Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Human stem-cell-derived embryo models: When bioethical normativity meets biological ontology.
Dev Biol
; 508: 88-92, 2024 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286184
2.
Synthetic embryos: a new venue in ethical research.
Reproduction
; 165(4): V1-V3, 2023 04 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821505
3.
Germline Gene Editing: The Gender Issues.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics
; : 1-7, 2023 Feb 27.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847191
4.
Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.
BMC Med Ethics
; 23(1): 18, 2022 03 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35246130
5.
Mandatory vaccination and the 'seat belt analogy' argument: a critical analysis in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Med Health Care Philos
; 25(2): 219-224, 2022 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35132507
6.
Re-defining the human embryo : A legal perspective on the creation of embryos in research.
EMBO Rep
; 25(2): 467-470, 2024 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38177918
7.
Is the 'serious' factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers.
J Med Ethics
; 46(2): 151-152, 2020 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31624091
8.
Immunity passports, fundamental rights and public health hazards: a reply to Brown et al.
J Med Ethics
; 46(10): 660-661, 2020 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907831
9.
Regulating germline editing in assisted reproductive technology: An EU cross-disciplinary perspective.
Bioethics
; 34(1): 16-32, 2020 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31877579
10.
Should we have a right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence?
Med Health Care Philos
; 23(2): 247-252, 2020 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31960228
11.
Should human germ line editing be allowed? Some suggestions on the basis of the existing regulatory framework.
Bioethics
; 33(1): 105-111, 2019 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080925
13.
Human dignity and gene editing: Using human dignity as an argument against modifying the human genome and germline is a logical fallacy.
EMBO Rep
; 19(10)2018 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30237156
14.
Comment on "Should gene editing replace embryo selection following PGD? Some comments on the debate held by the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis".
Prenat Diagn
; 39(12): 1170-1172, 2019 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31750560
15.
Obsolescence Is Not a Good Reason to Oppose All Types of Enhancement.
Am J Bioeth
; 19(7): 49-50, 2019 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237515
16.
Gene Editing and the Slippery Slope Argument: Should We Fix the Enhancement/Therapy Distinction as the Definitive Boundary?
Sci Eng Ethics
; 25(4): 1257-1258, 2019 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29564643
17.
Why whole body gestational donation must be rejected: a response to Smajdor.
Theor Med Bioeth
; 44(4): 327-340, 2023 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37418223
18.
COVID-19, the Immune System, and Organic Disability.
Asian Bioeth Rev
; : 1-23, 2022 Nov 14.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36407414
19.
Digital Covid Certificates as Immunity Passports: An Analysis of Their Main Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.
J Bioeth Inq
; 19(4): 635-642, 2022 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36121608
20.
[Prioritization of health resources in contexts of scarcity. SESPAS Report 2022]. / Priorización de recursos sanitarios en contextos de escasez. Informe SESPAS 2022.
Gac Sanit
; 36 Suppl 1: S51-S55, 2022.
Artigo
em Espanhol
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35781149