Nurses' perspectives: hospitalized older patients and end-of-life decision-making.

AIMS: To explore pressing issues identified by nurses caring for older patients in US NICHE (Nurses Improving Care for the Healthsystem Elders) hospitals, regarding palliative care and end-of-life (EOL) decision-making. Objectives are to (1) identify the most pressing palliative care and EOL decision-making issues and strategies to address them and (2) identify the association of nursing demographics (age, gender, race, education and experience), institutional/unit characteristics and these issues. BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses have an integral role in supporting older patients and families faced with palliative care and EOL decision-making issues. Despite national imperatives to improve the quality of palliative care, patients continue to experience uncontrolled pain, inadequate communication, disregard of their wishes and life prolonging interventions. These contribute to increased hospitalizations and costs. Understanding the prevalent issues is needed to address patient needs at the end-of-life. DESIGN: It is a mixed method study. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the NICHE Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile (GIAP) database (collected 1/08-9/13) was conducted using the sample of Critical Care RNs who provided comments regarding palliative care and EOL decision-making. Qualitative data were analyzed using Dedoose software. Data clusters and patterns of co-occurring codes were explored through an iterative analysis process. Themes were examined across nurse demographics, institutional and unit characteristics. RESULTS: Comments specifically addressing issues regarding EOL decision-making were provided by 393 critical care nurses from 156 hospitals (x‾ age = 42·3 years, 51% BSN degree). Overarching theme was discordance in goals of care (prolonging life versus quality of life), ineffective physician-patient-family communication, lack of time and unrealistic expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' descriptions highlight the need for increased communication, staff education and availability of palliative care services. RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE: Palliative care and EOL decision-making will remain a nursing priority as people age and require increased care.

Patient decision-making regarding left ventricular assist devices : A multiple case study.

OBJECTIVES: To understand how patients make decisions regarding a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). DESIGN: A qualitative multiple case study design was used to explore the context and influence of individuals regarding patients' decision-making processes through: 1) detailed, in-depth interviews of those mostly involved in the patient's decision and 2) pertinent data including observations, medical records, educational information and physical artifacts. Data clusters and patterns of co-occurring codes were examined using thematic analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes were extrapolated from individual case summaries to provide an in-depth analysis of each case and a cross-case analysis across the multiple cases. The predominant theme, consistent with other studies, was the salience of survival. FINDINGS: This case study approach revealed new themes beyond those of prior studies. Patients considered: 1) self-care management for patients without a caregiver, 2) acceptability and future expectations of the LVAD and 3) the role of nurses in eliciting patients' fears, values and preferences. CONCLUSION: The patients' decision-making processes regarding an LVAD involve a cost-benefit analysis of the anticipated needs and consequences of the LVAD. Acceptability of the device is relevant to clinical practice and public policy. Nurses have a unique role in seeking patients' concerns, an essential component of shared decision-making.

Building skill in heart failure self-care among community dwelling older adults: results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Most of the day-to-day care for heart failure (HF) is done by the patient at home and requires skill in self-care. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT) we tested the efficacy of a community-based skill-building intervention on HF self-care, knowledge and health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 1- and 3-months. METHODS: An ethnically diverse sample (n=75) of patients with HF (53% female; 32% Hispanic, 27% Black; mean age 69.9±10 years) was randomized to the intervention group (IG) or a wait-list control group (CG). The protocol intervention focused on tactical and situational HF self-care skill development delivered by lay health educators in community senior centers. Data were analyzed using mixed (between-within subjects) ANOVA. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in self-care maintenance [F(2,47)=3.42, p=.04, (Cohen's f=.38)], self-care management [F(2,41)=4.10, p=.02, (Cohen's f=.45) and HF knowledge [F(2,53)=8.00, p=.001 (Cohen's f=.54)] in the IG compared to the CG. CONCLUSIONS: The skill-building intervention improved self-care and knowledge but not HRQL in this community-dwelling sample. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Delivering an intervention in a community setting using lay health educators provides an alternative to clinic- or home-based teaching that may be useful across diverse populations and geographically varied settings.