Different Response to Immunotherapy According to Melanoma Histologic Subtype.

Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM) are the most common melanoma histologic subtypes and are characterized by different biological features. We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with advanced melanoma, treated with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 at our center, with data available on primary tumor subtype. The primary objective was to assess the association between histologic subtype and patients' outcomes. In addition, we analyzed whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing data of a cohort of advanced melanoma to identify genes and related pathways, characterized by significant differences between NMs and SSMs. Twenty-one patients with NM and 39 with SSM, treated with anti-PD-1(53/60) as monotherapy or combined with anti-CTLA-4 (7/60), were analyzed. All known clinical-pathologic prognostic factors were well balanced between NM and SSM groups, except for the ECOG-PS score. The overall response rate was 52.4% (95% confidence interval, 29.8-74.3) in the NMs group versus 20.5% (9.3-36.5) in the SSMs group (P-value=0.02). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 13.9 and 44.5 months in the NMs group versus only 3.2 and 12 months in SSMs group (progression-free survival P-value=0.032; overall survival P-value=0.002). Multivariable analysis adjusting for the ECOG-PS, confirmed similar results. Whole-exome and whole-transcriptome data of 28 NMs and 21 SSMs were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in terms of both TMB and frequency of mutation in any gene. A total of 266 genes were overexpressed in NMs as compared with SSMs, and enrichment-analysis revealed a significant enrichment (false discovery rate<0.05) of genes belonging to immune-related pathways involved in antigens presentation mechanisms, response to interferon gamma and neutrophil activation. We provided clinical evidences suggesting a relevant association between melanoma histologic subtype and response to immunotherapy.

Early Prediction of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors by Quantification of EGFR Mutations in Plasma of NSCLC Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The potential to accurately quantify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma from non-small-cell lung cancer patients would enable more rapid and more frequent analyses to assess disease status; however, the utility of such analyses for clinical purposes has only recently started to explore. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 69 patients with EGFR-mutated tumors and 21 negative control cases. EGFR mutations in plasma were analyzed by a standardized allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS). A semiquantitative index (SQI) was derived from dilutions of known EGFR mutation copy numbers. Clinical responses were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria and expressed as percent tumor shrinkage. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test and NGS assay in plasma versus tissue were 72% versus 100% and 74% versus 100%, respectively. Quantitative indices by the PCR test and NGS were significantly correlated (p < 0.001). EGFR testing at baseline and serially at 4 to 60 days during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy revealed a progressive decrease in SQI, starting from day 4, in 95% of cases. The rate of SQI decrease correlated with percent tumor shrinkage at 2 months (p < 0.0001); at 14 days, it was more than 50% in 70% of patients (rapid responders). In two patients with slow response, an early increase in the circulating levels of the T790M mutation was observed. No early T790M mutations were seen in plasma samples of rapid responders. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of EGFR mutations from plasma with a standardized PCR test is feasible. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a strong correlation between the EGFR SQI in the first days of treatment and clinical response with relevant implications for patient management.

An individual patient data metaanalysis of outcomes and prognostic factors after treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: An individual patient data metaanalysis was performed to determine clinical outcomes, and to propose a risk stratification system, related to the comprehensive treatment of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a systematic review of the literature, data were obtained on 757 NSCLC patients with 1 to 5 synchronous or metachronous metastases treated with surgical metastectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery, or radical external-beam radiotherapy, and curative treatment of the primary lung cancer, from hospitals worldwide. Factors predictive of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were evaluated using Cox regression. Risk groups were defined using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Analyses were conducted on training and validating sets (two-thirds and one-third of patients, respectively). RESULTS: Median OS was 26 months, 1-year OS 70.2%, and 5-year OS 29.4%. Surgery was the most commonly used treatment for the primary tumor (635 patients [83.9%]) and metastases (339 patients [62.3%]). Factors predictive of OS were: synchronous versus metachronous metastases (P < .001), N-stage (P = .002), and adenocarcinoma histology (P = .036); the model remained predictive in the validation set (c-statistic = 0.682). In RPA, 3 risk groups were identified: low-risk, metachronous metastases (5-year OS, 47.8%); intermediate risk, synchronous metastases and N0 disease (5-year OS, 36.2%); and high risk, synchronous metastases and N1/N2 disease (5-year OS, 13.8%). CONCLUSION: Significant OS differences were observed in oligometastatic patients stratified according to type of metastatic presentation, and N status. Long-term survival is common in selected patients with metachronous oligometastases. We propose this risk classification scheme be used in guiding selection of patients for clinical trials of ablative treatment.

Sarcoma spreads primarily through the vascular system: are there biomarkers associated with vascular spread?

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with specific molecular characteristics and currently classified on the basis of their tissue of origin and histologic appearance. Except for epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, angiosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma, which may spread to regional lymph nodes, the other histotypes spread via the vascular system to the lungs most of the time. A variety of molecular approaches, including gene expression profiling, have identified candidate biomarkers and generated insights into sarcoma biology. The comprehension of the pathogenesis of this malignancy according to the mesenchymal stem cell hypothesis parallels the description of several molecular pathways deregulated in sarcoma. Individuation of vascular spread biomarkers is actually focused on the study of factors involved both in hemostasis and angiogenesis. Interestingly the microenvironment of sarcomas showed the very same mesenchymal origin of the surrounding stromal cells. The presence of circulating tumor cells and miRNAs in blood samples of sarcoma patients represents the possibility not only to better stratify patients group according to the prognosis but also to tailor new individualized therapy. So, it could be predicted that some genes expressed in a specific sarcoma might have prognostic significance or therapeutic targeting potential and molecular targets can be identified in the tumor or in the tumor microenvironment. Therefore the initial evaluation of a sarcoma patient should include in-depth genetic evaluation including karyotyping and c-DNA/protein expression profiling. The chemokine signaling demonstrated to be deeply implicated in sarcoma development as well as to have a significant role in development of metastatic disease, especially in directing tumor cells towards the preferential sites of metastases in sarcoma, lung and bone. It is unsolved if the blood stream is a more favorable environment compared to lymphatic or if lymph nodes are more efficient in destroying metastatic sarcoma cells. But the comprehension of the regulatory mechanisms of the behavior of mesenchymal malignant tumors is at its dawn.

Optimizing pemetrexed-gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pharmacogenetic approach.

INTRODUCTION: The pemetrexed-gemcitabine combination is effective in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical data suggest that pemetrexed may synergistically interact with gemcitabine by enhancing the expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), increasing the uptake and intracellular activation of gemcitabine. A pharmacogenetic approach was adopted to evaluate hENT1 and dCK expressions in humans and to identify the potential best time interval to administer gemcitabine after pemetrexed in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: The dCK and hENT1 expressions, examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, were analyzed during each cycle before and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 hours after pemetrexed administration. The relative differences from baseline to each planned time, for peak values and for the relative difference at peak, were measured. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated with pemetrexed single agent (500 mg/m every 15 or 21 days). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) biphasic increase in both hENT1 and dCK genes at 1 to 2 and 24 to 48 hours after pemetrexed administration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence of dCK and hENT1 induction by pemetrexed in humans, suggesting that the pemetrexed→gemcitabine combination should be optimized by the administration of gemcitabine 1 to 2 or 24 to 48 hours after pemetrexed. These results support further studies to validate the role of dCK/hENT1 in vivo modulation for the optimization of gemcitabine-pemetrexed combination in patients with NSCLC.

Phase I study of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent, in combination with cisplatin in refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: NGR-hTNF exploits the tumor-homing peptide asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) for selectively targeting TNF-α to an aminopeptidase N overexpressed on cancer endothelial cells. Preclinical synergism with cisplatin was displayed even at low doses. This study primarily aimed to explore the safety of low-dose NGR-hTNF combined with cisplatin in resistant/refractory malignancies. Secondary aims included pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: NGR-hTNF was escalated using a doubling-dose scheme (0.2-0.4-0.8-1.6 µg/m(2)) in combination with fixed-dose of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)), both given intravenously once every three weeks. PKs and circulating TNF-receptors (sTNF-Rs) were assessed over the first three cycles. RESULTS: Globally, 22 patients (12 pretreated with platinum) received a range of one to ten cycles. Consistently with the low-dose range tested, maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at 0.2 (n = 4) and 0.4 µg/m(2) (n = 3). One DLT (grade 3 infusion-related reaction) was observed at 0.8 µg/m(2). This dose cohort was expanded to six patients without further DLTs. No DLTs were noted also at 1.6 µg/m(2) (n = 3). NGR-hTNF exposure increased dose-proportionally without apparent PK interactions with cisplatin. No shedding of sTNF-Rs was detected up to 0.8 µg/m(2). At the dose level of 0.8 µg/m(2), expanded to 12 patients for activity assessment, a platinum-pretreated lung cancer patient achieved a partial response lasting more than six months and five patients maintained stable disease for a median time of 5.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of NGR-hTNF 0.8 µg/m(2) with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) showed favorable toxicity profile and promising antitumor activity.

Phase II study of asparagine-glycine-arginine-human tumor necrosis factor alpha, a selective vascular targeting agent, in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: NGR-hTNF consists of human tumor necrosis factor alpha (hTNF-alpha) fused to the tumor-homing peptide asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) able to selectively bind an aminopeptidase N isoform overexpressed on tumor blood vessels. Hypervascularity is a prominent and poor-prognosis feature of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Currently, there are no standard options for patients with MPM who are failing a front-line pemetrexed-based regimen. We explored safety and efficacy of NGR-hTNF in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had radiologically documented tumor progression and performance status < or = 2. Primary study aim was progression-free survival (PFS). NGR-hTNF 0.8 microg/m(2) was given intravenously every 3 weeks. A subsequent cohort of patients received 0.8 microg/m(2) on a weekly basis. RESULTS: In the triweekly cohort (n = 43), only one grade 3 drug-related toxicity was noted, and the most common grades 1 to 2 were short-lived chills (71%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.3 months). Nineteen patients (44%) had disease control (one had partial response, and 18 had stable diseases) and experienced a median progression-free time of 4.4 months. In the weekly cohort (n = 14), there was no higher toxicity, and median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 4.1 months). Seven patients (50%) had disease control (all stable diseases) and had a median progression-free interval of 9.1 months. In the overall study population (N = 57), median PFS was 2.8 months. Median progression-free time was 4.7 months in twenty-six patients (46%) who achieved disease control. Median survival was 12.1 months. CONCLUSION: The tolerability and disease control of NGR-hTNF 0.8 microg/m(2) weekly warrant additional evaluation in patients with advanced MPM.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a multidisciplinary approach in the positron emission tomographic scan era.

BACKGROUND: We have assessed the survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous hematogenous solitary metastasis identified with complete staging workup, including total body [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan, and treated with a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS: We examined the database of all patients who underwent surgery for primary non-small cell lung cancer in our institute. The criteria required for inclusion in this analysis were diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer with synchronous hematogenous solitary metastasis by staging workup with total body computed tomography scan and brain magnetic resonance if indicated, total body positron emission tomography scan, radical surgery for the primary tumors, local treatment of the solitary metastasis, and systemic chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: We analyzed the data from 1,509 patients treated from January 2000 to December 2005: 10 patients (0.7%) satisfied the selection criteria. The median overall survival was 26 months, and the median time to progression was 20 months; 6 patients were alive at the time of analysis, with a median follow-up of 30 months. Four patients were tumor progression-free after 9, 18, 23, and 32 months from the start of their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The presentation of non-small cell lung cancer with a synchronous hematogenous solitary metastasis identified by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography containing complete staging workup is extremely rare. This subset of patients can achieve long-term survival after a multidisciplinary treatment approach.