Risk scores and biomarkers for the prediction of 1-year outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of the patients still die or have to be rehospitalized during the first year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This emphasizes the need for more strategic patient selection. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to compare the prognostic value of risk scores and circulating biomarkers to predict all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: We calculated the hazard ratios and C-statistics (area under the curve [AUC]) of 4 risk scores (logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE], EuroSCORE II, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality, and German aortic valve score) and 5 biomarkers of inflammation and/or myocardial dysfunction (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) for the risk of death (n = 80) and the combination of death or rehospitalization (n = 132) during the first year after TAVR in 310 consecutive TAVR patients. RESULTS: The EuroSCORE II and GDF-15 had the strongest predictive value for 1-year mortality (EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.711; GDF-15, AUC 0.686) and for the composite end point (EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.690; GDF-15, AUC 0.682). When added to the logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II, GDF-15 enhanced the prognostic performance of the score and enabled substantial reclassification of patients. Combinations of increasing tertiles of the logistic EuroSCORE or EuroSCORE II and GDF-15 allowed the stratification of the patients into subgroups with mortality rates ranging from 4.0% to 49.1% and death/rehospitalization rates ranging from 15.3% to 68.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified GDF-15 in addition to the logistic EuroSCORE and the EuroSCORE II as the most promising predictors of a poor outcome after TAVR.

Balloon post-dilation and valve-in-valve implantation for the reduction of paravalvular leakage with use of the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis.

AIMS: The aims of the study were to evaluate balloon post-dilation (BPD) and valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation for the reduction of paravalvular leakage (PVL) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with use of the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis and to assess whether the aortic regurgitation (AR) index can be used to quantify the reduction of PVL by these corrective measures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Angiography and the AR index were used to evaluate the severity of PVL before and after corrective measures in patients suffering from more than mild PVL. Corrective measures were performed in 44.7% (101/226 patients): BPD was performed in 85 patients and ViV implantation in 16 patients, respectively. In 86% (87/101 patients), PVL reduction was successful (no or mild PVL). BPD increased the AR index from 19.1±11.0 to 25.9±5.8 (p<0.001) and ViV implantation from 17.6±6.4 to 29.5±9.1 (p=0.008). One-year mortality (21.6% vs. 17.6% vs. 25.0%; p=0.69) and procedural stroke rate (2.4% vs. 2.4% vs. 0%; p=0.82) were not different between patients without corrective measures compared to patients who had undergone corrective measures (BPD or ViV). CONCLUSIONS: BPD and ViV implantation are safe and effective to reduce PVL in TAVI patients. The AR index is useful to quantify the success of these corrective measures for PVL reduction objectively.