Association of Follow-Up After an Emergency Department Visit for Mental Illness with Utilization Based Outcomes.

Follow-up within 30 days of an emergency department (ED) visit for mental illness is a new and widely-used quality measure. However, no empirical evidence validates associations between follow-up and subsequent utilization based outcomes. Using Massachusetts all payer claims data, we identified insured individuals with an ED visit for mental illness. Multivariate regression analysis estimated associations between follow-up within 30 days after an ED visit for mental illness with costs, hospitalizations, and additional ED visits in 180 days following the index visit. 63,814 index ED visits were included (56.5% female, mean [SD] age 38.0 [12.1] years, 48% Medicaid covered). 31% of index ED principal diagnoses were for major depressive disorder, 3% schizophrenia, 5% bipolar disorder, 34% anxiety disorder, 0.6% post-traumatic stress disorder, 8% other psychoses, and 19% other mental illness diagnoses. Only 33% of patients had a follow-up visit for mental illness within 30 days. Adjusted regression analyses show timely follow-up is associated with increased costs in the 180 days after (average marginal effect = $1622; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1459, 1786), an increased probability of inpatient hospitalization (2.7 percentage points; 95% CI 0.021, 0.032), and a small reduction in the probability of at least one additional ED visit (- 1.7 percentage points; 95% CI - 0.026 to 0.009). Overall follow-up rates are low; follow-up within 30 days of an ED visit for mental illness is associated with increased costs and increased probability of hospitalization in the follow-up period. It is not known whether increased rates of utilization improve patient outcomes, potentially by receiving appropriate more intensive care.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature and summarize cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes after intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) excision and tumor observation with CI. DATA SOURCES: OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science; conception to 2024. REVIEW METHODS: A literature review was performed using subject headings, MeSH terms, and keywords. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed by two independent reviewers and adjudicated by a third. Inclusion criteria included studies with ILS and CI with reported audiologic outcomes. Subjects were analyzed into two groups, ILS resection with CI and in situ ILS with CI. Patients with NF2 were included. The main outcome of interest was CI audiometric performance level, with secondary outcomes of CI user status and open-set speech attainment. RESULTS: There were 29 articles with a total of 93 patients who met inclusion criteria. The resection group had 17% low performers, 44% intermediate performers, and 38% high performers. The in situ group had 40% low performers, 32% intermediate performers, 27% high performers. The resection group had 69 patients with 97% maintaining user status and 92% with open-set speech recognition. The observation group had 24 patients, with 87% user rate and 86% achieving open-set speech recognition. There was a greater percentage of NF2 diagnosis seen in the in situ group. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of literature on CI and ILS. Patients are managed with both resection of tumor and implantation in situ. Early data are limited, with improvement in hearing outcomes and high user rates in both populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:3910-3920, 2024.

Maternity care clinician inclusion in Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) are increasingly common, but the network breadth for maternity care is not well described. The inclusion of maternity care clinicians in Medicaid ACOs has significant implications for access to care for pregnant people, who are disproportionately insured by Medicaid. PURPOSE: To address this, we evaluate obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYN), maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFM), certified nurse midwives (CNM), and acute care hospital inclusion in Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using publicly available provider directories for Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs (n = 16) from December 2020 -January 2021, we quantify obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, CNMs, and acute care hospital with obstetric department inclusion in each Medicaid ACO. We compare maternity care provider and acute care hospital inclusion across and within ACO type. For Accountable Care Partnership Plans, we compare maternity care clinician and acute care hospital inclusion to ACO enrollment. RESULTS: Primary Care ACO plans include 1185 OB/GYNs, 51 MFMs, and 100% of Massachusetts acute care hospitals, but CNMs were not easily identifiable in the directories. Across Accountable Care Partnership Plans, a mean of 305 OB/GYNs (median: 97; range: 15-812), 15 MFMs (Median: 8; range: 0-50), 85 CNMs (median: 29; range: 0-197), and half of Massachusetts acute care hospitals (median: 23.81%; range: 10%-100%) were included. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Substantial differences exist in maternity care clinician inclusion across and within ACO types. Characterizing the quality of included maternity care clinicians and hospitals across ACOs is an important target of future research. Highlighting maternal healthcare as a key area of focus for Medicaid ACOs-including equitable access to high-quality obstetric providers-will be important to improving maternal health outcomes.

Content Analysis of Patient-Facing Information Related to Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown pregnant people are not knowledgeable about preeclampsia, a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This lack of knowledge may impact their ability to report symptoms, comply with recommendations, and receive appropriate follow-up care. Pregnant people commonly seek information from sources outside their treating clinician, including pregnancy-specific books and online sources. We examined commonly used preeclampsia information sources to evaluate whether pregnant people are receiving up-to-date, guideline-based information. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of preeclampsia-related information in top-ranking websites and bestselling pregnancy books. We used American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists preeclampsia guidelines to construct a codebook, which we used to examine source content completeness and accuracy. For each source, we analyzed information about preeclampsia diagnosis, patient-reported symptoms, risk factors, prevention, treatment, and complications. RESULTS: Across 19 included sources (13 websites and 6 books), we found substantial variation in completeness and accuracy of preeclampsia information. We found high rates of mentions for preeclampsia symptoms. Risk factors were more commonly included in online sources than book sources. Most sources mentioned treatment options, including blood pressure medication and giving birth; however, one-third of online sources positively mentioned the nonrecommended treatment of bed rest. Prevention methods, including prenatal aspirin for high-risk pregnancies, and long-term complications of preeclampsia were infrequently mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Varying rates of accuracy in patient-facing preeclampsia information mean there is substantial room for improvement in these sources. Ensuring pregnant people receive current guideline-based information is critical for improving outcomes and implementing shared decision-making.

Postpartum Visit Attendance in the United States: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate postpartum care, including the comprehensive postpartum visit, is critical for long-term maternal health and the reduction of maternal mortality, particularly for people who may lose insurance coverage postpartum. However, variation in previous estimates of postpartum visit attendance in the United States makes it difficult to assess rates of attendance and associated characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of estimates of postpartum visit attendance. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science for articles published in English from 1995 to 2020 using search terms to capture postpartum visit attendance and use in the United States. RESULTS: Eighty-eight studies were included in this analysis. Postpartum visit attendance rates varied substantially, from 24.9% to 96.5%, with a mean of 72.1%. Postpartum visit attendance rates were higher in studies using patient self-report than those using administrative data. The number of articles including an estimate of postpartum visit attendance increased considerably over the study period; the majority were published in 2015 or later. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased systematic data collection efforts aligned with postpartum care guidelines and attention to postpartum visit attendance rates may help to target policies to improve maternal wellbeing. Most estimates indicate that a substantial proportion of women do not attend at least one postpartum visit, potentially contributing to maternal morbidity as well as preventing a smooth transition to future well-woman care. Estimates of current postpartum visit attendance are important for informing efforts that seek to increase postpartum visit attendance rates and to improve the quality of care.

Association of Insurance Status With Provision of Recommended Services During Comprehensive Postpartum Visits.

Importance: Improving care during the postpartum period is a clinical and policy priority. During the comprehensive postpartum visit, guidelines recommend delivery of a large number of assessment, screening, and counseling services. However, little is known about services provided during these visits. Objective: To examine rates of recommended services during the comprehensive postpartum visits and differences by insurance type. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 20 071 093 weighted office-based postpartum visits (645 observations) with obstetrical-gynecological or family medicine physicians from annual National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys from December 28, 2008, to December 31, 2016, and estimated multivariate regression models to calculate the frequency of recommended services by insurance type, controlling for visit, patient, and physician characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from November 1, 2019, to September 1, 2020. Exposures: Visit paid by Medicaid vs other payment types. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visit length and binary indicators of blood pressure measurement, depression screening, contraceptive counseling or provision, pelvic examinations, Papanicolaou tests, breast examinations, medication ordered or provided, referral to other physician, and counseling for weight reduction, exercise, stress management, diet and/or nutrition, and tobacco use. Results: A total of 20 071 093 weighted comprehensive postpartum visits to office-based family medicine or obstetrical-gynecological physicians were included (mean patient age, 29.7 [95% CI, 29.1-30.3] years). Of these visits, 34.3% (95% CI, 27.6%-41.1%) were covered by Medicaid. Mean visit length was 17.4 (95% CI, 16.4-18.5) minutes. The most common procedures were blood pressure measurement (91.1% [95% CI, 88.0%-94.2%]), pelvic examinations (47.3% [95% CI, 40.8%-53.7%]), and contraception counseling or provision (43.8% [95% CI, 38.2%-49.3%]). Screening for depression (8.7% [95% CI, 4.1%-12.2%]) was less common. When controlling for visit, patient, and physician characteristics, the only significant difference in visit length or provision of recommended services based on insurance type was a difference in provision of breast examinations (14.7% [95% CI, 8.0%-21.5%] for Medicaid vs 25.6% [95% CI, 19.4%-31.8%] for non-Medicaid; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that receipt of recommended services during comprehensive postpartum visits is less than 50% for most services and is similar across insurance types. These findings underscore the importance of efforts to reconceptualize postpartum care to ensure women have access to a range of supports to manage their health during this sensitive period.