An observational study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cancer in San Diego county.

Aim: To delineate clinical correlates of COVID-19 infection severity in hospitalized patients with malignancy. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all hospitalized patients with a hematologic and/or solid tumor malignancy presenting to the authors' institution between 1 March 2020 and 5 January 2021, with a laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine associations between specific severity outcomes and clinical characteristics. Results: Among 2771 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 246 (8.88%) met inclusion criteria. Patients who were actively receiving treatment had an increased rate of death following admission (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7). After adjusting for significant covariates, the odds ratio increased to 4.4. Patients with cancer involvement of the lungs had a trend toward increased odds of death after adjusting for covariates (OR: 2.3). Conclusions: Among COVID-19 positive hospitalized cancer patients, systemic anti-cancer therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality.

Plain language summary Though cancer is a biologically heterogenous disease with a wide spectrum of clinical features and behavior, accumulating evidence suggests that cancer patients are at greater susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and more likely to experience morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection than non-cancer patients. In this study, the authors reviewed the clinical characteristics of patients with a diagnosis of cancer hospitalized with COVID-19 to assess potential correlates of COVID-19 severity in this population. Notably, analysis of the hospital data revealed a statistically significant increased incidence of mortality in cancer patients who were receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy, than in those not on therapy. Likewise, there was a trend toward increased mortality in those with either primary or metastatic tumor involvement of the lung compared with those without lung involvement.

ABO phenotype and clinical correlates of COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients.

AIM: This study investigates the association between ABO blood phenotype and COVID-19 severity, measured by intensive care unit admission, need for intubation, hospitalization length and death. It further explores clinical predictors of COVID-19 severity within a primarily Hispanic demographic in San Diego County. MATERIALS & METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 942 total patients, 473 with available blood type, hospitalized at five Scripps Health hospitals with COVID-19. RESULTS: No significant association was found between ABO phenotype and COVID-19 severity on multivariate analysis, while a diagnosis of anemia and male sex was associated with all severity outcomes on exploratory analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results provide relevant clinical correlates of COVID-19 severity and help better elucidate the association between ABO phenotype and COVID-19.

Resection of hepatic metastasis after 5-fluorouracil and cofactor for colon cancer.

Hepatic metastases are common in colorectal cancer. However, only a small percentage of patients are candidates for resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used to downstage tumors so surgical resection becomes a viable option. We present a case of resection of hepatic metastasis from an 85-year-old patient with metastatic colorectal cancer after treatment with 5-Fluorouracil and 5,10-methylenetetrafolate (CoFactor), an analog of leucovorin, in a Phase II Clinical Trial. CoFactor was developed as a more active replacement of leucovorin to potentially allow reduced dosing of 5-FU. This could potentially be associated with diminished side effects. 5-Fluorouracil with leucovorin or CoFactor could represent another alternative for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection in metastatic colorectal cancer and warrants further studies, especially in elderly patients.

Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective single center study aimed to describe circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) utilization in a community practice for patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: All patients were included who were seen at the Scripps Hillcrest Oncology Clinic (San Diego, CA, USA) between September 2016 to March 2018 who had ctDNA assay testing performed. In this cohort, all ctDNA testing was performed to aid therapeutic decision making with wide variety in both the type of advanced solid tumor, as well as the line of therapy. RESULTS: Of the assays performed in the 41 patients included in this review, 42% of therapeutic actions following ctDNA assay results were influenced by the ctDNA result, including initiation of the corresponding Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapy, placement on clinical trial, and initiation of off label-targeted options. In addition, CGP results guided clinicians away from futile or harmful treatments, such as EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer patients with discovered KRAS mutations. No additional prognostic or therapeutic information was gathered in one quarter of patients for which ctDNA was drawn. Furthermore, discovered genomic alterations by ctDNA testing did not influence therapeutic action in 58% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the conundrum that having additional information regarding an individual's tumor biology does not yet translate into meaningful targeted therapy in the majority of cases. Further studies are needed regarding ctDNA utilization to help guide community oncologists who will continue to face the choice between targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy as science advances.