Subtle anterior subtalar dislocation.

Subtalar dislocations are uncommon injuries, and anterior subtalar dislocations are extremely rare. Only 7 cases have been reported in detail in the literature, but all were associated with substantial displacement immediately apparent on radiographs. We report a case of a subtle anterior subtalar dislocation that was missed on initial plain films but was subsequently treated successfully with closed reduction.

Intra-articular Placement of an Intraosseous Catheter.

Gaining vascular access is essential in the resuscitation of critically ill patients. Intraosseous (IO) placement is a fundamentally important alternative to intravenous (IV) access in conditions where IV access delays resuscitation or is not possible. This case report presents a previously unreported example of prehospital misplacement of an IO catheter into the intra-articular space of the knee joint. This report serves to inform civilian and military first responders, as well as emergency medicine physicians, of intra-articular IO line placement as a potential complication of IO vascular access. Infusion of large amounts of fluid into the joint space could damage the joint and be catastrophic to a patient who needs immediate IV fluids or medications. In addition, intra-articular IO placement could result in septic arthritis of the knee.

Timing of Surgery for Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Patients With Neurological Injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Large multicenter retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of fusion timing on inpatient outcomes in a nationally representative population with thoracolumbar fracture and concurrent neurological injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Among thoracolumbar trauma admissions, concurrent neurological injury is associated with greater long-term morbidity. There is little consensus on optimal surgical timing for these patients; previous investigations fail to differentiate thoracolumbar fracture with and without neurological injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 19,136 nonelective National Inpatient Sample cases (2004-2014) containing International Classifications of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes for closed thoracic/lumbar fracture with neurological injury and procedure codes for primary thoracolumbar/lumbosacral fusion, excluding open/cervical fracture. Timing classification from admission to fusion was same-day, 1-2-, 3-6-, and ≥7-day delay. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, complications, and infection; secondary outcomes included total and postoperative length of stay and charges. Logistic regressions and generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log-link evaluated the effect of surgical timing on primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, controlling for age, sex, fracture location, fusion approach, multiorgan system injury severity score, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery ≤72 hours (n=12,845) had the lowest odds of in-hospital cardiac [odds ratio (OR)=0.595; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.357-0.991] and respiratory complications (OR=0.495; 95% CI, 0.313-0.784) and infection (OR=0.615; 95% CI, 0.390-0.969). No differences were observed between same-day (n=4724) and 1-2-day delay (n=8121) (P>0.05). Lowest odds of hemorrhage or hematoma was observed following 3-6-day delay (OR=0.467; 95% CI, 0.236-0.922). A ≥7-day delay to fusion (n=2,002) was associated with greatest odds of hemorrhage/hematoma (OR=2.019; 1.107-3.683), respiratory complications (OR=1.850; 95% CI, 1.076-3.180), and infection (OR=3.155; 95% CI, 1.891-5.263) and greatest increases in mean postoperative length of stay (4.26% or 35.3% additional days) and charges (163,562 or 71.7% additional US dollars) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with thoracolumbar fracture and associated neurological injury who underwent surgery within 3 days of admission experienced fewer in-hospital complications. These benefits may be due to secondary injury mechanism avoidance and earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Online physician rating websites are increasingly used by patients to evaluate their doctors. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate factors associated with better spine surgeon ratings. METHODS: Orthopedic spine surgeons were randomly selected from the North American Spine Society directory utilizing a random number generator. Surgeon profiles on three physician rating websites, namely, www.HealthGrades.com, www.Vitals.com, and www.RateMDs.com, were analyzed to gather qualitative and quantitative data on patients' perceptions of the surgeons. Independent variables from the websites were analyzed in relation to overall physician or patient satisfaction rating. Comments were coded by subject into following three categories: professional competence, bedside manner, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 250 surgeons were evaluated, and 92% (n=230) of these doctors had at least one rating among the three websites. The surgeons with a higher average rating had significantly better trust (p<.01), scheduling (p<.01), staff (p<.01), helpfulness (p<.01), and punctuality (p<.01) scores but significantly less experience (p<.05). A linear regression model for the average rating of each surgeon (R2 value=0.754) yielded only following three significant variables: trustworthiness (p<.01), experience match (p<.05), and the average number of negative comments on surgeon's professional competence (p<.05). Trustworthiness (ß=0.749) was the strongest predictor variable of physician rating, followed by the number of negative professional competence comments (ß=-0.132) and experience match (ß=-0.112). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation assessed spine surgeon online patient ratings and categorized factors that patients associate with quality care. Trustworthiness was the most significant predictor of positive ratings, whereas ease of scheduling, quality of staff, helpfulness, and punctuality were also associated with higher patient ratings. Understanding what patients value may help optimize care of spine surgery patients.

Sex- and Sport-Specific Epidemiology of Cervical Spine Injuries Sustained During Sporting Activities.

BACKGROUND: Although several investigations have examined the epidemiology of cervical spine injuries in sports, few studies have analyzed the nationwide incidence and sex-specific epidemiology of cervical spine injuries. METHOD: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, which collects information on patients presenting to the emergency department at 100 hospitals across the United States, was queried for neck sprains and cervical fractures associated with sporting activities from 2000-2015. RESULT: A total of 26,380 neck sprains and 1166 fractures were identified. Compared with females, the incidence for injuries in males was 1.7 times greater for neck sprains and 3.6 times greater for fractures (P < 0.0001). Football was the most common cause of cervical sprains in males, followed by cycling and weightlifting/aerobics. Females sustained most neck sprains in weightlifting/aerobics, trampoline, and cheerleading. From 2000 to 2015, the incidence of neck sprains from aerobics increased from 15.5 to 25.3 per million person-years (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the incidence of cervical fractures from cycling increased from 0.67 to 2.7 per million (P < 0.0001). For males, cycling was the most common cause of fracture, followed by diving/swimming and football. For females, horseback riding was most common, followed by cycling and diving/swimming. CONCLUSIONS: Football is the leading cause of cervical sprains in the United States. The most common cause of cervical fracture in men is cycling, while in women it is horseback riding. The incidence of sport-related cervical fractures has increased by 35% from 2000 to 2015, which has been driven by an increase in cycling-related injuries.

Longer Operative Time in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Fusion Is Independently Associated With Increased Complication Rate.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of operative time on postoperative complications in patients age 65 and older undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. METHODS: All patients age 65 and older undergoing posterior lumbar fusion were identified in the 2012 to 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The primary outcome measures were complications occurring up to 30 days postoperatively, including death, any complication, and complication subtypes. The primary independent variable was operative duration. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses utilized logistic regression and analyzed operative duration as a continuous variable. Statistical significance was considered P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 4947 patients age 65 and older undergoing posterior lumbar fusion were identified. The mean operative time was 3.3 hours (SD 1.7). The overall complication rate was 13.4% (n = 665). In multivariate analysis, each incremental hour of operative time was associated with increased risk of postoperative thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.37), transfusion (OR= 1.25; 95% CI = 1.18-1.32), urinary tract infection (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.10-1.32), and total postoperative complications (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.16-1.27). CONCLUSION: For patients age 65 and older undergoing posterior lumbar fusion, longer operative time is associated with greater risk for thromboembolism, transfusion, intubation, kidney injury, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, and overall postoperative complications. This data highlights several specific complications that are influenced by operative time in older patients, and further supports the need for future protocols that seek to safely minimize operative time for posterior lumbar fusion.

Tobacco Use and Complications Following Spinal Fusion: A Comparison of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and National Inpatient Sample Datasets.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a known risk factor for inferior health outcomes. Retrospective analyses of large datasets may assess whether such risk is manifested or mitigated in clinical practice. Although many risk factor analyses use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), such investigations have seldom been directly compared. METHODS: NIS and NSQIP datasets were used. Primary outcome measures were perioperative complications. NSQIP complications were stratified based on occurrence before versus after discharge. Multiple logistic regression was employed in adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Among NSQIP (N = 56,145) and NIS (N = 1,311,426) patients, 24.0% and 31.8% were identified as tobacco users, respectively. Before discharge, NSQIP smokers had increased odds of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.43), postoperative intubation (aOR = 1.40), and sepsis (aOR = 1.71) and decreased odds of pulmonary embolism (aOR = 0.57) (all P < 0.05). After discharge, NSQIP smokers exhibited increased odds of cardiac arrest (aOR = 2.53) and surgical site infection (aOR = 1.25) and decreased odds of urinary tract infection (aOR = 0.68) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR = 0.61) (all P < 0.05). In adjusted analysis of NIS data, tobacco users exhibited increased odds of inpatient pneumonia (aOR = 1.57), myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.29), and postoperative intubation (aOR = 1.15) and decreased odds of pulmonary embolism (aOR = 0.80) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR = 0.78) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of tobacco use undergoing spinal fusion were at increased risk of pneumonia and intubation but decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the inpatient postoperative stay. After discharge, smokers exhibited increased odds of cardiac arrest and surgical site infection. NIS and NSQIP results were similar, with 9 of 12 outcomes exhibiting identical inpatient conclusions. Qualitative comparison of NIS and NSQIP yields results that offer increased validity over single-source studies.

Critical Assessment of the Contemporary Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process.

BACKGROUND: Matching into orthopaedic surgery residency in the United States has become an increasingly competitive process because of the large number of well-qualified applicants. Over the past several years, applicants have sought to maximize their chances of matching by submitting an increasing number of applications. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in application numbers, applicant qualifications, and application reviews, with the goal of obtaining data to help inform future improvements in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process. METHODS: Applicant data were obtained from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS, www.aamc.org/services/eras/stats) and the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP, www.nrmp.org/report-archives). These included residency application data from 2000 to 2017. In addition, we analyzed available NRMP Applicant Survey Reports between 2008 and 2017, Program Director Survey Reports between 2008 and 2016, and NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match between 2006 and 2016. RESULTS: The number of U.S. senior medical student applicants per orthopaedic surgery residency position was stable from 2000 to 2017 (1.13 vs. 1.16 for 2000 and 2017, respectively). A significant increase in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 and Step-2 scores and self-reported research activity was present over the same time period. The number of applications submitted per applicant significantly increased, by 71.7%, from 48.4 in 2006 to 83.1 in 2017. Additionally, applications per program increased 46.4% from 457 in 2010 to 669 in 2016. In 2010, programs performed in-depth reviews for 54% of applications; however, in 2016, in-depth reviews had decreased to 45% of applications. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic residency applicant USMLE scores and research productivity have increased over time. Concurrently, the average number of applications submitted per applicant has increased, with the average applicant applying to nearly half of all orthopaedic residency programs. Consequently, programs have seen more than double the number of applications over this study period. The accompanying decline in the proportion of applications undergoing in-depth review, along with the applicant and program resources associated with these changes, warrants the development of strategies to enhance the efficiency of the application process for orthopaedic residency.

Proximal junctional failure prevention in adult spinal deformity surgery utilizing interlaminar fixation constructs.

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common complication following fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. PJK and proximal junctional failure (PJF) may lead to pain, neurological injury, reoperation, and increased healthcare costs. Efforts to prevent PJK and PJF have aimed to preserve or reconstruct the posterior spinal tension band and/or modifying instrumentation to allow for more gradual transitions in stiffness at the cranial end of long spinal constructs. We describe placement of an interlaminar fixation construct at the upper instrumented vertebra which may decrease PJK/PJF severity, and is placed with little additional operative time and minimal posterior soft tissue trauma.

Early Subspecialization in Orthopedic Surgery Training.

Recent studies have shown that applicants to the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II examination are performing fewer procedures outside of their chosen subspecialty. In this study, the authors assessed whether trainees are beginning their subspecialization during residency. The authors reviewed the chosen fellowships and case logs of 231 residents graduating from 5 academic orthopedic residency training programs from 2002 to 2017. The number of cases logged by residents who chose a specialty was then compared with the number of cases logged by residents who chose other specialties. Residents who chose spine surgery (108.4±50.7 vs 74.4±60.2, P<.01), hand surgery (242.2±92.9 vs 194.3±78.2, P<.01), and sports medicine (278.5±105.8 vs 229.0±93.9, P<.01) performed significantly more procedures in their chosen fields than their colleagues. In contrast, for total joint arthroplasty (P=.18) and foot and ankle surgery (P=.46), there was no significant difference in the number of cases between residents who chose the sub-specialty and those who did not. Residents pursuing careers in spine surgery, hand surgery, and sports medicine obtained additional operative exposure to their chosen field during residency. Formalizing this early experience with specialization tracks during the chief year may be considered. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e39-e43.].

Predictors of Nonneurologic Complications and Increased Length of Stay After Cervical Spine Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have used National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data to study complications of thoracolumbar spinal deformity surgery, investigation of cervical spine deformity surgery has been limited. We performed a retrospective analysis of the NSQIP database to identify predictors of complications after cervical spine osteotomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing cervical spine osteotomy were identified in the NSQIP dataset using Current Procedural Terminology codes from years 2007-2016. For each patient, patient and case clinical characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and diagnosis of a nonneurologic complication (including reoperation and readmission) were abstracted. Patient and case clinical predictors of any of the reported complications and increased LOS were identified in multivariate logistic and Poisson regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: There were 950 patients identified with mean age 56.1 ± 12.4 years and mean body mass index 29.9 ± 6.8. Mean LOS was 3.5 ± 4.9 days. Overall medical complication rate was 15.8%. The most common complications were transfusion (78; 8.2%), readmission (45; 4.7%), reoperation (32; 3.4%), and reintubation (28; 3.0%). Risk factors for any complication included increased age (P = 0.0467), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III (P = 0.0023) and IV (P = 0.0013), and increased operative duration (P < 0.0001). Risk factors for increased LOS were decreased functional status (P = 0.0037), disseminated cancer (P = 0.0061), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III and IV (P < 0.0001), increased operative duration (P < 0.0001), and orthopaedic surgeon (vs. neurosurgeon) (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest to date of patients undergoing cervical osteotomy and provides useful clinical data for patient selection and counseling and 30-day reoperation and readmission rates.

Radiation Exposure and Health Risks for Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Orthopaedic surgeons are routinely exposed to intraoperative radiation and, therefore, follow the principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" with regard to occupational safety. However, standardized education on the long-term health effects of radiation and the basis for current radiation exposure limits is limited in the field of orthopaedics. Much of orthopaedic surgeons' understanding of radiation exposure limits is extrapolated from studies of survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Epidemiologic studies on cancer risk in surgeons and interventional proceduralists and dosimetry studies on true radiation exposure during trauma and spine surgery recently have been conducted. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the basics and basis of radiation exposure limits, be familiar with the current literature on the incidence of solid tumors and cataracts in orthopaedic surgeons, and understand the evidence behind current intraoperative fluoroscopy safety recommendations.

Factors predicting publication of spinal cord injury trials registered on www.ClinicalTrials. gov.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Treatment options for spinal cord injuries are currently limited, but multiple clinical trials are underway for a variety of interventions, drugs, and devices. The Food and Drug Administration website www.ClinicalTrials.gov catalogues these trials and includes information on the status of the trial, date of initiation and completion, source of funding, and region. This investigation assesses the factors associated with publication and the publication rate of spinal cord injury trials. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of publically available data on www.ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS: The www.ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for all trials on patients with spinal cord injury, and these trials were assessed for status, type of intervention, source of funding, and region. Multiple literature searches were performed on all completed trials to determine publication status. RESULTS: There were 626 studies identified concerning the treatment of patients with spinal cord injury, of which 250 (39.9%) were completed. Of these, only 119 (47.6%) were published. There was no significant difference in the rate of publication between regions (p> 0.16) or by study type (p> 0.29). However, trials that were funded by the NIH were more likely to be published than trials funded by industry (p= 0.01). CONCLUSION: The current publication rate of spinal cord injury trials is only 47.6%, though this rate is similar to the publication rate for trials in other fields. NIH-funded trials are significantly more likely to become published than industry-funded trials, which could indicate that some trials remain unpublished due to undesirable results. However, it is also likely that many trials on spinal cord injury yield negative results, as treatments are often ineffective.

Local Modalities for Preventing Surgical Site Infections: An Evidence-based Review.

Surgical site infections remain a dreaded complication of orthopaedic surgery, affecting both patient economics and quality of life. It is important to note that infections are multifactorial, involving both surgical and patient factors. To decrease the occurrence of infections, surgeons frequently use local modalities, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening; preoperative bathing; intraoperative povidone-iodine lavage; and application of vancomycin powder, silver-impregnated dressings, and incisional negative-pressure wound therapy. These modalities can be applied individually or in concert to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Despite their frequent use, however, these interventions have limited support in the literature.

Physician and patients factors associated with outcome of spinal epidural abscess related malpractice litigation.

Spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) can be challenging to diagnose and may result in serious adverse outcomes sometimes leading to neurologic compromise, sepsis, and even death. While SEA may lead to litigation for healthcare providers, little is known about the medicolegal factors predicting case outcome of SEA related litigation cases. Three large medicolegal databases (VerdictSearch, Westlaw, and LexisNexis) were queried for SEA-related malpractice cases. Plaintiff (patient) age, sex, previous infection history and clinical outcomes such as residual paraplegia/quadriplegia, and delay in diagnosis or treatment were examined. The relationship between these variables and the proportion of plaintiff rulings and size of indemnity payments were assessed. Of the 135 cases that met inclusion criteria, 29 (21.5%) settled, 59 (43.7%) resulted in a defendant ruling, and 47 (34.8%) resulted in a plaintiff ruling. Mean award for plaintiff rulings was $4,291,400 (95% CI, $5,860,129 to $2,722,671), which was significantly larger than mean awards for cases that settled out of court, $2,324,170 (95% CI, $3,206,124 to $1,442,217) (P<0.05). The proportion of plaintiff verdicts and size of monetary awards were not significantly related to age or sex of the patient. A previously known infection was not significantly associated with the proportion of plaintiff verdicts or indemnity payments (P>0.05). In contrast, plaintiff verdicts were more common for patients who became paraplegic or quadriplegic (P<0.02) and were associated with significantly higher monetary awards (P<0.05) relative to patients without paralysis. Plaintiff verdicts were also more common when cases had an associated delay in diagnosis (P=0.008) or delay in treatment (P<0.001). Internists were the most commonly sued physician named in 20 (14.8%) suits, followed by anesthesiologists in 13 (9.6%) suits, emergency medicine physicians in 12 (8.9%) suits, family medicine physicians in 9 (6.7%) suits, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons in 6 (4.4%) suits each, and multiple providers in 2 (1.5%) suits. The remaining lawsuits were against a hospital or another specialty not previously listed This investigation examined legal claims associated with SEA and found that the likelihood of a plaintiff verdict was significantly related to patient outcome (paralysis) and physician factors (delay in diagnosis or treatment compared). Additionally, paralyzed plaintiffs receive higher award payouts. Non-operative physicians, who are often responsible for initial diagnosis, were more frequently named in malpractice suits than surgeons. Increased awareness of the medicolegal implications of SEA can better prevent delays in diagnosis and treatment, and thus, alleged negligence-based lawsuits.

Variability in Treatment for Patients with Cervical Spine Fracture and Dislocation: An Analysis of 107,152 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries are a common cause of morbidity and mortality; however, the optimal treatment of many of these injuries is debated, and previous studies have shown substantial variation in treatment. We sought to examined treatment variation in arthrodesis and halo/tong placement in cervical spine injury patients over a 12-year period. METHODS: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, from 2000 to 2011, were used for this study. Patients were identified with a cervical vertebral facture or dislocation based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Using χ2 analysis, spinal arthrodesis rates and halo/tong placement rates were compared between hospitals based on teaching status for patients with and without spinal cord injury (SCI). RESULTS: The records of 107,152 patients with cervical fractures were examined. From 2000 to 2011, the overall arthrodesis rates fell from 25.2% to 20.6% (P < 0.001), and halo/tong placement rates fell from 13.2% to 3.6% (P < 0.001). In patients with cervical fracture without SCI, arthrodesis rates fell from 17.6% to 13.9% (P < 0.001), in cervical fracture patients with SCI, arthrodesis rates rose from 50.0% to 58.9% (P < 0.001), and in cervical dislocation patients, arthrodesis rates rose from 47.6% to 57.5% (P < 0.001). During the 12-year period, teaching hospitals had higher arthrodesis rates compared with nonteaching hospitals for patients with cervical fractures with SCI (57.3% vs. 53.4%, P = 0.001) and higher halo/tong placement rates for patients with cervical dislocations (2.7% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.004). Individual hospital variation showed a 3.5-fold variation in arthrodesis rates in 2000 to 2002, which fell to 3.0-fold by 2009 to 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrodesis rates for cervical fracture patients significantly decreased, and arthrodesis rates for cervical dislocation and SCI patients increased from 2000 to 2011, with variability in treatment based on hospital teaching status. Rates of halo/tong placement rapidly decreased for cervical spine trauma at both teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Individual hospital treatment variation also decreased over the study period. Further clinical studies examining the optimal treatment for spine trauma may lead to continued decreases in treatment variability.

Late-presenting dural tear: incidence, risk factors, and associated complications.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Unrecognized and inadequately repaired intraoperative durotomies may lead to cerebrospinal fluid leak, pseudomeningocele, and other complications. Few studies have investigated durotomy that is unrecognized intraoperatively and requires additional postoperative management (hereafter, late-presenting dural tear [LPDT]), although estimates of LPDT range from 0.6 to 8.3 per 1,000 spinal surgeries. These single-center studies are based on relatively small sample sizes for an event of this rarity, all with <10 patients experiencing LPDT. PURPOSE: This investigation is the largest yet conducted on LPDT, and sought to identify incidence, risk factors for, and complications associated with LPDT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This observational cohort study employed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (years 2012-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent spine surgery were identified based on presence of primary listed Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes corresponding to spinal fusion or isolated posterior decompression without fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary variable in this study was occurrence of LPDT, identified as reoperation or readmission with durotomy-specific CPT or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes but without durotomy codes present for the index procedure. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were generated. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression, respectively, generating both risk factors for LPDT and independent association of LPDT with postoperative complications. Statistical significance was defined as p<.05. RESULTS: In total, 86,212 patients were analyzed. The overall rate of reoperation or readmission without reoperation for LPDT was 2.0 per 1,000 patients (n=174). Of LPDT patients, 97.7% required one or more unplanned reoperations (n=170), and 5.7% of patients (n=10) required two reoperations. On multivariate analysis, lumbar procedures (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, p<.0001, vs. cervical), procedures involving both cervical and lumbar levels (OR 3.78, p=.0338, vs. cervical only), procedures with decompression only (OR 1.72, p=.0017, vs. fusion and decompression), and operative duration ≥250 minutes (OR 1.70, p=.0058, vs. <250 minutes) were associated with increased likelihood of LPDT. Late-presenting dural tear was significantly associated with surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 2.54, p<.0001), wound disruption (OR 2.24, p<.0001), sepsis (OR 2.19, p<.0001), thromboembolism (OR 1.71, p<.0001), acute kidney injury (OR 1.59, p=.0281), pneumonia (OR 1.14, p=.0269), and urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR 1.08, p=.0057). CONCLUSIONS: Late-presenting dural tears occurred in 2.0 per 1,000 patients who underwent spine surgery. Patients who underwent lumbar procedures, decompression procedures, and procedures with operative duration ≥250 minutes were at increased risk for LPDT. Further, LPDT was independently associated with increased likelihood of SSI, sepsis, pneumonia, UTI, wound dehiscence, thromboembolism, and acute kidney injury. As LPDT is associated with markedly increased morbidity and potential liability risk, spine surgeons should be aware of best-practice management for LPDT and consider it a rare, but possible etiology for developing postoperative complications.

Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy.

In BriefAuthors of this study analyzed hospital readmissions following laminectomy and developed predictive models to identify readmitted patients with an accuracy >95% when using all variables and >79% when using only predischarge variables. A model capable of predicting 40% of readmitted patients was created using only the variables known predischarge. This investigation is important in its provision of data that will assist the development of predictive models for readmission as well as interventions to prevent readmission in high-risk patients.

Completion of Multiple Fellowships by Orthopedic Surgeons: Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification Database.

Orthopedic surgeons have become increasingly subspecialized, and recent studies have shown that American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Step II applicants are performing a higher percentage of their cases within their chosen subspecialties. However, these studies focused exclusively on surgeons who have completed a single fellowship; little data exist on those who pursue a second fellowship. All applicants to the ABOS Part II examination from 2004 to 2016 were classified by their self-reported fellowship training history using the ABOS Part II examination database. Trends in the number of applicants completing multiple fellowships and the types of fellowships combined were analyzed. In addition, cases performed by applicants who had performed multiple fellowships were analyzed to determine what percentage were within their chosen subspecialties. A total of 9776 applicants to ABOS Part II were included in the database from 2004 to 2016, including 444 (4.5%) applicants who completed more than one fellowship. There were 43 different combinations of fellowships; the most common additional fellowships were trauma (40.1%), sports medicine (38.7%), and joints (30.4%). The most common combinations were joints and sports medicine (10.6%) and foot and ankle and sports medicine (10.1%). A significant increase occurred in physicians training in both pediatric orthopedics and sports medicine (P=.02). The percentage of cases within the applicants' chosen specialties ranged from 91.4% in sports to 73.6% in tumor. Multiple fellowship applicants represent a small percentage of all applicants, and although subspecialization in orthopedics is increasing, no increasing trend toward multiple fellowships within this dataset was observed. However, the significant increase in applicants who combined pediatric orthopedic and sports medicine fellowships suggests an increasing interest in treating this increasing patient population in addition to social and economic factors. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e33-e37.].

S-1 alar/iliac screw technique for spinopelvic fixation.

Spinopelvic fixation provides an important anchor for long fusions in spinal deformity surgery, and it is also used in the treatment of other spine pathologies. Iliac screws are known to sometimes require reoperation due to pain resulting from hardware prominence and skin injury. S-2 alar/iliac (S2AI) screws do not often require removal, but they may provide inadequate fixation in select cases. In this paper the authors describe a technique for S-1 alar/iliac screws that may be used independently or as a supplement to S2AI screws. A preliminary biomechanical analysis and 2 clinical case examples are also provided.