A first-in-class selective inhibitor of EGFR and PI3K offers a single-molecule approach to targeting adaptive resistance.

Despite tremendous progress in precision oncology, adaptive resistance mechanisms limit the long-term effectiveness of molecularly targeted agents. Here we evaluated the pharmacological profile of MTX-531 that was computationally designed to selectively target two key resistance drivers, epidermal growth factor receptor and phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase (PI3K). MTX-531 exhibits low-nanomolar potency against both targets with a high degree of specificity predicted by cocrystal structural analyses. MTX-531 monotherapy uniformly resulted in tumor regressions of squamous head and neck patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. The combination of MTX-531 with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase or KRAS-G12C inhibitors led to durable regressions of BRAF-mutant or KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer PDX models, resulting in striking increases in median survival. MTX-531 is exceptionally well tolerated in mice and uniquely does not lead to the hyperglycemia commonly seen with PI3K inhibitors. Here, we show that MTX-531 acts as a weak agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, an attribute that likely mitigates hyperglycemia induced by PI3K inhibition. This unique feature of MTX-531 confers a favorable therapeutic index not typically seen with PI3K inhibitors.

Epigenome reprogramming through H3K27 and H3K4 trimethylation as a resistance mechanism to DNA methylation inhibition in BRAFV600E-mutated colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: BRAFV600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits a strong correlation with DNA hypermethylation suggesting this subgroup of tumors presents unique epigenomic phenotypes. Nonetheless, 5-azacitidine, which inhibits DNA methyltransferase activity, is not efficacious in BRAFV600E CRC in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We randomized and treated mice implanted with patient-derived tumor xenografts harboring BRAFV600E mutation with control, 5-azacitidine, vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor), or the combination. Comprehensive epigenomic profiling was conducted on control and 5-azacitidine-treated tumor samples, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression. Combinations of epigenetic agents were explored in preclinical BRAFV600E CRC models. RESULTS: A profound reduction of DNA methylation levels upon 5-azacitidine treatment was confirmed, however, transcriptional repression was not relieved. This study unbiasedly explored the adaptive engagement of other epigenomic modifications upon 5-azacitidine treatment. A loss of histone acetylation and a gain of histone methylations, including H3K27 and H3K4 trimethylation, were observed around these hypomethylated regions suggesting the involvement of polycomb repressive complex (PRC) activity around the genome with loss of DNA methylation, therefore maintaining the repression of key tumor suppressor genes. Combined inhibition of PRC activity through EZH2 inhibitor with 5-azacitidine treatment additively improved efficacies in BRAFV600E CRC cells. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, DNA hypomethylation by 5-azacitidine exhibits a close association with H3K27me3 and PRC activity in BRAFV600E CRC, and simultaneous blockade of DNMT and EZH2 holds promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated CRC.

Therapeutic targeting of Syndecan-1 axis overcomes acquired resistance to KRAS-targeted therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

The therapeutic benefit of recently developed mutant KRAS (mKRAS) inhibitors has been limited by the rapid onset of resistance. Here, we aimed to delineate the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to mKRAS inhibition and identify actionable targets for overcoming this clinical challenge. Previously, we identified Syndecan-1 (SDC1) as a key effector for pancreatic cancer progression whose surface expression is driven by mKRAS. By leveraging both pancreatic and colorectal cancer models, we found that surface SDC1 expression was initially diminished upon mKRAS inhibition, but recovered in tumor cells that bypass mKRAS dependency. Functional studies showed that these tumors depended on SDC1 for survival, further establishing SDC1 as a driver for the acquired resistance to mKRAS inhibition. Mechanistically, we revealed that the YAP1-SDC1 axis was the major driving force for bypassing mKRAS dependency to sustain nutrient salvage machinery and tumor maintenance. Specifically, YAP1 activation mediated the recovery of SDC1 localization on cell surface that sustained macropinocytosis and enhanced the activation of multiple RTKs, promoting resistance to KRAS-targeted therapy. Overall, our study has provided the rationale for targeting the YAP-SDC1 axis to overcome resistance to mKRAS inhibition, thereby revealing new therapeutic opportunities for improving the clinical outcome of patients with KRAS-mutated cancers.

Defining the KRAS- and ERK-dependent transcriptome in KRAS-mutant cancers.

How the KRAS oncogene drives cancer growth remains poorly understood. Therefore, we established a systemwide portrait of KRAS- and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent gene transcription in KRAS-mutant cancer to delineate the molecular mechanisms of growth and of inhibitor resistance. Unexpectedly, our KRAS-dependent gene signature diverges substantially from the frequently cited Hallmark KRAS signaling gene signature, is driven predominantly through the ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, and accurately reflects KRAS- and ERK-regulated gene transcription in KRAS-mutant cancer patients. Integration with our ERK-regulated phospho- and total proteome highlights ERK deregulation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and other components of the cell cycle machinery as key processes that drive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) growth. Our findings elucidate mechanistically the critical role of ERK in driving KRAS-mutant tumor growth and in resistance to KRAS-ERK MAPK targeted therapies.

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Continuous Low-Irradiance Phototherapy Against Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.

Objective: The objective of this study is to report on the bactericidal effects of blue light administered at low irradiance for extended periods of time. Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) utilize biofilms that can limit the efficacy of antibiotics, causing infection and impaired wound healing. Unlike high-energy systems, continuous low-irradiance phototherapy (CLIP) avoids thermal injury of healthy tissue and can be delivered for extended periods. Methods: Four MDRO species, two of which contained different antibiotic resistance genes, were exposed to 405 nm irradiation in vitro. The microbes were incrementally exposed to increasing dose-rates (irradiance; mW/cm2) over a 24-h time period. Cell viability and biomass reduction assays were conducted to quantify the antibacterial/antibiofilm effects. Primary human dermal fibroblasts were also exposed to CLIP to assess whether these dose-rates would impair cell viability or proliferation. Results: CLIP exposure utilizing irradiances as low as 2.78 mW/cm2 delivered over 24 h resulted in a >3.0-log (>99.9%) and >2.0-log (>99.0%) microbial load reduction when organisms were grown in planktonic and biofilm-encapsulated conditions, respectively. Crystal violet biofilm assays revealed destruction of extracellular biofilm architecture following CLIP exposure. Human fibroblast viability and proliferation were unaffected by CLIP. Conclusions: This is the first report demonstrating the antimicrobial efficacy of CLIP for MDROs found in infected wounds. CLIP did not compromise cultured human fibroblast growth and survival. This study demonstrated that very low fluence rates (irradiances) delivered over extended periods are potently antimicrobial. There is translational potential for CLIP to be fabricated as a wearable device that would enable continuous ambulatory care of wounds.

KRASG12C-independent feedback activation of wild-type RAS constrains KRASG12C inhibitor efficacy.

Although KRAS has long been considered undruggable, direct KRASG12C inhibitors have shown promising initial clinical efficacy. However, the majority of patients still fail to respond. Adaptive feedback reactivation of RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling has been proposed by our group and others as a key mediator of resistance, but the exact mechanism driving reactivation and the therapeutic implications are unclear. We find that upstream feedback activation of wild-type RAS, as opposed to a shift in KRASG12C to its active guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound state, is sufficient to drive RAS-MAPK reactivation in a KRASG12C-independent manner. Moreover, multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) can drive feedback reactivation, potentially necessitating targeting of convergent signaling nodes for more universal efficacy. Even in colorectal cancer, where feedback is thought to be primarily epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated, alternative RTKs drive pathway reactivation and limit efficacy, but convergent upstream or downstream signal blockade can enhance activity. Overall, these data provide important mechanistic insight to guide therapeutic strategies targeting KRAS.

Comprehensive Clinical and Molecular Characterization of KRAS G12C-Mutant Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: KRAS p.G12C mutations occur in approximately 3% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Recently, two allosteric inhibitors of KRAS p.G12C have demonstrated activity in early phase clinical trials. There are no robust studies examining the behavior of this newly targetable population. METHODS: We queried the MD Anderson Cancer Center data set for patients with colorectal cancer who harbored KRAS p.G12C mutations between January 2003 and September 2019. Patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) and compared against KRAS nonG12C. Next, we analyzed several internal and external data sets to assess immune signatures, gene expression profiles, hypermethylation, co-occurring mutations, and proteomics. RESULTS: Among the 4,632 patients with comprehensive molecular profiling, 134 (2.9%) were found to have KRAS p.G12C mutations. An additional 53 patients with single gene sequencing were included in clinical data but excluded from prevalence analysis allowing for 187 total patients. Sixty-five patients had de novo metastatic disease and received a median of two lines of chemotherapy without surgical intervention. For the first three lines of chemotherapy, the median PFS was 6.4 months (n = 65; 95% CI, 5.0 to 7.4 months), 3.9 months (n = 47; 95% CI, 2.9 to 5.9 months), and 3.0 months (n = 21; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.4 months), respectively. KRAS p.G12C demonstrated higher rates of basal EGFR activation compared with KRAS nonG12C. When compared with an internal cohort of KRAS nonG12C, KRAS p.G12C patients had worse OS. CONCLUSION: PFS is poor for patients with KRAS p.G12C metastatic colorectal cancer. OS was worse in KRAS p.G12C compared with KRAS nonG12C patients. Our data highlight the innate resistance to chemotherapy for KRAS p.G12C patients and serve as a historical comparator for future clinical trials.

Clinical and Functional Characterization of Atypical KRAS/NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Mutations in KRAS/NRAS (RAS) predict lack of anti-EGFR efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it is unclear if all RAS mutations have similar impact, and atypical mutations beyond those in standard guidelines exist. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We reviewed 7 tissue and 1 cell-free DNA cohorts of 9,485 patients to characterize atypical RAS variants. Using an in vitro cell-based assay (functional annotation for cancer treatment), Ba/F3 transformation, and in vivo xenograft models of transduced isogenic clones, we assessed signaling changes across mutations. RESULTS: KRAS exon 2, extended RAS, and atypical RAS mutations were noted in 37.8%, 9.5%, and 1.2% of patients, respectively. Among atypical variants, KRAS L19F, Q22K, and D33E occurred at prevalence ≥0.1%, whereas no NRAS codon 117/146 and only one NRAS codon 59 mutation was noted. Atypical RAS mutations had worse overall survival than RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC (HR, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-6.80; P = 0.014). We functionally characterized 114 variants with the FACT assay. All KRAS exon 2 and extended RAS mutations appeared activating. Of 57 atypical RAS variants characterized, 18 (31.6%) had signaling below wild-type, 23 (40.4%) had signaling between wild-type and activating control, and 16 (28.1%) were hyperactive beyond the activating control. Ba/F3 transformation (17/18 variants) and xenograft model (7/8 variants) validation was highly concordant with FACT results, and activating atypical variants were those that occurred at highest prevalence in clinical cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We provide best available evidence to guide treatment when atypical RAS variants are identified. KRAS L19F, Q22K, D33E, and T50I are more prevalent than many guideline-included RAS variants and functionally relevant.