Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part I-diagnostics and preoperative planning.

PURPOSE: The aim of this ESSKA consensus is to give recommendations based on evidence and expert opinion to improve diagnosis, preoperative planning, indication and surgical strategy in ACL revision. METHODS: The European expert surgeons and scientists were divided into four groups to participate in this consensus. A "literature group" (four surgeons); "steering group" (14 surgeons and scientists); "rating group" (19 surgeons) and finally "peer review group" (51 representatives of the ESSKA-affiliated national societies from 27 countries). The steering group prepared eighteen question-answer sets. The quality of the answers received grades of recommendation ranging from A (high-level scientific support), to B (scientific presumption), C (low level scientific support) or D (expert opinion). These question-answer sets were then evaluated by the rating group. All answers were scored from 1 to 9. The comments of the rating group were incorporated by the steering group and the consensus was submitted to the rating group a second time. Once a general consensus was reached between the steering and rating groups, the question-answer sets were submitted to the peer review group. A final combined meeting of all the members of the consensus was held to ratify the document. RESULTS: The literature review for the diagnosis and preoperative planning of ACL revision revealed a rather low scientific quality. None of the 18 questions was graded A and six received a grade B. The mean rating of all the questions by the rating group was 8.4 ± 0.3. The questions and recommendations are listed below. CONCLUSION: ACL revision surgery is a widely debated subject with many different opinions and techniques. The literature reveals a poor level of standardisation. Therefore, this international consensus project is of great importance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II-surgical strategy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this ESSKA consensus is to give recommendations based on scientific evidence and expert opinion to improve the diagnosis, preoperative planning, indication and surgical strategy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament revision. METHODS: Part 2, presented herein, followed exactly the same methodology as Part 1: the so-called ESSKA formal consensus derived from the Delphi method. Eighteen questions were ultimately asked. The quality of the answers received the following grades of recommendation: Grade A (high level scientific support), Grade B (scientific presumption), Grade C (low level scientific support) or Grade D (expert opinion). All answers were scored from 1 to 9 by the raters. Once a general consensus had been reached between the steering and rating groups, the question-answer sets were submitted to the peer-review group. A final combined meeting of all the members of the consensus was then held to ratify the document. RESULTS: The review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the surgical strategy in cases of ACL reconstruction failure. Of the 18 questions, only 1 received a Grade A rating; 5, a Grade B rating; and 9, grades of C or D. The three remaining complex questions received further evaluations for each portion of the question and were looked at in more detail for the following grades: B and D; A, C and D; or A, B, C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.0 + - 1.1. The questions and recommendations are listed in the article. CONCLUSION: ACL revision surgery, especially the surgical strategy, is a widely debated subject with many different opinions and techniques. The literature reveals a poor level of standardization. Therefore, this international European consensus project is of great importance and clinical relevance for guiding the management of ACL revision in adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

PURPOSE: The aim of the ESSKA 2022 consensus Part III was to develop patient-focused, contemporary, evidence-based, guidelines on the indications for revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery (ACLRev). METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was used to provide recommendations on the appropriateness of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment in different clinical scenarios based on current scientific evidence in conjunction with expert opinion. A core panel defined the clinical scenarios with a moderator and then guided a panel of 17 voting experts through the RAM tasks. Through a two-step voting process, the panel established a consensus as to the appropriateness of ACLRev for each scenario based on a nine-point Likert scale (in which a score in the range 1-3 was considered 'inappropriate', 4-6 'uncertain', and 7-9 'appropriate'). RESULTS: The criteria used to define the scenarios were: age (18-35 years vs 36-50 years vs 51-60 years), sports activity and expectation (Tegner 0-3 vs 4-6 vs 7-10), instability symptoms (yes vs no), meniscus status (functional vs repairable vs non-functional meniscus), and osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade 0-I-II vs grade III). Based on these variables, a set of 108 clinical scenarios was developed. ACLRev was considered appropriate in 58%, inappropriate in 12% (meaning conservative treatment is indicated), and uncertain in 30%. Experts considered ACLRev appropriate for patients with instability symptoms, aged ≤ 50 years, regardless of sports activity level, meniscus status, and OA grade. Results were much more controversial in patients without instability symptoms, while higher inappropriateness was related to scenarios with older age (51-60 years), low sporting expectation, non-functional meniscus, and knee OA (KL III). CONCLUSION: This expert consensus establishes guidelines as to the appropriateness of ACLRev based on defined criteria and provides a useful reference for clinical practice in determining treatment indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Polyurethane scaffold implants for partial meniscus lesions: delayed intervention leads to an inferior outcome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of the implantation of an aliphatic polyurethane scaffold for the treatment of partial loss of meniscal tissue at a mean follow-up of 36 months. METHODS: A retrospective review on prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent implantation of an aliphatic polyurethane-based synthetic meniscal scaffold. Patients were evaluated for demographics data, lesion and implant characteristics (sizing, type and number of meniscal sutures), previous and combined surgeries and complications. Clinical parameters were rated using NRS, IKDC subjective, Lysholm, KOOS, and Tegner activity score, both preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 36 months (48 M and 19 F; mean age 40.8 ± 10.6 years; mean BMI 25.4 ± 4.3). The scaffold was implanted on the medial side in 54 cases, and on the lateral one in 13. Forty-seven patients had undergone previous surgical treatment at the same knee and 45 required combined surgical procedures. All evaluated scores improved significantly from the baseline. Among possible prognostic factors, a delayed scaffold implantation had lower post-operative clinical scores: IKDC subjective (P = 0.049), KOOS Sport (P = 0.044), KOOS total (p = 0.011), and Tegner (P = 0.03) scores at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation led to a significant clinical benefit in a large number of patients. A delayed intervention correlated with worse results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Good mid-term outcomes and low rates of residual rotatory laxity, complications and failures after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).

BACKGROUND: Residual rotational instability remains a controversial factor when analysing failure rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Anatomical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated a very important role of anterolateral structures for rotational control. Revision ACL is considered one of the main indications for a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Yet, few series evaluating these procedures are published. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of studies that assessed outcomes in patients treated with revision ACL surgery associated with a lateral extra-articular procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in February 2018 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Search and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were series of ACL revision reconstructions associated with lateral extra-articular procedures. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, subjective IKDC, KOOS, Cincinnati and WOMAC), joint stability measures (Lachman test, pivot-shift, arthrometer assessment and navigation assessment), graft type, reported chondral and meniscal injury, radiographic outcomes, complications and failures were recorded. Articles were assessed for level of evidence and methodology using a modification of the ACL Methodology Score (AMS) system. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of the 231 abstracts; 9 retrospective evaluations, two prospective cohorts and one combination of two populations (a retrospective and prospective series). A total of 851 patients evaluated with a mean age of 28.8 years (range 16-68 years) and a weighted mean follow-up of 4.9 years (range 1-10 years). The mean time from primary ACL reconstruction to revision was 5.3 years (reported in 7 studies, including 710 patients). The Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS scores indicated favorable results in studies that reported these outcomes. Objective evaluations reported 86% objective A and B IKDC results, 2.6 mm mean side-to-side arthrometric difference and 80% negative pivot-shift. About 74% of patients returned to their previous sport (evaluated in six studies). Few studies reported radiological evaluation. Fifty-nine complications (8.0%) and 24 failures (3.6%) were reported. The mean modified ACL Methodology Score was 55.5 (range 32-72). CONCLUSION: Good mid-term results were obtained for combined revision ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular procedures. Despite the fact that in clinical practice LET are a common indication associated with revision ACL, there are no high-level studies supporting this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The use of allograft tissue in posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Currently both autograft and allograft tissues are available for reconstruction of posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee injuries. Decision-making is based on a complex interplay between anatomical structures, functional bundles and varying biomechanical requirements. Despite theoretically better biological healing and reduced risk of disease transmission autografts are associated with donor site morbidity as well as being limited by size and quantity. The use of allografts eliminates donor-site morbidity but raises cost and issues of clinical effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to review current concepts and evidence for the use of allografts in primary posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament reconstructions. METHODS: A narrative review of the relevant literature was conducted for PCL, collateral ligament and multi-ligament knee reconstruction. Studies were identified using a targeted and systematic search with focus on recent comparative studies and all clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The rationale and principles of management underpinning the role of allograft tissue were identified and the clinical and functional outcomes were analysed. Finally, the position of postoperative physiotherapy and rehabilitation was identified. RESULTS: The review demonstrated paucity in high quality and up-to-date results addressing the issue especially on collaterals and multi-ligament reconstructions. There was no significant evidence of superiority of a graft type over another for PCL reconstruction. Contemporary principles in the management of posterolateral corner, MCL and multi-ligament injuries support the use of allograft tissue. CONCLUSION: The present review demonstrates equivalent clinical results with the use of autografts or allografts. It remains, however, difficult to generate a conclusive evidence-based approach due to the paucity of high-level research. When confronted by the need for combined reconstructions with multiple grafts, preservation of synergistic muscles, and adapted postoperative rehabilitation; the current evidence does offer support for the use of allograft tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Protocol and descriptive epidemiology of the SIGASCOT Italian multicentric registry of revision ACL reconstruction: a 1-year pilot study.

The aim of the present study was to present the demographic and baseline results of the first year of course of the SIGASCOT Italian registry of Revision ACL reconstruction.The data of the patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction, enrolled in by 20 SIGASCOT members from March 2015 to May 2016, were extracted from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS). Overall, 126 patients were enrolled; 18 were excluded due to incomplete data. Mean age at surgery was 30.4 ± 9.3 years (median 29; 23-38), mean BMI was 22.6 ± 2.3 kg/m2 and 77% were males. Revision was performed with a single-bundle technique in 94%, using allograft in 57% of cases and autograft in 43%. Only 28% had both menisci intact, and meniscal repair or replacement was performed in 25% of patients for medial meniscus and 8% for lateral meniscus. During the first year of enrollment, the SIGASCOT Italian ACL revision registry was able to collect the data of more than 100 patients. The revision ACL reconstruction was usually performed with a single-bundle technique, using allograft and autograft almost in the same extent.

A multilayer biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration shows superiority vs microfractures for the treatment of osteochondral lesions in a multicentre randomized trial at 2 years.

PURPOSE: The increasing awareness on the role of subchondral bone in the etiopathology of articular surface lesions led to the development of osteochondral scaffolds. While safety and promising results have been suggested, there are no trials proving the real potential of the osteochondral regenerative approach. Aim was to assess the benefit provided by a nanostructured collagen-hydroxyapatite (coll-HA) multilayer scaffold for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral knee lesions. METHODS: In this multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial, 100 patients affected by symptomatic chondral and osteochondral lesions were treated and evaluated for up to 2 years (51 study group and 49 control group). A biomimetic coll-HA scaffold was studied, and bone marrow stimulation (BMS) was used as reference intervention. Primary efficacy measurement was IKDC subjective score at 2 years. Secondary efficacy measurements were: KOOS, IKDC Knee Examination Form, Tegner and VAS Pain scores evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months. Tissue regeneration was evaluated with MRI MOCART scoring system at 6, 12 and 24 months. An external independent agency was involved to ensure data correctness and objectiveness. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement of all clinical scores was obtained from basal evaluation to 2-year follow-up in both groups, although no overall statistically significant differences were detected between the two treatments. Conversely, the subgroup of patients affected by deep osteochondral lesions (i.e. Outerbridge grade IV and OCD) showed a statistically significant better IKDC subjective outcome (+12.4 points, p = 0.036) in the coll-HA group. Statistically significant better results were also found for another challenging group: sport active patients (+16.0, p = 0.027). Severe adverse events related to treatment were documented only in three patients in the coll-HA group and in one in the BMS group. The MOCART score showed no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the safety and potential of a biomimetic implant. While no statistically significant differences were found compared to BMS for chondral lesions, this procedure can be considered a suitable option for the treatment of osteochondral lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Early osteoarthritis of the knee.

There is an increasing awareness on the importance in identifying early phases of the degenerative processes in knee osteoarthritis (OA), the crucial period of the disease when there might still be the possibility to initiate treatments preventing its progression. Early OA may show a diffuse and ill-defined involvement, but also originate in the cartilage surrounding a focal lesion, thus necessitating a separate assessment of these two entities. Early OA can be considered to include a maximal involvement of 50 % of the cartilage thickness based on the macroscopic ICRS classification, reflecting an OARSI grade 4. The purpose of this paper was to provide an updated review of the current status of the diagnosis and definition of early knee OA, including the clinical, radiographical, histological, MRI, and arthroscopic definitions and biomarkers. Based on current evidence, practical classification criteria are presented. As new insights and technologies become available, they will further evolve to better define and treat early knee OA.

Early osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint.

Patellofemoral joint cartilage lesions are associated with a variety of clinical situations including blunt trauma, lateral patella dislocations, or as a secondary development in the setting of abnormal joint loading. There is a need for more clarity on how to best address these lesions. Most specifically, when is it necessary to surgically treat these lesions of the patella and trochlea and which technique to use? This review will focus on the spectrum of patellofemoral disease/injury and their treatment strategies, with special emphasis on cartilage damage and early osteoarthritis. Chapter sections will review the most common scenarios of cartilage damage in the patellofemoral joint, with an attempt to summarize current treatment, their outcomes, remaining challenges and unanswered questions.

Load distribution in early osteoarthritis.

Total knee replacement is an accepted standard of care for the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis with good results in the vast majority of older patients. The use in younger and more active populations, however, remains controversial due to concerns over activity restrictions, implant survival, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. It is in these younger patient populations that alternatives to arthroplasty are increasingly being explored. Historically, osteotomy was utilized to address unicompartmental pain from degeneration and overload, for example, after meniscectomy. Utilization rates of osteotomy have fallen in recent years due to the increasing popularity of partial and total knee arthroplasty. This article explores the indications and outcomes of traditional unloading osteotomy, as well as newer options that are less invasive and offer faster return to function.

The role of meniscal tissue in joint protection in early osteoarthritis.

It is widely accepted that partial meniscectomy leads to early onset of osteoarthritis (OA). A strong correlation exists between the amount and location of the resected meniscus and the development of degenerative changes in the knee. On the other hand, osteoarthritic changes of the joint alter the structural and functional integrity of meniscal tissue. These alterations might additionally compromise the limited healing capacity of the meniscus. In young, active patients without cartilage damage, meniscus therapy including partial meniscectomy, meniscus suture, and meniscus replacement has proven beneficial effects in long-term studies. Even in an early osteoarthritic milieu, there is a relevant regenerative potential of the meniscus and the surrounding cartilage. This potential should be taken into account, and meniscal surgery can be performed with the correct timing and the proper indication even in the presence of early OA.

Spatial Transcriptomics in a Case of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma Reveals Clone-Specific Dysregulation of Genes Regulating Extracellular Matrix in the Invading Front.

Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) is recognized by its ability to invade the tumor capsule and blood vessels, although the exact molecular signals orchestrating this phenotype remain elusive. In this study, the spatial transcriptional landscape of an FTC is detailed with comparisons between the invasive front and histologically indolent central core tumor areas. The Visium spatial gene expression platform allowed us to interrogate and visualize the whole transcriptome in 2D across formalin-fixated paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. Four different 6 × 6 mm areas of an FTC were scrutinized, including regions with capsular and vascular invasion, capsule-near area without invasion, and a central core area of the tumor. Following successful capturing and sequencing, several expressional clusters were identified with regional variation. Most notably, invasive tumor cell clusters were significantly over-expressing genes associated with pathways interacting with the extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Subsets of these genes (POSTN and DPYSL3) were additionally validated using immunohistochemistry in an independent cohort of follicular thyroid tumors showing a clear gradient pattern from the core to the periphery of the tumor. Moreover, the reconstruction of the evolutionary tree identified the invasive clones as late events in follicular thyroid tumorigenesis. To our knowledge, this is one of the first 2D global transcriptional mappings of FTC using this platform to date. Invasive FTC clones develop in a stepwise fashion and display significant dysregulation of genes associated with the ECM and EMT - thus highlighting important molecular crosstalk for further investigations.

Atrophic changes in thyroid tumors are strong indicators of underlying DICER1 mutations: a bi-institutional genotype-phenotype correlation study.

Somatic and biallelic DICER1 mutations are reported in subsets of thyroid tumors, supporting the role of this gene in thyroid tumor development. As recent studies have brought attention to macrofollicular patterns, atrophic changes, and papillary structures as being associated with DICER1 mutations, we sought to explore these observations in a bi-institutional cohort. A total of 61 thyroid lesions (54 tumors and 7 cases of thyroid follicular nodular disease; TFND), including 26 DICER1 mutated and 35 DICER1 wildtype controls were subjected to histological re-investigation and clinical follow-up. DICER1-mutated lesions showed a statistically significant association with younger age at surgery (29.2 ± 12.5 versus 51.3 ± 18.8, p = 0.0001), a predominant macrofollicular growth pattern (20/26 mutated cases versus 18/35 wildtype; p = 0.01) and atrophic changes (20/26 mutated cases versus 2/35 wildtype; p = 0.0001). Similar results were obtained when excluding TFND cases. We also present clinical and histological triaging criteria for DICER1 sequencing of thyroid lesions, which led to the identification of DICER1 variants in 16 out of 26 cases (62%) when followed. Among these, 3 out of 12 cases with available data were found to carry a constitutional DICER1 mutation. This observation suggests that the majority of DICER1 mutations are somatic-however implies that sequencing of constitutional tissues could be clinically motivated. We conclude that DICER1 mutations are amassed in younger patients with macrofollicular-patterned tumors and, most strikingly, atrophic changes. Given the rate of constitutional involvement, our findings could be of clinical value, allowing the pathologist to triage cases for genetic testing based on histological findings.

Prevalence, Molecular Landscape, and Clinical Impact of DICER1 and DGCR8 Mutated Follicular-Patterned Thyroid Nodules.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in micro-RNA (miRNA) regulators DICER1 and DGCR8 have recently been uncovered, revealing a potential novel mechanism driving thyroid tumor development. However, the true frequency of these hotspot mutations in follicular-patterned thyroid tumors (FTs) and their relation to established driver gene events remain elusive. METHODS: A total of 440 FTs from 2 institutions were interrogated for DICER1, DGCR8, and RAS family hotspot mutations using Sanger sequencing. Whole-exome sequencing was also performed to identify additional driver gene aberrations in DICER1/DGCR8-mutant cases. Subsets of cases were further analyzed using miRNA expression profiling, and key dysregulated miRNAs were validated as markers of DICER1 mutations using quantitative RT-PCR analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was also probed for DICER1/DGCR8 mutations and miRNA dysregulation. RESULTS: Fourteen (3.2%) and 4 (1%) FTs harbored DICER1 and DGCR8 hotspot mutations, respectively, in the combined cohort, and no cases with normal tissue available were found to exhibit a constitutional variant. Two DGCR8-mutant cases also harbored oncogenic RAS mutations. Whole-exome sequencing analysis did not identify additional driver gene events in DICER1/DGCR8-positive cases. Comprehensive miRNA expression profiling revealed a unique pattern of dysregulated miRNAs in DICER1/DGCR8-mutant cases compared with wild-type lesions. Moreover, DICER1-mutant cases showed a remarkable reduction of 5' arm miRNAs, findings corroborated in the TCGA cohort. CONCLUSION: DICER1 and DGCR8 hotspot mutations are rare in unselected cohorts of FTs, and mutated cases exhibit a specific miRNA profile. Although DGCR8 mutations may coexist with established RAS gene alterations, FTs with DICER1 variants were devoid of other driver gene events.

Inhibition of ALK-Signaling Overcomes STRN-ALK-Induced Downregulation of the Sodium Iodine Symporter and Restores Radioiodine Uptake in Thyroid Cells.

Background: Radioiodine (RAI) is commonly used for thyroid cancer treatment, although its therapeutic benefits are restricted to iodine-avid tumors. The RAI-refractory disease develops with tumor dedifferentiation involving loss of sodium-iodine symporter (NIS). Thyroid cancers driven by ALK fusions are prone to dedifferentiation, and whether targeted ALK inhibition may enhance RAI uptake in these tumors remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the levels of NIS expression during the progression of ALK fusion-driven thyroid cancer, assess the effects of ALK activation on NIS-mediated RAI uptake, and test pharmacological options for its modulation. Methods: The expression of NIS at different stages of ALK-driven carcinogenesis was analyzed using a mouse model of STRN-ALK-driven thyroid cancer. For in vitro experiments, a system of doxycycline-inducible expression of STRN-ALK was generated using PCCL3 normal thyroid cells. The STRN-ALK-induced effects were evaluated with quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, immunofluorescence, RNA sequencing, and gene sets pathways analyses. RAI uptake was measured using 131I. Treatment experiments were done with FDA-approved ALK inhibitors (crizotinib and ceritinib), MEK inhibitor selumetinib, and JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Results: We found that Nis downregulation occurred early in ALK-driven thyroid carcinogenesis, even at the stage of well-differentiated cancer, with a complete loss in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Acute STRN-ALK expression in thyroid cells resulted in increased MAPK, JAK/STAT3, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling outputs associated with significant ALK-dependent downregulation of the majority of thyroid differentiation and iodine metabolism/transport genes, including Slc5a5 (Nis), Foxe1, Dio1, Duox1/2, Duoxa2, Glis3, Slc5a8, and Tg. Moreover, STRN-ALK expression in thyroid cells induced a significant loss of membranous NIS and a fourfold decrease of the NIS-mediated RAI uptake, which were reversed by ALK inhibitors crizotinib and ceritinib. In addition, a strong dose-dependent restoration of NIS with its membranous redistribution in STRN-ALK-expressing thyroid cells was observed after inhibition of MAPK signaling with selumetinib, which exhibited a cumulative effect with JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Conclusions: The findings of this preclinical study showed that ALK fusion-induced downregulation of NIS, the prerequisite of RAI refractoriness, could be reversed in thyroid cells by either direct inhibition of ALK or its downstream signaling pathways.

5hmC Immunohistochemistry: A Predictor of TERT Promoter Mutational Status in Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma?

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene aberrancies correlate to adverse prognosis in follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). As loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) has been associated with TERT promoter mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma, this study sought to analyze the levels of 5hmC in a cohort of follicular thyroid tumors with available TERT data. A total of 29 tumors (26 FTCs, 2 follicular thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential, and 1 oncocytic thyroid carcinoma) with known TERT promoter mutational status and TERT gene expression were assessed for 5hmC immunoreactivity using two antibodies (clones RM236 and 4D9.) Slides were analyzed using a semiquantitative scoring system. Of the 10 tumor cases with aberrant TERT, only 1 scored negative with both antibodies (1/10; 10%), whereas the remaining 9 cases (9/10; 90%) exhibited some positivity for at least one antibody. Of the 19 TERT wild-type tumors, no case was scored negative using RM236, and 2 cases (2/19; 11%) using 4D9. The differences between TERT promoter mutated and wild-type groups were non-significant. The sensitivity and specificity for 5hmC immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect mutated cases were 10% and 100% (RM236) and 20% and 89% (4D9). Therefore, 5hmC IHC is not a sensitive marker for detecting TERT promoter mutations in follicular thyroid tumors.

Autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue injection provides significant and prolonged clinical improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a case-series study.

PURPOSE: Among the conservative strategies to manage patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), an innovative approach exploiting the regenerative capability of adipose tissue and its resident MSCs (Mesenchymal Stem Cells or Medicinal Signalling Cells) has been proposed with encouraging results. This study aims to demonstrate the benefits of autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MAT) injection in the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis and whether any variables may affect the outcome. This is a case series single-centre study in which patients underwent intraarticular MAT injection without any associated procedures. METHODS: Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 patients (67 Knees) were included and retrospectively analysed with a mean follow-up of 34.04 ± 13.62 months (minimum 11 - maximum 59). Patients were assessed through the WOMAC and KOOS questionnaires at baseline (pre-treatment) and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-up. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of at least 7.5 points for the WOMAC pain scale and 7.2 for the WOMAC function scale compared to the baseline value was used. RESULTS: WOMAC and KOOS scores improved after treatment compared to baseline at all follow-ups with p < 0.001. Male gender and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2 were associated with smaller improvement in WOMAC and KOOS scores (with respect to females and to KL grade 1, respectively) up to 24 months. The percentage of patients who reach the MCID for WOMAC pain is generally lower than that of patients who reach the MCID for WOMAC function (around 80% at all time points), but it increases significantly over time. Moreover, the baseline score of the WOMAC pain and function influence the outcome. Patients with worse symptoms are more likely to reach the MCID. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular knee injection of MAT for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), recalcitrant to traditional conservative treatments, proved to be effective in a high percentage of cases. The positive association between a worse pre-operative score and a better clinical response to the treatment would support the idea that intra-articular administration of MAT could be considered in patients with very symptomatic KOA in which joint-replacement surgeries are not indicated (or accepted). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.