PEGylated nanoparticles interact with macrophages independently of immune response factors and trigger a non-phagocytic, low-inflammatory response.

Poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG)-based nanoparticles (NPs) - including cylindrical micelles (CNPs), spherical micelles (SNPs), and PEGylated liposomes (PLs) - are hypothesized to be cleared in vivo by opsonization followed by liver macrophage phagocytosis. This hypothesis has been used to explain the rapid and significant localization of NPs to the liver after administration into the mammalian vasculature. Here, we show that the opsonization-phagocytosis nexus is not the major factor driving PEG-NP - macrophage interactions. First, mouse and human blood proteins had insignificant affinity for PEG-NPs. Second, PEG-NPs bound macrophages in the absence of serum proteins. Third, lipoproteins blocked PEG-NP binding to macrophages. Because of these findings, we tested the postulate that PEG-NPs bind (apo)lipoprotein receptors. Indeed, PEG-NPs triggered an in vitro macrophage transcription program that was similar to that triggered by lipoproteins and different from that triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and group A Streptococcus. Unlike LPS and pathogens, PLs did not increase transcripts involved in phagocytosis or inflammation. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and SNPs triggered remarkably similar mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophage transcription programs. Unlike opsonized pathogens, CNPs, SNPs, and PLs lowered macrophage autophagosome levels and either reduced or did not increase the secretion of key macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Thus, the sequential opsonization and phagocytosis process is likely a minor aspect of PEG-NP - macrophage interactions. Instead, PEG-NP interactions with (apo)lipoprotein and scavenger receptors appear to be a strong driving force for PEG-NP - macrophage binding, entry, and downstream effects. We hypothesize that the high presence of these receptors on liver macrophages and on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells is the reason PEG-NPs localize rapidly and strongly to the liver.

Challenges and the Evolving Landscape of Assessing Blood-Based PD-L1 Expression as a Biomarker for Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy.

While promising, PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues as assessed by immunohistochemistry has been shown to be an imperfect biomarker that only applies to a limited number of cancers, whereas many patients with PD-L1-negative tumors still respond to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Recent studies using patient blood samples to assess immunotherapeutic responsiveness suggests a promising approach to the identification of novel and/or improved biomarkers for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the advances in our evolving understanding of the regulation and function of PD-L1 expression, which is the foundation for developing blood-based PD-L1 as a biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. We further discuss current knowledge and clinical study results for biomarker identification using PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, exosomes, and soluble forms of PD-L1 in the peripheral blood. Finally, we discuss key challenges for the successful development of the potential use of blood-based PD-L1 as a biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy.