RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of early cold stored platelet transfusion compared with standard care resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock. BACKGROUND: Data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of early cold stored platelet transfusion are lacking following severe injury. METHODS: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open label, clinical trial was performed at 5 US trauma centers. Injured patients at risk of large volume blood transfusion and the need for hemorrhage control procedures were enrolled and randomized. The intervention was the early transfusion of a single apheresis cold stored platelet unit, stored for up to 14 days versus standard care resuscitation. The primary outcome was feasibility and the principal clinical outcome for efficacy and safety was 24-hour mortality. RESULTS: Mortality at 24 hours was 5.9% in patients who were randomized to early cold stored platelet transfusion compared with 10.2% in the standard care arm (difference, -4.3%; 95% CI, -12.8% to 3.5%; P =0.26). No significant differences were found for any of the prespecified ancillary outcomes. Rates of arterial and/or venous thromboembolism and adverse events did not differ across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In severely injured patients, early cold stored platelet transfusion is feasible, safe and did not result in a significant lower rate of 24-hour mortality. Early cold stored platelet transfusion did not result in a higher incidence of arterial and/or venous thrombotic complications or adverse events. The storage age of the cold stored platelet product was not associated with significant outcome differences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04667468.
Assuntos
Preservação de Sangue , Transfusão de Plaquetas , Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Choque Hemorrágico/etiologia , Preservação de Sangue/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Ressuscitação/métodos , Temperatura BaixaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) to nonoperative management in severe chest wall injury. BACKGROUND: SSRF has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with clinical flail chest and respiratory failure. However, the effect of SSRF outcomes in severe chest wall injuries without clinical flail chest is unknown. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial comparing SSRF to nonoperative management in severe chest wall injury, defined as: (1) a radiographic flail segment without clinical flail or (2) ≥5 consecutive rib fractures or (3) any rib fracture with bicortical displacement. Randomization was stratified by the unit of admission as a proxy for injury severity. Primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, ventilator days, opioid exposure, mortality, and incidences of pneumonia and tracheostomy. Quality of life at 1, 3, and 6 months was measured using the EQ-5D-5L survey. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were randomized in an intention-to-treat analysis (usual care = 42, SSRF = 42). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The numbers of total fractures, displaced fractures, and segmental fractures per patient were also similar, as were the incidences of displaced fractures and radiographic flail segments. Hospital LOS was greater in the SSRF group. ICU LOS and ventilator days were similar. After adjusting for the stratification variable, hospital LOS remained greater in the SSRF group (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17-1.88). ICU LOS (RR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.94-2.92) and ventilator days (RR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.61--3.69) remained similar. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with displaced fractures were more likely to have LOS outcomes similar to their usual care counterparts. At 1 month, SSRF patients had greater impairment in mobility [3 (2-3) vs 2 (1-2), P = 0.012] and self-care [2 (1-2) vs 2 (2-3), P = 0.034] dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L. CONCLUSIONS: In severe chest wall injury, even in the absence of clinical flail chest, the majority of patients still reported moderate to extreme pain and impairment of usual physical activity at one month. SSRF increased hospital LOS and did not provide any quality of life benefit for up to 6 months.
Assuntos
Tórax Fundido , Fraturas das Costelas , Parede Torácica , Humanos , Fraturas das Costelas/cirurgia , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Tórax Fundido/cirurgia , Tórax Fundido/complicações , Parede Torácica/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Tempo de Internação , Costelas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood group O contains lower levels of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor. Higher incidence of bleeding among group O is reported in multiple contexts. Results of studies vary regarding outcomes stratified by blood group in trauma. We systematically reviewed the literature for outcomes related to blood group in trauma patients. Meta-analysis of studies evaluating mortality related to blood group was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies analysing relationships between blood group and outcomes in trauma patients. Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. We synthesized outcomes data related to blood group. Meta-analysis compared mortality rates between group O and non-O patients. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 13 studies. Statistically significant differences by blood group were reported in 3 of 10 (30%) studies evaluating mortality, 2 of 3 (66.7%) evaluating mortality from haemorrhage and 2 of 9 (22.2%) evaluating transfusion requirement. Meta-analysis was performed on seven studies evaluating mortality (total n = 11,835). There was significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 86%, p < 0.00001). No difference was found in mortality between group O and non-O patients (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-1.64, p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Existing literature does not consistently demonstrate a mortality difference between trauma patients with O and non-O blood groups. High variability in the methods and results among studies limits this conclusion, and further research is needed to delineate under what circumstances blood group may influence outcomes.
Assuntos
Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos , Hemorragia , Humanos , Hemorragia/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 illness can lead to thrombotic complications, organ failure, and death. Antithrombin (AT) regulates thromboinflammation and is a key component of chemical thromboprophylaxis. Our goal was to examine the link between AT activity and responsiveness to thromboprophylaxis, markers of hypercoagulability, and inflammation among severe COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective observational study enrolling SARS-CoV-2-positive patients admitted to the intensive care unit on prophylactic enoxaparin. Blood was collected daily for 7 days to assess AT activity and anti-factor Xa levels. Patient demographics, outcomes, and hospital laboratory results were collected. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney tests, and categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between AT activity and mortality. RESULTS: In 36 patients, 3 thromboembolic events occurred, and 18 (50%) patients died. Patients who died had higher fibrinogen, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and lower AT activity. Reduced AT activity was independently associated with mortality and correlated with both markers of hypercoagulability (D-dimer) and inflammation (CRP). CONCLUSION: Low AT activity is associated with mortality and persistent hypercoagulable and proinflammatory states in severe COVID-19 patients. The anti-thromboinflammatory properties of AT make it an appealing therapeutic target for future studies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombofilia , Trombose , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , Anticoagulantes , Inflamação , SARS-CoV-2 , Antitrombinas , Tromboinflamação , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Antitrombina IIIRESUMO
Importance: Critical bleeding is associated with a high mortality rate in patients with trauma. Hemorrhage is exacerbated by a complex derangement of coagulation, including an acute fibrinogen deficiency. Management is fibrinogen replacement with cryoprecipitate transfusions or fibrinogen concentrate, usually administered relatively late during hemorrhage. Objective: To assess whether survival could be improved by administering an early and empirical high dose of cryoprecipitate to all patients with trauma and bleeding that required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol. Design, Setting, and Participants: CRYOSTAT-2 was an interventional, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled, international, multicenter study. Patients were enrolled at 26 UK and US major trauma centers from August 2017 to November 2021. Eligible patients were injured adults requiring activation of the hospital's major hemorrhage protocol with evidence of active hemorrhage, systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg at any time, and receiving at least 1 U of a blood component transfusion. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive standard care, which was the local major hemorrhage protocol (reviewed for guideline adherence), or cryoprecipitate, in which 3 pools of cryoprecipitate (6-g fibrinogen equivalent) were to be administered in addition to standard care within 90 minutes of randomization and 3 hours of injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days in the intention-to-treat population. Results: Among 1604 eligible patients, 799 were randomized to the cryoprecipitate group and 805 to the standard care group. Missing primary outcome data occurred in 73 patients (principally due to withdrawal of consent) and 1531 (95%) were included in the primary analysis population. The median (IQR) age of participants was 39 (26-55) years, 1251 (79%) were men, median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 29 (18-43), 36% had penetrating injury, and 33% had systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg at hospital arrival. All-cause 28-day mortality in the intention-to-treat population was 26.1% in the standard care group vs 25.3% in the cryoprecipitate group (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.75-1.23]; P = .74). There was no difference in safety outcomes or incidence of thrombotic events in the standard care vs cryoprecipitate group (12.9% vs 12.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with trauma and bleeding who required activation of a major hemorrhage protocol, the addition of early and empirical high-dose cryoprecipitate to standard care did not improve all cause 28-day mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04704869; ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN14998314.
Assuntos
Hemorragia , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinogênio/efeitos adversos , Transfusão de Sangue , Transfusão de Componentes SanguíneosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although physiologic differences exist between younger and older children, pediatric trauma analyses are weighted toward older patients. Trauma-induced coagulopathy, determined by rapid thrombelastography (rTEG), is a predictor of outcome in trauma patients, but the significance of rTEG values among very young trauma patients remains unknown. Our objective was to identify the prehospital or physiologic factors, including rTEG values, that were associated with mortality in trauma patients younger than 5 y old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients younger than 5 y old that met the highest-level trauma activation criteria at an academic children's hospital from 2010-2016 were included. Data regarding demographics, pre-hospital management, laboratory values, injury severity, and outcome were queried. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were included. 60% were male, and the median age was 3 y (IQR 1-4). Overall mortality was 13% (n = 45); brain injury (91%) and hemorrhage (9%) were the causes of death. Compared to survivors, rTEG values in nonsurvivors showed longer activated clotting time and slower speed of clot formation. Clot strength was also decreased in nonsurvivors. On stepwise regression modeling, rTEG values were not significant predictors of mortality. Admission base deficit, arrival temperature, and head injury severity were identified as independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: While rTEG identified coagulopathy in trauma patients < 5 y old, it was not an independent predictor of mortality. Our findings suggest that trauma providers should pay close attention to admission base deficit, arrival temperature, and head injury severity when managing the youngest trauma patients.
Assuntos
Acidose/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hipotermia/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Tromboelastografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/sangue , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid infusion pumps employing filters, roller pumps, and heat exchangers for the administration of blood products are not approved for platelets or cryoprecipitate. This technology may decrease platelet count and degrade coagulation proteins. The effect of rapid infusers on the hemostatic potential of whole blood is unknown. METHODS: Five units of low titer O+ whole blood were obtained from anonymous donors. Each unit was subjected to infusion by five different techniques: (1) gravity infusion without a filter, (2) gravity infusion with a filter, (3) Belmont rapid infuser at 70 mL/min, (4) Belmont at 100 mL/min, and (5) pressurized infusion with a pneumatic pressure bag and filter. After infusion, platelet count, platelet function, thrombin generation, and hemostatic potential were measured for each aliquot. Infusion techniques were compared, using gravity infusion without a filter as the control. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in platelet count from baseline (168,000) in the BELMONT70 (97,000) and BELMONT100 (94,000) groups (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in platelet function (all P > 0.20). While there were no differences in thromboelastography parameters between control and infusion models (all P > 0.20), there were significant increases in thrombin generation parameters by CAT in both the BELMONT70 and BELMONT100 groups (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a rapid infuser decreases the platelet count of WB but does not decrease platelet function or overall hemostatic potential. In fact, thrombin generation and thrombin potential are actually increased. Rapid infusers are safe for the transfusion of WB.
Assuntos
Plaquetas/fisiologia , Transfusão de Sangue/instrumentação , Hemostasia/fisiologia , Bombas de Infusão/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Humanos , Contagem de Plaquetas , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Tromboelastografia , Trombina/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Protocols for expediting critical trauma patients directly from the helipad to the operating room tend to vary by center, rely heavily on physician gestalt, and lack supporting evidence. We evaluated a population of severely injured trauma patients with the aim of determining objective factors associated with the need for immediate surgical intervention. METHODS: All highest-activation trauma patients transported by air ambulance between 1/1/16 and 12/31/17 were enrolled retrospectively. Transfer, pediatric, isolated burn, and isolated head trauma patients were excluded. Patients who underwent emergency general surgery within 30 min of arrival without the aid of cross-sectional imaging were compared to the remainder of the cohort. RESULTS: Of the 863 patients who were enrolled, 85 (10%) spent less than 30 min in the emergency department (ED) before undergoing an emergency operation. The remaining 778 patients (90%) formed the comparison group. The ED ≤ 30 min group had a higher percentage of penetrating injuries, lower blood pressure, and was more likely to have a positive FAST exam. The "Direct to Operating Room" (DTOR) score is a predictive scoring system devised to identify patients most likely to benefit from bypassing the ED. The odds ratio of emergency operation within 30 min of hospital arrival increased by 2.71 (95% confidence interval 2.23-3.29; P < 0.001) for every 1-point increase in DTOR score. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients with profound hypotension or acidosis and positive FAST were more likely to require surgery within 30 min of hospital presentation. Use of a scoring system may allow early identification of these patients in the prehospital setting by nonphysician providers.
Assuntos
Hemorragia/cirurgia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Resgate Aéreo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Scoring systems, such as the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score, are used to identify patients at risk for massive transfusion (MT, ≥10 U red blood cells in 24 hours). Our aeromedical transport helicopter uses ultrasound to perform the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination. Our objective was to evaluate the ability of the Prehospital ABC (PhABC) Score to predict blood transfusions and the need for emergent laparotomy. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study of trauma patients who underwent an in-flight FAST during aeromedical transport during a 7-month period. PhABC Score was positive if ≥2 of the following were present in flight: penetrating trauma, heart rate >120 bpm, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, or a positive abdominal FAST. The PhABC Score was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 291 trauma patients met inclusion criteria, 23 underwent emergent laparotomy, and 12 received an MT. A positive PhABC Score predicted emergent laparotomy, with a positive predictive value of 48% and a negative predictive value of 95% (sensitivity 46%, specificity 96%, AUROC curve 0.83). A positive PhABC Score also predicted receipt of an MT with a positive predictive value of 28% and a negative predictive value of 94% (sensitivity 33%, specificity 93%, AUROC curve 0.77). Multiple logistic regression identified FAST as the most powerful contributor of the PhABC Score to the prediction of both emergent laparotomy (odds ratio 8.5, P < 0.001) and MT (odds ratio 5.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PhABC Score effectively predicts in-hospital resource utilization. It provides an outstanding undertriage rate from the prehospital setting, and it is helpful to improve trauma team activation, mobilize blood products, and prepare the operating room.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Sonográfica Focada no Trauma , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Triagem/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although studies have identified published indications that experts and practicing surgeons agree indicate use of damage control (DC) laparotomy, it is unknown whether these indications predict use of the procedure in practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a diagnostic performance study of the accuracy of a set of published appropriateness indications for predicting use of DC laparotomy. We included consecutive adults that underwent emergent laparotomy for trauma (2011-2016) at Memorial Hermann Hospital. RESULTS: We included 1141 injured adults. Two published preoperative appropriateness indications [a systolic blood pressure (BP) persistently <90 mmHg or core body temperature <34°C] produced moderate shifts in the pretest probability of conducting DC instead of definitive laparotomy. Five published intraoperative appropriateness indications produced large and often conclusive changes in the pretest probability of conducting DC during emergent laparotomy. These included the finding of a devascularized or completely disrupted pancreas, duodenum, or pancreaticoduodenal complex; an estimated intraoperative blood loss >4 L; administration of >10 U of packed red blood cells (PRBCs); and a systolic BP persistently <90 mmHg or arterial pH persistently <7.2 during operation. Most indications that produced large changes in the pretest probability of conducting DC laparotomy had an incidence of 2% or less. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that published appropriateness indications accurately predict use of DC laparotomy in practice. Intraoperative variables exert greater influence on the decision to conduct DC laparotomy than preoperative variables, and those indications that produce large shifts in the pretest probability of conducting DC laparotomy are uncommonly encountered.
Assuntos
Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric illness is an independent risk factor for trauma and recidivism and is often comorbid in the trauma population. There is no current standard for the delivery of mental health services in trauma care. The purpose of this study was to gauge trauma surgeon perceptions of needed and currently available resources for this patient population at level 1 trauma centers in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed to capture the estimated volume of psychiatric patients admitted to level 1 trauma centers, their available psychiatric services, and perceived need for resources. It was sent to 27 trauma surgery colleagues at different level 1 trauma centers across the United States using a public survey tool. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 27 trauma surgeons responded (81% response rate). Ten centers (48%) estimated admitting 1-5 patients with preexisting serious mental illness weekly, whereas others admitted more. Eight (36%) reported not having acute situational support services available. Ten respondents (46%) did not know how many psychiatric consultants were available at their institution. Twelve surgeons (55%) reported no designated outpatient follow-up for psychiatric issues. Sixteen trauma surgeons (73%) stated that expanded psychiatric services are needed at their trauma center. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients frequently present with preexisting serious mental illness and many struggle with psychological sequelae of trauma. Over half of the surveyed surgeons reported no outpatient follow-up for these patients, and almost three quarters perceived the need for expansion of psychiatric services. In addition to a lack of resources, these findings highlight an overlooked gap in high-quality patient-centered trauma care.
Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Lacunas da Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/psicologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapiaRESUMO
Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability due to trauma. Early administration of tranexamic acid may benefit patients with TBI. Objective: To determine whether tranexamic acid treatment initiated in the out-of-hospital setting within 2 hours of injury improves neurologic outcome in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 20 trauma centers and 39 emergency medical services agencies in the US and Canada from May 2015 to November 2017. Eligible participants (N = 1280) included out-of-hospital patients with TBI aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or less and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Interventions: Three interventions were evaluated, with treatment initiated within 2 hours of TBI: out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) bolus and in-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) 8-hour infusion (bolus maintenance group; n = 312), out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (2 g) bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (bolus only group; n = 345), and out-of-hospital placebo bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (placebo group; n = 309). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable neurologic function at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score >4 [moderate disability or good recovery]) in the combined tranexamic acid group vs the placebo group. Asymmetric significance thresholds were set at 0.1 for benefit and 0.025 for harm. There were 18 secondary end points, of which 5 are reported in this article: 28-day mortality, 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no disability] to 30 [death]), progression of intracranial hemorrhage, incidence of seizures, and incidence of thromboembolic events. Results: Among 1063 participants, a study drug was not administered to 96 randomized participants and 1 participant was excluded, resulting in 966 participants in the analysis population (mean age, 42 years; 255 [74%] male participants; mean Glasgow Coma Scale score, 8). Of these participants, 819 (84.8%) were available for primary outcome analysis at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 65% of patients in the tranexamic acid groups vs 62% in the placebo group (difference, 3.5%; [90% 1-sided confidence limit for benefit, -0.9%]; P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the tranexamic acid groups vs the placebo group (14% vs 17%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -7.9% to 2.1%]; P = .26), 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (6.8 vs 7.6; difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; P = .29), or progression of intracranial hemorrhage (16% vs 20%; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.8% to 2.1%]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe TBI, out-of-hospital tranexamic acid administration within 2 hours of injury compared with placebo did not significantly improve 6-month neurologic outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01990768.
Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Tranexâmico/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antifibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Encefalopatias/etiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/mortalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Gravidade do Paciente , Análise de Sobrevida , Tempo para o Tratamento , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Despite over a half-century of recognizing fibrinolytic abnormalities after trauma, we remain in our infancy in understanding the underlying mechanisms causing these changes, resulting in ineffective treatment strategies. With the increased utilization of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) to measure fibrinolysis in trauma, more questions than answers are emerging. Although it seems certain that low fibrinolytic activity measured by VHA is common after injury and associated with increased mortality, we now recognize subphenotypes within this population and that specific cohorts arise depending on the specific time from injury when samples are collected. Future studies should focus on these subtleties and distinctions, as hypofibrinolysis, acute shutdown, and persistent shutdown appear to represent distinct, unique clinical phenotypes, with different pathophysiology, and warranting different treatment strategies.
Assuntos
Fibrinólise/fisiologia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Humanos , Tromboelastografia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) remains the primary cause of transfusion-related fatalities (37%), recent reports estimate the incidence of TRALI at 0.008% per unit of plasma transfused and 0.004% per all products transfused. Because blood banks have moved toward male-predominant plasma, TRALI appears, anecdotally, to have been reduced to an extremely rare event. The purpose of this study was to estimate the current incidence of TRALI at a large, urban center known for its early and aggressive use of plasma in the setting of trauma, hemorrhagic shock, and massive transfusion. METHODS: The Blood Bank Registry of our hospital was queried for all transfused patients admitted from September 2002 through March 2013. The blood bank collected and investigated all cases of clinical acute lung injury meeting the consensus definition for TRALI, as well as potential cases for which the donor product was recalled for having a high reactivity level of human leukocyte antigen antibodies (ie, the antibodies that could cause TRALI). Clinical reactions were reviewed in conjunction with independent serological testing and classified by transfusion medicine physicians as being "probable TRALI" or of "unrelated etiology." The total number of units transfused at our facility during this time period was also obtained, allowing the incidence of TRALI to be estimated. Cases were analyzed based on demographics, outcome, blood types, observed symptoms and their duration, and type of product transfused. RESULTS: Seven cases were identified at our center for the indicated time period, with only 3 of these occurring in trauma. A total of 714,757 units of blood products were transfused between September 2002 and March 2013. The incidence of TRALI was estimated to be 1 case per 100,000 units of product for the entire study period. A broad range of patients was affected. Consistent with previous descriptions, an acute duration of symptoms (average, 1.4 days) was observed and usually resolved with supportive care. Reactions were observed predominantly in plasma products, both type specific and nontype specific. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that while TRALI still occurs, clinically meaningful cases are rare. Moreover, TRALI rates remain low despite the increasingly aggressive use of plasma and platelets in the trauma setting.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda Relacionada à Transfusão/epidemiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bancos de Sangue , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Plasma , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Reação Transfusional , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde , Adulto JovemRESUMO
After a hiatus of several decades, the concept of cold whole blood (WB) is being reintroduced into acute clinical trauma care in the United States. Initial implementation experience and data grew from military medical applications, followed by more recent development and data acquisition in civilian institutions. Anesthesiologists, especially those who work in acute trauma facilities, are likely to be presented with patients either receiving WB from the emergency department or may have WB as a therapeutic option in massive transfusion situations. In this focused review, we briefly discuss the historical concept of WB and describe the characteristics of WB, including storage, blood group compatibility, and theoretical hemolytic risks. We summarize relevant recent retrospective military and preliminary civilian efficacy as well as safety data related to WB transfusion, and describe our experience with the initial implementation of WB transfusion at our level 1 trauma hospital. Suggestions and collective published experience from other centers as well as ours may be useful to those investigating such a program. The role of WB as a significant therapeutic option in civilian trauma awaits further prospective validation.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Bancos de Sangue , Doadores de Sangue , Transfusão de Sangue/história , Transfusão de Sangue/mortalidade , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Medicina Militar/métodos , Ressuscitação/efeitos adversos , Ressuscitação/história , Ressuscitação/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Reação Transfusional/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/história , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality with penetrating TBI (p-TBI) patients having worse outcomes. These patients are more likely to be coagulopathic than blunt TBI (b-TBI) patients, thus we hypothesize that coagulopathy would be an early predictor of mortality. METHODS: We identified highest-level trauma activation patients who underwent an admission head CT and had ICU admission orders from August 2009-May 2013, excluding those with polytrauma and anticoagulant use. Rapid thrombelastography (rTEG) was obtained after emergency department (ED) arrival and coagulopathy was defined as follows: ACT≥128s, KT≥2.5s, angle≤56°, MA≤55mm, LY-30≥3.0% or platelet count≤150,000/µL. Regression modeling was used to assess the association of coagulopathy on mortality. RESULTS: 1086 patients with head CT scans performed and ICU admission orders were reviewed. After exclusion criteria were met, 347 patients with isolated TBI were analyzed-99 (29%) with p-TBI and 248 (71%) with b-TBI. Patients with p-TBI had a higher mortality (41% vs. 10%, p<0.0001) and a greater incidence of coagulopathy (64% vs. 51%, p<0.003). After dichotomizing p-TBI patients by mortality, patients who died were younger and were more coagulopathic. When adjusting for factors available on ED arrival, coagulopathy was found to be an early predictor of mortality (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.37, 11.72, p-value=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that p-TBI patients with significant coagulopathy have a poor prognosis. Coagulopathy, in conjunction with other factors, can be used to earlier identify p-TBI patients with worse outcomes and represents a possible area for intervention.