Improved outcomes after heart transplantation for cardiac amyloidosis in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis, caused most commonly by deposition of light chain (AL) or transthyretin (ATTR) type fibrils, has an extremely poor prognosis. In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated temporal trends in survival after heart transplantation for cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: We analyzed 48 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (AL, n = 32; familial ATTR, n = 16) who underwent heart transplantation from May 2002 to March 2017. Patients were analysed in 2 periods, Era 1 (2002- 2007) and Era 2 (2008- 2017), separated by altered patient selection in both, AL and ATTR amyloidosis, and changed chemotherapy regimens for AL amyloidosis. RESULTS: The modern era was characterized by a lower number of extracardiac organ involvement for AL (94% isolated cardiac amyloidosis in Era 2 vs 56% in Era 1; p = 0.0221), and more frequent treatment for AL with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (94% in Era 2 vs 6% in Era 1; p < 0.0001). AL patients had significantly lower survival than patients with non-amyloid cardiomyopathy after heart transplantation in Era 1, and ATTR patients had numerically lower survival. However, survival in the modern era was comparable to non-amyloid transplants in both cohorts, possibly reflecting a shift in chemotherapy strategies and patient selection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era, use of enhanced chemotherapy regimens for isolated advanced AL cardiac amyloidosis was associated with outcomes comparable to non-amyloid cardiomyopathy. We conclude that heart transplantation in highly selected patients with isolated non-systemic advanced cardiac amyloidosis may be a feasible approach.

The need for dedicated advanced heart failure units to optimize heart failure care: impact of optimized advanced heart failure unit care on heart transplant outcome in high-risk patients.

AIM: With an increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF), more patients with advanced disease have to be treated in cardiology units by sophisticated medical and interventional strategies. We therefore developed a dedicated advanced heart failure unit (AHFU) to target the specific needs of the many patients with advanced HF. We here present our concept and its impact on outcome in high-risk high-urgency (HU) heart transplant candidates. METHODS AND RESULTS: The eight-bed unit was established as an extension of the cardiologic intensive care and coronary care units in an intermediate care setting. Each bed was equipped with 24 h haemodynamic, respiratory, and arrhythmia monitoring. The unit is served 24/7 by five residents in cardiology, one staff cardiologist specializing in medical and interventional HF care, and 10 intensive care nurses. The cardiology team is supported by colleagues from cardiac surgery, sports medicine, psychosomatics, and the internal medicine departments. As an example of the intensified care on the AHFU, data from the cohorts of patients undergoing heart transplantation from HU status before (pre-AHFU 2008-11) and after establishment of the AHFU (AHFU 2012-15) were analysed. Interestingly, mortality on HU waiting list and post-heart transplant survival was comparable in both cohorts, despite significant increase in morbidity and co-morbidity as assessed by the Index for Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Transplantation model in the AHFU group. CONCLUSIONS: Our AHFU provides a unique and novel setting for the integration of modern pharmacological, interventional, surgical, and supportive HF therapy embedded in an academic heart centre. This may be a major step forward in the care of critical patients with advanced HF.

A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (NIMF) pharmacokinetics vary widely, and enterohepatic recirculation of the drug and its metabolites may be altered by concurrently administered immunosuppressants, including the widely used agent cyclosporin A (CsA). A reliable method of achieving effective and well-tolerated levels of NIMF-based immunosuppression would be of eminent interest. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the use of measured mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough levels (C0) and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited-sampling strategies for monitoring MPA exposure in stable heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplantation) receiving a CsA-containing or CsA-free immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The treatment groups were receiving chronic maintenance immunosuppressive regimens consisting of either CsA/MMF or rapamycin (RAPA)/MMF. An additional subgroup of patients was switched from the CsA-containing regimen to the RAPA-containing regimen. Fasting venous blood samples were obtained before dosing and at 40, 75, 120, and 240 minutes after administration of the morning dose of MME The validated Emit assay was used to measure MPA plasma concentrations. Dose adjustment of AUCs was performed by dividing the AUC by the morning NIMF dose in grams. Cmax after administration of the morning dose was determined from available MPA data points using curve-fitting analysis. The increase to Cmax (Cmax-C0) was calculated, and dose adjustment was performed as before. Abbreviated 12-hour MPA AUCs were estimated using a limited-sampling strategy (before dosing and 30 and 120 minutes after dosing) based on high-performance liquid chromatography data. Adverse events were monitored during routine follow-up visits. RESULTS: The study included 47 patients receiving CsA/MMF, 15 receiving RAPA/MMF, and 9 who were switched from CsA/MMF to RAPA/MME The population included 55 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 58.94 years and a mean weight of 81.85 kg. The only significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between groups were the mean number of years since heart transplantation (3.62 CsA/MMF vs 8.53 RAPA/MMF; P<0.01) and the proportions of patients still receiving corticosteroids (44.7% vs 13.3%, respectively; P<0.01). Reported adverse events were generally mild, including leukopenia (8.1%), diarrhea (6.5%), and abdominal pain (4.8%), and did not require drug discontinuation. In patients receiving CsA/MMF, MPA AUCs ranged from 19.67 to 81.80 mg/h.L (mean [SD], 41.92 [14.14] mg/h.L). MPA Co levels were poorly correlated with total AUC (r2=0.36). MPA Co levels of 0.5 and 1.6 mg/L were correlated with AUCs of <30 and <40 mg/h.L, respectively. In patients receiving RAPA/MMF, MPA AUCs ranged from 34.40 to 87.60 mg/h.L (mean, 51.07 [15.80] mg/h.L). The correlation between Co and total AUC was better than in the CsA/MMF group (r2=0.61). MPA C0 levels of 1.0 and 2.3 mg/L were correlated with AUCs of 30 and 40 mg/h.L, respectively. Statistically significant differences between RAPA/MMF and CsA/MMF were noted in the mean MMF dosage (1.90 [0.71] vs 2.87 [0.78] g/d, respectively; P<0.001), the mean dose-adjusted MPA AUC (60.95 [27.42] vs 31.92 [16.12] mg/h.L.g MMF; P<0.001), and mean dose-adjusted MPA C0 levels (5.10 [3.41] vs 1.41 [0.95] mg/L.g; P<0.001). The dose-adjusted increase to Cmax after morning dosing was comparable between groups, and there was no difference in the frequency distribution of Cmax. In the group switched from the CsA-containing regimen to the RAPA-containing regimen, the changes in MMF dose, dose-adjusted AUC, and MPA C0 levels were similar to those in the CsA/MMF and RAPA/MMF groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of measured MPA C0 levels and 12-hour MPA AUCs estimated by a limited-sampling strategy in stable heart transplant patients receiving chronic maintenance immunosuppressive therapy with CsA/MMF or RAPA/MMF, abbreviated AUC estimation predicted drug exposure more accurately than did measured C0 levels. Thus, MPA AUCs obtained by limited sampling may be useful in guiding clinical management and dosing. However, further study is required, including validation of these findings in clinical outcome studies.

Return to work after heart transplantation: discrepancy with subjective work ability.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the objective rate of return to work after heart transplantation (HTX) in comparison with the patients' subjective rating of their work ability and identifies predictors for return to work in a German heart transplant center. METHODS: A questionnaire covering demographics, clinical data, and professional aspects was sent to 200 heart transplant recipients at least 12 months after HTX. Participation was strictly anonymous enabling reliable results concerning subjective work ability. RESULTS: Response rate was 150 of 200 (75%). During the time after HTX, 45 of 150 (30.0%) patients had ever been in a job. Thirty-five of 95 (36.8%) patients of formal working age (<65 years) were employed after 12.6+/-1.9 months: 18 of 95 (18.9%) in full-time work, 9 of 95 (9.5%) in part-time work, and 6 of 95 (6.3%) in casual employment. Two of 95 (2.1%) patients worked as handicapped employees; only 1 of 95 (1.1%) patients was currently seeking work. Patients obtained financial benefits from their illness (n=54; 36%) or age-related annuity (n=8; 5.3%). Forty-two of 95 (44.2%) patients did not feel capable of working, three patients did not answer, and 50 of 95 patients (52.6%) felt fit for employment. Employment after HTX depended on age, duration of unemployment, diabetes mellitus, and financial need for paid employment. Financially independent patients (n=66) more often felt unable to work by subjective judgement (n=34/67; 50.7%) than patients who depended on paid employment (8/28; 28.6%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of employment after HTX in Germany is significantly lower than the subjective perception of the individual ability to work; underscoring the importance of sociodemographic and psychologic aspects during rehabilitation of HTX recipients.