Non-displaced Femoral Neck Stress Fractures in Young Adults: 7-Year Outcomes of Prophylactic Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment.

Retrospectively compare outcomes of prophylactic fixation to nonoperative treatment of incomplete or non-displaced femoral neck stress fractures (FNSF) in young adults. Outcomes of 82 patients (mean age 21.7 years) who were diagnosed with incomplete or non-displaced FNSFs from 2002 to 2015 were compared. Forty-one underwent prophylactic fixation; the remaining were treated without surgery. Fracture characteristics and complications were recorded. Pain scores, modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Scores (HOS) were obtained and compared. The average fracture line in the operative group was 67% of the femoral neck width versus 18% in the nonoperative group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in outcome scores between the two groups. Prophylactic fixation of high-risk non-displaced FNSFs resulted in similar outcome scores to non-operative management of lower-risk variants at an average of 7.3 years follow up. No patient in either group progressed to a displaced femoral neck stress fracture. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(3):173-176, 2020).

Return to Duty in Military Members Following Surgical Treatment of Incomplete Femoral Neck Fractures.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether active duty military members treated surgically for incomplete femoral neck stress fractures (FNSFs) return to duty. A retrospective review of 53 patients was evaluated to determine the rate of return to duty (RTD) related to sex, branch of service, side of fracture, and signs of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Signs of FAI were measured and compared to RTD. Sixty-seven percent of the sample population did not return to duty. Eighty-three percent of Marine Corps members did not return to duty and 18% of Navy active duty members did not return to duty. This finding was statistically significant (p < .001). Average follow-up was 25 months. Surgical fixation of FNSFs does not seem to affect the ability to return to active duty; however, it did prevent progression to complete or displaced fracture in all of the study patients. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(4):312-316, 2018).

Femoral Neck Stress Fractures: An Updated Review.

Femoral neck stress fractures represent a relatively rare spectrum of injuries that most commonly affect military recruits and endurance athletes. If unrecognized and if proper treatment is not initiated, this condition carries potentially devastating consequences. Patients will typically present with an insidious onset, atraumatic hip, and groin pain that is relieved with rest. The condition may be initially misdiagnosed because radiographs are often normal. Magnetic resonance imaging has demonstrated superior specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy compared with other diagnostic modalities in identifying and classifying stress fractures of the femoral neck. Treatment algorithms are based on the MRI fracture morphology and presence of an intra-articular effusion. Nonsurgical management consists of a period of non-weight-bearing followed by gradual return to activity. Surgical management consists of prophylactic fracture fixation with cannulated screws to prevent fracture progression. If left untreated, patients may progress to a complete displaced femoral neck fracture, which can be associated with complications that include nonunion, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and long-term disability. These poor outcomes emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of incomplete femoral neck stress fractures.

Outcomes Following the Urgent Surgical Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Stress Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical course, complication rates, and mid-term functional outcomes associated with the treatment of displaced femoral neck stress fractures (FNSFs). DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. SETTING: Military Tertiary Referral Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-one operatively treated displaced FNSFs between 2002 and 2015. INTERVENTION: Urgent reduction and fixation was performed. If nonunion developed, an intertrochanteric osteotomy was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunion, osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head, conversion to arthroplasty, modified Harris Hip Score, pain score, and Hip Outcome Score (HOS). RESULTS: Two (9.1%) patients developed nonunion. Both united after revision with intertrochanteric osteotomy. ON developed in one patient (4.8%) who was converted to arthroplasty. Average pain score at final follow-up was 2.0 (range 0-5). Average Modified Harris Hip Score was 84 (range 54-100). Average HOS Activities of Daily Living subscale was 80.9 (range 45.6-100). Average HOS Sport subscale was 69.8 (range 27.8-100). Larger displacement on injury films correlated with lower Modified Harris Hip Scores (P = 0.048) and lower HOS Sports Subscale Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (P = 0.023). The need for an open reduction trended toward being a risk factor for nonunion (P = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest series of patients undergoing urgent surgery for displaced FNSFs. Nonunion and ON is found at a similar rate to what is reported in the young traumatic literature. Pain and outcome scores compare favorably to other hip pathology in young adults. Initial injury severity is variably correlated to final outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral Neck Stress Fractures: MRI Risk Factors for Progression.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck stress fractures are overuse injuries with devastating consequences if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review femoral neck stress fractures using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based protocol and to identify imaging risk factors that could predict fracture progression requiring surgical intervention. METHODS: We identified all femoral neck stress fractures treated at our institution from 2002 to 2015. Inclusion criteria for the study were unilateral pathology involving either an incomplete femoral neck stress fracture with a visualized fracture line or edema without a distinct fracture line. MRI data were evaluated for edema, fracture line percentage, and hip effusion. A surgical procedure was offered to patients with fractures with interval progression on serial MRI after 6 weeks of nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: We identified 305 patients who met inclusion criteria. Initial MRI showed edema with a fracture line in 54.4% of patients and isolated edema in 45.6% of patients. Interval MRI was performed in 194 patients at a mean time of 6 weeks, and it revealed fracture progression in 13.9% of patients. There were no significant differences in the size of the fracture line on initial MRI between the group who progressed to a surgical procedure and those who resolved with nonoperative treatment (mean [and standard deviation], 24.6% ± 8.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 21.4% to 27.8%] and 25.5% ± 11.1% [95% CI, 22.9% to 28.1%]; p = 0.287). Of the patients who required a surgical procedure, 85.2% had an effusion on the initial MRI compared with only 26.3% of those who showed interval resolution with nonoperative treatment. Those who had a hip effusion on the initial MRI had 8 times (relative risk, 8.02 [95% CI, 2.99 to 21.5]; p < 0.0001) the risk of fracture progression to surgical fixation compared with those without a hip effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a femoral neck stress fracture and fracture line, the presence of a hip effusion on the initial MRI screening is an independent risk factor for fracture progression and early prophylactic surgical intervention should be considered. All patients with isolated edema in the femoral neck without a fracture line on the initial MRI had resolution with nonoperative treatment and did not have fracture progression toward surgical fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Morel-Lavallee Lesion in the Upper Extremity.

Background: The Morel-Lavallee lesion (MLL) is a closed internal degloving injury that results from shearing of the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying fascia. Disruption of the perforating blood vessels and lymphatics results in a lesion filled with serosanguinous fluid and necrotized fat. MLLs are most commonly described in association with pelvic and lower extremity trauma, and there are limited reports of these lesions in other locations. Methods: This case report describes a 58-year-old male referred from his primary care physician with a soft tissue mass in the upper arm. Careful history discovered prior trauma with extensive bruising and MRI revealed a large encapsulated mass consistent with MLL. Results: An open debridement with excision of pseudocapsule was performed. Meticulous closure over a drain was performed and the patient healed without complication or recurrence. Intra-operative cultures were negative and pathology was consistent with MLL. Conclusion: MLL should always be considered in the setting of previous trauma regardless the location. In the chronic setting an open approach with excision of pseudocapsule can have an acceptable result.

Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries in a Young Athletic Population.

BACKGROUND: There are 2 Level I studies comparing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis (PA) in high-energy Lisfranc injuries. There are no studies comparing ORIF and PA in young athletic patients with low-energy injuries. METHODS: All operatively managed low-energy Lisfranc injuries sustained by active duty military personnel at a single institution were identified from 2010 to 2015. The injury pattern, method of treatment, and complications were reviewed. Implant removal rates, fitness test scores, return to military duty rates, and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores were compared. Thirty-two patients were identified with the average age of 28 years. PA was performed in 14 patients with ORIF in 18. RESULTS: The PA group returned to full duty at an average of 4.5 months whereas the ORIF group returned at an average of 6.7 months ( P = .0066). The PA group ran their fitness test an average of 9 seconds per mile slower than their preoperative average whereas the ORIF group ran it an average of 39 seconds slower per mile ( P = .032). There were no differences between the 2 groups in the FAAM scores at an average of 35 months. Implant removal was performed in 15 (83%) in the ORIF group and 2 (14%) in the PA group ( P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Low-energy Lisfranc injuries treated with primary arthrodesis had a lower implant removal rate, an earlier return to full military activity, and better fitness test scores after 1 year, but there was no difference in FAAM scores after 3 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative cohort study.

Injury Characteristics of Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries Compared With High-Energy Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries result from high- and low-energy mechanisms though the literature has been more focused on high-energy mechanisms. A comparison of high-energy (HE) and low-energy (LE) injury patterns is lacking. The objective of this study was to report injury patterns in LE Lisfranc joint injuries and compare them to HE injury patterns. METHODS: Operative Lisfranc injuries were identified over a 5-year period. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury pattern, associated injuries, missed diagnoses, clinical course, and imaging studies were reviewed and compared. HE mechanism was defined as motor vehicle crash, motorcycle crash, direct crush, and fall from greater than 4 feet and LE mechanism as athletic activity, ground level twisting, or fall from less than 4 feet. Thirty-two HE and 48 LE cases were identified with 19.3 months of average follow-up. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics or missed diagnosis frequency (21% HE vs 18% LE). Time to seek care was not significantly different. HE injuries were more likely to have concomitant nonfoot fractures (37% vs 6%), concomitant foot fractures (78% vs 4%), cuboid fractures (31% vs 6%), metatarsal base fractures (84% vs 29%), displaced intra-articular fractures (59% vs 4%), and involvement of all 5 rays (23% vs 6%). LE injuries were more commonly ligamentous (68% vs 16%), with fewer rays involved (2.7 vs 4.1). CONCLUSIONS: LE mechanisms were a more common cause of Lisfranc joint injury in this cohort. These mechanisms generally resulted in an isolated, primarily ligamentous injury sparing the lateral column. Both types had high rates of missed injury that could result in delayed treatment. Differences in injury patterns could help direct future research to optimize treatment algorithms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.