Impact of Multidisciplinary Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)® Programs at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: As Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) programs expand across numerous subspecialties, growth and sustainability on a system level becomes increasingly important and may benefit from reporting multidisciplinary and financial data. However, the literature on multidisciplinary outcome analysis in ERAS is sparse. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary ERAS auditing in a hospital system. Additionally, we describe developing a financial metric for use in gaining support for system-wide ERAS adoption and sustainability. METHODS: Data from HPB, colorectal and urology ERAS programs at a single institution were analyzed from a prospective ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) database from September 2015 to June 2019. Clinical 30-day outcomes for the ERAS cohort (n = 1374) were compared to the EIAS pre-ERAS control (n = 311). Association between improved ERAS compliance and improved outcomes were also assessed for the ERAS cohort. The potential multidisciplinary financial impact was estimated from hospital bed charges. RESULTS: Multidisciplinary auditing demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.5 days, p < 0.001) for ERAS patients in aggregate and improved ERAS compliance was associated with reduced LOS (coefficient - 0.04, p = 0.004). Improved ERAS compliance in aggregate also significantly associated with improved 30-day survival (odds ratio 1.04, p = 0.001). Multidisciplinary analysis also demonstrated a potential financial impact of 44% savings (p < 0.001) by reducing hospital bed charges across all specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary auditing of ERAS programs may improve ERAS program support and expansion. Analysis across subspecialties demonstrated associations between improved ERAS compliance and postoperative LOS as well as 30-day survival, and further suggested a substantial combined financial impact.

Complicated Diverticular Disease.

The modern management of colonic diverticular disease involves grouping patients into uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis, after which the correct treatment paradigm is instituted. Recent controversies suggest overlap in management strategies between these two groups. While most reports still support surgical intervention for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease, more data are forthcoming suggesting complicated diverticulitis does not merit surgical resection in all scenarios. Given the significant risk for complication in surgery for diverticulitis, careful attention should be paid to patient and procedure selection. Here, we define complicated diverticulitis, discuss options for surgical intervention, and explain strategies for avoiding operative pitfalls that result in early and late postoperative complications.

Prehabilitation in Frail Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a customized marker of biological age that helps to gauge an individual's functional physiologic reserve and ability to react to stress and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. In order to mitigate frailty preoperatively, the concept of prehabilitation has entered the forefront which encompasses multidisciplinary interventions to improve health and lessen the incidence of postoperative decline. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail, surgical patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed by two independent researchers according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were (1) a randomized controlled trial, case-control or observational study; (2) prehabilitation intervention; (3) frailty assessment; and (4) surgical intervention. RESULTS: There were five articles included in the review. Evaluation of these articles demonstrated prehabilitation may improve operative outcomes in frail surgical patients. There were no assessments as to whether prehabilitation was cost-effective although it was feasible. Prehabilitation programs should include elements of exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial counseling. Frailty should be assessed with a validated index in surgical patients who may undergo prehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation in frail surgical patients may be the appropriate process through which providers can lessen operative risk. Currently, however, there is little evidence supporting the use of prehabilitation in this population with only five studies identified in this systematic review. More randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

Trauma Recidivism and Mortality Following Violent Injuries in Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Trauma recidivism accounts for approximately 44% of emergency department admissions and remains a significant health burden with this patient cohort carrying higher rates of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A level 1 trauma center registry was queried for patients aged 18-25 y presented between 2009 and 2015. Patients with nonaccidental gunshot wounds, stab wounds, or blunt assault-related injuries were categorized as violent injuries. Primary outcomes included mortality and recidivism, which were defined as patients with two unrelated traumas during the study period. Hospital records and the Social Security Death Index were used to aid in outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6484 patients presented with 1215 (18.7%) sustaining violent injuries (87.4% male, median age 22.2 y). Mechanism of violent injuries included 64.4% gunshot wound, 21.1% stab, and 14.8% blunt assault. Compared with nonviolent injuries, violent injury patients had increased risk of mortality (9.3% versus 2.1%, P < 0.0001). Out-of-hospital mortality was 2.6% (versus 0.5% nonviolent, P < 0.0005), with an average time to death being 6.4 mo from initial injury. Recidivism was 24.9% with mean time to second violent injury at 31.9 ± 21.0 mo; 14.9% had two trauma readmissions, and 8.0% had ≥3. Ninety percent of subsequent injuries occurred within 5 y, with 19.1% in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of injury after violent trauma extends past discharge as patients have significantly higher mortality rates following hospital release. Over one-quarter present with a second unrelated trauma or death. Improved medical, psychological, and social collaborative treatment of these high-risk patients is needed to interrupt the cycle of violent injury.

Prophylactic Ureteral Catheters for Colectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in technique and technology, using prophylactic ureteral catheters to avoid iatrogenic ureteral injury during colectomy remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and costs attributable to prophylactic ureteral catheters with colectomy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: The colectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014 was queried. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of 30-day ureteral injury after colectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined factors associated with ureteral injury and urinary tract infection in patients undergoing colectomy. RESULTS: A total of 51,125 patients were identified with a mean age of 60.9 ± 14.9 years and a BMI of 28.4 ± 6.7 k/m; 4.90% (n = 2486) of colectomies were performed with prophylactic catheters, and 333 ureteral injuries (0.65%) were identified. Prophylactic ureteral catheters were most commonly used for diverticular disease (42.2%; n = 1048), with injury occurring most often during colectomy for diverticular disease (36.0%; n = 120). Univariate analysis of outcomes demonstrated higher rates of ileus, wound infection, urinary tract infection, urinary tract infection as reason for readmission, superficial site infection, and 30-day readmission in patients with prophylactic ureteral catheter placement. On multivariate analysis, prophylactic ureteral catheter placement was associated with a lower rate of ureteral injury (OR = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25-0.81)). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study using a clinical data set. CONCLUSIONS: Here, prophylactic ureteral catheters were used in 4.9% of colectomies and most commonly for diverticulitis. On multivariate analysis, prophylactic catheter placement was associated with a lower rate of ureteral injury. Additional research is needed to delineate patient populations most likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteral stent placement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A482.

MELD-Na Score as a Predictor of Anastomotic Leak in Elective Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: For cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELD-Na) model is extensively studied. Because of the simplicity of the scoring system, there has been interest in applying MELD-Na to predict patient outcomes in the noncirrhotic surgical patient, and MELD-Na has been shown to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective colectomy. Our aim was to identify the utility of MELD-Na to predict anastomotic leak in elective colorectal cases. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database was queried (2012-2014) for all elective colorectal procedures in patients without ascites. Leak rates were compared by MELD-Na score using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 44,540 elective colorectal cases (mean age, 60.5 y ± 14.4, mean body mass index 28.8 ± 6.6 kg/m2, 52% female), of which 70% were colon resections and 30% involved partial rectal resections (low anterior resections). Laparoscopic approach accounted for 64.72% while 35.3% were open. The overall complication and mortality rates were 21% and 0.7%, respectively, with a total anastomotic leak rate of 3.4%. Overall, 98% had a preoperative MELD-Na score between 10 and 20. Incremental increases in MELD-Na score (10-14, 15-19, and ≥20) were associated with an increased leak rate, specifically in partial rectal resections (3.9% versus 5.1% versus 10.7% P <0.028). MELD-Na score ≥20 had an increased leak rate when compared with those with MELD-Na 10-14 (odds ratio [OR] 1.627; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.015, 2.607]). An MELD-Na score increase from 10-14 to 15-19 increases overall mortality (OR 5.22; 95% CI [3.55, 7.671]). In all elective colorectal procedures, for every one-point increase in MELD-Na score, anastomotic leak (OR 1.04 95% CI [1.006, 1.07]), mortality (OR 1.24; 95% CI, [1.20, 1.27]), and overall complications (OR 1.10; 95% CI [1.09, 1.12]) increased. MELD-Na was an independent predictor of anastomotic leak in partial rectal resections, when controlling for gender, steroid use, smoking, approach, operative time, preoperative chemotherapy, and Crohn's disease (OR 1.06, 95% CI [1.002, 1.122]). CONCLUSIONS: MELD-Na is an independent predictor of anastomotic leak in partial rectal resections. Anastomotic leak risk increases with increasing MELD-Na in elective colorectal resections, as does 30-d mortality and overall complication rate. As MELD-Na score increases to more than 20, restorative partial rectal resection has a 10% rate of anastomotic leak.

Cancer Center Volume and Type Impact Stage-Specific Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, and adherence to national and societal recommendations remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine variability in guideline adherence in rectal cancer treatment and investigate whether hospital volume correlated with variability seen. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database rectal cancer participant user files from 2005 to 2010. Stage-specific predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation use were determined, and variation in use across hospitals analyzed. Hospitals were ranked based on likelihood of preoperative therapy use by stage, and observed-to-expected ratios for neoadjuvant therapy use calculated. Hospital outliers were identified, and their center characteristics compared. RESULTS: A total of 23,488 patients were identified at 1183 hospitals. There was substantial variability in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation across hospitals. Patients managed outside clinical guidelines for both stage 1 and stage 3 disease tended to receive treatment at lower-volume, community cancer centers. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in adherence to national guidelines in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer across all stages. Both hospital volume and center type are associated with over-treatment of early-stage tumors and under-treatment of more invasive tumors. These findings identify a clear need for national quality improvement efforts in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Surgical resident learning styles have changed with work hours.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education instituted the 80-h workweek for residency programs in 2003. This presented a unique challenge for surgery residents who must acquire a medical and technical knowledge base during training. Therefore, learning should be delivered in an environment congruent with an individual's learning style. In this study, we evaluated the learning styles of general surgery residents to determine how learning styles changed after the implementation to the 80-h workweek. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kolb learning style inventory was taken by general surgery residents at the University of Cincinnati's Department of Surgery, and results from 1999-2012 were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared, logistic regression and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Significance was defined as a P value of <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 411 responses were obtained from 115 residents. Surgical residents were primarily converging (59.0%) and assimilating (19.1%) learners before 2003. However, there was a shift in predominate learning styles after the institution of the 80-h workweek to converging (43.9%) and accommodating (40.4%, P < 0.001). Surgical residents were also more likely to be team-based learners after the start of the 80-h workweek (odds ratio = 2.13, P = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: After the institution of the 80-h workweek, most general surgery residents remained action-based learners. However, there was a shift within this majority toward a preference for team-based learning. This change paralleled the transition to a more team-based approach to patient care with the implementation of the 80-h workweek. These findings are important for surgical educators to consider in the development of surgical resident curriculum.

The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that after controlling for case-mix differences, the rates of positive resection margin after rectal cancer surgery vary substantially in the United States and that high-volume hospitals have lower margin positivity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with oncologic resection for stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from the 1998-2010 National Cancer Data Base. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rates and hospital level variability in positive margin rates using Empirical Bayes techniques. RESULTS: A total of 113,113 patients were treated at 1446 hospitals. The mean overall risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rate was 7.3%. High-volume hospitals did not have a lower rate of adjusted margin positivity (7.4%, P = 0.75). When both case mix and hospital volume differences were factored into the model, variability in margin positivity rates increased by 9.8%, implying that referral to high-volume hospitals alone would not improve margin positivity rates. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer margin positivity rates vary substantially in the United States, despite adjusting for differences in case mix. These results support standardization of surgical technique and pathologic assessment as part of a broader initiative that identifies and refers patients to higher performing hospitals rather than simply to higher volume hospitals.

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved postoperative pain control, earlier return to work, and shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. However, there are varied technical approaches to laparoscopic resections. We therefore sought to determine whether the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with shorter length of stay compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques for sigmoid colectomies. METHODS: A retrospective review of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies performed by five colorectal surgeons from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Approaches were defined as: (1) straight laparoscopic if colon mobilization, inferior mesenteric artery transection and intra-corporeal anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, (2) hand assisted if a hand port was utilized to assist with mobilization and vessel transection, and (3) laparoscopic assisted if only the colon mobilization was performed intra-corporeally. Poisson regression was performed to determine the impact of surgical technique on LOS while controlling for differences in patient factors. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were identified with 71 straight laparoscopic, 57 hand-assisted, and 63 laparoscopic-assisted cases. Substantial variability in choice of surgical technique was seen across surgeons. Patient populations were similar, with the exception of hand-assisted procedures being more often used in obese patients. Unadjusted average postoperative days to discharge were 3.6 days for straight laparoscopic and 4.1 and 4.0 days for hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted approaches, respectively. While controlling for factors associated with longer hospital stay, the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with a 14 % shorter stay compared to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and a 15 % shorter stay compared to hand-assisted colectomy. The straight laparoscopic approach was also associated with earlier return of bowel function compared to other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The straight laparoscopic approach to sigmoid colectomy is associated with substantially shorter postoperative stay and earlier return of bowel function when compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques. When technically feasible, the straight laparoscopic approach is preferred.

Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has identified a number of patient and operative factors associated with anastomotic leak after colectomy; however, a study that examines these factors on a national level with direct coding for anastomotic leak is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic leak on a national level and quantify the additional morbidity and mortality experienced by these patients. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent segmental colectomy with anastomosis from the 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy procedure-targeted database. Anastomotic leak was defined as minor leak requiring percutaneous intervention or major leak requiring laparotomy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of anastomotic leak and its impact on postoperative outcomes. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary university department. PATIENTS: This study includes 13,684 patients who underwent segmental colectomy with anastomosis at American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-affiliated hospitals in 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome studied was anastomotic leak. RESULTS: The overall leak rate was 3.8%. Male sex, steroid use, smoking, open approach, operative time, and preoperative chemotherapy were associated with increased anastomotic leaks and diverting ileostomy with decreased incidence of leaks on multivariate analysis. Increased length of stay (13 vs 5 days; p < 0.001) and increased 30-day mortality (6.8% vs 1.6%; p < 0.001) were also seen in patients who experienced leaks. These patients also experienced increased readmission rates (43.5% vs 8.3%; p < 0.001) and were 37 times more likely to require reoperation as a complication of their primary procedure (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and the limited 30-day outcomes recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified patient and operative risk factors for anastomotic leak on a national scale. It also demonstrates that these patients have increased morbidity and 30-day mortality rates, experience multiple readmissions to the hospital, and have a higher likelihood of requiring further operative intervention.

Postoperative predictors of early discharge following laparoscopic segmental colectomy.

PURPOSE: There is increasing pressure to shorten length of stay (LOS) after major surgical procedures. Although laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to have shorter LOS than open colectomy, not all patients experience a short length of stay. Predictive factors for early discharge after laparoscopic colectomy have not been clearly defined. We hypothesized that patients who exhibit a brisk urine output and lack of a systemic inflammatory response on the first postoperative day would experience a shorter postoperative stay after laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic segmental colectomy by one of colorectal surgeons from 2012 to 2013. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative factors were examined. A multiple linear regression model was used to examine the impact of various factors on length of stay, while controlling for confounding variables. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was defined using Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus definitions. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients underwent a laparoscopic segmental colectomy. When controlling for confounding variables, ileus, postoperative complication, and SIRS response were associated with 2.67, 1.16, and 0.42 additional hospital days, respectively, while each additional liter of urine output on postoperative day 1 was associated with a 0.23-day decrease in LOS (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of postoperative ileus or overt complication, patients who do not exhibit a SIRS response, and have a brisk urine output on postoperative day (POD) 1, may be targeted for early hospital discharge after laparoscopic colectomy.

Factors associated with 30-day readmission after restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA: a national study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission has been identified by many payers as a surrogate for surgical quality. The 30-day readmission rate and factors associated with hospital readmission after restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to identify the rate of and factors associated with hospital readmission within 30 days of restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients undergoing IPAA from 2009 to 2012 in the University HealthSystem Consortium database was performed. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles according to the number of cases performed annually. SETTING: This study was conducted using a national database of university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 4952 patients within the 4-year study period were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was readmission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 22.8% overall, although high-volume centers performed significantly better than low-volume centers (high vs low volume: 19.7% vs 28.2%; p < 0.001). When controlling for confounding variables, multivariate analysis identified female sex (OR, 1.191; p = 0.02), government-based (vs private) insurance (OR, 1.364; p < 0.001), and higher preoperative severity of illness (OR, 1.491; p = 0.001) to be associated with readmission. In addition, a significant volume-dependent relationship on 30-day readmission was identified, wherein undergoing operation at the higher-volume hospitals was protective for predicting readmission. Hierarchical regression modeling indicated that 31% of the variation in readmission rates among individual hospitals was accounted for by hospital volume. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and limited postoperative complication data. CONCLUSIONS: The national 30-day readmission after IPAA creation was 22.8%, at least double that of other colorectal procedures. This high rate of readmission was mitigated by centers performing the highest volume of cases. Avoidance of referral to centers performing very few of these procedures annually may improve perioperative outcomes and reduce associated morbidity.

Crohn's disease and pregnancy: the impact of perianal disease on delivery methods and complications.

BACKGROUND: The optimal delivery method in patients with Crohn's disease is unknown, and there is no large-scale evidence on which to base decisions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare delivery methods and outcomes in patients with and without Crohn's disease. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify childbirth deliveries. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of Crohn's disease and perianal disease (anorectal fistula or abscess, rectovaginal fistula, anal fissure, and anal stenosis). SETTINGS: A large population-cohort database was used for the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were cesarean delivery and perineal lacerations. RESULTS: Of 6,794,787 pregnant women who delivered, 2882 had a diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Rates of cesarean delivery were higher in patients who had Crohn's disease with (83.1%) and without (42.8%) perianal disease in comparison with patients who did not have Crohn's disease with (38.9%) and without (25.6%) perianal disease (p < 0.001). Rates of 4th degree perineal lacerations were similar between patients who had or did not have Crohn's disease without perianal disease (1.4% vs 1.3%), but these rates increased significantly in patients with perianal disease (12.3%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, perianal disease (OR, 10.9; 95% CI, 8.3-4.1; p < 0.001) and smoking (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5-1.7; p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher rates of 4th degree laceration. Crohn's disease was not independently associated with 4th degree laceration. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study with the inherent limitations of large databases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Crohn's disease have higher rates of cesarean delivery. Perianal disease predicts severe perineal laceration independent of the presence of Crohn's disease. In the absence of perianal disease, the method of delivery in women with Crohn's disease should be predicated on obstetric indication.