Outcome of chronic granulomatous disease - Conventional treatment vs stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can cure chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), but it remains debated whether all conventionally treated CGD patients benefit from HSCT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 104 conventionally treated CGD patients, of whom 50 patients underwent HSCT. RESULTS: On conventional treatment, seven patients (13%) died after a median time of 16.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.0-18.0). Survival without severe complications was 10 ± 3% (mean ± SD) at the age of 20 years; 85% of patients developed at least one infection, 76% one non-infectious inflammation. After HSCT, 44 patients (88%) were alive at a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR 0.8-4.9): Six patients (12%) died from infections. Survival after HSCT was significantly better for patients transplanted ≤8 years (96 ± 4%) or for patients without active complications at HSCT (100%). Eight patients suffered from graft failure (16%); six (12%) developed acute graft-vs-host disease requiring systemic treatment. Conventionally treated patients developed events that required medical attention at a median frequency of 1.7 (IQR 0.8-3.2) events per year vs 0 (IQR 0.0-0.5) in patients beyond the first year post-HSCT. While most conventionally treated CGD patients failed to thrive, catch-up growth after HSCT in surviving patients reached the individual percentiles at the age of diagnosis of CGD. CONCLUSION: Chronic granulomatous disease patients undergoing HSCT until 8 years of age show excellent survival, but young children need more intense conditioning to avoid graft rejection. Risks and benefits of HSCT for adolescents and adults must still be weighed carefully.

Screening Newborns for Low T Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs) Fails to Detect Immunodeficiency, Centromeric Instability, and Facial Anomalies Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) in dried blood spots of newborns allows the detection of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (T cells <300/µL at birth) with a presumed sensitivity of 100%. TREC screening also identifies patients with selected combined immunodeficiency (CID) (T cells >300/µL, yet <1500/µL at birth). Nevertheless, relevant CIDs that would benefit from early recognition and curative treatment pass undetected. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that TREC screening at birth cannot identify CIDs that develop with age. METHODS: We analyzed the number of TRECs in dried blood spots in archived Guthrie cards of 22 children who had been born in the Berlin-Brandenburg area between January 2006 and November 2018 and who had undergone hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for inborn errors of immunity. RESULTS: All patients with SCID would have been identified by TREC screening, but only 4 of 6 with CID. One of these patients had immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome type 2 (ICF2). Two of 3 patients with ICF whom we have been following up at our institution had TREC numbers above the cutoff value suggestive of SCID at birth. Yet all patients with ICF had a severe clinical course that would have justified earlier HSCT. CONCLUSIONS: In ICF, naïve T cells may be present at birth, yet they decline with age. Therefore, TREC screening cannot identify these patients. Early recognition is nevertheless crucial, as patients with ICF benefit from HSCT early in life.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Cures Therapy-refractory Aspergillosis in Chronic Granulomatous Disease.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary invasive aspergillosis is a frequent and life-threatening complication for patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). Despite combined treatment with several groups of antifungal agents, conservative treatment of invasive aspergillosis often remains refractory. Pulmonary invasive aspergillosis is often treated by surgical resection of consolidated lobes or segments, donor granulocyte transfusions and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). These options are not mutually exclusive and often combined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We here describe the treatment of 3 patients with CGD who received HSCT upon active pulmonary invasive aspergillosis: Two of them received HSCT as salvage therapy for refractory aspergillosis, and 1 patient received elective HSCT in infancy but developed pulmonary aspergillosis during secondary graft failure. Based on our experience and available literature, we discuss indication as well as timing of HSCT, granulocyte transfusions and surgery in patients with CGD and pulmonary invasive aspergillosis. CONCLUSIONS: Upon diagnosis with invasive aspergillosis in CGD, we propose to start antifungal treatment and preparation for HSCT at the same time. Remission of pulmonary invasive aspergillosis before HSCT remains preferable but is not mandatory. When pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with CGD remains refractory for longer than 3 months on conservative treatment, HSCT without prior surgery or accompanying granulocyte transfusions is a feasible option.