Exploring how national educational organizations can promote educational research amongst members: a survey-based study.

BACKGROUND: Engagement of academic faculty in research remains low. While barriers to research have been explored, there are no data on how national organizations can help overcome these barriers. Our study explored faculty satisfaction and motivational drivers for engagement with research opportunities offered by the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP), an organization of pediatric medical educators, and characterize strategies perceived by faculty to promote the use of these opportunities. METHODS: In 2021, 5 survey questions were administered to faculty members of COMSEP to explore satisfaction with COMSEP's research offerings, the perceived value of educational research, and the facilitators, barriers and potential opportunities for COMSEP to promote research. Clark's Commitment and Necessary Effort model on motivation served as the theoretical framework for our study, which explores motivation, self-efficacy and contextual factors influencing an individual's pursuit of goals. Chi-square analysis and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test were used to compare categorical and scaled variables among groups who did and did not avail of COMSEP's research offerings. RESULTS: 90 (25%) of 360 recipients responded. 61% expressed satisfaction with COMSEP's research offerings. 68% indicated research was an expectation of their academic appointment, that education was their primary research focus (74%) and that they did not have other research opportunities that met their needs (58%). Of respondents, 75.7% of females had submitted a proposal compared to 60% of non-responders who were females. The comparison by gender was not statistically significant. Exploration by academic rank revealed that 35% of instructor/assistant professors had submitted a proposal compared to 65% of associate professors/professors (p =.05). Barriers leading to non-submission to any of the offerings included having too much other work, lack of enjoyment in writing and inability to find mentors. Respondents endorsed the importance of several strategies to promote engagement in research-skill building opportunities, personalized consultations and increased funding. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty educators value the importance of educational research and recognize that research opportunities offered by COMSEP address an unmet need, but express ambivalence in the enjoyment of writing (reflecting their mood), and endorse structural barriers, that are amenable to change, affecting their personal agency.

The Effectiveness of a Virtual Anatomy Curriculum Versus Traditional Cadaveric Dissection in UNC SOM's First-Year Class.

Even prior to the COVID pandemic, the push for medical schools to adopt virtual anatomy curricula in lieu of human cadaveric dissection was growing. In this study, musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal anatomy examination scores of first-year medical students at the UNC School of Medicine were compared across three consecutive years. These classes experienced in-person, virtual, and hybridized anatomy curriculum, respectively. There was not a single instance noted where in-person curriculum produced higher examination scores than virtual or hybridized models. By incorporating virtual or hybridized models of anatomy, medical education programs can effectively reach and educate students far beyond the traditional cadaver laboratory.

Interprofessional Education - A Mandate for Today's Radiology Curriculum.

Interprofessional education (IPE) brings educators and learners from two or more health professions together in a collaborative learning environment, specifically assuring that learners function as a team to provide patient-centered care, with each team member contributing a unique perspective. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Radiology have endorsed interprofessional and team communication as essential core competencies. Radiology educators must understand, include, and optimize IPE in their pedagogy; as a specialty, radiology must innovate more interprofessional experiences for medical students, residents and other allied health professions.

See One, Do One, Share One - Introducing Visual Abstracts in Journal Publication.

The visual abstract, read with ease and speed, is a logical evolution for today's journals to attract and maintain readers. However, many faculty have not yet constructed visual abstracts. This manuscript is a means to consolidate theory and commentaries into a cohesive explanation of why and how to develop a visual abstract. Tremendous growth opportunity exists for this innovation in the medical landscape, with current and future applications in journal publications, summary and dispersal of practice guidelines, and delivery of educational and training materials.

What Makes a Near-Peer Learning and Tutoring Program Effective in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Qualitative Analysis.

Peer tutoring can benefit both learners and peer teachers that are distinct from the learning that occurs in expert-guided learning environments. This study sought to evaluate the peer tutoring program at a large public medical school to determine the strengths and weaknesses of a near-peer tutoring program and its benefits beyond students' typical classroom-based learning. This was a survey-based study of learners and tutors participating in the peer tutoring program. Fifty-six learners and 20 tutors participated in the survey; most learners received tutoring in the preclinical phase of the curriculum. Narrative responses were thematically analyzed to identify themes for both groups. Learners' responses about the benefit of the near-peer tutoring program were in three primary categories: creating a safe learning environment, direct coaching skills, and pitfalls around the need for individualized direction. Tutors' responses about what made a successful tutoring relationship centered around crucial activities used to engage with learners, beneficial intrinsic qualities of learners such as motivation, and qualifications of tutors that were most helpful such as knowledge base. Peer tutoring programs should emphasize individualized feedback for learners that focuses on metacognitive, content-based, and socio-emotional support. In doing so, such programs can provide a well-structured approach to improve learner success. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01680-0.

Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Assessments in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Survey of Pediatric Educators.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in undergraduate medical education (UME), characterization of EPAs by pediatric educators, and opportunities and challenges with an EPA framework. METHODS: In 2020, 9 survey questions were administered to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, a national pediatric UME group. Clark's Commitment and Necessary Effort model on motivation served as the theoretical framework for our study. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven (31%) of 479 recipients, representing 75% of accredited schools responded. Eigty-three percent agreed that they understood what EPAs were, yet a minority reported using EPAs. Eighty-five percent of EPA users expressed satisfaction with EPAs in providing a shared framework and an opportunity to track student competence; dissatisfaction was expressed toward faculty resource needs. Among nonusers, barriers hindering implementation included faculty development challenges and faculty time. Qualitative analyses revealed a rich understanding of EPAs: that they offer a framework to measure learner competence by assessing performance in workplace-based tasks that can be used for entrustment decisions and for program evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Although most pediatric UME educators report understanding EPAs (contributing to self-efficacy) and recognize their benefits (value), a minority report actually using EPAs. EPAs, while providing a valuable framework, pose challenges from contextual factors affecting personal agency, which could affect educator commitment in implementation. For more widespread adoption of the EPAs, efforts should focus on minimizing these perceived barriers.

Creating an Open-Access Educational Radiology Website for Medical Students: A Guide for Radiology Educators.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Studies of medical school clerkship websites have reported efficient time management, resource utilization, and hands-on activities. We built a website devoted to medical student education in radiology to address student, educator, and school curricular needs and surveyed students to assess their satisfaction with the site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The website was created using an easily-recalled name, no-cost institutional software, and no-cost enterprise-level university hardware. The main menu links to the student formal didactic lecture calendar, custom-built health sciences library e-resources in radiology, American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, each radiology course page, and teaching files. Each course tab includes faculty-curated content from course lectures, supplemental articles and educational modules. At 6, 12, and 24 months, website analytics were assessed. At 12 and 24 months postimplementation, data were evaluated to include student assessment and satisfaction surveys and student course comments. This project was IRB-exempted. RESULTS: At 6 months, the website had received 5792 views, at 12 months 10,022 views and at 24 months 19,478 views. The website homepage with the formal didactic lecture calendar received 7156 views, the general clerkship page 4233 views, the teaching file page 3884, and thereafter subspecialty pages as follows: breast 1478, body 633, pediatrics 361, neuro 346, cardiothoracic 291, musculoskeletal 249, vascular interventional 178. One hundred fifty-two of 240 (63.3%) of students surveyed replied. Of students who utilized the website on the satisfaction survey, 80 of 97 (82.5%) indicated ratings of "extremely informative" and "very informative" to the question "How would you rate the website?." Students indicated convenience and structure as website strengths in their postcourse evaluations. CONCLUSION: The radiology medical student website incorporates demands and needs of today's students, faculty, and our medical school. A radiology clerkship website for medical students centralizes access to course resources and promotes an active learning experience with high satisfaction. Instructions on setting up a website are offered to today's radiology educators, including pearls and pitfalls.

Balancing clinical capacity with learner numbers.

BACKGROUND: The number of learners in clinical settings is increasing as health professions schools increase enrollment in order to develop the future workforce. Too many learners in clinics and hospital wards could create overcrowded conditions and diminish patient and learner experiences. Based on data gathered from a literature review, we identified challenges and solutions to address the increasing numbers of learners in clinical settings. RESULTS: Health care provider workload, physical environment and clinical culture were challenges identified from the literature review. These identified constraints were corroborated by learner and expert reflections on their experiences. CONCLUSION: As the need for more health care providers increases, the number of learners in clinical settings poses a challenge. Innovative models to deliver care, an increasing role for learners, strategic patient scheduling and redesigning workspaces may mitigate problems. The recommendations suggested from this review may offer solutions that individual preceptors and organisations can implement.

Collecting Validity Evidence: A Hands-on Workshop for Medical Education Assessment Instruments.

Introduction: There is an increasing call for developing validity evidence in medical education assessment. The literature lacks a practical resource regarding an actual development process. Our workshop teaches how to apply principles of validity evidence to existing assessment instruments and how to develop new instruments that will yield valid data. Methods: The literature, consensus findings of curricula and content experts, and principles of adult learning guided the content and methodology of the workshop. The workshop underwent stringent peer review prior to presentation at one international and three national academic conferences. In the interactive workshop, selected domains of validity evidence were taught with sequential cycles of didactics, demonstration, and deliberate practice with facilitated feedback. An exercise guide steered participants through a stepwise approach. Using Likert-scale items and open-response questions, an evaluation form rated the workshop's effectiveness, captured details of how learners reached the objectives, and determined participants' plans for future work. Results: The workshop demonstrated generalizability with successful implementation in diverse settings. Sixty-five learners, the majority being clinician-educators, completed evaluations. Learners rated the workshop favorably for each prompt. Qualitative comments corroborated the workshop's effectiveness. The active application and facilitated feedback components allowed learners to reflect in real time as to how they were meeting a particular objective. Discussion: This feasible and practical educational intervention fills a literature gap by showing the medical educator how to apply validity evidence to both existing and in-development assessment instruments. Thus, it holds the potential to significantly impact learner and, subsequently, patient outcomes.

Faculty attitudes about interprofessional education.

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional education (IPE) is an important component to training health care professionals. Research is limited in exploring the attitudes that faculty hold regarding IPE and what barriers they perceive to participating in IPE. The purpose of this study was to identify faculty attitudes about IPE and to identify barriers to participating in campus-wide IPE activities. METHODS: A locally used questionnaire called the Nebraska Interprofessional Education Attitudes Scale (NIPEAS) was used to assess attitudes related to interprofessional collaboration. Questions regarding perceived barriers were included at the end of the questionnaire. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the results in aggregate as well as by college. In addition, open-ended questions were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization framework to identify themes. RESULTS: The results showed that faculty had positive attitudes of IPE, indicating that is not a barrier to participating in IPE activities. Most common barriers to participation were scheduling conflicts (x24,285=19.17, p=0.001), lack of department support (x24,285=10.09, p=0.039), and lack of awareness of events (x24,285=26.38, p=0.000). Narrative comments corroborated that scheduling conflicts are an issue because of other priorities. Those who commented also added to the list of barriers, including relevance of the activities, location, and prior negative experiences. DISCUSSION: With faculty attitudes being positive, the exploration of faculty's perceived barriers to IPE was considered even more important. Identifying these barriers will allow us to modify our IPE activities from large, campus-wide events to smaller activities that are longitudinal in nature, embedded within current curriculum and involving more authentic experiences.