Long-term outcome of invasive pure micropapillary breast cancer compared with invasive mixed micropapillary and invasive ductal breast cancer: a matched retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Data on the prognostic impact of the micropapillary component in breast cancer are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of pure and mixed invasive micropapillary breast cancer (IMPC) patients compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) patients. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed all IMPC and IDC patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) between 1997 and 2019. The overall cohort of IMPC patients was divided in two groups, pure and mixed IMPC. Each patient with mixed or pure IMPC was matched with one patient with IDC, based on year of surgery, age, pT, pN, and molecular subtype. RESULTS: A total of 30,115 IDC, 120 pure IMPC and 150 mixed IMPC patients were considered eligible. Compared to IDC, pure and mixed IMPC patients presented a higher rate of locally advanced disease (pT2-T3, pN2-N3), vascular invasion, and Luminal B subtype. After matching, pure and mixed IMPC showed a significant higher rate of vascular invasion compared to IDC patients (p < 0.001). Invasive disease-free survival was better in IDC compared to pure IMPC patients (p = 0.11). Long-term overall survival was significantly worse in pure IMPC group compared to IDC group (p = 0.004), being instead similar between mixed IMPC vs matched IDC (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: These real-world data reported the worse prognosis of pure IMPC compared to IDC, highlighting the peculiar prognostic value of the micropapillary subtype itself in the decision-making process of IMPC management. An accurate pre-surgical diagnostic evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach are pivotal to best personalize its treatment.

The Evolving Role of Genomic Testing in Early Breast Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.

Multigene prognostic genomic assays have become indispensable in managing early breast cancer (EBC), offering crucial information for risk stratification and guiding adjuvant treatment strategies in conjunction with traditional clinicopathological parameters. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines endorse these assays, though some clinical contexts still lack definitive recommendations. The dynamic landscape of EBC management demands further refinement and optimization of genomic assays to streamline their incorporation into clinical practice. The breast cancer community is poised at the brink of transformative advances in enhancing the clinical utility of genomic assays, aiming to significantly improve the precision and effectiveness of both diagnosis and treatment for women with EBC. This article methodically examines the testing methodologies, clinical validity and utility, costs, diagnostic frameworks, and methodologies of the established genomic tests, including the Oncotype Dx Breast Recurrence Score®, MammaPrint, Prosigna®, EndoPredict®, and Breast Cancer Index (BCI). Among these tests, Prosigna and EndoPredict® have at present been validated only on a prognostic level, while Oncotype Dx, MammaPrint, and BCI hold both a prognostic and predictive role. Oncologists and pathologists engaged in the management of EBC will find in this review a thorough comparison of available genomic assays, as well as strategies to optimize the utilization of the information derived from them.

Preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a prospective clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of a scalp-cooling system in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a distressing side effect of cancer therapy. The trial aimed to assess feasibility and effectiveness of scalp-cooling system DigniCap® to prevent CIA in primary breast cancer patients receiving an anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). METHODS: Hair loss (HL) was evaluated by patient self-assessment and by the physician according to the Dean's scale at baseline and after each cycle of CT. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patient self-assessment HL score evaluated at least 3 weeks after completing CT. A Dean's scale score of 0-2 (i.e. HL ≤50%) was considered a success. RESULTS: From July 2014 to November 2016, 139 consecutive breast cancer patients were enrolled and received at least one treatment with scalp cooling. Fifty-six out of 131 evaluated patients successfully prevented HL (43%, 95% CI: 34-51%). Twenty-four patients (32%) discontinued the scalp cooling because of alopecia or scalp-cooling related AE, three patients had missing information on CIA, and 48 patients (64%) had a HL greater than 50% after CT. No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: DigniCap® System resulted as a promising medical device to be safely integrated in supportive care of early breast cancer patients. Longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term safety and feasibility. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03712696.

Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.

INTRODUCTION: The St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 recognized substantial progress in the pathological characterization of breast cancer subtypes. A useful surrogate definition was developed to distinguish luminal A-like breast cancer from luminal B-like disease based on a combination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and Ki-67 status, without a requirement for molecular diagnostics. Differences depend upon the choice of the threshold value for Ki-67 and the requirement for substantial PgR positivity. We aimed to verify the suitability of the new surrogate definitions of luminal subtypes in terms of distant disease control in a large series of patients. METHODS: We studied 9,415 women with a median follow-up of 8.1 years who (1) had ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer and (2) had undergone surgery at the European Institute of Oncology between 1994 and 2006. We evaluated distant disease-free survival of patients with "low" (<14%), "intermediate" (14% to 19%) or "high" (≥20%) Ki-67 positivity stratified by PgR expression (negative or low versus high). We calculated the cumulative incidence of distant events, considered competing events and performed multivariable analysis adjusted for pathologic tumor stage, pathologic node stage, tumor grade, peritumoral vascular invasion and menopausal status. RESULTS: Lack of substantial PgR positivity was associated with poorer outcomes only for patients with an intermediate Ki-67 level (P<0.001). The 4,890 patients (51.9%) with low Ki-67 level (any PgR expression level) or with intermediate Ki-67 level but substantial PgR positivity had comparably good outcomes and thus may represent a most advantageous grouping of those with luminal A-like disease. CONCLUSIONS: The updated pathological definition of intrinsic molecular subtypes may maximize the number of patients classified as having the luminal A-like intrinsic subtype of breast cancer and for whom the use of cytotoxic drugs could mostly be avoided.

Unlocking the Resistance to Anti-HER2 Treatments in Breast Cancer: The Issue of HER2 Spatial Distribution.

Approximately 15% of breast cancers are classified as HER2-positive, with an amplification of the ERBB2 gene and/or an overexpression of the HER2 protein. Up to 30% of HER2-positive breast cancers shows heterogeneity in HER2 expression and different patterns of spatial distribution, i.e., the variability in the distribution and expression of the HER2 protein within a single tumour. Spatial heterogeneity may potentially affect treatment, response, assessment of HER2 status and consequently, may impact on the best treatment strategy. Understanding this feature can help clinicians to predict response to HER2-targeted therapies and patient outcomes, and to fine tune treatment decisions. This review summarizes the available evidence on HER2 heterogeneity and spatial distribution and how this may affect current available treatment choices, exploring possible opportunities for overcoming this issue, such as novel pharmacological agents, belonging to the group of antibody-drug conjugates.

Invasive lobular breast cancer: subtypes and outcome.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common "special type" of breast cancer. Although conflicting literature data are available on the outcome of ILC, recently reported data indicate that ILC carries a poorer prognosis if compared to invasive ductal carcinomas. We evaluated clinical and biological features of 981 consecutive patients with pT1-3, pN1-3 M0 ILC. Median follow-up was 7.4 years for survival. A total of 541 patients were classified as classic (55.8%), 146 alveolar (14.9%), 145 mixed non-classic (14.8%), 104 solid (10.6%), and 38 trabecular (3.9%). A statistically significant difference in the outcome was observed at multivariate analysis for patients with solid (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.39-4.29 for OS; HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29-2.88 for DFS) and mixed non-classic (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.12-3.53 for OS) versus patients with classical ILC. A statistically significant difference in the risk of distant metastases was observed at multivariate analysis for patients with Luminal B (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.38-4.76), HER2 positive (HR 7.80, 95% CI 1.55-39.3), and triple negative (HR 7.61, 95% CI 2.63-22.1) subtypes versus patients with Luminal A ILC. Age ≥70 years, tumor size and degree of nodal involvement were additional independent predictors of reduced overall survival. The outcome of ILC significantly correlated with histological and immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes. New tailored strategies should be explored in these subgroups of patients with poor outcome.

Ten-year results of hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy and intraoperative electron boost in premenopausal women.

AIM: To evaluate outcome of intraoperative electron boost (IOERT) and hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) for breast cancer (BC) in young women. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women aged ≤ 48 with pT1-2 N0-1 BC received 12 Gy IOERT boost during conservative surgery followed by 3-dimensional conformal HWBI in 13 fractions (2.85 Gy/die). Local relapses (LR) and survival (disease-free, DFS; specific, BCSS; overall, OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: 481 consecutive BC patients, mostly node negative, with median age of 42 were treated between 2004 and 2014. Median tumor size was 1.48 cm and median IOERT collimator was 4 cm. After 25-day mean interval, HWBI was delivered. At a median follow-up of 9.6 years, there were 23 LRs (4.8 %, 9 of which were in the boost region). Ten-year LR cumulative incidence was 4.1 % (95 %CI, 2.5-6.3). Over time, local control rate decreased for Luminal A and HER2 positive with negative hormonal receptors, while remained steady for triple negative. At multivariate analysis, LR predictors included age < 40, extensive intraductal component and the use of 4-cm IOERT collimator size. Ten-year survival outcomes were as follows: DFS 80.0 % (95 % CI, 75.8-83.5), BCSS 97.5 % (95 % CI, 95.5-98.6 %), OS 96.5 % (95 % CI, 94.3-97.9). Luminal B HER2 negative had the worse survival outcomes. Perioperative complications were uncommon (16.4 %), acute toxicity was mild (<2% Grade 3), but moderate/severe fibrosis was described in 40.8 % of the cases. Cosmesis was scored as excellent/good in 86 % of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: ELIOT boost and HWBI achieved an excellent local control at the cost of tumor bed fibrosis. IOERT boost dose lower than 12 Gy is advisable.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx®) as Adjuvant Treatment in Early-Stage Luminal B-like Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy for Luminal B-like breast cancers usually includes anthracycline-based regimens. However, some patients are reluctant to receive chemotherapy because of side-effects, especially alopecia, and ask for a "less intensive" or personalized approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II feasibility trial to evaluate pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx®) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who received surgery for pT1-3, any N, and luminal B-like early-stage breast cancer (EBC) candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy were included. PLD was administered intravenously at 20 mg/m2 biweekly for eight courses. Endocrine therapy was given according to menopausal status. Trastuzumab was administered in HER2-positive disease. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the feasibility of this regimen, defined as the ability of a patient to achieve a relative dose intensity (RDI) of at least 85% of the eight cycles of treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), tolerability, breast cancer-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: From March 2016 to July 2018, 63 patients were included in the trial. Median age was 49 years (range: 33-76), with mostly pre- and peri-menopausal (65%) and stage I-II (94%). Only 5% of patients had HER2-positive EBC. Median RDI was 100% (range: 12.5-100%; interquartile range, IQR: 87.5-100%). The proportion of patients meeting the primary endpoint was 84% (95% confidence interval, CI: 73-92%). Overall, 55 out of 63 enrolled patients completed treatment (87%, 95% CI: 77-94%). Most common AEs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12.2%), fatigue (10.4%), and mucositis (8.5%). Only 13% of patients had G3 AEs. None had alopecia. After a median follow-up of 3.9 years (range: 0.3-4.7) two distant events were observed, and all patients were alive at the date of last visit. CONCLUSIONS: The trial successfully met its primary endpoint: the regimen was feasible and well tolerated and could be considered for further evaluation as a treatment option for patients with contraindications to standard anthracyclines or requiring a personalized, less intensive approach.

Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features.

In order to evaluate the outcome of patients with breast cancer according to response after primary therapy and according to clinical and biologic baseline features, we identified patients who were treated with preoperative therapy and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy, between 1995 and 2006. The outcome of patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) and patients with residual disease (RD) at final surgery was analyzed. Of the 687 patients treated with preoperative therapy, we identified 82 patients who achieved pCR (12%) and 605 patients with RD (88%). A statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with pCR compared with those who had RD (5 year DFS 73% vs. 59% P = 0.029; 5 year DDFS 81% vs. 72% P = 0.085; 5 year OS 88% vs. 77% P = 0.033). At the multivariate analysis, for patients achieving pCR, large tumor size (> 5 cm) correlated with worse DFS (HR 3.18; 95% CI 1.34-7.51); clinical nodal involvement was associated with poorer DFS and DDFS (HR 6.94; 95% CI 1.62-29.73 and HR 9.87 95% CI 1.29-75.53, respectively). pCR after preoperative systemic therapy correlated with significant improved outcome. A substantial rate of relapse was observed for patients with large tumors and with clinical nodal involvement at baseline. Further improvement in adjuvant treatment might be warranted.

Investigation of 18F-FDG PET in the selection of patients with breast cancer as candidates for sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to determine the role of [(18)F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the selection of patients with breast cancer as candidates for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Forty-four patients with primary breast cancer clinically classified as cT2, cT3 or cT4(a-c) cN0-N2 or cN3 M0 and with a baseline FDG PET scan positive both in the site of primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes underwent neoadjuvant therapy and then a second FDG PET scan. In the case of axillary FDG PET uptake, patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). If the second FDG PET scan was negative for axillary involvement, SNB was performed in order to evaluate axillary lymph node status. Only in the case of SN positivity did total ALND follow. RESULTS: Specificity and positive predictive value of FDG PET for detection of axillary lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant therapy were as high as 83% (95% confidence interval: 51-97%) and 85% (95% confidence interval: 54-97%), respectively, whereas sensitivity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were inadequate for a correct staging (34, 32 and 48%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The poor sensitivity of FDG PET in detecting axillary lymph node metastases makes SNB mandatory in cases of a negative scan. The relatively high positive predictive value seems to suggest a role of FDG PET in selecting patients who, after neoadjuvant therapy, are candidates for ALND, avoiding SNB. However, this issue requires confirmation in a larger series of patients.

Prognosis of selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Triple negative breast cancer encompasses several biological entities with different outcomes and is a priority to identify which patients require more treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence and which patients need less treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among the 210 women with first primary invasive apocrine non metastatic breast cancer operated on between January 1998 and December 2016 at the European Institute Oncology, Milan, we identified 24 patients with a pT1-pT2, node-negative, triple negative subtype and Ki-67 ≤ 20% who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). We compared the outcome of this cohort with a similar group of 24 patients with ductal tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by pathological stage and biological features and also with a similar group of 12 patients with apocrine tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age was 64 and 61 years in the apocrine (w/o CT) and ductal group, respectively. The median value of Ki-67 expression was 12% in the apocrine group (w/o CT) and 16% in the ductal group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, no patients in the apocrine group (w/o CT) experienced a breast cancer related event compared with 4 events in the ductal carcinoma group (Gray test p-value = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of selected apocrine triple negative breast cancer patients who did not received adjuvant chemotherapy is excellent and supports a treatment de-escalation. Multicenter projects focusing on the possibility of avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subtypes of triple negative breast cancers with favorable outcome are warranted.

Neoadjuvant Degarelix Versus Triptorelin in Premenopausal Patients Who Receive Letrozole for Locally Advanced Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms. RESULTS: Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected. CONCLUSION: In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.

Role of endocrine responsiveness and HER2/neu overexpression in inflammatory breast cancer treated with multimodality preoperative therapy.

We analyzed the role of endocrine responsiveness and HER2/neu overexpression in inflammatory breast cancer treated with multimodality preoperative therapy. Thirty-eight patients (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PgR] >or=10% of the cells 21, premenopausal 14, Ki-67 expression >or=20% of the cells 30, HER2/neu overexpressed 11) were treated with six courses of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (FU) as continuous infusion, perioperative FU as continuous infusion, mastectomy and loco-regional radiotherapy. In endocrine-responsive patients, endocrine treatment (letrozole, either alone or if premenopausal with triptorelin) was given preoperatively and as adjuvant treatment. There were 32 objective responders (84.2%; 95% CI 70.0-94.6%), three of whom had pathologic complete remission. At the multivariate analysis disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with ER and PgR absent tumors compared with the positive expression cohort (hazards ratio [HR]: 5.91; 95% CI 1.69-20.7; p = 0.005), in particular if HER2/neu overexpression was detected (HR: 16.5; 95% CI 4.24-64.5; p < 0.0001). New multimodality and targeted strategies should be explored in endocrine nonresponsive breast cancer.

Metronomic Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the benefit of metronomic cyclophosphamide, capecitabine, and vinorelbine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of metronomic oral chemotherapy with vinorelbine 40 mg orally 3 times a week, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily, and capecitabine 500 mg 3 times a day (VEX regimen) in untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients. The biopsy of the metastatic site had to be triple-negative, independent of the hormone receptor expression of the primary tumor. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints included assessment of safety and clinical benefit (objective response rate plus stable disease rate at ≥24 weeks). RESULTS: 25 patients were included, and 22 were evaluable for both efficacy and toxicities (median age, 66 years). Median TTP was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval 3.6-12.6). The most common grade 1-2 toxicities were nausea, diarrhea, leuko-/neutropenia, and reversible liver enzyme alteration. Grade 3 events included hand and foot syndrome (9%). CONCLUSION: The VEX regimen demonstrated activity and was relatively well tolerated when given as first-line therapy in selected metastatic breast cancer patients with triple-negative disease.

Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Weekly Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Metronomic Cyclophosphamide With or Without Trastuzumab and Endocrine Therapy as Preoperative Treatment of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and highly aggressive disease. A neoadjuvant regimen with chemotherapy and an antiangiogenic strategy was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary or recurrent IBC who were candidates for neoadjuvant treatment received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab every 3 weeks and oral metronomic cyclophosphamide for 6 months. Trastuzumab was added for patients with HER2+ tumors and endocrine therapy was added for patients with estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor ≥ 10% tumors. Oral metronomic capecitabine and cyclophosphamide was continued for 6 months after surgery in those patients with a response. The primary efficacy endpoints were pathologic complete remission (pCR) and the objective response. RESULTS: From July 2010 to December 2013, 34 patients with IBC were included. The surrogate intrinsic tumor subtypes were as follows: luminal B-like (HER2-), 10 (29%); luminal B-like (HER2+), 8 (24%); HER2+ (nonluminal), 6 (18%); and triple negative, 10 (29%). An objective response was obtained in 30 patients (88%; 95% confidence interval, 73%-97%) and a pCR in 10 patients (29%; 95% confidence interval, 15%-48%). The proportion of pCR was significantly greater in the patients with HER2+ tumors (57%) than in patients with triple-negative (20%) or luminal B-like (HER2-) tumors (0%; P = .019). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival was 58% and 72%, respectively. The achievement of pCR was associated with longer disease-free (P = .12) and overall (P = .029) survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with IBC, neoadjuvant treatment with the investigated regimen was successful and well tolerated. Further studies evaluating the potential benefit of an antiangiogenic strategy in this setting are awaited.

The choice of systemic adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer represent a distinct population for which tailored adjuvant treatments are needed. Endocrine therapy is mandatory for this population. For premenopausal patients, ovarian ablation or tamoxifen can be recommended; the combination of both, as well as the combination of ovarian ablation and aromatase inhibitors is under investigation. For postmenopausal patients, tamoxifen for 5 years is the 'standard of care'. Anastrozole can be recommended for patients with a contraindication to tamoxifen. The addition of 5 years of letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen has yielded benefits in terms of disease-free survival. The sequential use of tamoxifen and exemestane was superior to tamoxifen for 5 years. However, in both studies, long-term toxicity is still not fully evaluated. The addition of chemotherapy to endocrine treatment can be recommended for patients at high risk of relapse and in young patients. Chemotherapy should consist of 3-6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil or of an anthracycline-containing regimen. The addition of taxanes cannot be routinely recommended in this population. Endocrine treatment should start after completion of chemotherapy.

Adjuvant endocrine therapies for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: standards and not.

Hormonal manipulations have been used for more than 100 years for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and after definition of the concept of micro-metastases also in the adjuvant setting. In the postmenopausal population, tamoxifen has played the most important role for almost four decades. Progestins or the first generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were only marginally used in the adjuvant setting due to their prohibitive toxicity. The new generation of anti-estrogen compounds, the selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) like fulvestrant have a higher affinity for the estrogen receptor than tamoxifen, but none of its agonist activities, and have shown promising clinical activity in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The third generation of AIs investigated in six large trials has been reported to be superior to tamoxifen in terms of disease-free survival, but not in terms of survival. These trials will be discussed in terms of results in different subpopulations and of toxicity.

Intermittent Letrozole Administration as Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Biologic Study.

BACKGROUND: Letrozole withdrawal for 3 months might permit estrogenic stimulation in residual resistant breast cancer disease susceptible to letrozole reintroduction. We investigated the impact of a 3-month letrozole-free interval on serum estradiol levels in patients with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive (> 10% of immunoreactive cells), node-negative early breast cancer were eligible. Patients received letrozole for 5 years with a 3-month treatment-free interval after the first year of therapy. The primary end point was to evaluate the increase in serum estradiol levels after a 3-month treatment-free interval. The secondary end points were the evaluations of other biologic markers (eg, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, osteocalcin). RESULTS: From November 2007 to February 2012, 130 evaluable patients were enrolled. The median age was 61 years. Mean values of estradiol levels at time of discontinuation were 5.6 pg/mL (standard deviation 1.7). Estradiol levels increased after a 3-month treatment-free interval by a mean of 3.3 pg/mL (66%; P < .0001). Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels decreased from baseline by a mean of 7.5 mU/mL (P < .0001), and 1.4 mU/mL (P = .0062), respectively. Triglycerides decreased from baseline by a mean of 8.6 mg/dL (P = .036), and osteocalcin increased by a mean of 2.8 ng/mL (P = .013). CONCLUSION: Intermittent letrozole significantly affects estradiol levels.

Phase II Study With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Infusional Fluorouracil Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel With Metronomic Cyclophosphamide as a Preoperative Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aggressive biological behavior and the lack of target therapy prompts the search for new therapeutic approaches for triple-negative breast cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy in terms of Ki-67 variation and clinical response but also the toxicity of a neoadjuvant regimen based on metronomic principles including ECF (epidoxorubicin with cisplatin on day 1 with low-dose 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion every 21 days for 4 courses) followed by paclitaxel (90 mg/m(2)) on day 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for 3 courses in combination with metronomic oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg/d for 12 weeks in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer (T2-T4a-d, N0-3, M0) with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor < 10%. RESULTS: We enrolled 34 patients from June 2009 to May 2013. All were considered evaluable on an intention-to treat basis. The mean difference between the percentage of Ki-67 positive cells evaluated in surgical resection specimens and in pretreatment tumor core biopsy was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-51; P < .0001) for the entire population, and 22% (95% CI, 7-38; P = .0097) in patients who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR). Responses to the treatment were obtained in 31 patients [91%] of the patients, and 19 patients (56%; 95% CI, 35-70) had a pCR. Stable disease was observed in 3 patients and none had progressive disease. Grade ≥ 3 hematologic adverse events included leukopenia in 9% (3 of 34), neutropenia in 38% (13 of 34), and anemia in 3% (1 of 34) of patients. Nonhematologic Grade ≥ 3 toxicities included only stomatitis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: A neoadjuvant program with an ECF regimen followed by weekly paclitaxel with metronomic cyclophosphamide proved to be very effective, with high pCR rates, reduction of Ki-67, and it was associated with a low toxicity profile.