RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Inotropes and inopressors are often first-line treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock. We summarize the pharmacology, indications, and contraindications of dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and levosimendan. We also review the data on the use of these medications for acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock in this article.
Assuntos
Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Contração Miocárdica/efeitos dos fármacos , Choque Cardiogênico/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Cardiotônicos/efeitos adversos , Contraindicações de Medicamentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) after curative resection of stage II and III colon cancer varies widely. Although certain features are considered high risk for PC, the impact of these features on PC incidence is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients ≥ 18 years old with resected stage II and III colonic adenocarcinoma treated at two academic institutions from 2007 to 2018. Clinicopathologic features, treatment and outcomes data were recorded. Patients with reported high-risk features (pT3N0-2 with mucinous/signet ring components, pT4, pN1c, perforation) were identified. The remaining stage II and III patients were used for comparison. RESULTS: Of 219 eligible patients, 93/219 (42.5%) were stage II and 126/219 (57.5%) were stage III. Median follow-up time was 25 (1-146) months. Adjuvant systemic treatment was administered to 133/219 (60.7%) patients. Overall incidence of PC was 14/219 (6.4%) and the median time to PC was 18 (1-37) months. The high-risk and comparison groups contained 113 and 106 patients, respectively. Incidence of PC was significantly different between groups (high-risk 9.7% vs comparison 2.8%, p = 0.04). Median time to PC was not significantly different between the groups [high-risk 17 (1-37) months vs comparison 20 (7-36) months, p = 0.88]. CONCLUSION: Overall PC incidence in patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer was 6.4%. Although the high-risk group developed PC at a significantly higher rate, the rate of PC in this group was still below 10%. The results of this study represent real-world rates of PC and should be taken into account when designing future studies.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adolescente , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Incidência , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation leads to improvement in symptoms and survival in patients with advanced heart failure. An important factor in improving outcomes post-LVAD implantation is optimal preoperative patient selection and optimization. In this review, we highlight the latest on the evaluation of patients with advanced heart failure for LVAD candidacy, including discussion of patient selection, implantation timing, laboratory and other testing considerations, and the importance of psychosocial evaluation. Such thorough evaluation by multidisciplinary team can serve to improve the outcomes of a complex group of patients with advanced heart failure being evaluated for LVAD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: One notable change to the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing listing criteria was to allow for the use of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring for inpatients listed as status 3 for heart transplantation. We wanted to explore the feasibility of performing daily focused echocardiograms in place of invasive monitoring in this population. METHODS: On retrospective chart review of inpatients listed for transplantation at our institution, 8 patients in the invasive monitoring group listed as status 1A (October 2016 to October 2018) and 9 patients in the echocardiographic group listed as status 3 (October 2018 to February 2020) were identified. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the average measured/estimated right atrial, pulmonary artery systolic, and wedge pressures, although the echo cohort had lower cardiac index (P = .001). There were 2 patients with positive blood cultures treated with Swan exchange in Swan cohort and a total of 14 Swan exchanges. There were no infections in the noninvasive group. CONCLUSION: We present our experience with the use of noninvasive daily hemodynamic assessment using focused echocardiograms to manage patients undergoing heart transplantation listing as status 3 under the new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system. This approach appears safe and feasible; however, it requires validation in larger cohorts.