Cognitive impairment in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is associated with abnormal segments in the Circle of Willis.

OBJECTIVE: Our group has previously demonstrated that patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) demonstrate cognitive impairment. One proposed mechanism for cognitive impairment in patients with ACAS is cerebral hypoperfusion due to flow-restriction. We tested whether the combination of a high-grade carotid stenosis and inadequate cross-collateralization in the Circle of Willis (CoW) resulted in worsened cognitive impairment. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with high-grade (≥70% diameter-reducing) ACAS underwent carotid duplex ultrasound, cognitive assessment, and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. The cognitive battery consisted of nine neuropsychological tests assessing four cognitive domains: learning and recall, attention and working memory, motor and processing speed, and executive function. Raw cognitive scores were converted into standardized T-scores. A structured interpretation of the magnetic resonance angiography images was performed with each segment of the CoW categorized as being either normal or abnormal. Abnormal segments of the CoW were defined as segments characterized as narrowed or occluded due to congenital aplasia or hypoplasia, or acquired atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion. Linear regression was used to estimate the association between the number of abnormal segments in the CoW, and individual cognitive domain scores. Significance was set to P < .05. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66.1 ± 9.6 years, and 79.2% (n = 19) were male. A significant negative association was found between the number of abnormal segments in the CoW and cognitive scores in the learning and recall (ß = -6.5; P = .01), and attention and working memory (ß = -7.0; P = .02) domains. There was a trend suggesting a negative association in the motor and processing speed (ß = -2.4; P = .35) and executive function (ß = -4.5; P = .06) domains that did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-grade ACAS, the concomitant presence of increasing occlusive disease in the CoW correlates with worse cognitive function. This association was significant in the learning and recall and attention and working memory domains. Although motor and processing speed and executive function also declined numerically with increasing abnormal segments in the CoW, the relationship was not significant. Since flow restriction at a carotid stenosis compounded by inadequate collateral compensation across a diseased CoW worsens cerebral perfusion, our findings support the hypothesis that cerebral hypoperfusion underlies the observed cognitive impairment in patients with ACAS.

Lack of association between cognitive impairment and systemic inflammation in asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (ACAS) is associated with cognitive impairment. Systemic inflammation occurs in patients with systemic atherosclerosis and is also associated with cognitive impairment. The goal of this study was to determine if cognitive impairment in patients with ACAS is the result of systemic inflammation. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 104 patients (63 patients with ACAS, 41 controls) with cognitive function and inflammatory biomarker assessments was performed. Venous blood was assayed for proinflammatory biomarkers (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-6R, IL-8, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor-α, matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). The patients also underwent comprehensive cognitive testing to compute five domain-specific cognitive scores per patient. We first assessed the associations between carotid stenosis and cognitive function, and between carotid stenosis and systemic inflammation in separate regression models. We then determined whether cognitive impairments persisted in patients with carotid stenosis after accounting for inflammation by adjusting for inflammatory biomarker levels in a combined model. RESULTS: Patients with ACAS and control patients differed in age, race, coronary artery disease prevalence, and education. Stenosis patients had worse cognitive scores in two domains: learning and memory (P = .05) and motor and processing speed (P = .002). Despite adjusting for inflammatory biomarker levels, patients with ACAS still demonstrated deficits in the domains of learning and memory and motor and processing speed. CONCLUSIONS: Although systemic atherosclerosis-induced inflammation is a well-recognized cause for cognitive impairment, our data suggest that it is not the primary underlying mechanism behind cognitive impairments seen in ACAS. Cognitive impairments in learning and memory and motor and processing speed seen in patients with ACAS persist after adjusting for systemic inflammation. Thus, alternative mechanisms should be explored to account for the observed functional impairments.

Revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis improves balance and mobility.

OBJECTIVE: Balance and mobility function worsen with age, more so for those with underlying chronic diseases. We recently found that asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) restricts blood flow to the brain and might also contribute to balance and mobility impairment. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that ACAS is a modifiable risk factor for balance and mobility impairment. Our goal was to assess the effect of restoring blood flow to the brain by carotid revascularization on the balance and mobility of patients with high-grade ACAS (≥70% diameter-reducing stenosis). METHODS: Twenty adults (age, 67.0 ± 9.4 years) undergoing carotid endarterectomy for high-grade stenosis were enrolled. Balance and mobility assessments were performed before and 6 weeks after revascularization. These included the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Berg Balance Scale, the Four Square Step Test, the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the Timed Up and Go test, gait speed, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), and the Walking While Talking complex test. RESULTS: Consistent with our previous findings, patients demonstrated reduced scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery, Berg Balance Scale, DGI, and Timed Up and Go test and in gait speed. Depending on the outcome measure, 25% to 90% of the patients had scored in the impaired range at baseline. After surgery, significant improvements were observed in the outcome measures that combined walking with dynamic movements, including the DGI (P = .02) and Mini-BESTest (P = .002). The proportion of patients with Mini-BESTest scores indicating a high fall risk had decreased significantly from 90% (n = 18) at baseline to 40% (n = 8) after surgery (P = .02). We used Pearson's correlations to examine the relationship between balance and mobility before surgery and the change after surgery. Patients with lower baseline DGI and Mini-BESTest scores demonstrated the most improvement after surgery (r = -0.59, P = .006; and r = -0.70, P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid revascularization improved patients' balance and mobility, especially for measures that combine walking and dynamic movements. The greatest improvements were observed for the patients who had been most impaired at baseline.

The Incidence of Ischemic Colitis after Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Is Decreasing in the Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic colitis (IC) is a well-described complication of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of IC in patients with rAAA undergoing open repair (OR) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) at a single institution. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of IC before and after the implementation of a formal rupture AAA protocol (rEVAR protocol). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients presenting with rAAA to our institution between January 2002 and October 2013 was performed. Variables were analyzed for association with IC. Comparisons were made using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, Student's t-test for continuous variables, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Three hundred three patients with rAAA presented over the 10-year study period. One hundred ninety-one patients underwent OR and 89 patients underwent endovascular repair. Twenty-three patients died either in the emergency department, en route to the operating room, or after choosing comfort care. Predictive factors of IC included estimated blood loss, corresponding need for resuscitation, and duration of procedure. Of patients who underwent OR, the rate of IC was 21% (40/191). This was significantly higher than patients who underwent EVAR, 7% (6/89), P < 0.05. The type of intervention did not influence 30-day mortality in patients with IC. However, only 17% (1/6) of patients who had IC following EVAR required colectomy versus 48% (19/40) of patients with IC following OR (P = 0.21). Implementation of our formal rEVAR protocol decreased the incidence of IC significantly from 37.1% (36/97) to 6.4% (10/157), P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IC has decreased significantly in the endovascular era but continues to portend a poor prognosis. Implementation of a formal, multidisciplinary rEVAR protocol in our institution decreased the incidence of IC.