Efficacy and safety of ralinepag, a novel oral IP agonist, in PAH patients on mono or dual background therapy: results from a phase 2 randomised, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This phase 2 study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of immediate-release orally administered ralinepag, a selective, non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist with a 24-h terminal half-life, compared to placebo in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: 61 PAH patients who were receiving standard care, including mono or dual PAH-targeted background therapy were randomised 2:1 to ralinepag (n=40) or placebo (n=21). The starting dose of ralinepag was 10 µg twice daily. Dosage was then up-titrated as tolerated over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period, to a maximum total daily dose of 600 µg (300 µg twice daily). The primary efficacy end-point was the absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22. Additional end-points included percentage change in PVR from baseline, other haemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Ralinepag significantly decreased PVR by 163.9 dyn·s·cm-5 compared to an increase of 0.7 dyn·s·cm-5 with placebo (p=0.02); the least-squares mean change from baseline PVR was -29.8% compared with placebo (p=0.03). 6MWD increased from baseline by 36.2 m with ralinepag and 29.4 m with placebo (p=0.90). Serious adverse events occurred in 10% of ralinepag patients and 29% of placebo patients. Study discontinuations occurred in 13% of ralinepag patients and 10% of placebo patients. SUMMARY: Ralinepag reduced PVR compared with placebo in PAH patients on mono (41%) or dual combination (59%) background therapy.

Safety and efficacy of rodatristat ethyl for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (ELEVATE-2): a dose-ranging, randomised, multicentre, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of serotonin in pulmonary arterial hypertension has been extensively studied in recent decades, with preclinical data strongly indicating involvement in disease pathogenesis; however, clinical studies have yielded mixed results. METHODS: ELEVATE-2 was a phase 2b dose-ranging, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial investigating rodatristat ethyl as a treatment for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The study was conducted at 64 sites across 16 countries in Europe and North America. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO functional class II or III symptom severity, and had received a stable dose and regimen of one or more pulmonary arterial hypertension treatments for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive two placebo tablets, one placebo and one rodatristat ethyl 300 mg tablet, or two rodatristat ethyl 300 mg tablets twice daily using an interactive response system. Participants, investigators, site personnel, and sponsors were masked to treatment allocation. Participants who completed the 24 week treatment period were invited to continue in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was percent change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 24. Primary efficacy analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population and analyses of harms were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received any amount of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04712669, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between March 18, 2021 and Dec 13, 2022, 108 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned. 36 participants received placebo, 36 received rodatristat ethyl 300 mg, and 36 received rodatristat ethyl 600 mg twice daily. Overall, 85 (79%) of participants were female and 23 (21%) were male. The mean age was 52·8 years (SD 14·7) in the full analysis set. In the open-label extension phase, 62 (82%) of participants were female and 14 (18%) were male, and the mean age was 52·8 years (SD 14·7); this phase was terminated following sponsor review of unmasked main study results. Least-squares mean percent change in PVR from baseline to week 24 favoured placebo and was 5·8% (SE 18·1) for the placebo group, 63·1% (18·5) for the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and 64·2% (18·0) for the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported for 29 (81%) patients in the placebo group, 33 (92%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and all 36 (100%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. TEAE leading to study discontinuation were reported for three (8%) patients in the placebo group, four (11%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and four (11%) in the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. There was one (3%) TEAE leading to death in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group. INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that reducing peripheral serotonin concentrations via rodatristat ethyl has a negative effect on pulmonary haemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. This finding suggests that manipulating this pathway might not be a suitable option for pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. FUNDING: Enzyvant Therapeutics (now Sumitomo Pharma America).

A randomized, controlled, multicentre trial comparing pegvisomant alone with combination therapy of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with acromegaly who are suboptimally controlled on long-acting octreotide (LAR), treatment options are to switch to pegvisomant monotherapy (PM) or add pegvisomant to LAR (P-LAR). Our objective was to evaluate if the safety and efficacy of these regimens differ. DESIGN: This was an open-label, multicentre, randomized, 40-week outpatient study. The control arm consisted of patients controlled on LAR (n = 28). PATIENTS: A total of 27 patients with suboptimally controlled acromegaly [as indicated by a serum IGF-I level > or = 1.3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) of the age-related reference range] were randomized to PM (10 mg once daily initially, then adjusted in 5-mg increments every 8 weeks based on IGF-I levels) and 29 to P-LAR (LAR dosing remained fixed). MEASUREMENTS: The primary end-point was adverse events (AEs). The secondary end-point was biochemical IGF-I-based efficacy. The RIA for IGF-I was discontinued by the manufacturer during the study and a chemiluminescent assay was subsequently used. Previously obtained IGF-I levels were re-analysed. RESULTS: PM and P-LAR were well tolerated and there were no differences in the number of AEs. Patients receiving P-LAR tended to be more likely to have clinically significant increases in hepatic transaminase levels, especially those receiving high-dose LAR. Normalization of IGF-I was similar with both regimens (56% and 62% of patients for PM and P-LAR respectively). The change in IGF-I assay resulted in lower rates of IGF-I normalization than expected. Reductions in fasting glucose levels were greater with PM than with P-LAR (-0.8 mmol/l; 95% confidence interval -1.16, -0.53 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: In patients suboptimally controlled on LAR, PM and P-LAR were equally well tolerated and effective in normalizing IGF-I, and overall clinical improvement was observed with both regimens. Thus, pegvisomant monotherapy and adjunctive therapy are equally viable options for the treatment of LAR-resistant acromegaly.

Lipoatrophy in GH deficient patients treated with a long-acting pegylated GH.

OBJECTIVE: Changes observed during adult GH deficiency (GHD) are most often reversed with the administration of recombinant human GH (rhGH). To avoid daily injections, a long-acting GH molecule has been obtained by covalent binding of polyethylene glycol (PEG) with rhGH (PEG-GH), allowing weekly s.c. injections. This study was designed to assess its efficacy and safety, in adult GHD subjects. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel group study. Subjects were recruited from 34 centers. A total of 105 subjects with GHD were assigned a treatment. They received 6 weekly injections of either PEG-GH or placebo. Subjects were randomized into one out of four treatment groups (Groups A-D) or placebo (Group E). Groups A, B, and C received 1, 3, and 4 mg PEG-GH respectively, for the first 3 weeks followed by 2, 6, and 8 mg PEG-GH respectively, for the remaining 3 weeks. Group D received 4 mg PEG-GH for 6 weeks. Group E received placebo. The study was suspended because of the development of lipoatrophy in certain subjects and restarted with an injection rotation plan, before being terminated due to further subjects developing lipoatrophy. RESULTS: A total of 13 cases of injection-site lipoatrophy were reported, of which ten were in females and three occurred after the first injection; all cases were independent of PEG-GH dose or IGF1 levels, either basal or under treatment. CONCLUSION: The unpredictable occurrence of injection-site lipoatrophy with weekly long-acting pegylated GH molecules may be a limiting factor for their development.