Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 89(7): 1185-1192, 2017 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27566991

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the typical location of the common femoral artery (CFA) bifurcation, the origin and most inferior reflection of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) relative to the femoral head (FH) and whether patient demographics predicted anatomical variations. BACKGROUND: In the absence of ultrasound guidance or prior imaging, the precise location of the CFA bifurcation and IEA can only be determined following access site angiography. Fluoroscopic landmarks are commonly used to estimate the location of the CFA bifurcation, but the position of the IEA is less well characterized. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on 989 patients with femoral angiography in the FAUST trial were analyzed. The level of CFA bifurcation and the origin and most inferior reflection of the IEA were classified by angiography. Logistic regression was used to explore whether baseline demographics were associated with anatomic variations. RESULTS: The CFA bifurcation occurs below the middle 1/3rd of the femoral head in 95% of patients, and no patient factors are predictive of a high bifurcation. The IEA origin has a more variable anatomically pattern, with high BSA, male gender, and white race associated with a low IEA origin. CONCLUSION: Operators should attempt to access the CFA at the level of the middle 1/3rd of the FH to maximize the chance of CFA cannulation. However, this location carries an 11% risk of being at or above the IEA origin. Baseline demographics were of limited utility for predicting anatomic variants of the CFA bifurcation and the course of the IEA. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Angiografia , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Malformações Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Superfície Corporal , Cateterismo Periférico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Artérias Epigástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/anormalidades , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Punções , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , População Branca
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 3(7): 751-8, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20650437

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of femoral arterial access with ultrasound (US) guidance with standard fluoroscopic guidance. BACKGROUND: Real-time US guidance reduces time to access, number of attempts, and complications in central venous access but has not been adequately assessed in femoral artery cannulation. METHODS: Patients (n = 1,004) undergoing retrograde femoral arterial access were randomized 1:1 to either fluoroscopic or US guidance. The primary end point was successful common femoral artery (CFA) cannulation by femoral angiography. Secondary end points included time to sheath insertion, number of forward needle advancements, first pass success, accidental venipunctures, and vascular access complications at 30 days. RESULTS: Compared with fluoroscopic guidance, US guidance produced no difference in CFA cannulation rates (86.4% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.17), except in the subgroup of patients with CFA bifurcations occurring over the femoral head (82.6% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.01). US guidance resulted in an improved first-pass success rate (83% vs. 46%, p < 0.0001), reduced number of attempts (1.3 vs. 3.0, p < 0.0001), reduced risk of venipuncture (2.4% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.0001), and reduced median time to access (136 s vs. 148 s, p = 0.003). Vascular complications occurred in 7 of 503 and 17 of 501 in the US and fluoroscopy groups, respectively (1.4% vs. 3.4% p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, routine real-time US guidance improved CFA cannulation only in patients with high CFA bifurcations but reduced the number of attempts, time to access, risk of venipunctures, and vascular complications in femoral arterial access. (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial [FAUST]; NCT00667381).


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Destreza Motora , Punções , Radiografia Intervencionista , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA