Effects of high adherence to mediterranean or low-fat diets in medicated secondary prevention patients.

Although the Mediterranean diet (MD) and the low-fat Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes Diet (TLCD) promote equivalent increases in event-free survival in secondary coronary prevention, possible mechanisms of such complete dietary patterns in these patients, usually medicated, are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the MD versus the TLCD in markers of endothelial function, oxidative stress, and inflammation after acute coronary syndromes. Comparison was made between 3 months of the MD (n = 21; rich in whole grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, and olive oil, plus red wine) and the TLCD (n = 19; plus phytosterols 2 g/day) in a highly homogenous population of stable patients who experienced coronary events in the previous 2 years (aged 45 to 65 years, all men) allocated to each diet under a strategy designed to optimize adherence, documented as >90%. Baseline demographics, body mass index and clinical data, and use of statins and other drugs were similar between groups. The MD and TLCD promoted similar decreases in body mass index and blood pressure (p ≤0.001) and particularly in plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine levels (p = 0.02) and l-arginine/asymmetric dimethylarginine ratios (p = 0.01). The 2 diets did not further enhance flow-mediated brachial artery dilation compared to baseline (4.4 ± 4.0%). Compared to the TLCD, the MD promoted decreases in blood leukocyte count (p = 0.025) and increases in high-density lipoprotein levels (p = 0.053) and baseline brachial artery diameter. Compared to the MD, the TLCD decreased low-density lipoprotein and oxidized low-density lipoprotein plasma levels, although the ratio of oxidized to total low-density lipoprotein remained unaltered. Glucose, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, triglycerides, myeloperoxidase, intercellular adhesion molecular, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and glutathione serum and plasma levels remained unchanged with either diet. In conclusion, medicated secondary prevention patients show evident although small responses to the MD and the TLCD, with improved markers of redox homeostasis and metabolic effects potentially related to atheroprotection.

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography with early injection of atropine with versus without chronic beta-blocker therapy in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease.

Although a new protocol of dobutamine stress echocardiography with the early injection of atropine (EA-DSE) has been demonstrated to be useful in reducing adverse effects and increasing the number of effective tests and to have similar accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with conventional protocols, no data exist regarding its ability to predict long-term events. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of EA-DSE and the effects of the long-term use of beta blockers on it. A retrospective evaluation of 844 patients who underwent EA-DSE for known or suspected CAD was performed; 309 (37%) were receiving beta blockers. During a median follow-up period of 24 months, 102 events (12%) occurred. On univariate analysis, predictors of events were the ejection fraction (p <0.001), male gender (p <0.001), previous myocardial infarction (p <0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy (p = 0.021), calcium channel blocker therapy (p = 0.034), and abnormal results on EA-DSE (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of events were male gender (relative risk [RR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to 2.81, p = 0.013) and abnormal results on EA-DSE (RR 4.45, 95% CI 2.84 to 7.01, p <0.0001). Normal results on EA-DSE with beta blockers were associated with a nonsignificant higher incidence of events than normal results on EA-DSE without beta blockers (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.87, p = 0.54). Abnormal results on EA-DSE with beta blockers had an RR of 4.97 (95% CI 2.79 to 8.87, p <0.001) compared with normal results, while abnormal results on EA-DSE without beta blockers had an RR of 5.96 (95% CI 3.41 to 10.44, p <0.001) for events, with no difference between groups (p = 0.36). In conclusion, the detection of fixed or inducible wall motion abnormalities during EA-DSE was an independent predictor of long-term events in patients with known or suspected CAD. The prognostic value of EA-DSE was not affected by the long-term use of beta blockers.