Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions.

The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19-23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2-day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter-observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis ("isolated v") represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.

Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions.

The 9th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in La Coruna, Spain on June 23-29, 2007. A total of 235 pathologists, clinicians and scientists met to address unsolved issues in transplantation and adapt the Banff schema for renal allograft rejection in response to emerging data and technologies. The outcome of the consensus discussions on renal pathology is provided in this article. Major updates from the 2007 Banff Conference were: inclusion of peritubular capillaritis grading, C4d scoring, interpretation of C4d deposition without morphological evidence of active rejection, application of the Banff criteria to zero-time and protocol biopsies and introduction of a new scoring for total interstitial inflammation (ti-score). In addition, emerging research data led to the establishment of collaborative working groups addressing issues like isolated 'v' lesion and incorporation of omics-technologies, paving the way for future combination of graft biopsy and molecular parameters within the Banff process.

Multifocal renal allograft biopsy: impact on therapeutic decisions.

OBJECTIVE: There are no data to support the suggestion that samples removed from one segment of the transplanted kidney are representative of the whole graft. The aim of this study was to compare the histological differences between biopsies obtained from different portions of the renal allograft and their impact on treatment recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred percutaneous biopsies were performed on kidney allografts and samples were collected from the upper and lower poles (100 kidneys). All samples were randomized and blindly reviewed. We obtained the discordance rates between the poles for the grading of acute rejection and for the diagnosis of nephrotoxicity due to immunosuppression. We also checked if the differences found were sufficient to call for different clinical recommendations. These values were compared with the intrapathologist variation rates. RESULTS: In 70 kidneys adequate sampling was obtained from both poles. The diagnosis of acute rejection were made in 17. The discordance rate between the upper and lower poles was 82.3% (kappa = 0.34), higher than the intrapathologist variation (P = .002). Nephrotoxicity was found in 14 kidneys. The discordance rate between the upper and lower poles was 28.6% (kappa = 0.88), with no difference compared with the intrapathologist variation. In 14 of the 70 kidneys (25.7%), discordances between poles had impact on clinical recommendations, most of these cases due to different gradings of acute rejection (78%). This number was higher than the intrapathologist variation (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The histopathological changes in the kidney allograft are not always homogeneous. This heterogeneity may affect the therapeutic recommendations.

Donor transmission intestinal carcinoma after kidney transplantation: case report.

Tumor transmission is a rare complication of organ transplantation. Despite several improvements in excluding donor malignant disease, there continue to be reports of unknown tumors in the donors. The risk of having a donor with an undetected malignancy ranges between 1.3% and 2%. The cases of two kidney transplant recipients who had intestinal carcinoma transmitted from the same deceased donor are described. The clinical presentation, previous data, and management options are discussed. As a result of the increase in the overall donor pool, using extended criteria donors, donors of extreme ages, donors with prolonged intensive care admission, and donors who may potentially transmit disease to their recipients, the risk of tumor transmission and also infections should be considered.