Global Health Outreach by United States Ophthalmology Residency Programs: Understanding of Host Country Systems-Based Practice.

INTRODUCTION: For medical residents, global health outreach is the first experience of learning how to develop partnerships with foreign medical systems. The overall objective of this project was to develop an overview of global health programs in U.S. ophthalmology residencies. The investigation focused on characterizing the goals and services offered, the didactics taught to residents, and the program director's understanding of systems-based practice gained in the host country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was sent to all U.S. ophthalmology residency program directors. The two outcome measures of the study were characterization of global health outreach and didactics completed by U.S. ophthalmology residency programs and review of program director understanding of host country systems of care. RESULTS: Twelve program directors of 117 (10.26%) answered the survey. 100% of programs from the Department of Defense responded. Countries served included Ecuador, Panama, Honduras, Dominican Republic, India, Tanzania, Nepal, Bhutan, Guatemala, Micronesia, Haiti, Mongolia, Bolivia. Sixty five percent worked at a free-standing public hospital. Many programs offered resident participation with only 41.87% giving residents ACGME credit. Most programs (91.67%) offered fewer than 5 hours of global health didactics. When program directors were asked about their knowledge of host country systems of care, most noted understanding of the hospital functions like the referral system, transitions of care, hospital funding, and medical supply chain, but not of the perception of patients with chronic or congenital ophthalmic diseases, host country general or ophthalmic medical education, patient research safeguards and host country malpractice system. CONCLUSION: From the small sample of program directors, Ophthalmology residency program global health outreach varies in faculty and resident participation, and in goals and services offered. In addition, there was a wide variation in ophthalmology program director understanding of host country systems of care.

Refractive Surgery: Malpractice Litigation Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To review data on malpractice claims related to refractive surgery to identify common allegations and injuries and financial outcomes. METHODS: The WestlawNext database was reviewed for all malpractice lawsuits/settlements related to refractive eye surgery. Data evaluated included patient demographics, type of operation performed, plaintiff allegation, nature of injury, and litigation outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 167 cases met the inclusion criteria, of which 108 cases (64.7%) were found to be favorable and 59 cases (35.3%) unfavorable to the defendant. A total of 141 cases were tried by a jury with 108 cases (76.4%) favorable and 33 cases (23.6%) unfavorable to the defendant. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed in 127 cases (76%). The most common allegations were negligence in treatment or surgery in 127 cases (76%) and lack of informed consent in 83 cases (49.7%). For all cases, the need for future surgery (P = 0.0001) and surgery resulting in keratoconus (P = 0.05) were more likely to favor the plaintiff. In jury verdict decisions, cases in which failure to diagnose a preoperative condition was alleged favored the defendant (P = 0.03), whereas machine malfunction (P = 0.05) favored the plaintiff. After adjustment for inflation, the overall mean award was $1,287,872. Jury verdicts and settlements led to mean awards of $1,604,801 and $826,883, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice litigation in refractive surgery tends to favor the defendant. However, large awards and settlements were given in cases that were favorable to the plaintiff. The need for future surgery and surgery leading to keratoconus increased the chance of an unfavorable outcome.