Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser-Related Histological Changes on Vulvar Tissue in Patients With Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fractional CO2 laser has been proposed as an effective treatment for the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). However, the effects of laser treatment on vulvar tissue have never been assessed. We aimed to assess histological changes related to fractional CO2 laser in vulvar tissue from GSM patients. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center observational prospective cohort study was performed enrolling all GSM patients from July 2017 to October 2018. Patients underwent three outpatient vulvovaginal applications of fractional CO2 laser and vulvar biopsy before and after treatment. Rates of histological changes in vulvar tissue, the difference in means of Vulva Health Index (VuHI), Vaginal Health Index (VHI), Visual Analogue Scale scores for GSM symptoms, and procedure-related pain, and rate of patient's overall satisfaction with treatment were assessed. Univariate comparisons between continuous variables were performed by using the paired t-test (α error = 0.05). RESULTS: Of 20 enrolled patients, 18 underwent all laser applications, and 15 underwent both vulvar biopsies. 93.3% of patients showed remodeling of vulvar connective tissue; 80% showed improvement in vulvar epithelium trophism and 86.7% showed neovascularization. Differences in means between before and after treatment were significant for VuHI, VHI, and all GSM symptoms. Means ± standard deviation of the degree of pain at each laser application were 4.4 ± 0.9, 3.7 ± 1.6, and 2.9 ± 1.9. The rate of overall satisfaction with the treatment was 72.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Fractional CO2 laser leads to a restoration of the normal architecture of vulvar tissue, with significant improvement in GSM-related signs and symptoms, and overall satisfaction with the treatment in most GSM patients. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the tolerability and diagnostic accuracy of virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy (VUH) with that of conventional diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in the workup of patients who are infertile. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery Unit of Sacred Heart Hospital Don Calabria in Negrar, Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 120 consecutive women who underwent hysterosalpingosonography and subsequent VUH and conventional hysteroscopy for infertility evaluation were included. The inclusion criterion was infertility for at least 1 year, with evaluation in the early or intermediate follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. INTERVENTIONS: After the placement of an intracervical catheter, a Ringer Lactate solution was injected into the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and a 3D volume was obtained. The ultrasound volume acquired was successively elaborated offline, and a VUH was performed. Subsequently, a variable amount of air was introduced into the uterine cavity, and the patency of the salpinges was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VUH findings were compared with those of conventional hysteroscopy performed in the subsequent month. For the detection of endometrial pathology in the overall pool, the sensitivity and specificity of VUH in comparison with conventional hysteroscopy were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.3%-100%), respectively. For the detection of uterine cavity pathology and uterine malformations in the overall pool, the sensitivities of VUH were 80% (95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with specificities of 100% (95% CI, 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%), respectively, when compared with conventional hysteroscopy. The positive predictive values for endometrial pathology, uterine cavity alterations, and uterine malformations were 100% (95% CI, 84.6%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 39.8%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 75.3%-100%), respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area of 100%, 90% (95% CI, 70%-100%), and 100%, respectively. There were no cases of severe vasovagal reactions or other complications. Most patients (67%, 81 of 120 women) described the examination as "less painful than expected," 25% (30 of 120 women) "just as expected," and only 7% (9 of 120 women) as "more painful than expected." CONCLUSION: VUH was well tolerated and showed a high accuracy (100%) in the study of the uterine cavity when compared with conventional hysteroscopy.

Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of coexistent cancer: WHO versus EIN criteria.

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is classified into benign and precancerous according to two different histomorphological systems: the World Health Organisation (WHO) system (based on the subjective evaluation of cytological atypia) and the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) system (based on a combination of several parameters that are assessable subjectively, or objectively through computerised analysis). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends use of the EIN system. Nonetheless, a higher prognostic value for EIN criteria was demonstrated only with the objective assessment, which is not routinely applicable. The aim of this study was to evaluate which of the subjective classifications of EH (WHO or EIN) has better prognostic value, by assessing the risk of coexistent cancer. Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles from the inception of the databases to July 2018. All studies assessing the presence of cancer on hysterectomy specimens after a preoperative histological diagnosis of EH were included. Odds ratios (ORs), sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sixteen cohort studies and three case-control studies, assessing 2582 EHs, were included. The WHO criteria showed an OR of 11.15 (95% CI 7.65-16.24), a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.90) and a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64-0.70) for coexistent cancer. The subjective EIN system showed a similar OR (11.85, 95% CI 4.91-28.62; P = 0.90), higher sensitivity (0.98, 95% CI 0.94-0.99), and lower specificity (0.29, 95% CI 0.24-0.34). The WHO system and the subjective EIN system have similar prognostic values. However, the EIN criteria appear to be more sensitive and thus more suitable for selecting women who need to be treated, whereas the WHO criteria, based on cytological atypia, seem to be more specific for lesions at higher risk of cancer. Therefore, integration of the EIN system with cytological atypia should be considered.

Correction to: The role of recombinant LH in women with hypo-response to controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

.

The role of recombinant LH in women with hypo-response to controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of recombinant human LH supplementation in women with hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials in which recombinant FSH monotherapy protocols were compared with LH-supplemented protocols in hypo-responders. A search was conducted of the Scopus, MEDLINE databases without time or language restrictions. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (odds ratio: 2.03, P = 0.003), implantation rates (odds ratio: 2.62, P = 0.004) and number of oocytes retrieved (weight mean differences: 1.98, P = 0.03) were observed in hypo-responders supplemented with recombinant LH versus hypo-responders who underwent FSH monotherapy. No differences in terms of mature oocytes or miscarriage rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our analysis confirms that women with a hypo-response to exogenous gonadotropins might benefit from LH supplementation. However, more trials are required before a definitive conclusion can be drawn.

Should progesterone and estrogen receptors be assessed for predicting the response to conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Progestins are used as conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC). We aimed to assess whether immunohistochemical expression of estrogens and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) predicts the treatment response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing ER and PR expression in EH and EEC treated with progestins. Relative risk for poor response, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR- ) and area under the curve (AUC) on summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. Subgroup analyses were based on administration route (oral progestin or levonorgestrel-intrauterine device) and on histological diagnosis (atypical EH/EEC or non-atypical EH). Only high accuracy (AUC > 0.9; LR+  >10; LR-  <0.1) was considered determining for the clinical practice. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 635 patients were included in the systematic review. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from the meta-analysis. Negative ER expression did not significantly predict poor response (P = 0.16), with low predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.637). Negative PR significantly predicted poor response (P = 0.01), with moderate accuracy (AUC = .806). In the oral progestin subgroup, neither ER (P = 0.55) nor PR (P = 0.18) had significant predictive value. In the levonorgestrel-intrauterine device subgroup, both ER (P < 0.0001) and PR (P = 0.02) were significantly predictive of good response, although the accuracy was suboptimal (LR+ 6.02 and 2.48, respectively; LR- 0.59 and 0.55, respectively). The atypical EH/EEC subgroup showed non-significant results. Data about non-atypical EH were not extractable. CONCLUSIONS: ER and PR expressions are significantly predictive of response in EH and EEC treated with a levonorgestrel-intrauterine device but not with oral progestins. However, their accuracy is insufficient to be determining in the clinical practice.

Immunohistochemical predictive markers of response to conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Progestogens are widely used for the conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, they do not achieve the regression in all cases. Although several immunohistochemical markers have been assessed to predict the response to treatment, their usefulness is still unclear. We aimed to analyze the usefulness of each immunohistochemical marker studied in predicting the response to progestogens in endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2000 to June 2018. All studies assessing the association of immunohistochemical markers with the outcome of the progestogen-based therapy in endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer were included. The expression of immunohistochemical markers in pretreatment phase and changes of expression during the follow-up were evaluated in relation to response to therapy and relapse. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with 1360 women were included in the systematic review; 43 immunohistochemical markers were assessed. The most studied predictive markers in the pretreatment phase were progesterone and estrogen receptors, although with conflicting results; their isoforms, and in particular progesterone receptor B, appeared more promising. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of mismatch repair proteins, Dusp6, GRP78 and PTEN combined with other molecules such as phospho-AKT or phospho-mTOR. In the follow-up phase, Nrf2 and survivin showed the stronger evidence; a role may also be played by Bcl2 and Ki67. Further studies are necessary for Fas, NCoR, AKR1C1, HE4, PAX2 and SPAG9. CONCLUSIONS: Several immunohistochemical markers might be helpful in predicting the response to conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer on pretreatment and follow-up specimens. Further studies are needed to confirm their usefulness and possibly integrate them in a predictive immunohistochemical panel.

Management of women with atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus: A quantitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Atypical polypoid adenomyoma is an uncommon uterine lesion which can coexist with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and/or cancer. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma affects premenopausal women in most cases, but it shows high recurrence rate if conservatively treated. To date, the management of patients is based on low-quality evidence and is not standardized. Our primary aim was to explore the optimal management of atypical polypoid adenomyoma, with particular regard to the fertility-sparing approach. The secondary aim was to define clinicopathologic features of atypical polypoid adenomyoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting outcomes of atypical polypoid adenomyoma treatments. Univariate comparisons among outcomes of fertility-sparing treatments (rates of initial response, progression, recurrence, final complete response, pregnancy) were performed with Fisher's exact test (α = .05). RESULTS: Eleven retrospective studies with 237 patients were included; 85.5% of patients were premenopausal and 62.9% were nulliparous. Atypical polypoid adenomyoma coexisted with atypical hyperplasia in 5.5% of cases and with endometrial cancer in 5.9%. Overall risks of recurrence and progression to cancer were 28.9% and 16.6%, respectively. Fertility-sparing treatments included hormonal therapy with or without maintenance, hysteroscopic transcervical resection, dilation and curettage, and hormonal therapy combined with transcervical resection or dilation and curettage. Transcervical resection showed significantly higher initial response rates (P from <0.001 to 0.023) than any other treatment. Transcervical resection and transcervical resection+hormonal therapy showed significantly lower progression rates (P < 0.001), and higher final complete response rates (P < 0.001) than any other treatment. No significant differences were found in the rates of pregnancy (P = 0.533 - 0.647) or recurrence (P = 0.052 - 0.475). Among the different transcervical resection techniques, the 4-step transcervical resection showed significantly lower rates of progression (P = 0.002) and recurrence (P = 0.013) than other techniques. Limitations to our results were the retrospective design of the studies and the relatively small sample size, due to the rarity of atypical polypoid adenomyoma. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its effectiveness and safety, transcervical resection may be the first-line fertility-sparing treatment for atypical polypoid adenomyoma. In particular, 4-step transcervical resection showed the best results. Given the risk of recurrence, progression and coexistent atypical hyperplasia or cancer, follow-up biopsies are advisable. When fertility preservation is not required, hysterectomy might be advisable.

PAX2 in endometrial carcinogenesis and in differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

INTRODUCTION: Benign and precancerous endometrial hyperplasias (EH) are differentiated according to two alternative histomorphologic classifications: World Health Organization (WHO) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) system. The 2017 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines recommend paired box 2 protein (PAX2) immunohistochemistry to identify precancerous EH. However, methods for interpreting immunostaining and diagnostic accuracy are not defined, and the role of PAX2 in endometrial carcinogenesis is unclear. We aimed to assess: (a) PAX2 expression throughout endometrial carcinogenesis, from normal endometrium to benign EH, precancerous EH, and endometrial cancer (EC); (b) the diagnostic accuracy of PAX2 immunohistochemistry in diagnosing precancerous EH, defining criteria for its use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for from their inception to July 2018. All studies evaluating PAX2 immunohistochemistry in normal endometrium, EH, and EC were included. Univariate comparisons of PAX2 expression were performed with Fisher's exact test (significant P < .05). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve on summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. Subgroup analyses were based on expression thresholds (decrease vs complete loss) and classifications used (WHO vs EIN). RESULTS: Six studies with 266 normal endometrium, 586 EH, and 114 EC were included. Both decrease and complete loss of PAX2 expression were significantly more common in EC and precancerous EH than benign EH. Diagnostic accuracy was moderate for both PAX2 complete loss and decrease (areas under the curve 0.829 and 0.876, respectively). PAX2 complete loss with EIN system showed the best results (sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.95; DOR = 43.13). CONCLUSIONS: PAX2 seems to behave as a tumor suppressor in endometrial carcinogenesis. PAX2 is an accurate marker of precancerous EH; complete loss of PAX2 and EIN classification appear as the optimal diagnostic criteria.

Loss of PTEN expression as diagnostic marker of endometrial precancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial hyperplasia may be either a benign proliferation or a premalignant lesion. In order to differentiate these two conditions, two possible histologic classifications can be used: the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) classification. The 2017 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines recommend the use of immunohistochemistry for tumor suppressor protein phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) to improve the differential diagnosis. Nonetheless, its diagnostic accuracy has never been defined. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of immunohistochemistry for PTEN in the differential diagnosis between benign and premalignant endometrial hyperplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from their inception to May 2018 for studies assessing immunohistochemical expression of PTEN in endometrial hyperplasia specimens. PTEN status ("loss" or "presence") was the index test; histological diagnosis ("precancer" or "benign") was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) on summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated (95% CI), with a subgroup analysis based on the histologic classification adopted (WHO vs EIN). RESULTS: Twenty-seven observational studies with 1736 cases of endometrial hyperplasia were included. Pooled estimates showed low diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity 54% (95% CI 50%-59%), specificity 66% (63%-69%), LR+ 1.55 (1.29-1.87), LR- 0.72 (0.62-0.83), DOR 3.56 (2.02-6.28), AUC 0.657. When the WHO subgroup was compared with the EIN subgroup, higher accuracy (AUC 0.694 vs. 0.621), and higher heterogeneity in all analyses, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemistry for PTEN showed low diagnostic usefulness in the differential diagnosis between benign and premalignant endometrial hyperplasia. In the absence of further evidence, the recommendation about its use should be reconsidered.