RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are subtypes of primary cutaneous lymphomas and represent complex diseases regarding their physiopathology and management. Depending on the stage of the disease, different treatment regimens are applied, but there is no consensus on an optimal approach. Prognosis for patients with early stage MF is favorable, but significantly worsens in advanced disease and in SS, where patients frequently relapse and require multiple therapies. METHODS: We investigated the potential anticancer effects of NEO212, a novel compound generated by covalently conjugating perillyl alcohol (a natural monoterpene) to temozolomide (an alkylating agent), on MF and SS cell lines in vitro. HUT-78, HUT-102, and MyLa cells were treated with NEO212 under different conditions, and drug effects on proliferation, viability, and apoptosis were characterized. RESULTS: NEO212 inhibited proliferation, diminished viability, and stimulated apoptosis in all cell lines, although with varying degrees of potency in the different cell lines. It down-regulated c-myc and cyclin D1 proteins, which are required for cell proliferation, but triggered endoplasmic reticulum stress and activation of caspases. Pretreatment of cells with antioxidants ascorbic acid and beta-mercaptoethanol prevented these NEO212-induced effects. CONCLUSIONS: NEO212 exerted promising anticancer effects on SS and MF cell lines. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) appears to play a key role in the NEO212-induced cell death process, because the blockage of ROS with antioxidants prevented caspase activation. We propose that NEO212 should be investigated further toward clinical testing in these tumor types.
RESUMO
Most patents covering dermatologic products contain patent claims directed to the pharmaceutical formulation of the product. Such patents, known as formulation patents, are vulnerable to attacks based on the legal argument that the formulations covered are obvious over formulations already known prior to the filing of the patent application. Because obviousness is an important concept in patent law, recent court cases concerning obviousness and formulation patents were examined and discussed below. Courts have ruled that patent claims are obvious when features of the claimed formulation are found in the prior art, even if the features or characteristics of the formulation are not explicitly disclosed in the prior art. However, patentees have successfully overcome obviousness challenges where there were unexpected results or properties and/or the prior art taught away from the claimed invention.