Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Analg ; 115(1): 202-6, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22543069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty may provide superior analgesia but can produce footdrop, which may mask surgically induced peroneal nerve injury. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, we evaluated whether performing a selective tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa would avoid complete peroneal motor block. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa or a sciatic nerve block proximal to its bifurcation in combination with femoral nerve block as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. Local anesthetic solution of sufficient volume to encircle the target nerve was administered for the block, up to a maximum of 20 mL. General anesthesia was administered for surgery. After emergence from anesthesia, in the recovery room, the presence or absence of peroneal sensory and motor block was noted. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded for 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The tibial nerve block and sciatic nerve block were performed 1.7 cm (99% CI, 1.3 to 2.1) and 9.4 cm (99% CI, 8.3 to 10.5) proximal to the popliteal crease, respectively (99% CI for difference between means: 6.4 to 9.0; P < 0.001). A lower volume of ropivacaine 0.5% was used for the tibial nerve block, 8.7 mL (99% CI, 7.9 to 9.4) versus 15.2 mL (99% CI, 14.9 to 15.5), respectively (99% CI for difference between means, 5.6 to 7.3; P < 0.001). No patient receiving a tibial nerve block developed complete peroneal motor block compared to 82.5% of patients with sciatic nerve block (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the pain scores and opioid consumption between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial nerve block performed in the popliteal fossa in close proximity to the popliteal crease avoided complete peroneal motor block and provided similar postoperative analgesia compared to sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Nervo Femoral , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/prevenção & controle , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Nervo Fibular , Nervo Tibial , Idoso , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Connecticut , Feminino , Nervo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/etiologia , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atividade Motora/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Nervo Fibular/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Nervo Tibial/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
2.
Paediatr Drugs ; 5(9): 615-27, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12956618

RESUMO

Most anesthetic and analgesic agents in current use traverse the placental barrier in varying degrees, but are well tolerated by the fetus if judiciously administered. For labor analgesia, many options are available. Systemic administration of opioids and sedatives is one such option. Repeated maternal administration of opioids such as pethidine (meperidine) results in significant fetal exposure and neonatal respiratory depression. Patient-controlled analgesia with synthetic opioids such as fentanyl, alfentanil, and the new ultra-short-acting remifentanil may be used for labor analgesia in selected patients. Other options for labor analgesia include epidural and combined spinal-epidural techniques. With such techniques, neonatal exposure to opioids and sedatives can be minimized or totally avoided. While limiting the fetal exposure to the harmful effects of depressant drugs, epidural anesthesia and/or analgesia improves placental perfusion and oxygenation of the fetus, which is beneficial, especially in conditions such as pregnancy-induced hypertension. Regional blocks are also administered for the majority of cesarean deliveries because of the overwhelming and unequivocal evidence of maternal and fetal safety compared with general anesthesia for this indication. However, in some instances, administration of general anesthesia is unavoidable. Neonatal respiratory depression with low Apgar scores, and umbilical arterial and venous pH associated with general anesthesia, is often transient. A properly administered anesthetic, whether regional or general, has no significant adverse fetal or neonatal effects.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Troca Materno-Fetal/efeitos dos fármacos , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Troca Materno-Fetal/fisiologia , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA