Causes of Emergency Department Overcrowding and Blockage of Access to Critical Services in Beijing: A 2-Year Study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a serious issue worldwide. OBJECTIVES: This study was done to evaluate the degree of overcrowding in local "teaching hospitals" in Beijing, and to ascertain the apparent root causes for the pervasive degree of overcrowding in these EDs. METHODS: This is a multicenter cross-sectional study. The studied population included all ED patients from 18 metropolitan teaching hospital EDs in Beijing for calendar years 2013 and 2014. Patient characteristics, and the primary reasons that these patients sought care in these EDs, are described. RESULTS: The total numbers of annual emergency visits were 1,554,387 and 1,615,571 in 2013 and 2014, respectively. High acuity cases accounted for 4.6% and 5.5% of the total annual emergency visits in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The percentage of patients placed into "Observation" beds, which were created to accommodate patients deemed to have problems too complex to be treated in an inpatient bed, or to accommodate patients simply needing chronic care, was 11.9% and 13.1% in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The ED-boarded patients accounted for 2.71% and 2.6% of the total annual emergency visits in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The average waiting time to admit the ED-boarded patients was 37.1 h and 36.2 h in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Respiratory symptoms were the most common presenting complaints, and an upper respiratory infection was the most common ED diagnosis. Patients who had pneumonia or various manifestations of end-stage diseases, such as advanced dementia or multiple organ dysfunction, were the most common characteristics of patients who had stays in "Observation" units. CONCLUSIONS: One principal reason for ED crowding in Beijing lies in the large numbers of patients who persist in the expectation of receiving ongoing care in the ED for minor illnesses. However, as is true in many nations, one of the other most important root causes of ED crowding is "access block," the inability to promptly move patients deemed by emergency physicians to need inpatient care to an inpatient bed for that care. However, in our system, another challenge, not widely described as a contributor to crowding in other nations, is that doctors assigned to inpatient services have been empowered to refuse to admit patients perceived to have overly "complex" needs. Further, patients with multisystem illnesses or end-stage status, who need ongoing chronic care to manage activities of daily living, have begun to populate Beijing EDs in increasing numbers. This is an issue with various root causes.

Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that poor sepsis outcomes are related to delays in diagnosis and treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the mortality rate between two groups of patients, one group presenting before and one group presenting after implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) sepsis performance improvement bundles in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: This was a prospective study. The studied population included severe sepsis and septic shock patients entered in the SSC database who were admitted to the ED between June 2008 and December 2009. Patients were divided into two groups based on when they presented to the ED. Key treatment interventions, admission to the intensive care unit, and in-hospital mortality were compared. In addition, a survey was completed by the treating physicians to identify reasons for failures to comply with indicators. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five (195) patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were enrolled in the study. Mortality was significantly higher at 44.8% in the baseline group (Group 1) compared to 31.6% in the group studied after the SSC protocol was instituted (Group 2) (p < 0.05). Compliance with all elements of the sepsis resuscitation bundle was 1% in Group 1 and 9% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Compliance with all elements of the management bundle was 1% in Group 1 and 12.8% in Group 2. The most frequently reported reasons by physicians for failure to comply with the bundles were: "did not think it was needed" and "unsure of reason." CONCLUSION: The results revealed a significant drop in mortality after implementing the SSC protocol and sepsis performance improvement bundles in the ED. The barriers to implementing sepsis guidelines are knowledge, attitude, and behavioral barriers.

Image-based monitoring of one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the increasing demand for one-lung ventilation in both thoracic surgery and other procedures, identifying the correct placement becomes increasingly important. Currently, endobronchial intubation is suspected based on a combination of auscultation and physiological findings. We investigated the ability of the visual display of airflow-induced vibrations to detect single-lung ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. METHODS: Double-lumen tubes were placed prior to surgery. Tracheal and endobronchial lumens were alternately clamped to produce unilateral lung ventilation of right and left lung. Vibration response imaging, which detects vibrations transmitted to the surface of the thorax, was performed during both right- and left-lung ventilation. Geographical area of vibration response image as well as amount and distribution of lung sounds were assessed. RESULTS: During single-lung ventilation, the image and video obtained from the vibration response imaging identifies the ventilated lung with a larger and darker image on the ventilated side. During single-lung ventilation, 87.2 +/- 5.7% of the measured vibrations was detected over the ventilated lung and 12.8 +/- 5.7% over the non-ventilated lung (P < 0.0001). It was also noted that during single-lung ventilation, the vibration distribution in the non-ventilated lung had a majority of vibration detected by the medial sensors closest to the midline (P < 0.05) as opposed to the midclavicular sensors when the lung is ventilated. CONCLUSIONS: During single-lung ventilation, vibration response imaging clearly showed increased vibration in the lung that is being ventilated. Distribution of residual vibration differed in the non-ventilated lung in a manner that suggests transmission of vibrations across the mediastinum from the ventilated lung. The lung image and video obtained from vibration response imaging may provide useful and immediate information to help one-lung ventilation assessment.

Tracheocarotid fistula secondary to laryngeal carcinoma presenting as massive hemoptysis.

Tracheovascular fistulas are not traditionally included in the differential diagnosis of massive hemoptysis. We report the first such case due to a tracheocarotid fistula produced by occult subglottic laryngeal cancer. Also described is the unusual role the cuffed endotracheal tube played in obscuring the diagnosis and palliating the hemorrhage.

The practice of critical care medicine. A national survey report. ACCP Council on Critical Care.

Aggressive reimbursement reform has been an imposing directive for care providers of ICU medicine. Timely knowledge of actual care routines obtained from a large sample of actively practicing physicians should be mandatory when developing any guidelines or practice standards. A questionnaire was therefore designed by the steering committee of the ACCP Council on Critical Care and sent to its members. The 1,294 responses were analyzed for demographics of the individual practitioner, local aspects of ICU staffing and policies, reimbursement, and a specific practice issue, nutrition. The typical respondent was aged 41 to 50 (41 percent), was a pulmonary subspecialist (68 percent), was not critical care certified (55 percent), worked 25 to 50 percent of his or her total time in the ICU (40 percent), and would continue ICU practice despite poor reimbursement (82 percent). Physicians practiced within a group (53 percent), in a 100- to 500-bed hospital (69 percent), with house staff available (60 percent), and predominantly cared for Medicare patients (55 percent). The following data may allow better judgments to be made pertaining to the implementation of care policies in the current ICU environment.

Pelger-Huet anomaly of granulocytes in a patient with tuberculosis.

The association of abnormal granulocyte nuclear formation and tuberculosis was first reported by Pelger in 1928. Huet, however, concluded this defect was hereditary, and the association of Pelger-Huet anomaly (PHA) of granulocytes and tuberculosis was obscured for many years. We report the second patient in the English literature with severe tuberculous infection and PHA, further substantiating the diagnostic and prognostic importance of PHA and tuberculosis.

Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.

An American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference was held in Northbrook in August 1991 with the goal of agreeing on a set of definitions that could be applied to patients with sepsis and its sequelae. New definitions were offered for some terms, while others were discarded. Broad definitions of sepsis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome were proposed, along with detailed physiologic parameters by which a patient may be categorized. Definitions for severe sepsis, septic shock, hypotension, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome were also offered. The use of severity scoring methods when dealing with septic patients was recommended as an adjunctive tool to assess mortality. Appropriate methods and applications for the use and testing of new therapies were recommended. The use of these terms and techniques should assist clinicians and researchers who deal with sepsis and its sequelae.

The laboratory-clinical interface: point-of-care testing.

POC testing provides an opportunity for clinicians and laboratorians to work together to consider how best to serve the patients within an individual institution. Each health system has unique characteristics relative to patient population, as well as a unique laboratory structure. If physicians, nurses, laboratorians, and pathologists work collaboratively, the best interests of patients will be served. In some institutions that cater to specific patient groups, POC testing may offer clear and distinct advantages. In other institutions with sophisticated transport systems and established rapid response capabilities, the quality resulting from central laboratory testing may outweigh any advantages of bedside testing. Clearly, attention to regulatory issues, QC issues, the importance of proper documentation, proficiency testing, performance enhancement, and cost-effectiveness is requisite. As the technology for diagnostic testing advances through more microcomputerization, microchemistry, and enhanced test menus, the concept of POC testing will need perpetual revisiting. We hope that the information provided here will aid clinicians, laboratorians, and administrators in their quest to best serve their patients.

Other supportive therapies in sepsis.

Patients who survive the circulatory and organ deficits in sepsis may still fall victim to complications such as pulmonary embolism and stress ulcer bleeding. Although there is no clearcut evidence to quantitate the impact of such complications on mortality, the anticipated impact is grave when considering the compromised physiological reserve of these patients. For this reason it is important to institute effective prophylaxis to minimize the impact. In addition, catabolism associated with sepsis likely influences the recovery of patients with sepsis and moreover can compromise the response of the immune system against an infectious insult. Early and adequate nutritional support therefore appears important. There is much controversy and lack of prospective research regarding effect of supportive therapies on outcome in patients with severe sepsis. This research is needed.

Current therapy for sepsis.

The treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock remains a challenge as we approach the next millennium. Although more attention is being given to guidelines and care pathways for sepsis, these are unfortunately based primarily on consensus opinion. Additional research into supportive interventions in this potentially devastating disease is needed. Priorities in the management of sepsis include rapid reversal of hypotension and hypoperfusion, followed by empiric antibiotic therapy and definitive localization and treatment of infection nidus. A wide variety of adrenergic agents may be useful in sepsis. Initial therapy for hypoperfusion, however, should be targeted toward establishing adequate intravascular volume and left ventricular preload. Adjunctive therapy to prevent complications during the intensive care unit stay is important.

Innovative therapies for sepsis.

Sepsis and septic shock continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite numerous advances in the supportive care of patients with sepsis, the overall mortality has changed little in the past 20 years. Many innovative therapies have been attempted in the field of sepsis, primarily aimed at stopping the cycle of cytokine activation which is part of the systemic inflammatory response. Therapies have also targeted other molecular mediators of inflammation and coagulation. Despite encouraging preliminary preclinical results, most of the early trials in sepsis research have failed to offer hope of improving survival with the use of these innovative therapies. Postulated reasons for the failure of clinical trials include the disparity between animal models and clinical reality, the heterogeneous nature of patient populations and sepsis, and the complexity of the inflammatory cascade. On a more hopeful note, three recent trials assessing corticosteroids, anti-tumour necrosis factor strategy and drotrecogin alfa (rhAPC), respectively, have proclaimed positive results. However, only the drotrecogin alfa trial has been peer reviewed and published.

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the intensive care unit.

The primary uses of FFB in the intensive care unit are in the diagnosis of opportunistic infection and for airway management. In addition, use of PTC brush or BAL with quantitative cultures may allow identification of the specific cause of bacterial pneumonia. Determination of the location and cause of pulmonary hemorrhage is possible in the intubated patient without massive hemoptysis. Use of FFB in atelectasis is more controversial and less commonly encountered. Other uses include foreign body retrieval, tamponade of bleeding segments and diagnosis/treatment of BPF. In addition to development of technical skills and knowledge of the indications for FBB, critical care physicians should be aware of contraindications and potential complications, as well as steps to minimize the latter.

Blood gas monitoring.

Arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements are one of the most frequently requested laboratory examinations in critically ill patients. ABGs include measurement of pHa, PaCO2, PaO2, and oxyhemoglobin saturation. These measurements allow for assessment of the nature, progression, and severity of metabolic and respiratory disturbances.

Pharmacologic issues in the management of septic shock.

Despite our increased understanding of the biochemistry and physiology of sepsis, the treatment of septic shock remains a challenge. Initial management of septic shock entails urgent and emergent stabilization of the patient followed by broad-spectrum, empiric antibiotic therapy. After volume resuscitation, vasopressors or inotropic therapy or both may be necessary to restore perfusion. Adjunctive therapies and monitoring strategies may be helpful in preventing complications in the intensive care setting. Additional research and clinical trials are needed to identify supportive interventions that may affect the outcome of the septic patient.

Does cocaine cause coronary vasospasm in chronic cocaine abusers? A study of coronary and systemic hemodynamics.

The pathogenesis of acute myocardial ischemia or infarction following cocaine abuse is not known. Cocaine causes an increase in circulating catecholamines. Therefore alpha-adrenergic mediated focal or generalized coronary artery spasm has been presumed to be the likely mechanism to induce ischemia. However, coronary vasospasm in chronic cocaine abusers has not been demonstrated angiographically. Moreover, it has been observed that patients commonly manifest ischemic changes hours up to a week after abusing cocaine. In order to evaluate direct effects of cocaine on coronary vasculature, 6 chronic cocaine abusers admitted with prolonged chest pain and electrocardiographic ST- and T-wave changes were studied. Cocaine administered intravenously (maximum 32 mg) produced subjective sensation of central nervous stimulation (the "high") in all patients. However there was no significant change in coronary artery diameter (assessed by computer-assisted quantitative technique), myocardial perfusion (assessed by contrast echocardiography) or left ventricular wall motion (assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography) as compared with the baseline values. Coronary sinus flow (thermodilution) showed an upward trend, a probable reflection of a significant increase in cardiac output (average 62%, p less than 0.007). Despite a significant elevation in heart rate (average 56%, p less than 0.007), mean systemic arterial pressure (average 12%, p less than 0.05) and rate-pressure product (average 69%, p less than 0.005), no symptomatic or acute electrocardiographic changes were observed. It is concluded that recreational doses of cocaine do not cause focal or generalized coronary vasospasm or reduced myocardial perfusion in patients who present with chest pain temporally related to cocaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Red/orange person syndrome.

We present a case of a patient whose skin turned orange overnight. The patient had tried to commit suicide by taking approximately forty 300 mg rifampicin capsules. Her case served as a stimulus for us to review the literature. Photographs taken during the initial work-up recorded the changes; her normal skin color returned within twenty-four hours, although her urine and tears remained orange for several days.

Acute life-threatening asthma.

Although adrenergic therapy may be lifesaving in patients with severe acute asthma, attention must also be directed toward reversing underlying inflammation with corticosteroids. Other therapy for acute severe bronchospasm is controversial, although inhalant anticholinergic therapy may have adjunctive benefit. Aminophylline or magnesium sulfate may be indicated in those patients with life-threatening asthma who do not respond to conventional therapy. Chest radiographs are needed in patients who (1) present in extreme distress, (2) need to be hospitalized, or (3) have clinical manifestations of pneumonia or pneumothorax. Antibiotics are not used for acute asthma in the absence of pneumonia.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," last published in 2008. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 68 international experts representing 30 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict of interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independent of any industry funding. A stand-alone meeting was held for all subgroup heads, co- and vice-chairs, and selected individuals. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. METHODS: The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations as strong (1) or weak (2). The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. Recommendations were classified into three groups: (1) those directly targeting severe sepsis; (2) those targeting general care of the critically ill patient and considered high priority in severe sepsis; and (3) pediatric considerations. RESULTS: Key recommendations and suggestions, listed by category, include: early quantitative resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 h after recognition (1C); blood cultures before antibiotic therapy (1C); imaging studies performed promptly to confirm a potential source of infection (UG); administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials therapy within 1 h of the recognition of septic shock (1B) and severe sepsis without septic shock (1C) as the goal of therapy; reassessment of antimicrobial therapy daily for de-escalation, when appropriate (1B); infection source control with attention to the balance of risks and benefits of the chosen method within 12 h of diagnosis (1C); initial fluid resuscitation with crystalloid (1B) and consideration of the addition of albumin in patients who continue to require substantial amounts of crystalloid to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (2C) and the avoidance of hetastarch formulations (1B); initial fluid challenge in patients with sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion and suspicion of hypovolemia to achieve a minimum of 30 mL/kg of crystalloids (more rapid administration and greater amounts of fluid may be needed in some patients (1C); fluid challenge technique continued as long as hemodynamic improvement is based on either dynamic or static variables (UG); norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg (1B); epinephrine when an additional agent is needed to maintain adequate blood pressure (2B); vasopressin (0.03 U/min) can be added to norepinephrine to either raise mean arterial pressure to target or to decrease norepinephrine dose but should not be used as the initial vasopressor (UG); dopamine is not recommended except in highly selected circumstances (2C); dobutamine infusion administered or added to vasopressor in the presence of (a) myocardial dysfunction as suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output, or (b) ongoing signs of hypoperfusion despite achieving adequate intravascular volume and adequate mean arterial pressure (1C); avoiding use of intravenous hydrocortisone in adult septic shock patients if adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy are able to restore hemodynamic stability (2C); hemoglobin target of 7-9 g/dL in the absence of tissue hypoperfusion, ischemic coronary artery disease, or acute hemorrhage (1B); low tidal volume (1A) and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure (1B) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); application of at least a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS (1B); higher rather than lower level of PEEP for patients with sepsis-induced moderate or severe ARDS (2C); recruitment maneuvers in sepsis patients with severe refractory hypoxemia due to ARDS (2C); prone positioning in sepsis-induced ARDS patients with a PaO (2)/FiO (2) ratio of ≤100 mm Hg in facilities that have experience with such practices (2C); head-of-bed elevation in mechanically ventilated patients unless contraindicated (1B); a conservative fluid strategy for patients with established ARDS who do not have evidence of tissue hypoperfusion (1C); protocols for weaning and sedation (1A); minimizing use of either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation targeting specific titration endpoints (1B); avoidance of neuromuscular blockers if possible in the septic patient without ARDS (1C); a short course of neuromuscular blocker (no longer than 48 h) for patients with early ARDS and a PaO (2)/FI O (2) <150 mm Hg (2C); a protocolized approach to blood glucose management commencing insulin dosing when two consecutive blood glucose levels are >180 mg/dL, targeting an upper blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL (1A); equivalency of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or intermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1B); use of stress ulcer prophylaxis to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with bleeding risk factors (1B); oral or enteral (if necessary) feedings, as tolerated, rather than either complete fasting or provision of only intravenous glucose within the first 48 h after a diagnosis of severe sepsis/septic shock (2C); and addressing goals of care, including treatment plans and end-of-life planning (as appropriate) (1B), as early as feasible, but within 72 h of intensive care unit admission (2C). Recommendations specific to pediatric severe sepsis include: therapy with face mask oxygen, high flow nasal cannula oxygen, or nasopharyngeal continuous PEEP in the presence of respiratory distress and hypoxemia (2C), use of physical examination therapeutic endpoints such as capillary refill (2C); for septic shock associated with hypovolemia, the use of crystalloids or albumin to deliver a bolus of 20 mL/kg of crystalloids (or albumin equivalent) over 5-10 min (2C); more common use of inotropes and vasodilators for low cardiac output septic shock associated with elevated systemic vascular resistance (2C); and use of hydrocortisone only in children with suspected or proven "absolute"' adrenal insufficiency (2C). CONCLUSIONS: Strong agreement existed among a large cohort of international experts regarding many level 1 recommendations for the best care of patients with severe sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for this important group of critically ill patients.