To scan or not to scan: effect of scanning the axilla of all patients undergoing diagnostic breast ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Breast ultrasonography is a useful modality in patients undergoing diagnostic and screening breast imaging. However, breast ultrasound has a high false positive rate and can be time-consuming to perform. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of incidental axillary findings found on diagnostic breast ultrasounds at a single multi-site institution that has a standard protocol of scanning the axilla for all breast ultrasound exams. METHODS: All diagnostic breast ultrasounds were retrospectively reviewed from January 2017 to September 2019. Follow-up imaging, relevant clinical history, and pathology results were also reviewed. All positive axillary findings were divided into incidental or non-incidental findings depending on whether there was a direct clinical indication to scan the axilla. Descriptive statistics were performed with a 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Of the 19,695 diagnostic ultrasounds performed during this timeframe, there were 91 (0.5%) incidental axillary findings given a BIRADS category 3 or 4, and none of these findings resulted in the diagnosis of an occult breast cancer. One biopsy-proven SLL/CLL lymphoma was diagnosed that was otherwise clinically occult. CONCLUSION: Routine axillary scanning in all patients undergoing a diagnostic breast ultrasound at a large multi-site institution yields a low rate of incidental findings and has minimal impact on detection of cancer.

Advanced imaging of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Advances in MR imaging of arthritis include contrast-enhanced, dynamic, and quantitative imaging techniques. These advances may result in MR imaging becoming the gold standard in diagnosing early RA. MR imaging is a useful technique in diagnosis, follow-up, and evaluation of remission in rheumatic diseases of the joints. Early diagnosis of RA, in the first 6 months after the onset of symptoms, may lead to earlier control and prevent future erosions and deformities.

Magnetic resonance imaging in early detection of rheumatoid arthritis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice in early diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The pathologic processes in RA involve synovitis, joint effusion, proliferation of fibrovascular connective tissue, and the formation of pannus. Other imaging techniques available for imaging of RA include ultrasound, scintigraphy, computed tomography, and plain radiography (PR). MRI provides high sensitivity in detecting inflammatory changes in the joints. Several studies report high intra- and interobserver reliability and low variation for MRI. MRI allows detection and, in some cases, quantification of synovial changes. Dynamic MRI is a new technique that utilizes rate of synovial enhancement in evaluation of inflammatory changes. MRI allows visualization of erosions in three orthogonal planes. MRI has been shown in many studies to have much greater sensitivity than PR in detecting erosions. Use of a contrast agent further increases the sensitivity in detecting erosions and differentiates and outlines synovial proliferation from fluid collection. Other manifestations of RA such as intraosseous cysts, tenosynovitis, bone marrow edema, and carpal tunnel syndrome can also be visualized on magnetic resonance images. Advances in MRI include contrast-enhancement, dynamic, and quantitative techniques. MRI assists in the early detection of RA, which allows earlier initiation of treatment with disease-modifying therapies.

MRI of large intraosseous lesions in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate on MRI the occurrence of large cystlike intraosseous lesions in patients with inflammatory arthritis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively reviewed contrast-enhanced MR images of 128 hands and wrists in 44 patients with clinical presentation of inflammatory arthritis. Large lesions (> or = 1 cm) found on MR images were further evaluated for the presence of a cortical break and intraarticular extension. These data were correlated with clinical and laboratory findings and the duration of arthritis. RESULTS: We found 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, seven with psoriatic arthritis, two with systemic lupus erythematosus, one with HIV-associated arthritis, one with mixed connective tissue disorder, one with paraneoplastic-associated arthritis, one with inflammatory bowel disease arthritis, and five patients with early unclassified inflammatory arthritis. Twelve patients had 16 large intraosseous lesions, none of which were detected on available radiographs (availability of radiographs for large erosions was 75%). A cortical break with intraarticular extension of the large lesions was seen in 12 cases. Four lesions were not intraarticular. CONCLUSION: Even large intraosseous lesions may be occult on radiography. MRI is a superior technique for detecting these lesions in the small joints of the hand and wrist in inflammatory arthritis. Although large intraosseous erosions often communicate with joints, we observed four large purely intraosseous enhancing lesions without intraarticular connection. Patients with large erosions have a longer duration of inflammatory arthritis.