Stillbirth in women with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus-still a current topic.

PURPOSE: Compared to the general stillbirth rate in Germany for term deliveries of 0.12% the risk in type 1 diabetes mellitus is reported to be up to ten times higher. The reasons for this excess risk of intrauterine demise are still not fully elucidated. Risk factors named in the literature include poor glycemic control before and during pregnancy and the occurrence of ketoacidosis. Additionally there might be a diabetes related type of placental dysfunction leading to organ failure in late pregnancy. Understanding the underlying causes is mandatory to develop strategies to reduce the incidences. The Purpose of this publication is to point out the difficulties in prediction of intrauterine death in pregnant type 1 diabetes patients and thus emphasizing the necessity of constant awareness to all caregivers. METHODS: We present a case series of four cases of stillbirth that occurred in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus at our tertiary care obstetric unit during a five-year period. RESULTS: In all four presented cases the underlying cause of intrauterine demise was different and we could not find a common mechanism or risk profile. Furthermore, established monitoring tools did not become peculiar to raise awareness. We compared our cases to published data. Underlying causes of intrauterine death in type 1 diabetes are discussed in the light of the current literature. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors of stillbirth in diabetic pregnancies are high maternal blood glucose levels including pre-conceptional HbA1c and diabetic ketoacidosis. Late acute placental insufficiency are associated with intrauterine death in type 1 diabetes. Despite the elevated risk of near term intrauterine demise there are currently no guidelines on how to monitor pregnancies in type 1 diabetes for fetal distress during the third trimester. Established thresholds for fetal Doppler data indicating fetal distress in normal and growth restricted fetuses may not be applicable for overgrown fetuses. Future research on how to monitor the diabetic fetus needs to be initiated.

[Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pregnant patients in the rescue service]. / Kardiopulmonale Reanimation der schwangeren Patientin im Rettungsdienst: Standardisierter Ansatz für das notfallmedizinische Management.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a pregnant patient is a rarity in prehospital emergency medicine and an extraordinary challenge for the emergency team. Besides modifications to emergency medical procedures due to physiological changes during pregnancy, specific reversible causes must be considered and psychosocial difficulties must be managed. This article aims to present a standard operating procedure for this special situation. In these circumstances the basics of crew resource management (CRM) are of special interest for the emergency team and are therefore mentioned in this article.

Awareness of euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis during pregnancy prevents recurrence of devastating outcomes: a case report of two pregnancies in one patient.

BACKGROUND: Euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during pregnancy is a life-threatening obstetric emergency. It requires early identification and prompt action. Obstetricians' knowledge about symptoms, diagnostic pitfalls and management during pregnancy and delivery need to be improved. We report a case of a young diabetic woman developing severe euglycaemic DKA in two consecutive pregnancies; the first pregnancy resulted in the most deviating outcome (i.e., intrauterine death), while the second pregnancy resulted in the delivery of a healthy newborn. Thus, the novelty of the case presented here is the possibility to demonstrate how the management of DKA in pregnancy can dramatically change outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a young diabetic woman in whom DKA was concealed by hyperemesis and oesophageal reflux. This woman presented to our delivery unit with severe euglycaemic DKA during her first pregnancy. While the mother's condition could be successfully stabilized, the foetus died shortly after admission. Two years later, the same woman presented with similar problems. Repeated episodes of mild euglycaemic DKA could be successfully managed with consequent interdisciplinary treatment and close observation, leading to a good pregnancy outcome, i.e., the birth of a healthy child. CONCLUSION: Awareness of euglycaemic DKA needs to be increased to reduce the risk of severe complications during pregnancies in diabetic women. This case report demonstrates that increased awareness of DKA with immediate recognition and a successful multidisciplinary approach are mandatory for an positive pregnancy outcomes.

[Guideline adherence and quality assurance in radiological diagnostics in cases of suspected child abuse in Germany]. / Leitlinientreue und Qualitätssicherung in der bildgebenden Diagnostik bei Verdacht auf Kindesmisshandlung in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging plays a key role in the evaluation of non-accidental consequences of injuries in childhood. Fractures are the second most common consequence of child abuse, after skin lesions such as abrasions or bleeding. With the evidence of radiological criteria, non-accidental fractures can be differentiated from accidental fractures. Special types of fractures such as the classic metaphyseal lesion can only be differentiated if the image quality is high. AIM: The goal of this prospective study was to assess adherence to guidelines and quality assurance of radiological diagnostics in the event of suspected abuse in Germany. For this purpose, the quantity and diagnostic quality in university and non-university hospitals as well as the existence of a pediatric radiology department were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 958 X­ray examinations of 114 suspected abuse cases (46 girls, 68 boys) were evaluated; 42 cases from university, 42 from maximum care and 30 from regular care clinics with a median age of 6 months (3 weeks-3 years of age) were assessed as DICOM data by 3 pediatric radiologists in a consensus procedure with regard to adherence to guidelines and various quality parameters. An accompanying questionnaire was used to compare the theoretical knowledge with the respective practical implementation. RESULTS: A mean of 8.4 X­rays (range 1-22) were made per case. In 12 of 114 assessed cases (10%) there was a complete skeletal status according to the S1 guideline. A babygram was performed in 13 cases (10.5%). Departments with focus on pediatric radiology produced significantly more X­rays per skeletal status than facilities without this specialization (p < 0.04). Significantly higher qualitative implementation was recorded in university hospitals (p < 0.001). Regardless of the type of institution, there was only marginal agreement between the questionnaire response and the available image material. CONCLUSION: In Germany, a guideline-compliant procedure in the event of suspected child abuse is largely lacking. It remains to be seen whether this will change in the future with the broader implementation of child protection groups and the S3+ child protection guideline adopted in 2019 (AWMF register 027-069). The establishment of reference centers for a second diagnosis and recommendations for imaging technology can also improve the quality of care over the long term.