UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Risk Factors for the Development of Early Recurrence in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Disease recurrence after retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery is common, and resection may offer no benefit for patients who experience recurrence early. This study examined the incidence of early recurrence (EREC) in RPS patients, and the association between EREC and prognosis, aiming to identify the factors associated with EREC. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at two tertiary RPS centers were analyzed. The study defined EREC as any evidence of local recurrence and/or distant metastases on the CT scan up to 6 months after surgery. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of EREC. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 657 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five of these patients (9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-12.4%) developed EREC. Five-year OS was 3% for the patients with EREC versus 76% for those without EREC (p < 0.001). Patient characteristics were compared between the EREC and non-EREC patients, and EREC was found to be significantly associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p = 0.006), tumor histology (p = 0.002), tumor grading (p < 0.001), radiotherapy (p = 0.04), and postoperative complications measured as a comprehensive complications index value (p = 0.003). However, the only significant independent predictor of EREC in the multivariable analysis was grade 3 tumors, with an odds ratio of 14.8 (95% CI, 4.44-49.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early recurrence is associated with a poor prognosis, and a high tumor grade is an independent predictor for the development of EREC. Patients with EREC may benefit the most from new therapeutic options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making in the management of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma is complex and requires input from a number of different specialists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of agreement in terms of resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected across different retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings. METHODS: The CT scans and clinical information of 21 anonymized retroperitoneal sarcoma patients were sent to all of the retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings in Great Britain, which were asked to give an opinion about resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected. The main outcome was inter-centre reliability, which was quantified using overall agreement, as well as the chance-corrected Krippendorff's alpha statistic. Based on the latter, the level of agreement was classified as: 'slight' (0.00-0.20), 'fair' (0.21-0.40), 'moderate' (0.41-0.60), 'substantial' (0.61-0.80), or 'near-perfect' (>0.80). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were reviewed at 12 retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings, giving a total of 252 assessments for analysis. Consistency between centres was only 'slight' to 'fair', with rates of overall agreement and Krippendorff's alpha statistics of 85.4 per cent (211 of 247) and 0.37 (95 per cent c.i. 0.11 to 0.57) for resectability; 80.4 per cent (201 of 250) and 0.39 (95 per cent c.i. 0.33 to 0.45) for treatment allocation; and 53.0 per cent (131 of 247) and 0.20 (95 per cent c.i. 0.17 to 0.23) for the organs proposed to be resected. Depending on the centre that they had attended, 12 of 21 patients could either have been deemed resectable or unresectable, and 10 of 21 could have received either potentially curative or palliative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-centre agreement between retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings was low. Multidisciplinary team meetings may not provide the same standard of care for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma across Great Britain.

Association Between Ageing and Short-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, more elderly patients are receiving surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, high-quality data investigating associations between ageing and prognosis are lacking. Our study aimed to investigate whether ageing is associated with inferior short-term survival outcomes after RPS surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS between 2008 and 2019 at two tertiary sarcoma centres were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality, and the primary explanatory variable was patient age, classified as: < 55, 55-64, 65-74 or 75+ years. RESULTS: The 692 patients undergoing surgery (mean age 60.8 ± 13.8 years) had a 1-year mortality rate of 9.4%, which differed significantly by age (p < 0.001), with rates of 7.2%, 6.9%, 8.7% and 22.8% for the < 55, 55-64, 65-74 and 75+ years groups, respectively. The distribution of causes of death also differed significantly by age (p = 0.023), with 22% and 28% of deaths in the 65-74 and 75+ years groups caused by post-operative complications, versus none in the < 55 and 55-64 years groups. On multivariable analysis, age of 75+ years (versus < 55 years) was a significant independent predictor of 1-year mortality [odds ratio (OR) 7.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-18.9, p < 0.001]; no significant increase in risk was observed in the 55-64 (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.87) or 65-74 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.15) years groups. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative complications are an important cause of deaths in elderly patients. These findings are relevant to decision-making and counselling when surgery is considered for patients with RPS.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS. METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. RESULTS: Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS. CONCLUSIONS: Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Overall survival in abdominal wall sarcoma treated with curative intent surgery: A retrospective study from two European referral centres.

INTRODUCTION: Primary abdominal wall sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumours. The mainstay of management is surgery, although local recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM) are common. OBJECTIVES: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary outcomes; factors associated with prognosis secondary outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery of primary abdominal wall sarcomas between April 2008 and May 2018 were identified at two referrals centres for sarcoma surgery. Patient demographics, tumour and treatment-related characteristics were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: A cohort of 65 patients underwent surgical resection with a median follow-up of 56 months, 5-year OS and DFS were 69% and 71%, respectively. Eleven patients (16.9%) experienced a recurrence event: 6 LR (9.2%), 10 DM (15.4%) and 5 both (7.7%). At univariate analysis, size (p = 0.03), grade (p = 0.001) and depth (p = 0.04) were associated with OS while size (p = 0.02) was associated with DFS. No significant relationship with tumour depth, type of surgery, surgical margin status or neo-/adjuvant treatment was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Recurrence events are less common following treatment of abdominal wall sarcomas if compared to extremities STSs, but size (≥5 cm), high malignancy grade (FNCLCC 3) and depth are associated with worse OS.

The molecular landscape of well differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Well differentiated liposarcoma (WD-LPS) is a relatively rare tumour, with fewer than 50 cases occurring per year in the UK. These tumours are both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-resistant and present a significant treatment challenge requiring radical surgery. Little is known of the molecular landscape of these tumours and no current targets for molecular therapy exist. We aimed to carry out a comprehensive molecular characterisation of WD-LPS via whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and methylation array analysis. A recurrent mutation within exon 1 of FOXD4L3 was observed (chr9:70,918,189A>T; c.322A>T; p.Lys108Ter). Recurrent mutations were also observed in Wnt signalling, immunity, DNA repair, and hypoxia-associated genes. Recurrent amplification of HGMA2 was observed, although this was in fact part of a general amplification of the region around this gene. Recurrent gene fusions in HGMA2, SDHA, TSPAN31, and MDM2 were also observed as well as consistent rearrangements between chromosome 6 and chromosome 12. Our study has demonstrated a recurrent mutation within FOXD4L3, which shows evidence of interaction with the PAX pathway to promote tumourigenesis. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cumulative Burden of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Correlations between postoperative complications and oncological outcomes have been reported in several malignancies, but their impact in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the association between postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with RPS. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at a sarcoma center were evaluated. The cumulative burden of postoperative complications was quantified using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and associations with local recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Data were available for 191 patients, of whom 160 (82.9%) developed at least one postoperative complication, with a median CCI of 20.9 (interquartile range 8.7-33.5). After postoperative deaths were excluded (n = 3, 1.6%), the remaining patients were divided into those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (n = 97) and > 20.9 (n = 91). Patients with a CCI >20.9 had significantly shorter OS than those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (43.3% vs. 69.5% at 5 years; p = 0.005), and this difference remained significant after multivariable adjustment for patient- and treatment-related factors [hazard ratio (HR) 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-4.09; p = 0.004]. However, CCI > 20.9 was not found to be a significant independent predictor of either LR (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.76-2.23; p = 0.333) or DM (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.93; p = 0.786). CONCLUSION: Increasing complication burden, as quantified by the CCI, is a significant independent predictor of OS; however, there is no evidence of a significant association with either LR or DM, which may be more related to tumor biological factors.

Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation. RESULTS: Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.

Comparison of comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to compare the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) in patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: Data were collected for patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2019 at a tertiary institution. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was used as a surrogate marker for clinical outcomes, and associations with CDC and CCI were assessed. RESULTS: Data were available for 191 patients, with the highest CDC Grade of I, II, III, and IV in 18.3%, 41.9%, 17.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; the 30-day postoperative mortality (CDC Grade V) was 1.6% (N = 3). Whilst both classification systems were significantly correlated with LOS, this association was significantly stronger for CCI (Spearman's ρ: 0.768 vs. 0.648, p < 0.001). Increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, and organ weighted resection scores were independently associated with longer LOS. However, the association between LOS and both the CDC and CCI remained significant, even after adjusting for these factors (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CCI is more strongly associated with LOS than the CDC, and represents a useful tool to quantify the total burden of postoperative complications after surgery for RPS.

Tumor necrosis is significantly associated with reduced recurrence-free survival after curative resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: The impact of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) is still debated. The objective was to determine whether tumor necrosis is an independent risk factor for survival in patients with GISTs. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary GIST from March 2003 to October 2018 at two sarcoma referral centers were retrospectively identified. Patients who received neoadjuvant imatinib were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression models were produced, to assess whether tumor necrosis was an independent predictor of either overall or recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Forty-one out of 195 (21.0%) patients had tumor necrosis. Tumor necrosis was associated with a significantly higher modified National Institute of Health risk score, with 29 out of 41 (70.7%) patients with necrosis classified as high risk, compared to 52 out of 153 (34.0%) without (p < .001). Tumor necrosis was found to be independently predictive of recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.62-10.56, p < .001) on multivariable analysis. At 5 years, 44.3% of patients with necrosis had either died or developed recurrence, compared to 9.9% of those without. CONCLUSION: Tumor necrosis is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in patients with operable GISTs. It should be routinely reported by pathologists, and used by clinicians when counseling patients and deciding on adjuvant therapy.

Primary mesenteric sarcomas: Collaborative experience from the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).

BACKGROUND: Primary mesenteric soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and limited evidence is available to inform management. Surgical resection is challenging due to the proximity of vital structures and a need to preserve enteric function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients undergoing primary resection for mesenteric STS. METHODS: The Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) is an intercontinental collaborative comprising specialist sarcoma centers. Data were collected retrospectively for all patients with mesenteric STS undergoing primary resection between 2000 and 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases from 15 institutions were included. The spectrum of pathology was similar to the retroperitoneum, although of a higher grade. R0/R1 resection was achieved in 87%. Median OS was 56 months. OS was significantly shorter in higher-grade tumors (p = .018) and extensive resection (p < .001). No significant association between OS and resection margin or tumor size was detected. Rates of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases (DM) at 5 years were 60% and 41%, respectively. Liver metastases were common (60%), reflecting portal drainage of the mesentery. CONCLUSION: Primary mesenteric sarcoma is rare, with a modest survival rate. LR and DM are frequent events. Liver metastases are common, highlighting the need for surveillance imaging.

Improved Biopsy Accuracy in Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Biopsy sensitivity in retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is variable. Patients with grade 3 DDLPS face a significant risk of metastatic disease and may potentially benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, making highly accurate pretherapy diagnosis essential. Our study aimed to establish whether diagnostic sensitivity could be improved by targeting solid areas of tumor on percutaneous biopsy. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, data on patients with suspected primary retroperitoneal sarcoma who underwent a biopsy were collected, and diagnostic accuracy was calculated. These data were compared with our previously reported series from 2005 to 2016. For DDLPS tumors, comparisons were then made between biopsies that targeted the solid component and those that did not. RESULTS: Data were available for 121 patients in the current series and 238 from the previous study. The proportion of biopsies returning a histological subtype concordant with postoperative pathology was 83% in the current series, marking a significant improvement over our previous study (67%, p = 0.001). For diagnosis of DDLPS, biopsy sensitivity improved from 40 to 74% (p < 0.001), with an increase from 13 to 50% (p = 0.006) where grade 3 DDLPS was treated as a separate disease. Within the current series, targeted biopsy yielded a sensitivity of 100% for identifying DDLPS, compared with 10% in nontargeted biopsy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Systematic targeting of solid areas of tumor within suspected retroperitoneal liposarcoma has improved sensitivity for detection of both DDLPS and grade 3 DDLPS on biopsy. This approach minimizes the risk of underdiagnosis of patients with DDLPS who could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Outcome after ex situ or ante situm liver resection with hypothermic perfusion and auto-transplantation: A single-centre experience in adult and paediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Evolving surgical technology and medical treatment have led to an expansion of indications to enable resection of large hepatic tumours with involvement of other abdominal structures. METHODS: Twelve extended liver and abdominal resections, either ex situ with auto-transplantation of the liver remnant or ante situm with veno-venous bypass (VVBP) were performed between 2016 and 2018. We describe our preoperative assessment, compare surgical strategies and assess outcomes. RESULTS: The median age of the 10 adult patients was 50.5 years with a majority suffering from sarcoma-like tumours. The two paediatric patients were 3 and 8 years of age, both with hepatoblastoma. Two patients underwent ex situ resections with auto-transplantation of the liver remnant, and nine patients had ante situm tumour removal with the use of VVBP in four. All patients achieved a good immediate liver function. Local infection and acute kidney injury were found in two patients. One patient underwent biliary reconstruction for bile leak. Tumour recurrence was seen in seven patients (58.3%), with four lung metastases. Five patients died from tumour recurrence (41.7%) during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Extreme liver resections should be performed in experienced centres, where surgical subspecialties are available with access to cardiovascular support. Additionally, experience in split and living-donor liver transplantation is beneficial.

Biphasic malignant tumours of the abdominal cavity.

Carcinosarcomas (CS) are uncommon, highly aggressive, biphasic tumours consisting of both sarcomatous and carcinomatous elements. They appear to originate from a common cell of origin, either via transformation from a single premature precursor or conversion of a mature epithelial cell through an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CS should be considered a unique cancer subtype with cells typically displaying diffuse mitotic activity and widespread atypical mitoses predisposing to early metastasis and a tendency to local recurrence following resection. This review addresses the pathophysiology of CS and discusses its presentation, natural history and management at a variety of sites within the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneum.

Outcomes Following Extended Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Results From a UK Referral Centre.

BACKGROUND: Primary extended resection has been proposed as the initial treatment for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. This approach comprises an extended en-bloc resection of the directly infiltrated organs and adjacent uninvolved organs. The results of such radical surgery have yet to be validated. This retrospective study aims to investigate this practice in a contemporary series from a referral center in the UK. METHODS: We extracted data from consecutive patients who underwent extended resectional surgery between 2009 and 2013, and investigated the type of resection performed, the effectiveness of extended surgery in providing negative microscopic margins, and the occurrence of post-surgical adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Fifty-two patients had a primary tumor (75.4 %), and in 55 patients (79.7 %) the tumor was resected en bloc with adjacent organs or structures. Colonic resection (N = 35, 50.7 %) and nephrectomy (N = 28, 40.6 %) were the most frequently performed organ resections. Organs were infiltrated in 22 patients (32 %), and there was no association between organ infiltration and patient variables and staging characteristics. Negative microscopic margins were achieved in 88.6 % of patients in this series. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (30 %) and a reoperation was required in ten cases (14.5 %). No independent predictors of morbidity were identified and no 30-day postoperative deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Four-fifths of patients in this series had organs removed in association with the retroperitoneal sarcoma. This approach in a specialist sarcoma unit results in negative microscopic tumor margins in up to 90 % of cases and can be performed safely.

Psychological Prehabilitation Before Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients experience anxiety and depression after diagnosis and during treatment. A wide range of psychological interventions have been proposed to alleviate distress, but the evidence about the perioperative effectiveness of such interventions is not clear. This systematic review examined the effect of preoperative psychological interventions or prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of the published data was performed using Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo for the period from 1946 to February 2014. A total of 951 publications (case series, single case reports, and reviews) were found. Only seven of these studies included patients undergoing an operation for cancer and a preoperative psychological intervention. RESULTS: Six of the seven studies were randomized controlled trials. Four were conducted with patients who had breast cancer (n = 356). The other studies included patients with gynecologic cancer (n = 30), colorectal cancer (n = 60), and prostate cancer (n = 159). Assessment of the studies showed four to be of good quality, two to be of moderate quality, and one to be of poor quality. Interventions did not affect traditional surgical outcomes (e.g., length of hospital stay, complications, analgesia use, or mortality) but positively affected patients' immunologic function. However, psychological interventions appeared to have an impact on patients' reported outcome measures including psychological outcomes, quality of life, and somatic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Available data suggested that preoperative psychological prehabilitation may have a role for cancer patients undergoing surgery. Further evidence is needed to evaluate its role.