Advanced Concepts in Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty.

As the adoption and utilization of outpatient total joint arthroplasty continues to grow, key developments have enabled surgeons to safely and effectively perform these surgeries while increasing patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. Here, the authors will discuss the evidence-based principles that have guided this paradigm shift in joint arthroplasty surgery, as well as practical methods for selecting appropriate candidates and optimizing perioperative care. There will be 5 core efficiency principles reviewed that can be used to improve organizational management, streamline workflow, and overcome barriers in the ambulatory surgery center. Finally, future directions in outpatient surgery at the ASC, including the merits of implementing robot assistance and computer navigation, as well as expanding indications for revision surgeries, will be debated.

A Remote Physical Therapy Program Demonstrates Similar Outcomes Compared to In-Person, Supervised Physical Therapy After Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients are candidates for same-day discharge (SDD). Previous research has shown that internet-based remote physical therapy (RPT) can produce equivalent outcomes to supervised outpatient physical therapy (OPT) after TKA. We sought to compare outcomes between RPT and OPT in patients undergoing SDD TKA using an electronic remote perioperative management (ERPM) program. METHODS: Patients undergoing SDD TKA were enrolled in an ERPM program and randomized to ERPM + RPT or ERPM + OPT. Preoperative and 6-week functional assessments included knee range of motion, timed up and go, and 4-meter gait speed. Numerical Rating Scale pain scores were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 and 12 weeks, and satisfaction was assessed at 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Participants completed the Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively. OPT utilization was collected 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 197 initially randomized patients, 76 remained in the ERPM + RPT group and 95 in the ERPM + OPT group after withdrawals and crossovers. Baseline characteristics showed no differences between the 2 groups. No clinically relevant differences were observed in knee range of motion, Numerical Rating Scale pain, patient-reported outcomes, functional assessments, or satisfaction at any follow-up time. Participants in the ERPM + OPT group attended an average of 11.57 physical therapy sessions, incurring a total cost of $462.8 and 133 minutes of travel. Conversely, the ERPM + RPT group experienced no expenses or travel time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the ERPM + RPT group had similar outcomes, lower costs, and saved time compared to patients in the ERPM + OPT group after SDD TKA. Further analysis is needed to determine predictive indicators for crossovers.

Evaluating Knee Recovery Beyond Patient Reports: A Comparative Study of Smart Implantable Device-Derived Gait Metrics Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is frequently performed for advanced osteoarthritis, with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) traditionally reporting on efficacy. These subjective evaluations, although useful, may inaccurately reflect post-TKA activity levels. With technological advancements, smart implantable devices (SIDs) offer objective, real-time gait metrics, potentially providing a more accurate postoperative recovery assessment. This study compares these objective metrics with PROMs to evaluate TKA success more effectively. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 88 participants undergoing TKA using a SID. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had advanced osteoarthritis. We excluded those who had bilateral TKAs, joint infections, or neuromuscular disease. The SID system collected daily gait metrics, including step count, distance traveled, walking speed, stride length, cadence, and functional knee range of motion. The PROMs, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement, Veterans Rand 12 Physical Component Summary, and Veterans Rand 12 Mental Component Summary, were analyzed against SID gait metrics. Among the 88 patients, 80 provided continuous data over 12 weeks. RESULTS: All gait metrics, except stride length, significantly increased at the 12-week point (P < .05). The PROMs also significantly improved postoperatively (P < .05). Initial low positive correlations between 12-week PROMs and SID metrics decreased after adjusting for demographic variables, leaving only weak correlations between the Veterans Rand 12 Physical Component Summary and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement with functional knee range of motion (r = 0.389, P = .002; r = 0.311, P = .014, respectively), and Veterans Rand 12 Mental Component Summary with step count (r = 0.406, P = .001) and distance traveled (r = 0.376, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that both PROMs and SID gait metrics show significant improvements post-TKA, though they correlate weakly with each other, suggesting a possible discrepancy between perceived recovery and actual functional improvement. The SID gait metrics might provide a valuable addition to traditional PROMs by offering an objective representation of physical capabilities unaffected by patient compliance or subjective perceptions of recovery. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger populations and to explore whether integrating SID metrics can enhance long-term functional outcomes.

Use of a fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system produced greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes at one year compared to manual, fluoroscopic-assisted technique.

INTRODUCTION: The adoption of new technology should be supported by improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to assess the one-year PROMs of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a novel, fluoroscopy-based, robotic-assisted (RA-THA) system when compared to a manual, fluoroscopic-assisted technique (mTHA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of 91 consecutive mTHA and 85 consecutive RA-THA via a direct anterior approach was conducted. All cases were performed by the same surgeon at the same institution, for a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Outcomes included one-year Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) Physical/Mental, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome (HOOS) Pain/Physical Function/Joint Replacement, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity scores, as well as the difference between pre-operative and one-year post-operative PROMs. RESULTS: Patients in the RA-THA cohort had lower pre-operative HOOS-JR scores compared to patients in the mTHA cohort (37.0 vs. 43.1; p = 0.031). Cohorts experienced similar one-year post-operative VR-12, HOOS, and UCLA Activity scores. Patients in the RA-THA cohort experienced greater improvements across all pre- and post-operative HOOS scores compared to patients in the mTHA cohort: Pain (+ 54.7 vs. +42.1; p = 0.009), Physical Function (-41.6 vs. -28.7; p = 0.007), and Joint Replacement (+ 46.6 vs. +33.0; p = 0.002). These differences exceeded minimum clinically important difference (MCID). CONCLUSIONS: Both manual and robotic cohorts experienced benefit from THA at one-year post-operative. Importantly, the use of a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic assistance system for primary THA resulted in greater improvements in PROMs at one-year relative to manual technique.

Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: Practical Guidelines for Success, Effect of COVID--19, and the Roles of Technology and Partnering With Industry.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a drastic effect on the landscape of outpatient joint arthroplasty. By accelerating the migration to ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments, protocols and techniques had to adapt quickly. In addition, the roles of technology and partnering with industry became more appealing in some cases to address specific voids and needs during this transition period. The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly affected the state of outpatient joint arthroplasty in 2020 with long-lasting effects that will continue to shape the practice of outpatient total joint arthroplasty for years to come.

Outpatient Joint Replacement: Practical Guidelines for Your Program Based on Evidence, Success, and Failures.

Joint arthroplasty is increasingly being performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Enabled by enhanced recovery protocols and multimodal pain management, and incentivized by the implementation of value-based payment models, this trend is projected to continue, with more than half of total joint replacements predicted to be outpatient by 2026.1 Like any advance in healthcare, this transition offers both new advantages and new challenges. ASCs provide opportunities to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes while lowering costs, but realizing these advantages requires a new level of presurgery preparation for both surgeons and patients. This chapter outlines key considerations for success when transitioning to performing joint arthroplasty at ASCs. Paramount among these are patient selection and preparation. Additional considerations include protocol optimization through data tracking and iterative refinement. A clear understanding of the differences in performing joints at an ASC versus a hospital outpatient setting enables surgeons to make the transition smoothly, maintain a high-quality patient experience, and deliver optimum outcomes.

In Vivo Determination and Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Kinematics for Normal, Preoperative Degenerative, and Postoperative Implanted Hips.

BACKGROUND: The study objective is to analyze subjects having a normal hip and compare in vivo kinematics to subjects before and after receiving a total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty subjects, 10 with a normal hip and 10 with a preoperative, degenerative hip were analyzed performing normal walking on level ground while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Seven preoperative subjects returned after receiving a total hip arthroplasty using the anterior surgical approach by a single surgeon. Using 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional registration techniques, joint models were overlayed on fluoroscopic images to obtain transformation matrices in the image space. From these images, displacements of the femoral head and acetabulum centers were computed, as well as changes in contact patches between the 2 surfaces throughout the gait cycle. RESULTS: Implanted hips experienced the least amount of separation, compression, and overall sliding throughout the entire gait cycle, but they did show signs of edge loading contact patterns. Conversely, the degenerative hips experienced the most compression, sliding, and separation, with the maximum amount of sliding being 6.9 mm. The normal group ranged in the middle, with the maximum amount of sliding being 1.75 mm. CONCLUSION: Current analysis revealed trends that degenerative hips experience more abnormal hip kinematics that leads to higher articulating surface forces and stresses within the acetabulum. None of the implanted hips experienced hip separation.

Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: Transitioning to the Ambulatory Surgery Center.

The performance of joint arthroplasty in an outpatient setting is expected to rise significantly over the coming decade, with predictions that greater than half of all primary joint arthroplasties will be performed in an outpatient setting by the year 2026. Financial pressures, bundled payment models, and improved understanding of patient recovery have led to discharging patients home the same day as the index procedure. Arthroplasty surgeons are starting to utilize ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) to perform these outpatient arthroplasty procedures. Our duty as arthroplasty surgeons continues to be to protect our patients' overall care and safety during this transition from a traditional hospital model. Appreciating that postoperative treatment, disposition, physical space, and sterile processing department capabilities are different from traditional hospital models is paramount to success in an ASC. Differences between hospital and ASC models place additional staffing, financial pressure, and time pressure on the arthroplasty surgeon to select and prepare patients before surgery. Adequately preparing patients involves medical optimization, setting patient and family expectations, identifying appropriate caregivers, and establishing effective communication tools after surgery. It is imperative to develop protocols to deal with predictable discharge delays that include blood pressure, oversedation, postoperative urinary retention, postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, pain, and social issues. These protocols are best first developed in a hospital setting where they can be implemented and changed before starting in an ASC. Arthroplasty surgeons will continue to protect patients by developing protocols and preparing patients appropriately for care in an ASC.

Spinopelvic Motion: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Subject.

Knowledge of the relationship between the hip and spine is essential in the effort to minimize instability and improve outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A detailed yet straightforward preoperative imaging workup can provide valuable information on pelvic positioning, which may be helpful for optimum placement of the acetabular cup. For a streamlined preoperative assessment of THA candidates, classification systems with a capacity for providing a more personalized approach to performance of THA have been introduced. Familiarity with these systems and their clinical application is important in the effort to optimize component placement and reduce the risk of instability. Looking ahead, the principles of the hip-spine relationship are being integrated using emerging innovative technologies, promising further streamlining of the evaluation process.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation versus Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrifice: Comparing Patient Outcomes in Medial Congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This study aimed to compare outcomes and complication rates between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and excision utilizing a medial congruent (MC) polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a specialized ambulatory surgery center (ASC) dedicated to hip and knee arthroplasty. A retrospective review was performed between May 2023 and October 2023 analyzing 398 patients who underwent primary MC TKA by high-volume joint arthroplasty surgeons (n = 9) with either PCL preservation (n = 264) or sacrifice (n = 134) in a single free-standing ASC. Patients were matched chronologically on a 2:1 basis. Demographics, baseline function, 90-day complications, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded for each patient. There were no differences in preoperative baseline function or patient-reported outcome measures, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists class among patient groups. The PCL-preserve and PCL-sacrifice cohorts showed significant variation in 12-week postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, Junior (KOOS, JR.) scores. Specifically, the number of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in KOOS, JR. scores was higher in the PCL-sacrifice group (p < 0.05). Yet, no complications within the 90-day period were associated with PCL status and other patient-reported outcomes. This study comparing outcomes between MC TKAs with PCL retention and sacrifice suggests that both techniques are viable options with similar functional outcomes, pain scores, and complication rates, which may have benefits in an ASC setting. The PCL-sacrifice group exhibited a statistically significant increase in patients who achieved the MCID in KOOS, JR. score compared with the PCL-preserving at early follow-up. Future research should employ prospective, randomized designs to further validate these findings and explore long-term implications.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty utilizing a fluoroscopy-guided system resulted in improved intra-operative efficiency relative to a computerized tomography-based platform.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a computerized-tomography (CT) based workflow increases surgical time relative to traditional manual technique. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the intra-operative efficiencies of two robotic THA systems: a fluoroscopy-based platform (FL-RTHA) and a contemporary, CT-based (CT-RTHA) platform. A review of 107 consecutive FL-RTHA and 159 CT-RTHA primary, direct anterior approach (DAA) THA procedures was conducted. All cases were performed by one of two surgeons operating at the same institution, for a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Primary outcome variables included averages and consistencies (variances) for surgical times and operating room (OR) times. A secondary outcome was to quantify the duration of robot-active phases in the FL-RTHA workflow. The FL-RTHA cohort experienced shorter surgical times (38.71 min ± 7.00 vs. 75.33 min ± 11.38; p < 0.001) and OR times (101.35 min ± 12.22 vs. 156.74 min ± 17.79; p < 0.001) compared to the CT-RTHA cohort. Surgical times and OR times were both more consistent in the FL-RTHA cohort compared to the CT-RTHA cohort (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent DAA THA with the assistance of a fluoroscopy-based robotic system experienced shorter and more consistent surgical times and OR times compared to patients who underwent similar DAA THA procedures with a contemporary, CT-based robotic platform.