TSA for osteoarthritis. Preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, all of the subjects completed the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale (ASES), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) measure, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Abbreviated Version (WHOQOL-BREF). RESULTS: From 3 months after surgery, significant improvement in HADS-depression, HADS-anxiety, and WHOQOL-BREF scores as well as in the other outcome measures of VAS pain score, ASES score, and SSV were observed. The prevalence of depression and anxiety decreased from a rate of 15.2% and 19.5%, respectively, preoperatively to a rate of 6.5% for each at 12 months postoperatively. Preoperative HADS-depression and HADS-anxiety scores did not correlate with any of the clinical and functional outcome measures at 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed significant improvement in psychological status and HRQoL as well as in pain and functional ability from 3 months after TSA in patients with osteoarthritis. Preoperative depression and anxiety did not predict poor postoperative outcome. Our findings suggest that TSA offers an excellent chance of improving psychological status and HRQoL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effects of ACL reconstruction surgery on muscle activity of the lower limb during a jump-cut maneuver in males and females.

We compared muscle activity of the quadriceps, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles when ACL-intact (ACL(INT)) and ACL-reconstructed (ACL(REC)) male and female subjects performed a jump-cut task. Surface electromyography sensors were used to evaluate time to peak muscle activity and muscle activity ratios. Rectus femoris (RF) and vastus medialis (VM) peak timing was 71 and 78 ms earlier in ACL(INT) than in ACL(REC) subjects, respectively. Biceps femoris (BF) peak timing was 90 ms earlier in ACL(INT) than in ACL(REC) subjects and 75 ms earlier in females than in males. Medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle peak timing was 77 ms earlier in ACL(INT) than in ACL(REC) subjects. Lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and MG muscle peak times were 106 ms and 87 ms earlier in females than in males, respectively. The RF, VM, BF, and MG peaked later in ACL(REC) than in ACL(INT) subjects. There was evidence suggesting that the loading phase quadriceps:hamstring (quad:ham) muscle activity ratio was greater in ACL(REC) than in ACL(INT) subjects. Finally, the injury risk phase quad:ham muscle activity ratio was 4.8 times greater in females than in males. In conclusion, differences exist in muscle activity related to ACL status and sex that could potentially help explain graft failure risk and the sex bias.