Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 19(7): 504-6, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9702573

RESUMO

New recommendations regarding prophylaxis of healthcare workers exposed to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prompted us to examine the frequency and nature of percutaneous injuries at this hospital. Four previously defined risk factors for transmission of HIV were evaluated. Between 1993 and 1995, 1,070 percutaneous injuries were reported, including 11 in which the source patient had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Five of these injuries involved at least one risk factor for transmission. No source patient was found to have AIDS as a result of testing following exposure. We conclude that high-risk injuries are infrequent and that postexposure prophylaxis will not increase costs greatly at this medical center.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Virginia
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 17(10): 641-8, 1996 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8899437

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study compliance with preventive strategies at a university hospital during an outbreak of nosocomial influenza A during the winter of 1988, and the rates of vaccination of healthcare workers and of nosocomial influenza following changes in vaccine practices after the outbreak. DESIGN: Retrospective review of employee health, hospital epidemiology, hospital computing; and clinical microbiology records. SETTING: A university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Unvaccinated personnel with exposure within the previous 72 hours to an unisolated case of influenza were offered influenza vaccine and 14 days of amantadine hydrochloride prophylaxis. Personnel with exposure more than 72 hours before evaluation were offered vaccine. A mobile cart was introduced for vaccinating personnel after the 1988 outbreak. RESULTS: An outbreak of influenza with 10 nosocomial cases occurred in 1988. Only 4% of exposed employees had been vaccinated previously and 23% of exposed, unvaccinated employees agreed to take vaccine, amantadine, or both. A mobile-cart vaccination program was instituted, and annual vaccination rates steadily increased from 26.3% in 1989 to 1990 to 38% in 1993 to 1994 (P < .0001). The relative frequency of documented cases of influenza in employees with symptoms of influenza decreased significantly during this period (P = .025), but nosocomial influenza rates among patients did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: A mobile-cart influenza vaccination program was associated with a significant increase in compliance among healthcare workers, but a majority still remained unvaccinated. The rate of nosocomial influenza among patients was not reduced by the modest increase in the vaccination rate, but influenza rates remained acceptably low, perhaps due to respiratory isolation of patients and furlough of employees with influenza.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização , Vírus da Influenza A , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amantadina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hospitais com mais de 500 Leitos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/tendências , Lactente , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isolamento de Pacientes , Vigilância da População , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Virginia/epidemiologia
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 16(10): 570-6, 1995 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8568201

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cause of an outbreak of needlestick injuries (NSIs) in hospital employees. SETTING: A 700-bed university hospital. DESIGN: Outbreak investigation, laboratory evaluation of a medical waste disposal device, cost analysis. METHODS: Employee health department records were reviewed of workers suffering sticks from needles piercing fiberboard-contaminated material containers (CMCs). A laboratory evaluation of needle-puncture resistance properties of the CMCs was performed using a testing apparatus. The cost of a hospital waste disposal program using fiberboard CMCs was compared with the cost of a program using rigid plastic (polypropylene) boxes. RESULTS: During 40 months of surveillance in 1986 and from 1989 to 1991, only one NSI had occurred from a needle piercing a CMC. During 9 months in 1993, 13 NSIs occurred due to needles piercing CMCs (P < .001). No clinical illness resulted from the NSIs. The outbreak was halted by a temporary change to plastic (polypropylene) boxes for sharps disposal ($4.92 to $23.33/cu ft) until receipt of a box with a newly designed solid fiberboard liner ($1.25/cu ft). CMC liners used during the epidemic had a mean needle puncture resistance of 527 g, as compared with 660 g for liners used before the outbreak (P < .001). The new solid fiberboard liner has a mean puncture resistance of 1,765 g. A program of waste disposal using fiberboard CMCs was found to cost approximately one-seventh the cost of a program using plastic boxes for disposal of infectious waste. CONCLUSION: A program for infectious waste disposal using fiberboard CMCs can be safe and cost-effective if appropriate standards for puncture resistance are met.


Assuntos
Contenção de Riscos Biológicos , Surtos de Doenças , Eliminação de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/epidemiologia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Contenção de Riscos Biológicos/economia , Contenção de Riscos Biológicos/instrumentação , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Eliminação de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Eliminação de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde/instrumentação , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/etiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/prevenção & controle , Plásticos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Virginia/epidemiologia
4.
N Engl J Med ; 331(3): 169-73, 1994 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8008031

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After outbreaks of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposed the use of respirators with high-efficiency particulate air filters (HEPA respirators) as part of isolation precautions against tuberculosis, along with a respiratory-protection program for health care workers that includes medical evaluation, training, and tests of the fit of the respirators. Each HEPA respirator costs between $7.51 and $9.08, about 10 times the cost of respirators currently used. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using data from the University of Virginia Hospital on exposure to patients with tuberculosis and rates at which the purified-protein-derivative (PPD) skin test became positive in hospital workers. The costs of a respiratory-protection program were based on those of an existing program for workers dealing with hazardous substances. RESULTS: During 1992, 11 patients with documented tuberculosis were admitted to our hospital. Eight of 3852 workers (0.2 percent) had PPD tests that became positive. Five of these conversions were believed to be due to the booster phenomenon; one followed unprotected exposure to a patient not yet in isolation; the other two occurred in workers who had never entered a tuberculosis isolation room. These data suggest that it will take more than one year for the use of HEPA respirators to prevent a single conversion of the PPD test. Assuming that one conversion is prevented per year, however, it would take 41 years at out hospital to prevent one case of occupationally acquired tuberculosis, at a cost of $1.3 million to $18.5 million. CONCLUSIONS: Given the effectiveness of currently recommended measures to prevent nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis, the addition of HEPA respirators would offer negligible protective efficacy at great cost.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle , Ventiladores Mecânicos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Humanos , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Tuberculose/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA