RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients on hemodialysis have an elevated risk for COVID-19 but were not included in efficacy trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study to estimate the real-world effectiveness and immunogenicity of two mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a large, representative population of adult hemodialysis patients in the United States. In separate, parallel analyses, patients who began a vaccination series with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in January and February 2021 were matched with unvaccinated patients and risk for outcomes were compared for days 1-21, 22-42, and ≥43 after first dose. In a subset of consented patients, blood samples were collected approximately 28 days after the second dose and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G was measured. RESULTS: A total of 12,169 patients received the BNT162b2 vaccine (matched with 44,377 unvaccinated controls); 23,037 patients received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (matched with 63,243 unvaccinated controls). Compared with controls, vaccinated patients' risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 postvaccination became progressively lower during the study period (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for BNT162b2 was 0.21 [0.13, 0.35] and for mRNA-1273 was 0.27 [0.17, 0.42] for days ≥43). After a COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccinated patients were significantly less likely than unvaccinated patients to be hospitalized (for BNT162b2, 28.0% versus 43.4%; for mRNA-1273, 37.2% versus 45.6%) and significantly less likely to die (for BNT162b2, 4.0% versus 12.1%; for mRNA-1273, 5.6% versus 14.5%). Antibodies were detected in 98.1% (309/315) and 96.0% (308/321) of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis, vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and lower risk of hospitalization or death among those diagnosed with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in nearly all patients after vaccination. These findings support the use of these vaccines in this population.
Assuntos
Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/administração & dosagem , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/imunologia , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective among patients on dialysis. Because individual vaccines may be differentially available or acceptable to patients, it is important to understand comparative effectiveness relative to other vaccines, such those on the basis of adenovirus technologies. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical effectiveness of adenovirus vector-based Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) to mRNA-based BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) in a contemporary cohort of patients on dialysis. Patients who received a first BNT162b2 dose were matched 1:1 to Ad26.COV2.S recipients on the basis of date of first vaccine receipt, US state of residence, site of dialysis care (in-center versus home), history of COVID-19, and propensity score. The primary outcome was the comparative rate of COVID-19 diagnoses starting in the 7th week postvaccination. In a subset of consented patients who received Ad26.COV2.S, blood samples were collected ≥28 days after vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies were measured. RESULTS: A total of 2572 matched pairs of patients qualified for analysis. Cumulative incidence rates of COVID-19 did not differ for BNT162b2 versus Ad26.COV2.S. No differences were observed in peri-COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths among patients receiving BNT162b2 versus Ad26.COV2.S, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the at-risk period. Results were similar when excluding patients with a history of COVID-19, in subgroup analyses restricted to patients who completed the two-dose BNT162b2 regimen, and in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 59.4% of 244 patients who received Ad26.COV2.S. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of patients on dialysis, no difference was detected in clinical effectiveness of BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S over the first 6 months postvaccination, despite an inconsistent antibody response to the latter.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Adenovirus , COVID-19 , Ad26COVS1 , Adenoviridae/genética , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , RNA Mensageiro , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is rare among individuals with few coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk factors, the ability of naturally acquired immunity to prevent reinfection among patients with ESKD is not known. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted among adults with ESKD treated with in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) in the United States. Exposure was ascribed on the basis of the presence or absence of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, and separately, a history of documented COVID-19 before study entry. Outcomes were assessed after an infection-free period, and were any SARS-CoV-2 infection (i.e., detected by protocolized PCR tests or during routine clinical surveillance), and clinically manifest COVID-19 (consisting of only the latter). RESULTS: Of 2337 consented participants who met study inclusion criteria, 9.5% were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive at baseline; 3.6% had a history of COVID-19. Over 6679 patient-months of follow-up, 263 participants had evidence of any SARS-CoV-2 infection, including 141 who had clinically manifest COVID-19. Presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (versus its absence) at baseline was associated with lower risk of any SARS-CoV-2 infection (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.95) and clinically manifest COVID-19 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.67). CONCLUSION: Among patients with ESKD, naturally acquired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity is associated with a 45% lower risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a 79% lower risk of clinically manifest COVID-19. Because natural immunity is incomplete, patients with ESKD should be prioritized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, independent of their COVID-19 disease history.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/imunologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/imunologia , Diálise Renal , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/farmacologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Reinfecção/complicações , Reinfecção/epidemiologia , Reinfecção/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) being investigated for the treatment of anemia of CKD. In this noninferiority trial, we compared daprodustat administered three times weekly with epoetin alfa (epoetin) in patients on prevalent hemodialysis switching from a prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on hemodialysis with a baseline hemoglobin of 8-11.5 g/dl receiving an ESA were randomized 2:1 to daprodustat three times weekly (n=270) or conventional epoetin (n=137) for 52 weeks. Dosing algorithms aimed to maintain hemoglobin between 10 and 11 g/dl. The primary end point was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the average during the evaluation period (weeks 28-52). The principal secondary end point was average monthly intravenous iron dose. Other secondary end points included BP and hemoglobin variability. RESULTS: Daprodustat three times weekly was noninferior to epoetin for mean change in hemoglobin (model-adjusted mean treatment difference [daprodustat-epoetin], -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.10). During the evaluation period, mean (SD) hemoglobin values were 10.45 (0.55) and 10.51 (0.85) g/dl for daprodustat and epoetin groups, respectively. Responders (defined as mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period in the analysis range of 10 to 11.5 g/dl) were 80% in the daprodustat group versus 64% in the epoetin group. Proportionately fewer participants in the daprodustat group versus the epoetin group had hemoglobin values either below 10 g/dl or above 11.5 g/dl during the evaluation period. Mean monthly intravenous iron use was not significantly lower with daprodustat versus epoetin. The effect on BP was similar between groups. The percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between daprodustat (75%) and epoetin (79%). CONCLUSIONS: Daprodustat was noninferior to epoetin in hemoglobin response and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Three Times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD), NCT03400033.
Assuntos
Anemia , Eritropoetina , Hematínicos , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/etiologia , Epoetina alfa , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobinas , Ferro , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a prevalence of 9.1% globally, and frequently results in elevated serum phosphate, increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients. DS-2330b, an oral NaPi-IIb inhibitor, reduced intestinal phosphate absorption in preclinical studies, but its effect in patients with CKD is unknown. This 2-part, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, single- and repeated-dose, phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of DS-2330b in patients with CKD on HD. METHODS: Part A, a 2-period, 2-way study, evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics of DS-2330b 250 mg in solution and tablet formulations. Part B assessed the safety of DS-2330b in solution (chosen based on results of part A) and its effect on serum phosphate. Patients were randomized to placebo 3 times daily (TID), DS-2330b 400 mg TID, DS-2330b 400 mg with sevelamer 1.6 g TID, and sevelamer 1.6 g with placebo TID for 14 days. Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) monitoring. RESULTS: Six patients completed part A. Two patients experienced serious AEs considered unrelated to DS-2330b treatment. Thirty-two patients enrolled and completed part B. Serum phosphate mean change from baseline ± SD was -2.2±1.5 mg/dl versus -1.9 ± 1.1 mg/dl for DS-2330b monotherapy versus placebo. Patients receiving DS-2330b with sevelamer or sevelamer with placebo experienced the greatest serum phosphate decrease from baseline. Nine patients (28.1%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 7 patients experienced drug-related TEAEs. The TEAE incidence was comparable between DS-2330b and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: DS-2330b, alone or in combination with sevelamer, was safe and well tolerated but did not demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy in HD patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and are poorly responsive to HBV vaccines. Current vaccine recommendations for hemodialysis patients utilize more than twice the amount of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) used for healthy adults and achieve lower immune responses. METHODS: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial was conducted among adults 18 years of age and older who were initiating or undergoing hemodialysis who had not previously received hepatitis B vaccine. Participants received four doses of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) (20 mcg rHBsAg + 3000 mcg CpG 1018, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist) administered at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Participants are being followed for 68 weeks. This paper reports the final immunogenicity analysis of the primary endpoint at study week 20 and an interim safety analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 119 participants receiving hemodialysis who were followed for a median of 47.4 weeks. Of the 119 participants, 75 were in the per-protocol population. At week 20, the seroprotection rate (% with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs] ≥ 10 mIU/mL) was 89.3% and the percentage of participants with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL was 81.3%. The anti-HBs geometric mean concentration was 1061.8 mIU/mL. HepB-CpG was well tolerated with no observed safety concerns. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving hemodialysis, HepB-CpG given as four doses was well tolerated and induced very high anti-HBs concentrations and seroprotection in a very high proportion of recipients.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Hepatite B , Adolescente , Adulto , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluid monitoring is an important management strategy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). The µCor™ Heart Failure and Arrhythmia Management System uses a radiofrequency-based thoracic fluid index (TFI) to track pulmonary edema. During hemodialysis, the acute removal of fluid through ultrafiltration offers a model for measuring a patient's fluid status. The objective of the study was to assess the relationship between the device measured TFI and ultrafiltration volume (UFV). DESIGN SETTING PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients undergoing chronic dialysis with and without heart failure were enrolled in the study. The relationship between TFI and UFV in each individual subject was assessed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The average correlation across all subjects was calculated through the use of the Fisher's z transform. Responder analysis was performed to assess the magnitude of change in TFI before and after dialysis. RESULTS: Twenty subjects were enrolled in the trial. The mean volume of fluid removal was 3.63 L (SD 0.88 L). The mean correlation based on Fisher's transform was 0.95 CI (0.92-0.99). Responder analysis showed that the mean reduction of TFI after dialysis was 5.5% ± 3.8. CONCLUSION: The µCor system provides radiofrequency-based measurements of thoracic fluid which correlate well with total body fluid removal in a real-world setting. Fluid management based on the radar-derived TFI may provide benefits to dialysis patients and serves as a potential model for pulmonary edema common to the clinical course of heart failure.
RESUMO
The mass balance, pharmacokinetics, and biotransformation of JTZ-951 (enarodustat), a novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, were characterized in patients (N = 6) with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Following a 10-mg (100 µCi) oral dose of 14 C-JTZ-951, whole blood, feces, dialysate, and, if feasible, urine were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessments and for metabolite profiling and identification in appropriate matrices. Fecal excretion was the major route of elimination of radioactivity, and urinary excretion a minor route, with mean (coefficient of variation [%CV]) recovery of 77.1 (16.2)% and 10.9 (92.0)% of the dose, respectively. Radioactivity was not detected in the dialysate, and mean (%CV) total recovery in excreta was 88.0 (14.9)%. For parent JTZ-951 in plasma, the mean (%CV) effective half-life was 8.96 (7.7)% hours, and area under the curve over 24 hours comprised the majority (>80%) of total exposure, with relatively low variability in these pharmacokinetic variables. Based on profiling of plasma radioactivity, parent JTZ-951 was the predominant circulating component, accounting for 93.7% or more of radioactivity, and metabolite M2 (hydroxylated product) was the only detectable metabolite, but its exposure was minor (<5%) versus unchanged JTZ-951. In urine and feces, the predominant analyte was JTZ-951, and metabolite M2 was the predominant albeit minor metabolite, with small amounts of other metabolites. Thus, plasma exposure to drug-derived radioactivity was primarily due to parent JTZ-951, and the drug was cleared mainly by excretion of unchanged JTZ-951. The study appropriately characterized the disposition of JTZ-951 in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Glicinas N-Substituídas/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Diálise Renal , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Área Sob a Curva , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glicinas N-Substituídas/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase/farmacocinética , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Triazóis/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patiromer is a potassium (K+) binding polymer indicated for treating hyperkalemia. Among patients receiving chronic hemodialysis (HD), this study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with patiromer initiation, describe patiromer utilization, and analyze serum K+ pre- and post-patiromer initiation. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from a large dialysis provider in the United States (study period: December 21, 2015, to December 20, 2016), HD patients were included who had a medication order for patiromer, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), or laboratory evidence of hyperkalemia (no K+ binder [NoKb] cohort). The index date was the first order for patiromer/SPS, or the first K+ ≥5.0 mEq/l (NoKb cohort), respectively. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient characteristics associated with patiromer initiation. We evaluated patiromer utilization using Kaplan-Meier methodology and proportion of days covered. Serum K+ concentrations were assessed pre- versus post-patiromer initiation. RESULTS: Study cohorts included 527 (patiromer), 852 (SPS), and 8747 (NoKb) HD patients. Median follow-up was 141 days. Patiromer initiators were 2.6 times more likely to have had multiple prior episodes of hyperkalemia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-3.7). Most (61%) commenced patiromer on 8.4 g once daily; 60% of patients' first patiromer order remained open after 180 days. Statistically significant reductions in K+, averaging approximately -0.5 mEq/l, were observed post-patiromer initiation (48% pre-patiromer vs. 22% post-patiromer had K+ ≥6.0 mEq/l [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Patiromer initiators receiving chronic hemodialysis had comparatively more severe, uncontrolled baseline hyperkalemia. Medication order data show long-term patiromer use was associated with significantly reduced K+.
Assuntos
Automóveis , Amor , Médicos/psicologia , Mudança Social , Valores Sociais , Humanos , MinnesotaRESUMO
Acute kidney injury is followed by regeneration of damaged renal tubular epithelial cells. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that renal stem cells exist in the adult kidney and participate in the repair process. A unique population of cells that behave in a manner that is consistent with a renal stem cell were isolated from rat kidneys and were termed multipotent renal progenitor cells (MRPC). Features of these cells include spindle-shaped morphology; self-renewal for >200 population doublings without evidence for senescence; normal karyotype and DNA analysis; and expression of vimentin, CD90 (thy1.1), Pax-2, and Oct4 but not cytokeratin, MHC class I or II, or other markers of more differentiated cells. MRPC exhibit plasticity that is demonstrated by the ability of the cells to be induced to express endothelial, hepatocyte, and neural markers by reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The cells can differentiate into renal tubules when injected under the capsule of an uninjured kidney or intra-arterially after renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oct4 expression was seen in some tubular cells in the adult kidney, suggesting these cells may be candidate renal stem cells. It is proposed that MRPC participate in the regenerative response of the kidney to acute injury.