RESUMO
PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common condition with a range of short- and long-term health implications. Providing patient-centred care is a key principle to ensure patients are well informed and empowered to participate in clinical decision making. This study aimed to develop a patient-centred sleep study report for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and to determine whether or not its implementation led to improved patient understanding of their disease. METHODS: The study was performed in two phases. The first phase utilised the Delphi-survey technique to develop and critically appraise a patient-centred sleep study report (PCSR) for patients with OSA, to accurately and simply convey key components of the patient's diagnosis and management. The second phase was a prospective, randomised controlled trial to assess the effect of the PCSR on patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and understanding as measured through validated patient questionnaires. RESULTS: The PCSR was developed on key concepts deemed to be important by the surveyed physicians, senior sleep scientists and patients. This included ensuring the results were customised, highlighting the patient's apnoea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index and arousal index and limiting technical information to a few key pieces. Patients randomised to receive the PCSR had improved understanding and perceived patient-physician interaction compared to those randomised to standard care. CONCLUSION: The development and implementation of the PCSR was feasible and improved patient understanding and perceived patient-physician interaction in patients with moderate to severe OSA. Whether or not use of the PCSR will translate to improved compliance with therapy will require further evaluation.
Assuntos
Medicina , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Sono , Cooperação do Paciente , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/métodosRESUMO
In recent decades, the concept of a vascular origin of migraine has been replaced by theories based on a neuronal pathophysiology. These theories all involve rapid changes in the functioning of the brain, particularly the brain stem, and the trigeminal nerves. While such paroxysmal changes in function could be the result of altered synaptic transmission, or other physiological changes, they could also be due to changes in the function of voltage-regulated sodium and calcium ion channels. Support for this view of migraine as a channelopathy comes from an examination of the likely mechanism of action of migraine prophylactic drugs. It is the present hypothesis that most of the widely used drugs for migraine prevention work by inhibiting the function of one or both of these ion channels. A review of the laboratory research done on most of the commonly used migraine prophylactic drugs, divided into five classes, reveals that they all may work on sodium channels, calcium channels, or both. If this is the common mechanism of action of migraine prophylactics, it should lead toward the development of more effective prophylactic drugs.
Assuntos
Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Canais Iônicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Canais de Cálcio/efeitos dos fármacos , Canais de Cálcio/fisiologia , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/metabolismo , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Neurônios/efeitos dos fármacos , Canais de Sódio/efeitos dos fármacos , Canais de Sódio/fisiologia , Transmissão Sináptica/fisiologia , Nervo Trigêmeo/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Thomas Jefferson had severe headaches on a number of occasions during his adult life, as noted by most of his biographers. Some occurred during important historical events, including the period just before the writing of the Declaration of Independence. Historians generally have considered these headaches to be migraines, while some physician authors have considered the alternative diagnoses of tension-type headaches and cluster headaches. A review of the literature, including Jefferson's many letters, suggests that they probably were migraines, although not all of the current diagnostic criteria can be met.