Tumour growth rate improves tumour assessment and first-line systemic treatment decision-making for immunotherapy in patients with liver metastatic uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The RECIST-based response variably matches the clinical benefit of systemic therapies for liver metastatic uveal melanoma (LMUM). The aims were to determine whether the tumour growth rate (TGR) can help predict the survival in patients with LMUM and to provide information for the management of first-line systemic treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study included 147 (training: n = 110, validation: n = 37) patients with LMUM treated with first-line systemic treatment between 2010 and 2021. Two TGR-derived parameters were calculated, TGR0 and TGR3m. Multivariate Cox analyses identified independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: TGR3m was a strong independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS (p < 0.001). The RECIST-based response was no longer significant in the OS analyses. Only immunotherapy regimens correlated with higher OS (HR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5; p < 0.001) in the low-TGR3m (≤50%/m) subgroup. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. TGR0, disease-free interval (DFI), and the sum of target lesions at baseline were predictive factors of low TGR3m. DISCUSSION: The use of TGR3m would improve tumour assessment by identifying patients who would benefit from first-line immunotherapy regimens despite PD. TGR0, DFI and the sum of target lesions were correlated with TGR3m, which can support first-line treatment decision-making for immunotherapy.

Cumulative Radiation Exposure in Covid-19 Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Medical imaging plays a major role in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patient diagnosis and management. However, the radiation dose received from medical procedures by these patients has been poorly investigated. We aimed to estimate the cumulative effective dose (CED) related to medical exposure in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison to the usual critically ill patients. We designed a descriptive cohort study including 90 successive ICU COVID-19 patients admitted between March and May 2020 and 90 successive non-COVID-19 patients admitted between March and May 2019. In this study, the CED resulting from all radiological examinations was calculated and clinical characteristics predictive of higher exposure risk identified. The number of radiological examinations was 12.0 (5.0-26.0) [median (interquartile range) in COVID-19 vs. 4.0 (2.0-8.0) in non-COVID-19 patient (P < 0.001)]. The CED during a four-month period was 4.2 mSv (1.9-11.2) in the COVID-19 vs. 1.2 mSv (0.13-6.19) in the non-COVID-19 patients (P < 0.001). In the survivors, the CED in COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 patients was ≥100 mSv in 3% vs. 0%, 10-100 mSv in 23% vs. 15%, 1-10 mSv in 56% vs. 30% and <1 mSv in 18% vs. 55%. The CED (P < 0.001) and CED per ICU hospitalization day (P = 0.004) were significantly higher in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients. The CED correlated significantly with the hospitalization duration (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and the number of conventional radiological examinations (r = 0.8, P < 0.001). To conclude, more radiological examinations were performed in critically ill COVID-19 patients than non-COVID-19 patients resulting in higher CED. In COVID-19 patients, contribution of strategies to limit CED should be investigated in the future.