Palonosetron hydrochloride is an effective and safe option to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children.

BACKGROUND: Emesis and nausea are common adverse effects of chemotherapy. Consequences include dehydration, acute renal failure, esophageal rupture, electrolyte imbalance and undernutrition, among others. First-generation 5-HT3 antagonists significantly reduce these symptoms but are expensive and require administration every 8-12h. Palonosetron, a second generation 5-HT3 antagonist has proven better results in adult populations. Other benefits include a one-dose administration with effect for up to 7 days and a lower treatment cost. No clinical studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of palonosetron in children. METHODS: Prior to every course, patients were randomized to receive palonosetron or ondansetron. Patients or guardians recorded the number of emetic events and the intensity of nausea over a 7-day period. They also reported any possible adverse effects. Statistical analysis included chi(2) test, relative risk, and Student's t test. RESULTS: Fifty courses were analyzed for each group. There was a significant reduction in emesis on the first 3 days and in the intensity of nausea in the first four days in the palonosetron group. There was an increased risk of presenting emesis and nausea in the acute phase when treated with ondansetron. No adverse effects were reported. The cost of treatment was also reduced when using palonosetron. CONCLUSIONS: Palonosetron is a safe and effective antiemetic treatment in children, as well as being cost effective.

Clinical and molecular parameters for risk stratification in Mexican children with medulloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Clinical, histological, and more recently, molecular factors have been described as important in survival of the patient with medulloblastoma. Best survival results include aggressive chemotherapeutic protocols. More exact risk analysis may differentiate patients who require aggressive treatments from those with low risk who may respond adequately to less aggressive protocols. METHODS: Twenty six patients were included over a 10-year period and were followed for at least 5 years. Personal variables were obtained from their clinical records. Immunochemistry studies were performed on their formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Statistical analysis included chi(2) test, odds risk, linear regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Metastatic disease and chemotherapy with VP16-carboplatin reduce the patient's probability of survival, whereas anaplastic histology increases the probability of death. Global survival and disease-free survival were 66.6 and 45.02%, respectively. Only two patients overexpressed the ERBB2 protein, and no significant difference was found in survival in terms of ERBB2 overexpression. CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification has become very important in medulloblastoma. We found an increased hazard of death when metastatic disease was present. Gene expression in Mexican children requires a larger sample in order to be analyzed.