RESUMO
The impact of blood pressure targets and surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) on continuous urinary oxygenation (PuO2), a validated surrogate of renal medullary PO2, during general surgery, is unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of different blood pressure targets and surgical procedures on PuO2. We randomized patients receiving either laparoscopic or open surgery into two mean arterial pressure (MAP) target groups: usual MAP or a high MAP. We measured PuO2 in real-time and analyzed it according to the type of surgery and blood pressure target. The study was retrospectively registered on the 5th of July 2023 (ACTRN12623000726651). We included 43 participants who underwent either laparoscopic (n = 20) or open surgery (n = 23). We found that PuO2 significantly decreased during both laparoscopic and open surgery under a usual blood pressure target (- 51% and - 49%, respectively). However, there was a sharper fall with laparoscopic surgery resulting in a higher PuO2 with open surgery (mean difference: 11 ± 1 mmHg higher; p < 0.001). Targeting a higher MAP resulted in a higher PuO2 over time during laparoscopic surgery (mean difference: 7 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001). In contrast, targeting a usual MAP resulted in a higher PuO2 during open surgery (mean difference: 7 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001). Surgical approach and intraoperative blood pressure targets significantly impact urinary oxygenation. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and understand their potential clinical implications.Registration number: ACTRN12623000726651; Date of registration: 05/07/2023 (retrospectively registered).
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Oxigênio , Humanos , Pressão Sanguínea , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anaesthetic care during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has the unique challenge of maintaining ventilation and oxygenation via a shared upper airway. Supplemental oxygen is recommended by international society guidelines, however, the optimal route or rate of oxygen delivery is not known. Various oxygen delivery devices have been investigated to improve oxygenation during upper GI endoscopy, however, these are limited by commercial availability, costs and in some cases, the expertise required for insertion. Anecdotally at our centre, higher flows of supplemental oxygen can safely be delivered via an oxygenating mouthguard routinely used during upper GI endoscopic procedures. AIM: To assess the incidence of hypoxaemia (SpO2 < 90%) in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy receiving supplemental oxygen using an oxygenating mouthguard at 20 L/min flow compared to standard nasal cannula (SNC) at 2 L/min flow. METHODS: A single centre, prospective, randomised clinical trial at two sites of an Australian tertiary hospital between October 2020 and September 2021 was conducted. Patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation were randomised to receive supplemental oxygen via high-flow via oxygenating mouthguard (HFMG) at 20 L/min flow or SNC at 2 L/min flow. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxaemia of any duration measured by pulse oximetry. Intraprocedural-related, procedural-related, and sedation-related adverse events and patient-reported outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were randomised. Eight patients were excluded after randomisation. 292 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The incidence of hypoxaemia was significantly reduced in those allocated HFMG. Six patients (4.4%) allocated to HFMG experienced an episode of hypoxaemia, compared to thirty-four (22.1%) patients allocated to SNC (P value < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the rates of adverse events or patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The use of HFMG offers a novel approach to reducing the incidence of hypoxaemia during short upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in low-risk patients undergoing deep sedation.