Can 3D imaging modeling recognize functional tissue and predict liver failure? A retrospective study based on 3D modelling of the major hepatectomies after hepatic modulation.

BACKGROUND: Thanks to the introduction of radiomics, 3d reconstruction can be able to analyse tissues and recognise true hypertrophy from non-functioning tissue in patients treated with major hepatectomies with hepatic modulation.The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of 3D Imaging Modelling in predict liver failure. METHODS: Patients submitted to major hepatectomies after hepatic modulation at Sanchinarro University Hospital from May 2015 to October 2019 were analysed. Three-dimensional reconstruction was realised before and after surgical treatment. The volumetry of Future Liver Remnant was calculated, distinguishing in Functional Future Liver Remnant (FRFx) i.e. true hypertrophy tissue and Anatomic Future Liver Remnant (FRL) i.e. hypertrophy plus no functional tissue (oedema/congestion) These volumes were analysed in patients with and without post hepatic liver failure. RESULTS: Twenty-four procedures were realised (11 ALPPS and 13 PVE followed by major hepatectomy). Post hepatic liver failure grade B and C occurred in 6 patients. The ROC curve showed a better AUC for FRFxV (74%) with respect to FRLV (54%) in prediction PHLF > B. The increase of anatomical FRL (iFRL) was superior in the ALPPS group (120%) with respect to the PVE group (73%) (p = 0,041), while the increase of functional FRFX (iFRFx) was 35% in the ALLPS group and 46% in the PVE group (p > 0,05), showing no difference in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D reconstruction model can allow optimal surgical planning, and through the use of specific algorithms, can contribute to differential functioning liver parenchyma of the FLR.

Right-side colectomy with complete mesocolic excision vs conventional right-side colectomy in the treatment of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in the treatment of right-side colon cancer when compared with standard right-side hemicolectomy, focusing on oncological outcomes, mortality and morbidity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE archives, including studies on CME in right-side colon cancer. Primary outcomes were five-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes investigated were mortality and morbidity rates, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, day of postoperative flatus, pulmonary infection, duration of hospital stay and number of lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: Seventeen studies have been included in this meta-analysis for a total of 3918 patients. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) results improved in the CME group with respect to conventional right-side colectomy with an OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.02-3.45) and OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.33-5.74), respectively. The incidence of mortality and morbidity was comparable between the two groups. Moreover, conventional surgery time was faster than CME (MD 33.69 min, 95% CI 12.79-54.59), while no significant differences were reported in mean blood loss and hospital stay. Furthermore, the CME group showed a higher mean number of harvested lymph nodes (MD 7.08 lymph nodes 95% CI 4.90-9.27). CONCLUSION: Complete mesocolic excision of the right-side colectomy improves oncological outcomes without increasing mortality and morbidity rates compared to standard right-side hemicolectomy. CME should therefore be routinely performed in the treatment of right-side colon cancer.

It is possible to avoid routine splenic flexure mobilization during left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resection? A single center experience compared to the surgical reality.

BACKGROUND: Routine splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) during left hemicolectomy and high anterior rectal resection guarantees a well perfused and tension-free anastomosis, respecting current oncological criteria. According to the recent literature, only 70% of laparoscopic colorectal surgeons considered routine SFM mandatory. Because of its difficulty, SFM increases morbidity including surrounding organs injuries. The goal of the study is to report our experience in avoiding routine SFM during colorectal resection compared to the current surgical state of art. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on elective left hemicolectomy without routine SFM performed in our unit between January 2015 to April 2020. Patients were recruited according to diagnosis, histopathology, operative time, ASA score, post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-five oncological patients, underwent to surgery without SFM. The other 13 patients underwent to SFM due to technical issues. The mean operative time was 160.2±44.7 mins, significantly shorter than in patients whose SFM occurred (210.3 min). The morbidity rate was 1%, reintervention occurred in one patient. Eighteen-month median follow-up morbidity was 11% while mortality was 3%. Recurrence rate was of about 5%. CONCLUSIONS: As results from study data analysis, left colectomy can be conducted safely in both laparoscopic and laparotomic approach without SFM in selected cases. As reported in a recent meta-analysis, benefits of avoiding SFM concern reduced operative time without compromising postoperative outcome and respecting oncological criteria, as emerged by our results. Colorectal resection without SFM when is feasible, improves surgical approach reducing technical difficulties and avoiding splenic injuries.

Recurrent giant fibrovascualr oesophageal polyp: Benefits and pitfalls of a multimodal approach.

Fibrovascular polyp of the cervical esophagus represents about 0.5% to 1% of all benign oesophageal tumours. Usually asymptomatic, when FP protrudes into the oesophageal lumen, this may cause respiratory obstruction and provoke dysphagia, vomiting, dyspnoea, and retrosternal pain. In this article, we describe a multimodal approach in the treatment of a complex recurrent FP, for which surgical resection represents the safer and less invasive procedure.