The Effect of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Sedation on Norepinephrine Requirements in Septic Shock Patients: A Crossover Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Propofol-based sedation may increase hemodynamic instability by decreasing vascular tone and venous return. Incremental exogenous catecholamines doses may be required to counteract such effects, aggravating the deleterious effects of sympathetic overstimulation. α-2 adrenergic agonists have been reported to decrease norepinephrine requirements in experimental septic shock. The aim of the present study is to test the hypothesis that switching from sedation with propofol to the α-2 agonist dexmedetomidine may decrease norepinephrine doses in septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective open-label crossover study. SETTINGS: University hospital, ICU. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight septic shock patients requiring norepinephrine to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure and needing deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil to maintain a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score between -3 and -4. INTERVENTIONS: An initial set of measurements including hemodynamics, norepinephrine doses, and depth of sedation were obtained during sedation with propofol. Propofol was then replaced by dexmedetomidine and a second set of data was obtained after 4 hours of dexmedetomidine infusion. Sedation was switched back to propofol, and a final set of measurements was obtained after 8 hours. A Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score between -3 and -4 was maintained during the study period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Norepinephrine requirements decreased from 0.69 ± 0.72 µg/kg/min before dexmedetomidine to 0.30 ± 0.25 µg/kg/min 4 hours after dexmedetomidine infusion, increasing again to 0.42 ± 0.36 µg/kg/min while on propofol 8 hours after stopping dexmedetomidine (p < 0.005). Dexmedetomidine dosage was 0.7 ± 0.2 µg/kg/hr. Before and after dexmedetomidine infusion, sedative doses remained unchanged (propofol 2.6 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.2 mg/kg/hr; p = 0.23 and remifentanil 1.27 ± 0.17 vs 1.27 ± 0.16 µg/kg/hr; p = 0.52, respectively). Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale was -4 (-4 to -3) before, -4 (-4 to -3) during, and -4 (-4 to -4) after dexmedetomidine (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: For a comparable level of sedation, switching from propofol to dexmedetomidine resulted in a reduction of catecholamine requirements in septic shock patients.

Presepsin as a potential marker for bacterial infection relapse in critical care patients. A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic bacterial infection carries a high risk of mortality in critical care patients. Improvements in diagnostic procedures are required for effective management of sepsis. Recently, the soluble CD14 subtype, or presepsin, has been suggested as a reliable marker of sepsis, and we set out to compare its diagnostic performance with that of procalcitonin (PCT). We focused on a cohort of septic patients who, during their hospitalization, relapsed after a period of clinical relief from symptoms. METHODS: In total 21 adult patients were studied during their hospitalization in the Critical Care Unit of Policlinico Umberto I hospital; 74 plasma samples were collected at multiple time points, and presepsin levels were measured using a PATHFAST analyzer. RESULTS: Presepsin and PCT were significantly lower in healthy controls than in sepsis or severe sepsis (p<0.001), both enabled a significant difference to be detected between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and severe sepsis (p<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) calculated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 0.888 for presepsin and 0.910 for PCT. In those patients in whom a clinical recurrence of sepsis was observed, while PCT levels normalized during the transient remission phase, presepsin levels (>1000 pg/mL) remained high. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of monitoring a combination of several biomarkers in order to obtain a reliable diagnosis. Maximal presepsin levels could alert clinicians not to suspend antibiotic treatments and to carefully monitor septic patients' state of health, even after clinical symptoms have disappeared and PCT levels returned to normal.

Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: ß-blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of ß-stimulating catecholamines in septic shock. However, their negative chronotropy and inotropy may potentially lead to an inappropriately low cardiac output, with a subsequent compromise of microvascular blood flow. The purpose of the present pilot study was to investigate the effects of reducing heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute in patients with septic shock using the ß-1 adrenoceptor blocker, esmolol, with specific focus on systemic hemodynamics and the microcirculation. DESIGN: Prospective, observational clinical study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary ICU at a university hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 24 hours of initial hemodynamic optimization, 25 septic shock patients with a heart rate greater than or equal to 95 beats per minute and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg received a titrated esmolol infusion to maintain heart rate less than 95 beats per minute. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after esmolol administration. Heart rates targeted between 80 and 94 beats per minute were achieved in all patients. Whereas cardiac index decreased (4.0 [3.5; 5.3] vs 3.1 [2.6; 3.9] L/min/m; p<0.001), stroke volume remained unchanged (34 [37; 47] vs 40 [31; 46] mL/beat/m; p=0.32). Microcirculatory blood flow in small vessels increased (2.8 [2.6; 3.0] vs 3.0 [3.0; 3.0]; p=0.002), while the heterogeneity index decreased (median 0.06 [interquartile range 0; 0.21] vs 0 [0; 0]; p=0.002). PaO2 and pH increased while PaCO2 decreased (all p<0.05). Of note, norepinephrine requirements were significantly reduced by selective ß-1 blocker therapy (0.53 [0.29; 0.96] vs 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] µg/kg/min; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that heart rate control by a titrated esmolol infusion in septic shock patients was associated with maintenance of stroke volume, preserved microvascular blood flow, and a reduction in norepinephrine requirements.

Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: ß-Blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of ß-adrenergic receptor stimulation in septic shock. However, ß-Blockers are not traditionally used for this condition and may worsen cardiovascular decompensation related through negative inotropic and hypotensive effects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the short-acting ß-blocker esmolol in patients with severe septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Open-label, randomized phase 2 study, conducted in a university hospital intensive care unit (ICU) between November 2010 and July 2012, involving patients in septic shock with a heart rate of 95/min or higher requiring high-dose norepinephrine to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or higher. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned 77 patients to receive a continuous infusion of esmolol titrated to maintain heart rate between 80/min and 94/min for their ICU stay and 77 patients to standard treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Our primary outcome was a reduction in heart rate below the predefined threshold of 95/min and to maintain heart rate between 80/min and 94/min by esmolol treatment over a 96-hour period. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and organ function measures; norepinephrine dosages at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours; and adverse events and mortality occurring within 28 days after randomization. RESULTS: Targeted heart rates were achieved in all patients in the esmolol group compared with those in the control group. The median AUC for heart rate during the first 96 hours was -28/min (IQR, -37 to -21) for the esmolol group vs -6/min (95% CI, -14 to 0) for the control group with a mean reduction of 18/min (P < .001). For stroke volume index, the median AUC for esmolol was 4 mL/m2 (IQR, -1 to 10) vs 1 mL/m2 for the control group (IQR, -3 to 5; P = .02), whereas the left ventricular stroke work index for esmolol was 3 mL/m2 (IQR, 0 to 8) vs 1 mL/m2 for the control group (IQR, -2 to 5; P = .03). For arterial lactatemia, median AUC for esmolol was -0.1 mmol/L (IQR, -0.6 to 0.2) vs 0.1 mmol/L for the control group (IQR, -0.3 for 0.6; P = .007); for norepinephrine, -0.11 µg/kg/min (IQR, -0.46 to 0.02) for the esmolol group vs -0.01 µg/kg/min (IQR, -0.2 to 0.44) for the control group (P = .003). Fluid requirements were reduced in the esmolol group: median AUC was 3975 mL/24 h (IQR, 3663 to 4200) vs 4425 mL/24 h(IQR, 4038 to 4775) for the control group (P < .001). We found no clinically relevant differences between groups in other cardiopulmonary variables nor in rescue therapy requirements. Twenty-eight day mortality was 49.4% in the esmolol group vs 80.5% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.59; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients in septic shock, open-label use of esmolol vs standard care was associated with reductions in heart rates to achieve target levels, without increased adverse events. The observed improvement in mortality and other secondary clinical outcomes warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231698.

Effects of vasopressinergic receptor agonists on sublingual microcirculation in norepinephrine-dependent septic shock.

INTRODUCTION: The present study was designed to determine the effects of continuously infused norepinephrine (NE) plus (1) terlipressin (TP) or (2) arginine vasopressin (AVP) or (3) placebo on sublingual microcirculation in septic shock patients. The primary study end point was a difference of ≥ 20% in the microvascular flow index of small vessels among groups. METHODS: The design of the study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. NE was titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 and 75 mmHg after establishment of normovolemia in 60 septic shock patients. Thereafter patients (n = 20 per group) were randomized to receive continuous infusions of either TP (1 µg/kg/hour), AVP (0.04 U/minute) or placebo (isotonic saline). In all groups, open-label NE was adjusted to maintain MAP within threshold values if needed. The sublingual microcirculatory blood flow of small vessels was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 6 hours after randomization. RESULTS: TP and AVP decreased NE requirements at the end of the 6-hour study period. The data are medians (25th and 75th interquartile ranges (IQRs)): 0.57 µg/kg/minute (0.29 to 1.04) vs. 0.16 µg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.37) for TP and 0.40 µg/kg/minute (0.20 to 1.05) vs. 0.23 µg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.77) for AVP, with statistical significance of P < 0.05 vs. baseline and vs. placebo. There were no differences in sublingual microcirculatory variables, systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport and acid-base homeostasis among the three study groups during the entire observation period. The proportions of perfused vessels increased in relation to baseline within all study groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. The specific data were as follows (median (IQR)): 9.7% (2.6 to 19.8) for TP, 8.9% (0.0 to 17.8) for AVP, and 6.9% (3.5 to 10.1) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison), as well as perfused vessel density 18.6% (8.6 to 36.9) for TP, 20.2% (-3.0 to 37.2) for AVP, and 11.4% (-3.0 to 19.4) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that to achieve a MAP of 65 to 75 mmHg in septic patients treated with NE, the addition of continuously infused low-dose TP or AVP does not affect sublingual microcirculatory blood flow. In addition, our results suggest that microcirculatory flow abnormalities are mainly related to other factors (for example, volume status, timing, hemodynamics and progression of the disease) rather than to the vasopressor per se. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00995839.

Relationship between norepinephrine dose, tachycardia and outcome in septic shock: A multicentre evaluation.

PURPOSE: Septic shock is associated with massive release of endogenous catecholamines. Adrenergic agents may exacerbate catecholamine toxicity and contribute to poor outcomes. We sought to determine whether an association existed between tachycardia and mortality in septic shock patients requiring norepinephrine for more than 6 h despite adequate volume resuscitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicentre retrospective observational study on 730 adult patients in septic shock consecutively admitted to eight European ICUs between 2011 and 2013. Three timepoints were selected: T1 (first hour of infusion of norepinephrine), Tpeak (time of highest dose during the first 24 h of treatment), and T24 (24-h post-T1). Binary logistic regression models were constructed for the three time-points. RESULTS: Overall ICU mortality was 38.4%. Mortality was higher in those requiring high-dose (≥0.3 mcg/kg/min) versus low-dose (<0.3 mcg/kg/min) norepinephrine at T1 (53.4% vs 30.6%; p < 0.001) and T24 (61.4% vs 20.4%; p < 0.0001). Patients requiring high-dose with concurrent tachycardia had higher mortality at T1; in the low-dose group tachycardia was not associated with mortality. Resolving tachycardia (from T1 to T24) was associated with lower mortality compared to patients where tachycardia persisted (27.8% vs 46.4%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of high-dose norepinephrine and concurrent tachycardia are associated with poor outcomes in septic shock.

Effects of levosimendan on mitochondrial function in patients with septic shock: a randomized trial.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is key feature of septic shock and contributes to the development of sepsis related organ dysfunction. It is characterized by a variable reduction of the respiratory chain (RC) activities, altered mitochondrial morphology and reactive oxygen species production. Recent data have reported the efficacy of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, in improving heart performance and organ perfusion in critically ill patients. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that Levosimendan has antioxidant properties. Nevertheless, the effects of levosimendan on mitochondrial function are not fully elucidated. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of levosimendan on mitochondria performance. Five mitochondrial parameters were screened: the redox status; the amount of scavenging enzymes; the activities of the RC complexes; the mitochondrial content; the steady state levels of the RC subunits; the mitochondrial biogenesis. Our results show that patients treated with levosimendan had a significant reduction of glutathionylated proteins and an increase in the amount of the antioxidant enzyme MnSOD, underlining its antioxidant properties. The activities of the RC complexes I, II and III were unchanged in the mitochondria of patients treated with levosimendan compared to controls whereas the mitochondrial content was significantly higher in levosimendan vs. control patients. Finally, evaluation of mitochondrial biogenesis did not show any significant difference in the two groups, although an overall increase in the amount of the RC subunits was observed in the levosimendan group. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that in septic shock patients, Levosimendan exerts antioxidant action by increasing antioxidant defense and lowering oxidative damage.