Recurrent Ischemic Stroke and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Suffered an Acute Stroke While on Treatment With Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: The RENO-EXTEND Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation who suffered an ischemic stroke while on treatment with nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, rates and determinants of recurrent ischemic events and major bleedings remain uncertain. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study aimed to estimate the rates of ischemic and bleeding events and their determinants in the follow-up of consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who suffered an acute cerebrovascular ischemic event while on nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment. Afterwards, we compared the estimated risks of ischemic and bleeding events between the patients in whom anticoagulant therapy was changed to those who continued the original treatment. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up time of 15.0±10.9 months, 192 out of 1240 patients (15.5%) had 207 ischemic or bleeding events corresponding to an annual rate of 13.4%. Among the events, 111 were ischemic strokes, 15 systemic embolisms, 24 intracranial bleedings, and 57 major extracranial bleedings. Predictive factors of recurrent ischemic events (strokes and systemic embolisms) included CHA2DS2-VASc score after the index event (odds ratio [OR], 1.2 [95% CI, 1.0-1.3] for each point increase; P=0.05) and hypertension (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.0-5.1]; P=0.04). Predictive factors of bleeding events (intracranial and major extracranial bleedings) included age (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2] for each year increase; P=0.002), history of major bleeding (OR, 6.9 [95% CI, 3.4-14.2]; P=0.0001) and the concomitant administration of an antiplatelet agent (OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.4-5.5]; P=0.003). Rates of ischemic and bleeding events were no different in patients who changed or not changed the original nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants treatment (OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering a stroke despite being on nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy are at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and bleeding. In these patients, further research is needed to improve secondary prevention by investigating the mechanisms of recurrent ischemic stroke and bleeding.

Prognostic utility of semi-quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography scores in the SCOT-HEART trial.

BACKGROUND: Information from cardiac computed tomography angiography can be summarized using visual semi-quantitative scores. However, the optimal method and their prognostic utility is unknown. METHODS: Five semi-quantitative scores were calculated in the SCOT-HEART trial, including segment involvement score (SIS), segment stenosis score (SSS), CT Leaman (CT-LeSc), multivessel aggregate stenosis score (MVAS), and CAD-RADS 2.0 including plaque modifier (P). Prediction of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was compared to the 10-year cardiovascular risk score. RESULTS: Imaging was performed in 1,769 individuals (age 58 â€‹± â€‹10 years, 56% male) with 41 (2.3%) experiencing myocardial infarction and 74 (4%) MACE over 4.9 â€‹± â€‹1.1 years. P based on calcium score and SIS had good agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79, 0.79). SIS, SSS, CT-LeSec, and MVAS performed similarly for the prediction of myocardial infarction (area under the curve [AUC] 0.74, 0.75, 0.75, 0.74, all p â€‹> â€‹0.1) and MACE (AUC 0.73, 0.74, 0.74, 0.73, all p â€‹> â€‹0.1), and were superior to the cardiovascular risk score (AUC 0.62 and 0.65, both p â€‹< â€‹0.001). High semi-quantitative scores were associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and MACE, with the greatest adjusted risk associated with CT-LeSc≥8 (Hazard ratio [HR] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7, 11.6, p â€‹< â€‹0.001 and HR 5.2, 95% CI 3.1, 8.7, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and SSS≥10 (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.4, 8.9, p â€‹< â€‹0.001 and HR 5.3, 95% CI 3.3, 8.5, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Semi-quantitative scores performed similarly for the prediction of myocardial infarction and MACE, with all superior to the cardiovascular risk score.

Patients' time in therapeutic range on warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients in Warfarin Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic.

BACKGROUND: The quality of warfarin therapy can be determined by the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) of international normalized ratio (INR). The estimated minimum TTR needed to achieve a benefit from warfarin therapy is ≥ 60%. AIM: To determine TTR and the predictors of poor TTR among atrial fibrillation patients who receive warfarin therapy. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a cardiology referral center in Selangor, Malaysia. A total of 420 patients with atrial fibrillation and under follow-up at the pharmacist led Warfarin Medication Therapeutic Adherence Clinic between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. Patients' clinical data, information related to warfarin therapy, and INR readings were traced through electronic Hospital Information system. A data collection form was used for data collection. The percentage of days when INR was within range was calculated using the Rosendaal method. The poor INR control category was defined as a TTR < 60%. Predictors for poor TTR were further determined by using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients [54.0% male; mean age 65.7 (10.9) years] were included. The calculated mean and median TTR were 60.6% ± 20.6% and 64% (interquartile range 48%-75%), respectively. Of the included patients, 57.6% (n = 242) were in the good control category and 42.4% (n = 178) were in the poor control category. The annual calculated mean TTR between the year 2014 and 2018 ranged from 59.7% and 67.3%. A high HAS-BLED score of ≥ 3 was associated with poor TTR (adjusted odds ratio, 2.525; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-3.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our population, a high HAS-BLED score was associated with poor TTR. This could provide an important insight when initiating an oral anticoagulant for these patients. Patients with a high HAS-BLED score may obtain less benefit from warfarin therapy and should be considered for other available oral anticoagulants for maximum benefit.