Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Controle Glicêmico/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Insulina Isófana/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pituitary tumours that present with nasal symptoms are uncommon. Management can be difficult due to their aggressive nature, location and extension. METHODS: We report a series of three cases of prolactinomas that enlarged inferiorly presenting initially as nasal polyps. RESULTS: Recurrence of symptoms (case 1) prompted testing for serum prolactin and examination of histology confirmed the presence of a prolactinoma. In cases 2 and 3, radiological evidence of a pituitary mass prompted testing for a prolactinoma. No patients exhibited clinical signs of hyperprolactinaemia. All three cases have residual tumour at 2-4 years after diagnosis, despite prolactin levels approaching the normal range on dopaminergic therapy. CONCLUSION: Pituitary tumours that invade the nasal cavity are rare and clinicians should be aware of their existence. A prolactinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal tumours. Measurement of serum prolactin can expedite a diagnosis and prevent delay of treatment with dopamine agonists.
Assuntos
Pólipos Nasais/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Cabergolina , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Erros de Diagnóstico , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/sangue , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/terapia , Prolactina/sangueRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: It is established that external pituitary irradiation (EPI) effectively reduces serum GH levels in acromegaly. However, its effect in normalising serum IGF1 has been disputed. We looked at the number of our patients who achieved persistently normal IGF1 levels whilst free of adjunctive treatment for at least 1 year after EPI. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: We identified 63 acromegalic patients between 1964 and 2004 who received EPI. Six were excluded: three had surgery after EPI, two had no medical records available, and one had a pituitary Yttrium implant. MEASUREMENTS: Patients received 4500-5000 cGy in fractionated doses. IGF1 levels were correlated with their respective age-related reference ranges. RESULTS: After EPI, the number of patients with normal IGF1 and free of adjunctive medical treatment for at least 1 year were four patients by 3 years, nine patients by 5 years and seventeen by 10 years, with the current number of 25/57 (44%). Concordance between IGF1 levels and random GH dropped from 90% at the time of EPI to 65% at 3 years, 66% at 5 years and 71% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that, with time, EPI achieves a normal IGF1 in significant numbers of patients with acromegaly, thus obviating the need for life-long expensive medical therapy. For each patient this benefit has to be weighed against the possibility of new hypopituitarism as a result of the treatment. Any decision to use EPI is easier in the context of pre-existent hypopituitarism.