RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and to identify factors associated with this. METHODS: HRQoL was measured pre-SRS, at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Physical functioning, cognitive functioning, role functioning, and fatigue were analyzed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Motor dysfunction, future uncertainty, visual disorder, communication deficit, and headaches were analyzed with the EORTC QLQ-BN20. Clinically important symptom or functional impairment was assessed following set thresholds. Factors associated with impairment were identified through multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: At baseline, 178 patients were included; 54% (n=96) completed questionnaires at 3 months and 39% (n=70) at 6 months. Before SRS, 29% of linear accelerator (LINAC) patients reported physical and cognitive impairment, while 25% reported impairment for fatigue. At 6 months, 39%, 43%, and 57% of LINAC patients reported impairment respectively. Forty-five percent of Gamma Knife (GK) patients reported impairment pre-SRS for physical, cognitive functioning, and fatigue. At 6 months, 48%, 43%, and 33% of GK patients reported impairment respectively. Except for role functioning, pre-SRS symptom and functioning scores were associated with impairment at 3 months, whereas scores at 3 months were associated with impairment at 6 months. Age, gender, systemic therapy, and intracranial progression were not associated with clinically important impairment. CONCLUSION: As 33-57% of patients with brain metastases reported symptom burden and functional impairments that were of clinical importance, it is recommended to pay attention to the HRQoL outcomes of these patients during clinical encounters.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Aceleradores de Partículas , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Fadiga/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Brain metastases (BM) themselves and treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can influence neurocognitive functioning. This prospective study aimed to assess neurocognitive decline in patients with BM after SRS. METHODS: A neuropsychological test battery was assessed yielding ten test outcomes. Neurocognitive decline at 3 and 6 months post SRS was compared to measurement prior to Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS. Reliable change indices with correction for practice effects were calculated to determine the percentage of neurocognitive decline (defined as decline on ≥ 2 test outcomes). Risk factors of neurocognitive decline were analyzed with binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 194 patients pre-SRS, 40 GK and 29 LINAC patients had data accessible at 6 months. Compared to baseline, 38% of GK patients declined at 3 months, and 23% declined at 6 months. GK patients declined on attention, executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skill. Of LINAC patients, 10% declined at 3 months, and 24% at 6 months. LINAC patients declined on executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skills. Risk factors of neurocognitive decline at 3 months were high age, low education level and type of SRS (GK or LINAC). At 6 months, high age was a risk factor. Karnofsky Performance Scale, BM volume, number of BM, tumor progression and neurocognitive impairment pre-SRS were no risk factors. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive decline occurs in a considerable proportion of patients with BM treated with GK or LINAC SRS. Overall, high age appears to be a risk factor for neurocognitive decline after SRS.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Aceleradores de Partículas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Clinical studies showing that non-central nervous system cancer patients can develop cognitive impairment have primarily focused on patients with specific cancer types and intensive treatments. To better understand the course of cognitive function in the general population of cancer patients, we assessed cognitive trajectories of patients before and after cancer diagnosis in a population-based setting. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2014, 2211 participants from the population-based Rotterdam study had been diagnosed with cancer of whom 718 (32.5%) had undergone ≥1 cognitive assessment before and after diagnosis. Cognition was measured every 3 to 6 years using a neuropsychological battery. Linear mixed models were used to compare cognitive trajectories of patients before and after diagnosis with those of age-matched cancer-free controls (1:3). RESULTS: Median age at cancer diagnosis was 70.3 years and 47.1% were women. Most patients (68.1%) had received local treatment only. Cognitive trajectories of patients before and after cancer diagnosis were largely similar to those of controls. After diagnosis, the largest difference was found on a memory test (patients declined with 0.14 units per year on the Word Learning Test: delayed recall [95% CI = -0.35; 0.07] and controls with 0.09 units [95% CI = -0.18;-0.00], p for difference = .59). CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal cohort, cancer did not appear to alter the trajectory of change in cognitive test results over time from that seen in similar individuals without cancer, although most cancer patients did not receive systemic therapies. Future studies should focus on identifying subgroups of patients who are at high risk for developing cognitive impairment.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Neoplasias , Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Testes NeuropsicológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is an important candidate mechanism underlying cancer and cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment. We investigated levels of blood cell-based inflammatory markers in breast cancer survivors on average 20 years after chemotherapy and explored the relation between these markers and global cognitive performance. METHODS: One hundred sixty-six breast cancer survivors who received post-surgical radiotherapy and six cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy on average 20 years before enrollment were compared with 1344 cancer-free women from a population-based sample (50-80 years old). Breast cancer survivors were excluded if they used adjuvant hormonal therapy or if they developed relapse, metastasis, or second primary malignancies. Systemic inflammation status was assessed by the granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Cognitive performance was assessed using an extensive neuropsychological test battery from which the general cognitive factor was derived to evaluate global cognitive performance. We examined the association between cancer, the general cognitive factor, and inflammatory markers using linear regression models. RESULTS: Breast cancer survivors had a lower general cognitive factor than non-exposed participants from the comparator group (mean difference = -0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.35 to -0.06). Inflammatory markers were higher in cancer survivors compared with non-exposed participants (mean difference for log(GLR) = 0.31; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.37, log(PLR) = 0.14; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.19, log(SII) = 0.31; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.39). The association between higher levels of inflammatory markers and lower general cognitive factor was statistically significant in cancer survivors but not among non-exposed participants. We found a group-by-inflammatory marker interaction; cancer survivors showed additional lower general cognitive factor per standard deviation increase in inflammatory markers (P for interaction for GLR = 0.038, PLR = 0.003, and SII = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that (1) cancer survivors have increased levels of inflammation on average 20 years after treatment and (2) these inflammatory levels are associated with lower cognitive performance. Although this association needs verification by a prospective study to determine causality, our findings can stimulate research on the role of inflammation in long-term cognitive problems and possibilities to diminish such problems.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Cognição , Inflamação/sangue , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/psicologia , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To investigate and to compare the relation between dementia and cancer with the association between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cancer. METHODS: A total of 13,207 persons from the Rotterdam Study were followed between 1990 and 2013 for the onset of dementia and cancer (sample 1). Between 2002 and 2005, a subset of 5,181 persons underwent extensive cognitive testing for MCI and subsequently were followed up for cancer until 2013 (sample 2). We used Cox proportional hazard models to determine the association between dementia and cancer, and MCI and cancer. RESULTS: In sample 1, 1,404 patients were diagnosed with dementia, and 2,316 developed cancer (63 among dementia cases). Dementia was associated with a decreased risk of cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% CI 0.41-0.68). In sample 2, 513 persons were diagnosed with MCI and 670 persons developed cancer (81 among MCI cases). In contrast to individuals with dementia, those with MCI tended to have an increased risk of cancer (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.99-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: We found that persons with MCI tended to have an increased risk of cancer, whereas those with dementia have a decreased risk. These findings call into question a biological explanation for the inverse link between dementia and cancer, thereby suggesting the presence of methodological bias.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Demência/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , RiscoRESUMO
Blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI is widely used for inferring neuronal activation and is becoming increasingly popular for assessing cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) when combined with a vasoactive stimulus. The BOLD signal contains changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and thus information regarding neurovascular coupling and CVR. The BOLD signal, however, is also modulated by changes in cerebral blood volume (CBV) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), as well as changes in the physiological baseline state. Here, we measured BOLD and CBF responses upon neuronal (visual) activation, before and after a vasodilatory challenge (acetazolamide, ACZ) in patients with vertebrobasilar steno-occlusive disease. After ACZ, the neuronal activation induced BOLD response was reduced or even negative (3 out of 8 subjects), whereas the CBF response remained similar. We show that BOLD alone cannot correctly assess the neuronal activation and underlying neurovascular coupling. The generally assumed positive relationship between BOLD and CBF responses may be severely compromised under changes in the physiological baseline state. Accompanying CBF measurements contain crucial information, and simulations suggest an altered flow-metabolism coupling in these patients.
Assuntos
Acetazolamida/farmacologia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo , Inibidores da Anidrase Carbônica/farmacologia , Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatologia , Consumo de Oxigênio/fisiologia , Idoso , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/tratamento farmacológico , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Circulação Cerebrovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Consumo de Oxigênio/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke, nonfocal neurological symptoms, such as confusion and nonrotatory dizziness, may be associated with a higher risk of vascular events. We assessed the relationship between nonfocal symptoms and the long-term risk of vascular events or death in patients with a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. METHODS: We related initial symptoms with outcome events in 2409 patients with a transient ischemic attack (n=723) or minor ischemic stroke (n=1686), included in the Life Long After Cerebral ischemia cohort. All patients underwent a standardized interview on the occurrence of focal and nonfocal neurological symptoms during the qualifying event. The primary outcome was the composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death, vascular death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Hazard ratios were calculated with Cox regression. RESULTS: Focal symptoms were accompanied by nonfocal symptoms in 739 (31%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 10.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in 1313 (55%) patients. There was no difference in the risk of the primary outcome between patients with both focal and nonfocal symptoms and patients with focal symptoms alone (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.09; P=0.60). The risk of each of the secondary outcomes was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of the patients with a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke has both focal and nonfocal neurological symptoms. Nonfocal symptoms are not associated with an increased long-term risk of vascular events or death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was not registered because enrollment began before July 1, 2005.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/mortalidade , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC is challenging. We aimed to identify resistance mechanisms (RM) to osimertinib in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. METHODS: EGFRm+ patients with new or progressive LM during osimertinib were enrolled. NGS Ampliseq was performed on DNA isolated from CSF. Patients were prescribed osimertinib dose escalation (DE, 160mg QD) following lumbar puncture. Clinical and radiological response was evaluated four weeks after osimertinib DE. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included. The driver mutation was identified in 93% of CSF samples (n=26). Seven (27%) harbored ≥1 RM. Twenty-five patients (89%) were prescribed osimertinib DE. Four weeks afterwards, symptoms improved in five patients, stabilized in nine and worsened in eleven patients. Twenty-one (84%) patients underwent MR imaging. Four showed radiological improvement, fourteen stabilization, and three worsening. CONCLUSIONS: In 27% of patients an RM was found in CSF ctDNA, none of which are targetable at time of writing, and clinical efficacy of osimertinib DE seems limited. There is much to gain in diagnostic as well as therapeutic strategies in EGFRm+ NSCLC LM.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In patients with a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke, the combination of focal and nonfocal symptoms has been associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that nonfocal symptoms are more frequent in patients with symptomatic stenosis of a vertebral artery (VA) than of a carotid artery (CA). Therefore, we assessed the prevalence of nonfocal symptoms in patients with a recent TIA or nondisabling ischemic stroke and studied their relation with symptomatic CA or VA stenosis. METHODS: We administered a standardized questionnaire on the occurrence of focal and nonfocal symptoms during the qualifying TIA or nondisabling ischemic stroke and in the preceding 6 months. We included 50 consecutive patients with a recently symptomatic CA stenosis ≥50%, 50 consecutive patients with a recently symptomatic VA stenosis ≥50%, 25 consecutive patients with an anterior circulation event without an ipsilateral CA stenosis ≥50%, and 25 consecutive patients with a posterior circulation event without a relevant VA stenosis ≥50%. Relative risks for the presence of nonfocal symptoms in relation to the presence of a symptomatic stenosis were calculated with univariate and multivariate Poisson regression. Adjustments were made for age, sex, stroke as the qualifying event, and cardiovascular risk factors. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients in whom the vascular territory of the event was confirmed on imaging. RESULTS: During the qualifying ischemic event, focal symptoms were accompanied by nonfocal symptoms in 80 (53%) patients. Nonfocal symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with a VA stenosis (72%) than in patients with a CA stenosis [26%; adjusted relative risk (aRR), 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-4.6]. A higher prevalence of nonfocal symptoms was found in patients with posterior circulation TIAs and strokes (73%) than in patients with anterior circulation TIAs and strokes (33%; aRR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.1). During the preceding 6 months, 45% of patients with and 20% of patients without a symptomatic stenosis had had nonfocal symptoms (aRR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.3). Subgroup analysis for the 89 (59%) patients with ischemia visible on imaging gave essentially the same results. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the TIAs or nondisabling ischemic strokes were associated with nonfocal neurological symptoms. Nonfocal symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with a symptomatic VA stenosis than CA stenosis.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas/epidemiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/diagnósticoRESUMO
QUESTION: What is the diagnostic accuracy of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) framework to assess the risk of vascular complications in patients seeking physiotherapy care for neck pain and/or headache? DESIGN: Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty patients seeking physiotherapy for neck pain and/or headache in primary care. METHODS: Nineteen physiotherapists performed the index test according to the IFOMPT framework. Patients were classified as having a high, intermediate or low risk of vascular complications, following manual therapy and/or exercise, derived from the estimated risk of the presence of vascular pathology. The reference test was a consensus medical decision reached by a vascular neurologist and an interventional neurologist, with input from a neuroradiologist. The neurologists had access to clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, including an angiogram of the cervical arteries. OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated for 'no contraindication' (ie, the low-risk category) and 'contraindication' (ie, the high-risk and intermediate-risk categories) for manual therapy and/or exercise. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and the area under the curve were calculated. RESULTS: Manual therapy and/or exercise were contraindicated in 54.7% of the patients. The sensitivity of the IFOMPT framework was low (0.50, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.61) and its specificity was moderate (0.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were weak at 1.36 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.99) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.05), respectively. The area under the curve was poor (0.57, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.65). CONCLUSION: The IFOMPT framework has poor diagnostic accuracy when compared with a reference standard consisting of a consensus medical decision.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Many patients with a malignant (i.e., grade II-IV) glioma are of working age, yet they are rarely included in "cancer and work" studies. Here, we explored (1) the work-related experiences and unmet needs of patients with a malignant glioma and (2) the experiences and needs of relevant healthcare and occupational (health) professionals ("professionals") in providing work-related support to this patient group. METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were held with patients with a malignant glioma who were of working age and had an employment contract at diagnosis, and relevant professionals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Patients (n = 22) were on average 46 ± 13 years of age (64% male) and diagnosed with a grade II (n = 12), III (n = 4), or IV glioma (n = 6). Professionals (n = 16) had on average 15 ± 9 years of relevant work experience with the patient group. Four themes emerged from the data: (1) having a malignant glioma: experienced consequences on work ability, (2) communicating about the consequences of a malignant glioma at work, (3) distilling the right approach: generic or tailored work-related support, and (4) accessibility of work-related support. CONCLUSIONS: Glioma-specific consequences on patients' work ability necessitate better communication between, and tailored guidance for, patients, relevant professionals, and the workplace. Suggestions for improvement, e.g., the periodic use of comprehensive neuropsychological assessments, are provided in the article. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patients with a malignant glioma would benefit from tailored and proactive outreach about work-related issues bv relevant professionals.
RESUMO
One in three people will be diagnosed with cancer during their lifetime. The community of cancer patients is growing, and several common cancers are becoming increasingly chronic; thus, cancer survivorship is an important part of health care. A large body of research indicates that cancer and cancer therapies are associated with cognitive impairment. This research has mainly concentrated on chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment but, with the arrival of immunotherapies, the focus is expected to widen and the number of studies investigating the potential cognitive effects of these new therapies is rising. Meanwhile, patients with cognitive impairment and their healthcare providers are eagerly awaiting effective approaches to intervene against the cognitive effects of cancer treatment. In this Review, we take stock of the progress that has been made and discuss the steps that need to be taken to accelerate research into the biology underlying cognitive decline following chemotherapy and immunotherapy and to develop restorative and preventive interventions. We also provide recommendations to clinicians on how to best help patients who are currently experiencing cognitive impairment.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Neoplasias , Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Cognitiva/terapia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Introduction: Increasingly more adolescent and young adult (AYA, aged 18-39 years) patients with an uncertain and/or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP) are gaining life-years because of novel treatments or refinement of established therapies, and sometimes even face the prospect of long-term disease control. This study aims to examine the challenges of AYAs with a UPCP in daily life to inform the development of AYA care programs. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted among AYAs with a UPCP. Since we expected differences in experiences between three AYA subgroups, we interviewed patients of these subgroups (1): traditional survivors (2), low-grade glioma survivors, and (3) new survivors. Interviews were analyzed using elements of grounded theory. AYA patients were actively involved as research partners. Results: In total 46 AYAs with UPCP participated and shared their challenges in daily life. They were on average 33.4 years old (age range 23-44) and most of them were women (63%). The most common tumor types were low-grade gliomas (16), sarcomas (7), breast cancers (6), and lung cancers (6). We identified five primary themes: (1) feeling inferior to previous self and others (e.g. feeling useless, who wants me in a relationship), (2) feeling of being alone (e.g. lonely thoughts, nobody really gets me), (3) ongoing confrontation (e.g. it is always there, own decline), (4) grief about life (e.g. grief about life I did not get, grief about old life), and (5) loss of control over the future (e.g. not able to make future plans, waiting for growth). Although all of the challenges were identified in the three AYA subgroups, the perceived intensity of the challenges differed slightly between the subgroups. Discussion: AYAs living with a UPCP experience challenges associated to their sense of altered identity, their position in the social network, and the future uncertainties. This study highlights the importance to recognize and acknowledge the unique challenges of this group. To provide age-specific care, it is important to embed acceptance and commitment therapy and AYA peer support within the healthcare system and other care programs to support AYAs to live well with their disease.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common glial primary brain tumour, is without exception lethal. Every year approximately 600 patients are diagnosed with this heterogeneous disease in The Netherlands. Despite neurosurgery, chemo -and radiation therapy, these tumours inevitably recur. Currently, there is no gold standard at time of recurrence and treatment options are limited. Unfortunately, the results of dedicated trials with new drugs have been very disappointing. The goal of the project is to obtain the evidence for changing standard of care (SOC) procedures to include whole genome sequencing (WGS) and consequently adapt care guidelines for this specific patient group with very poor prognosis by offering optimal and timely benefit from novel therapies, even in the absence of traditional registration trials for this small volume cancer indication. METHODS: The GLOW study is a prospective diagnostic cohort study executed through collaboration of the Hartwig Medical Foundation (Hartwig, a non-profit organisation) and twelve Dutch centers that perform neurosurgery and/or treat GBM patients. A total of 200 patients with a first recurrence of a glioblastoma will be included. Dual primary endpoint is the percentage of patients who receive targeted therapy based on the WGS report and overall survival. Secondary endpoints include WGS report success rate and number of targeted treatments available based on WGS reports and number of patients starting a treatment in presence of an actionable variant. At recurrence, study participants will undergo SOC neurosurgical resection. Tumour material will then, together with a blood sample, be sent to Hartwig where it will be analysed by WGS. A diagnostic report with therapy guidance, including potential matching off-label drugs and available clinical trials will then be sent back to the treating physician for discussing of the results in molecular tumour boards and targeted treatment decision making. DISCUSSION: The GLOW study aims to provide the scientific evidence for changing the SOC diagnostics for patients with a recurrent glioblastoma by investigating complete genome diagnostics to maximize treatment options for this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186064.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Doença Crônica , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/terapia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sequenciamento Completo do GenomaRESUMO
AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis (ICI-iE) is a rare but life-threatening toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aim to identify the characteristics of ICI-iE and describe factors that discriminate it from herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis and anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, as two alternative entities of encephalitis. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, we collected patients with ICI-iE reported to the Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology from January 2015 to September 2021 and compared their clinical features and outcome with 46 consecutive patients with HSV-1 or anti-LGI1 encephalitis who were treated at a German neurological referral centre. RESULTS: Thirty cases of ICI-iE, 25 cases of HSV-1 encephalitis and 21 cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis were included. Clinical presentation of ICI-iE was highly variable and resembled that of HSV-1 encephalitis, while impairment of consciousness (66% vs. 5%, p = .007), confusion (83% vs. 43%; p = .02), disorientation (83% vs. 29%; p = .007) and aphasia (43% vs. 0%; p = .007) were more common in ICI-iE than in anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Antineuronal antibodies (17/18, 94%) and MRI (18/30, 60%) were mostly negative in ICI-iE, but cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed pleocytosis and/or elevated protein levels in almost all patients (28/29, 97%). Three patients (10%) died of ICI-iE. Early immunosuppressive treatment was associated with better outcome (r = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: ICI-iE is a heterogeneous entity without specific clinical features. CSF analysis has the highest diagnostic value, as it reveals inflammatory changes in most patients and enables the exclusion of infection. Early treatment of ICI-iE is essential to prevent sequelae and death.
Assuntos
Encefalite , Glioma , Herpesvirus Humano 1 , Autoanticorpos , Estudos de Coortes , Encefalite/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular , Leucina , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Over the past decade, cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved the outcome of many malignancies. However, with the broad use of ICIs, neurological immune related adverse events (irAE) are increasingly recognized. ICI-induced encephalitis (ICI-iE) is a particularly severe irAE, often leading to treatment termination, long-term sequalae or death. Despite its high morbidity and mortality, data on clinical features and diagnostic criteria are limited. We aimed to define clinical, radiologic and laboratory characteristics of ICI-iE and identify factors that discriminate it from anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated (anti-LGI)-1 encephalitis and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis - two alternative causes of encephalitis - to increase the awareness of ICI-iE and improve its diagnosis and management. To that end, we retrospectively collected 30 cases of ICI-iE that were reported to the Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO) and 46 cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis or herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 encephalitis that presented to a large German neurological referral center (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin) between January 2015 and September 2021. Signs and symptoms, imaging and electroencephalogram features, laboratory findings and outcome measures were assessed using standardized case report forms as well as patients' medical records and compared between the groups. The data reported here represents the largest primary cohort of patients with ICI-iE to date and the first comparison with other types of encephalitis. As all three disorders - ICI-iE, HSV-1 encephalitis and anti-LGI1 encephalitis - are rare neurological entities, this dataset can be used as a reference in future clinical studies on ICI-induced neurotoxicity, neurological autoimmune disorders, and central nervous system infections.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Validation of the 2016 RANO MRI scorecard for leptomeningeal metastasis failed for multiple reasons. Accordingly, this joint EORTC Brain Tumor Group and RANO effort sought to prospectively validate a revised MRI scorecard for response assessment in leptomeningeal metastasis. METHODS: Coded paired cerebrospinal MRI of 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid cancers at baseline and follow-up after treatment and instructions for assessment were provided via the EORTC imaging platform. The Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the interobserver pairwise agreement. RESULTS: Thirty-five raters participated, including 9 neuroradiologists, 17 neurologists, 4 radiation oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, and 2 medical oncologists. Among single leptomeningeal metastases-related imaging findings at baseline, the best median concordance was noted for hydrocephalus (Kappa = 0.63), and the worst median concordance for spinal linear enhancing disease (Kappa = 0.46). The median concordance of raters for the overall response assessment was moderate (Kappa = 0.44). Notably, the interobserver agreement for the presence of parenchymal brain metastases at baseline was fair (Kappa = 0.29) and virtually absent for their response to treatment. 394 of 700 ratings (20 patients x 35 raters, 56%) were fully completed. In 308 of 394 fully completed ratings (78%), the overall response assessment perfectly matched the summary interpretation of the single ratings as proposed in the scorecard instructions. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the principle utility of the new scorecard, but also indicates the need for training of MRI assessment with a dedicated reviewer panel in clinical trials. Electronic case report forms with "blocking options" may be required to enforce completeness and quality of scoring.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinomatose Meníngea , Oncologistas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of ischemic stroke in patients with asymptomatic vertebral artery stenosis is unknown. We examined the incidence of posterior circulation ischemic stroke in patients with asymptomatic stenosis of the vertebral artery origin (VAo). METHODS: We studied a hospital-based cohort of 3717 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 52 to 68 years) with atherosclerotic arterial disease enrolled in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study. We included patients in whom duplex ultrasound of the carotid artery and vertebral artery had been performed. Patients with symptomatic VAo stenosis or planned revascularization of the carotid artery or vertebral artery were excluded. Data were analyzed with Cox regression; hazard ratios were adjusted for age and vascular risk factors. RESULTS: In 282 patients (7.6%), asymptomatic VAo stenosis>50% was diagnosed with duplex ultrasound. During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (SD, 3.0), posterior circulation ischemic stroke occurred in 5 of the 282 patients with asymptomatic VAo stenosis at baseline (annual stroke rate, 0.4%) and in 12 of the 3435 patients without VAo stenosis (annual stroke rate, <0.1%). The risk of posterior circulation ischemic stroke was higher in patients with VAo stenosis than in patients without VAo stenosis (hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 13.1) and was further increased in patients with both VAo and carotid artery stenosis (hazard ratio, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.0 to 37.3). In multivariable analysis, this risk remained essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with atherosclerotic arterial disease and asymptomatic VAo stenosis have a higher risk of posterior circulation ischemic stroke than patients without such a stenosis, but the absolute risk remains low.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/epidemiologia , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/complicações , Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Clinicians are recommended to use the clinical reasoning framework developed by the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) to provide guidance regarding assessment of the cervical spine and potential for cervical artery dysfunction prior to manual therapy and exercise. However, the interexaminer agreement and reliability of this framework is unknown. This study aimed to estimate the interexaminer agreement and reliability of the IFOMPT framework among physical therapists in primary care. METHODS: Ninety-six patients who consulted a physical therapist for neck pain or headache were included in the study. Each patient was tested independently by 2 physical therapists, from a group of 17 physical therapists (10 pairs) across The Netherlands. Patients and examiners were blinded to the test results. The overall interexaminer agreement, specific agreement per risk category (high-, intermediate-, and low-risk), and interexaminer reliability (weighted κ) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall agreement was 71% (specific agreement in high-risk category = 63%; specific agreement in intermediate-risk category = 38%; specific agreement in low-risk category = 84%). Overall reliability was moderate (weighted κ = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.21-0.57) and varied considerably between pairs of physical therapists (κ = 0.14-1.00). CONCLUSION: The IFOMPT framework showed an insufficient interexaminer agreement and fair interexaminer reliability among physical therapists when screening the increased risks for vascular complications following manual therapy and exercise prior to treatment. IMPACT: The IFOMPT framework contributes to the safety of manual therapy and exercise. It is widely adopted in clinical practice and educational programs, but the measurement properties are unknown. This project describes the agreement and reliability of the IFOMPT framework.
Assuntos
Artérias Carótidas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Cervicalgia/terapia , Fisioterapeutas , Adulto , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/fisiopatologia , Países Baixos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The EANO ESMO guidelines have proposed a classification of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid cancers based on clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology presentation. MRI patterns are classified as linear, nodular, both, or neither. Type I LM is defined by positive CSF cytology (confirmed LM) whereas type II LM is defined by typical clinical and MRI signs (probable or possible LM). Here we explored the clinical utility of these LM subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assembled data from 254 patients with newly diagnosed LM from solid tumors. Survival curves were derived using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. RESULTS: Median age at LM diagnosis was 56 years. Typical clinical LM features were noted in 225 patients (89%); 13 patients (5%) were clinically asymptomatic. Tumor cells in the CSF were observed in 186 patients (73%) whereas the CSF was equivocal in 24 patients (9.5%) and negative in 44 patients (17.5%). Patients with confirmed LM had inferior outcome compared with patients with probable or possible LM (P = 0.006). Type I patients had inferior outcome than type II patients (P = 0.002). Nodular disease on MRI was a negative prognostic factor in type II LM (P = 0.014), but not in type I LM. Administration of either intrathecal pharmacotherapy (P = 0.020) or systemic pharmacotherapy (P = 0.0004) was associated with improved outcome in type I LM, but not in type II LM. CONCLUSION: The EANO ESMO LM subtypes are highly prognostic and should be considered for stratification and overall design of clinical trials.