Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Wound Care ; 31(6): 480-491, 2022 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678784

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the topical debriding agent, Debrichem, could potentially afford the UK's National Health Service (NHS) a cost-effective intervention for the management of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs). METHOD: A Markov model was constructed depicting the management of hard-to-heal VLUs with Debrichem plus standard care (SC) or SC alone over a period of 12 months. The model was populated with inputs from an indirect comparison of two propensity score-matched cohorts. The model estimated the cost-effectiveness of the two interventions in terms of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2019/20 prices. RESULTS: Addition of Debrichem to a SC protocol to treat hard-to-heal VLUs was found to increase the probability of healing by 75% (from 0.35 to 0.61) by 12 months, and to increase health-related quality of life over 12 months from 0.74 to 0.84 QALYs per patient. The 12-month cost of treatment with Debrichem plus SC (£3128 per patient) instead of SC alone (£7195 per patient) has the potential to reduce the total NHS cost of wound management by up to 57%. Hence, Debrichem was estimated to improve health outcomes for less cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that Debrichem plus SC remained a cost-effective (dominant) treatment with plausible variations in costs and effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, the addition of Debrichem to a SC protocol potentially affords a cost-effective treatment to the NHS for managing hard-to-heal VLUs.


Assuntos
Úlcera da Perna , Úlcera Varicosa , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido , Úlcera Varicosa/terapia
2.
Diabetes Care ; 26(6): 1874-8, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12766126

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reulceration and reamputation rates in a cohort of diabetic patients following first ray amputation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of 89 diabetic patients, 63 men and 26 women, who underwent first ray amputation in the period from January 2000 to December 2001. The first ray lesions were Wagner grade 2 in 3 patients, Wagner grade 3 in 47 patients, and Wagner grade 4 in 39 patients. Following surgical wound healing, all patients wore special footwear with rocker bottom soles and custom molded insoles and were put on an intensive secondary prevention program. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 16.35 +/- 6.76 months (range 7-28). Fifteen patients developed new ulcerations, with 11 lesions occurring ipsilaterally and 4 contralaterally to the first ray amputation. In seven patients, the new lesion was treated and healed with dressing. Eight patients underwent a new surgical procedure: panmetatarsal head resection in four patients, toe amputation in two patients, a transmetatarsal amputation in one patient, and Lisfranc's amputation in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: In the population studied, the first ray amputation presented a lower reulceration and reamputation rate with respect to that reported in the literature. This finding should therefore be attributed to the follow-up program, which uses shoes with a rocker bottom sole and custom molded insoles and intensive ambulatory check-ups.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/métodos , Pé Diabético/cirurgia , Ossos do Metatarso/cirurgia , Idoso , Pé Diabético/prevenção & controle , Retinopatia Diabética/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Recidiva , Sapatos , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA