The anatomic substrate of irreversible airway obstruction and barotrauma in a case of hurricane-triggered fatal status asthmaticus during puerperium: Lessons from an autopsy.

Non-fully reversible airway obstruction in fatal asthma is often seen in association with profound structural changes of the bronchial wall, termed airway remodeling. Evidence suggests that heavy precipitation events can trigger epidemics of severe asthma. We present a case of fatal asthma in a young woman with no prior near-fatal exacerbations and postulate that the patient's extensive airway remodeling and puerperal state (susceptibility factors), in combination with a massive allergen challenge during a hurricane landfall (triggering factor), played a central role in her death. The autopsy revealed diffuse obstruction of proximal and distal bronchi by mucous plugs together with transmural chronic inflammation, tissue eosinophilia, extensive goblet cell hyperplasia with MUC-5 expression and airway smooth muscle (ASM) thickening. The observed distribution of airway remodeling was heterogeneous with sparing of the lingula, which exhibited hyperinflation and expansion of perivascular spaces indicative of dissecting air. The massive stagnation of mucus and significant inter-airway structural heterogeneity created an anatomical substrate for unequal airflow distribution facilitating the development of barotrauma. Although not considered conventional risk factors for fatal asthma, we believe that in this case, the patient's puerperal state in conjunction with an extreme environmental event dispersing aeroallergens were major contributors to the development of a fatal asthma attack. Our autopsy findings suggest that effective strategies to evacuate stagnated mucus and induce relaxation of thickened ASM are crucial in the management of life-threatening asthma exacerbations.

Outcomes of Patients Who Have Do Not Resuscitate Status prior to Being Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.

Admission of patients who have do not resuscitate (DNR) status to an intensive care unit (ICU) is potentially a misallocation of limited resources to patients who may neither need nor want intensive care. Yet, patients who have DNR status are often admitted to the ICU. This is a retrospective review of patients who had a valid DNR status at the time that they were admitted to an ICU in a single hospital over an eighteen-month period. Thirty-five patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The primary reasons for admission to the ICU were respiratory distress (54.2%) and sepsis (45.7%). Sixteen (45.7%) of the patients died, compared to a 5.4% mortality rate for all patients admitted to our ICU during this period (p < 0.001). APACHE II score was a significant predictor of mortality (18.5 ± 1.3 alive and 23.4 ± 1.4 dead; p = 0.038). Of the 19 patients discharged alive, 9 were discharged home, 5 to hospice, and 4 to a post-acute care facility. Conclusions. Patients who have DNR status and are admitted to the ICU have a higher mortality than other ICU patients. Those who survive have a high likelihood of being discharged to hospice or a post-acute care facility. The value of intensive intervention for these patients is not supported by these results. Only a minority of patients were seen by palliative care and chaplain teams, services which the literature supports as valuable for DNR patients. Our study supports the need for less expensive and less intensive but more appropriate resources for patients and families who have chosen DNR status.